Search (94 results, page 1 of 5)

  • × theme_ss:"Visualisierung"
  1. Pejtersen, A.M.: Implications of users' value perception for the design of a bibliographic retrieval system (1986) 0.03
    0.025100138 = product of:
      0.07530041 = sum of:
        0.07530041 = product of:
          0.11295061 = sum of:
            0.040580396 = weight(_text_:science in 2961) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040580396 = score(doc=2961,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11619691 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044112243 = queryNorm
                0.34923816 = fieldWeight in 2961, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2961)
            0.072370216 = weight(_text_:29 in 2961) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.072370216 = score(doc=2961,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15517308 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044112243 = queryNorm
                0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 2961, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2961)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    5. 8.2006 10:16:29
    Source
    Empirical foundation of information and software science. Ed.: J.C. Agarwal u. P. Zunde
  2. Börner, K.: Atlas of knowledge : anyone can map (2015) 0.02
    0.024796385 = product of:
      0.07438915 = sum of:
        0.07438915 = product of:
          0.111583725 = sum of:
            0.06087059 = weight(_text_:science in 3355) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06087059 = score(doc=3355,freq=18.0), product of:
                0.11619691 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044112243 = queryNorm
                0.52385724 = fieldWeight in 3355, product of:
                  4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                    18.0 = termFreq=18.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3355)
            0.050713137 = weight(_text_:22 in 3355) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050713137 = score(doc=3355,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15447356 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044112243 = queryNorm
                0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 3355, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3355)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Content
    One of a series of three publications influenced by the travelling exhibit Places & Spaces: Mapping Science, curated by the Cyberinfrastructure for Network Science Center at Indiana University. - Additional materials can be found at http://http://scimaps.org/atlas2. Erweitert durch: Börner, Katy. Atlas of Science: Visualizing What We Know.
    Date
    22. 1.2017 16:54:03
    22. 1.2017 17:10:56
    LCSH
    Science / Atlases
    Science / Study and teaching / Graphic methods
    Communication in science / Data processing
    Subject
    Science / Atlases
    Science / Study and teaching / Graphic methods
    Communication in science / Data processing
  3. Platis, N. et al.: Visualization of uncertainty in tag clouds (2016) 0.02
    0.020796224 = product of:
      0.06238867 = sum of:
        0.06238867 = product of:
          0.093583 = sum of:
            0.033816997 = weight(_text_:science in 2755) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033816997 = score(doc=2755,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11619691 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044112243 = queryNorm
                0.2910318 = fieldWeight in 2755, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2755)
            0.059766002 = weight(_text_:22 in 2755) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.059766002 = score(doc=2755,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15447356 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044112243 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2755, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2755)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    1. 2.2016 18:25:22
    Series
    Lecture notes in computer science ; 9398
  4. Petrovich, E.: Science mapping and science maps (2021) 0.02
    0.019459939 = product of:
      0.058379814 = sum of:
        0.058379814 = product of:
          0.08756972 = sum of:
            0.06344631 = weight(_text_:science in 595) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06344631 = score(doc=595,freq=44.0), product of:
                0.11619691 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044112243 = queryNorm
                0.5460241 = fieldWeight in 595, product of:
                  6.6332498 = tf(freq=44.0), with freq of:
                    44.0 = termFreq=44.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=595)
            0.024123406 = weight(_text_:29 in 595) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024123406 = score(doc=595,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15517308 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044112243 = queryNorm
                0.15546128 = fieldWeight in 595, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=595)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Science maps are visual representations of the structure and dynamics of scholarly knowl­edge. They aim to show how fields, disciplines, journals, scientists, publications, and scientific terms relate to each other. Science mapping is the body of methods and techniques that have been developed for generating science maps. This entry is an introduction to science maps and science mapping. It focuses on the conceptual, theoretical, and methodological issues of science mapping, rather than on the mathematical formulation of science mapping techniques. After a brief history of science mapping, we describe the general procedure for building a science map, presenting the data sources and the methods to select, clean, and pre-process the data. Next, we examine in detail how the most common types of science maps, namely the citation-based and the term-based, are generated. Both are based on networks: the former on the network of publications connected by citations, the latter on the network of terms co-occurring in publications. We review the rationale behind these mapping approaches, as well as the techniques and methods to build the maps (from the extraction of the network to the visualization and enrichment of the map). We also present less-common types of science maps, including co-authorship networks, interlocking editorship networks, maps based on patents' data, and geographic maps of science. Moreover, we consider how time can be represented in science maps to investigate the dynamics of science. We also discuss some epistemological and sociological topics that can help in the interpretation, contextualization, and assessment of science maps. Then, we present some possible applications of science maps in science policy. In the conclusion, we point out why science mapping may be interesting for all the branches of meta-science, from knowl­edge organization to epistemology.
    Date
    27. 5.2022 18:19:29
    Footnote
    Beitrag in einem Special issue on 'Science and knowledge organization' mit längeren Überblicken zu wichtigen Begriffen der Wissensorgansiation.
  5. Palm, F.: QVIZ : Query and context based visualization of time-spatial cultural dynamics (2007) 0.02
    0.016009936 = product of:
      0.048029806 = sum of:
        0.048029806 = product of:
          0.07204471 = sum of:
            0.036185108 = weight(_text_:29 in 1289) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036185108 = score(doc=1289,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15517308 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044112243 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 1289, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1289)
            0.0358596 = weight(_text_:22 in 1289) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0358596 = score(doc=1289,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15447356 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044112243 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1289, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1289)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Content
    Vortrag anlässlich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".
    Date
    20. 1.2008 17:28:29
  6. Wen, B.; Horlings, E.; Zouwen, M. van der; Besselaar, P. van den: Mapping science through bibliometric triangulation : an experimental approach applied to water research (2017) 0.02
    0.01590477 = product of:
      0.047714304 = sum of:
        0.047714304 = product of:
          0.071571454 = sum of:
            0.041417193 = weight(_text_:science in 3437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041417193 = score(doc=3437,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.11619691 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044112243 = queryNorm
                0.3564397 = fieldWeight in 3437, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3437)
            0.030154258 = weight(_text_:29 in 3437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030154258 = score(doc=3437,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15517308 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044112243 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 3437, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3437)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The idea of constructing science maps based on bibliographic data has intrigued researchers for decades, and various techniques have been developed to map the structure of research disciplines. Most science mapping studies use a single method. However, as research fields have various properties, a valid map of a field should actually be composed of a set of maps derived from a series of investigations using different methods. That leads to the question of what can be learned from a combination-triangulation-of these different science maps. In this paper we propose a method for triangulation, using the example of water science. We combine three different mapping approaches: journal-journal citation relations (JJCR), shared author keywords (SAK), and title word-cited reference co-occurrence (TWRC). Our results demonstrate that triangulation of JJCR, SAK, and TWRC produces a more comprehensive picture than each method applied individually. The outcomes from the three different approaches can be associated with each other and systematically interpreted to provide insights into the complex multidisciplinary structure of the field of water research.
    Date
    16.11.2017 13:29:12
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 68(2017) no.3, S.724-738
  7. Osinska, V.; Bala, P.: New methods for visualization and improvement of classification schemes : the case of computer science (2010) 0.02
    0.015778502 = product of:
      0.047335505 = sum of:
        0.047335505 = product of:
          0.07100326 = sum of:
            0.03514366 = weight(_text_:science in 3693) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03514366 = score(doc=3693,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.11619691 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044112243 = queryNorm
                0.30244917 = fieldWeight in 3693, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3693)
            0.0358596 = weight(_text_:22 in 3693) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0358596 = score(doc=3693,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15447356 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044112243 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3693, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3693)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Generally, Computer Science (CS) classifications are inconsistent in taxonomy strategies. t is necessary to develop CS taxonomy research to combine its historical perspective, its current knowledge and its predicted future trends - including all breakthroughs in information and communication technology. In this paper we have analyzed the ACM Computing Classification System (CCS) by means of visualization maps. The important achievement of current work is an effective visualization of classified documents from the ACM Digital Library. From the technical point of view, the innovation lies in the parallel use of analysis units: (sub)classes and keywords as well as a spherical 3D information surface. We have compared both the thematic and semantic maps of classified documents and results presented in Table 1. Furthermore, the proposed new method is used for content-related evaluation of the original scheme. Summing up: we improved an original ACM classification in the Computer Science domain by means of visualization.
    Date
    22. 7.2010 19:36:46
  8. Thissen, F.: Screen-Design-Manual : Communicating Effectively Through Multimedia (2003) 0.01
    0.013341613 = product of:
      0.04002484 = sum of:
        0.04002484 = product of:
          0.06003726 = sum of:
            0.030154258 = weight(_text_:29 in 1397) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030154258 = score(doc=1397,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15517308 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044112243 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 1397, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1397)
            0.029883001 = weight(_text_:22 in 1397) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029883001 = score(doc=1397,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15447356 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044112243 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1397, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1397)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2008 14:29:25
  9. Soylu, A.; Giese, M.; Jimenez-Ruiz, E.; Kharlamov, E.; Zheleznyakov, D.; Horrocks, I.: Towards exploiting query history for adaptive ontology-based visual query formulation (2014) 0.01
    0.012550069 = product of:
      0.037650205 = sum of:
        0.037650205 = product of:
          0.056475304 = sum of:
            0.020290198 = weight(_text_:science in 1576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020290198 = score(doc=1576,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11619691 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044112243 = queryNorm
                0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 1576, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1576)
            0.036185108 = weight(_text_:29 in 1576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036185108 = score(doc=1576,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15517308 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044112243 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 1576, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1576)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Series
    Communications in computer and information science; 478
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 8th Research Conference, MTSR 2014, Karlsruhe, Germany, November 27-29, 2014, Proceedings. Eds.: S. Closs et al
  10. Chen, C.: CiteSpace II : detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature (2006) 0.01
    0.011954496 = product of:
      0.035863485 = sum of:
        0.035863485 = product of:
          0.053795226 = sum of:
            0.023912227 = weight(_text_:science in 5272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023912227 = score(doc=5272,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.11619691 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044112243 = queryNorm
                0.20579056 = fieldWeight in 5272, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5272)
            0.029883001 = weight(_text_:22 in 5272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029883001 = score(doc=5272,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15447356 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044112243 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5272, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5272)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This article describes the latest development of a generic approach to detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. The work makes substantial theoretical and methodological contributions to progressive knowledge domain visualization. A specialty is conceptualized and visualized as a time-variant duality between two fundamental concepts in information science: research fronts and intellectual bases. A research front is defined as an emergent and transient grouping of concepts and underlying research issues. The intellectual base of a research front is its citation and co-citation footprint in scientific literature - an evolving network of scientific publications cited by research-front concepts. Kleinberg's (2002) burst-detection algorithm is adapted to identify emergent research-front concepts. Freeman's (1979) betweenness centrality metric is used to highlight potential pivotal points of paradigm shift over time. Two complementary visualization views are designed and implemented: cluster views and time-zone views. The contributions of the approach are that (a) the nature of an intellectual base is algorithmically and temporally identified by emergent research-front terms, (b) the value of a co-citation cluster is explicitly interpreted in terms of research-front concepts, and (c) visually prominent and algorithmically detected pivotal points substantially reduce the complexity of a visualized network. The modeling and visualization process is implemented in CiteSpace II, a Java application, and applied to the analysis of two research fields: mass extinction (1981-2004) and terrorism (1990-2003). Prominent trends and pivotal points in visualized networks were verified in collaboration with domain experts, who are the authors of pivotal-point articles. Practical implications of the work are discussed. A number of challenges and opportunities for future studies are identified.
    Date
    22. 7.2006 16:11:05
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.3, S.359-377
  11. Wu, I.-C.; Vakkari, P.: Effects of subject-oriented visualization tools on search by novices and intermediates (2018) 0.01
    0.010398112 = product of:
      0.031194335 = sum of:
        0.031194335 = product of:
          0.0467915 = sum of:
            0.016908498 = weight(_text_:science in 4573) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.016908498 = score(doc=4573,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11619691 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044112243 = queryNorm
                0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 4573, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4573)
            0.029883001 = weight(_text_:22 in 4573) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029883001 = score(doc=4573,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15447356 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044112243 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4573, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4573)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    9.12.2018 16:22:25
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 69(2018) no.12, S.1428-1445
  12. Osinska, V.; Kowalska, M.; Osinski, Z.: ¬The role of visualization in the shaping and exploration of the individual information space : part 1 (2018) 0.01
    0.010398112 = product of:
      0.031194335 = sum of:
        0.031194335 = product of:
          0.0467915 = sum of:
            0.016908498 = weight(_text_:science in 4641) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.016908498 = score(doc=4641,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11619691 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044112243 = queryNorm
                0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 4641, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4641)
            0.029883001 = weight(_text_:22 in 4641) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029883001 = score(doc=4641,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15447356 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044112243 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4641, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4641)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Studies on the state and structure of digital knowledge concerning science generally relate to macro and meso scales. Supported by visualizations, these studies can deliver knowledge about emerging scientific fields or collaboration between countries, scientific centers, or groups of researchers. Analyses of individual activities or single scientific career paths are rarely presented and discussed. The authors decided to fill this gap and developed a web application for visualizing the scientific output of particular researchers. This free software based on bibliographic data from local databases, provides six layouts for analysis. Researchers can see the dynamic characteristics of their own writing activity, the time and place of publication, and the thematic scope of research problems. They can also identify cooperation networks, and consequently, study the dependencies and regularities in their own scientific activity. The current article presents the results of a study of the application's usability and functionality as well as attempts to define different user groups. A survey about the interface was sent to select researchers employed at Nicolaus Copernicus University. The results were used to answer the question as to whether such a specialized visualization tool can significantly augment the individual information space of the contemporary researcher.
    Date
    21.12.2018 17:22:13
  13. Graphic details : a scientific study of the importance of diagrams to science (2016) 0.01
    0.007889251 = product of:
      0.023667753 = sum of:
        0.023667753 = product of:
          0.03550163 = sum of:
            0.01757183 = weight(_text_:science in 3035) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01757183 = score(doc=3035,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.11619691 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044112243 = queryNorm
                0.15122458 = fieldWeight in 3035, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3035)
            0.0179298 = weight(_text_:22 in 3035) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0179298 = score(doc=3035,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15447356 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044112243 = queryNorm
                0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 3035, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3035)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Content
    As the team describe in a paper posted (http://arxiv.org/abs/1605.04951) on arXiv, they found that figures did indeed matter-but not all in the same way. An average paper in PubMed Central has about one diagram for every three pages and gets 1.67 citations. Papers with more diagrams per page and, to a lesser extent, plots per page tended to be more influential (on average, a paper accrued two more citations for every extra diagram per page, and one more for every extra plot per page). By contrast, including photographs and equations seemed to decrease the chances of a paper being cited by others. That agrees with a study from 2012, whose authors counted (by hand) the number of mathematical expressions in over 600 biology papers and found that each additional equation per page reduced the number of citations a paper received by 22%. This does not mean that researchers should rush to include more diagrams in their next paper. Dr Howe has not shown what is behind the effect, which may merely be one of correlation, rather than causation. It could, for example, be that papers with lots of diagrams tend to be those that illustrate new concepts, and thus start a whole new field of inquiry. Such papers will certainly be cited a lot. On the other hand, the presence of equations really might reduce citations. Biologists (as are most of those who write and read the papers in PubMed Central) are notoriously mathsaverse. If that is the case, looking in a physics archive would probably produce a different result.
    Dr Howe and his colleagues do, however, believe that the study of diagrams can result in new insights. A figure showing new metabolic pathways in a cell, for example, may summarise hundreds of experiments. Since illustrations can convey important scientific concepts in this way, they think that browsing through related figures from different papers may help researchers come up with new theories. As Dr Howe puts it, "the unit of scientific currency is closer to the figure than to the paper." With this thought in mind, the team have created a website (viziometrics.org (http://viziometrics.org/) ) where the millions of images sorted by their program can be searched using key words. Their next plan is to extract the information from particular types of scientific figure, to create comprehensive "super" figures: a giant network of all the known chemical processes in a cell for example, or the best-available tree of life. At just one such superfigure per paper, though, the citation records of articles containing such all-embracing diagrams may very well undermine the correlation that prompted their creation in the first place. Call it the ultimate marriage of chart and science.
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://www.economist.com/news/science-and-technology/21700620-surprisingly-simple-test-check-research-papers-errors-come-again.
  14. Eibl, M.: Recherche in elektronischen Bibliothekskatalogen (1999) 0.01
    0.006700947 = product of:
      0.02010284 = sum of:
        0.02010284 = product of:
          0.060308516 = sum of:
            0.060308516 = weight(_text_:29 in 3465) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.060308516 = score(doc=3465,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15517308 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044112243 = queryNorm
                0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 3465, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3465)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    29. 1.2005 19:20:34
  15. Yukimo Kobashio, N.; Santos, R.N.M.: Information organization and representation by graphic devices : an interdisciplinary approach (2007) 0.01
    0.006700947 = product of:
      0.02010284 = sum of:
        0.02010284 = product of:
          0.060308516 = sum of:
            0.060308516 = weight(_text_:29 in 1101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.060308516 = score(doc=1101,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15517308 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044112243 = queryNorm
                0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 1101, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1101)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    29.12.2007 18:17:29
  16. Haller, S.H.M.: Mappingverfahren zur Wissensorganisation (2002) 0.01
    0.006640667 = product of:
      0.019922001 = sum of:
        0.019922001 = product of:
          0.059766002 = sum of:
            0.059766002 = weight(_text_:22 in 3406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.059766002 = score(doc=3406,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15447356 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044112243 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3406, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3406)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    30. 5.2010 16:22:35
  17. Information visualization in data mining and knowledge discovery (2002) 0.01
    0.006017027 = product of:
      0.01805108 = sum of:
        0.01805108 = product of:
          0.02707662 = sum of:
            0.015123421 = weight(_text_:science in 1789) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015123421 = score(doc=1789,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.11619691 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044112243 = queryNorm
                0.13015339 = fieldWeight in 1789, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1789)
            0.0119532 = weight(_text_:22 in 1789) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0119532 = score(doc=1789,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15447356 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044112243 = queryNorm
                0.07738023 = fieldWeight in 1789, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1789)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    23. 3.2008 19:10:22
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIST 54(2003) no.9, S.905-906 (C.A. Badurek): "Visual approaches for knowledge discovery in very large databases are a prime research need for information scientists focused an extracting meaningful information from the ever growing stores of data from a variety of domains, including business, the geosciences, and satellite and medical imagery. This work presents a summary of research efforts in the fields of data mining, knowledge discovery, and data visualization with the goal of aiding the integration of research approaches and techniques from these major fields. The editors, leading computer scientists from academia and industry, present a collection of 32 papers from contributors who are incorporating visualization and data mining techniques through academic research as well application development in industry and government agencies. Information Visualization focuses upon techniques to enhance the natural abilities of humans to visually understand data, in particular, large-scale data sets. It is primarily concerned with developing interactive graphical representations to enable users to more intuitively make sense of multidimensional data as part of the data exploration process. It includes research from computer science, psychology, human-computer interaction, statistics, and information science. Knowledge Discovery in Databases (KDD) most often refers to the process of mining databases for previously unknown patterns and trends in data. Data mining refers to the particular computational methods or algorithms used in this process. The data mining research field is most related to computational advances in database theory, artificial intelligence and machine learning. This work compiles research summaries from these main research areas in order to provide "a reference work containing the collection of thoughts and ideas of noted researchers from the fields of data mining and data visualization" (p. 8). It addresses these areas in three main sections: the first an data visualization, the second an KDD and model visualization, and the last an using visualization in the knowledge discovery process. The seven chapters of Part One focus upon methodologies and successful techniques from the field of Data Visualization. Hoffman and Grinstein (Chapter 2) give a particularly good overview of the field of data visualization and its potential application to data mining. An introduction to the terminology of data visualization, relation to perceptual and cognitive science, and discussion of the major visualization display techniques are presented. Discussion and illustration explain the usefulness and proper context of such data visualization techniques as scatter plots, 2D and 3D isosurfaces, glyphs, parallel coordinates, and radial coordinate visualizations. Remaining chapters present the need for standardization of visualization methods, discussion of user requirements in the development of tools, and examples of using information visualization in addressing research problems.
    With contributors almost exclusively from the computer science field, the intended audience of this work is heavily slanted towards a computer science perspective. However, it is highly readable and provides introductory material that would be useful to information scientists from a variety of domains. Yet, much interesting work in information visualization from other fields could have been included giving the work more of an interdisciplinary perspective to complement their goals of integrating work in this area. Unfortunately, many of the application chapters are these, shallow, and lack complementary illustrations of visualization techniques or user interfaces used. However, they do provide insight into the many applications being developed in this rapidly expanding field. The authors have successfully put together a highly useful reference text for the data mining and information visualization communities. Those interested in a good introduction and overview of complementary research areas in these fields will be satisfied with this collection of papers. The focus upon integrating data visualization with data mining complements texts in each of these fields, such as Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (Fayyad et al., MIT Press) and Readings in Information Visualization: Using Vision to Think (Card et. al., Morgan Kauffman). This unique work is a good starting point for future interaction between researchers in the fields of data visualization and data mining and makes a good accompaniment for a course focused an integrating these areas or to the main reference texts in these fields."
  18. Cobo, M.J.; López-Herrera, A.G.; Herrera-Viedma, E.; Herrera, F.: Science mapping software tools : review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools (2011) 0.01
    0.0060119107 = product of:
      0.018035732 = sum of:
        0.018035732 = product of:
          0.054107193 = sum of:
            0.054107193 = weight(_text_:science in 4486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054107193 = score(doc=4486,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.11619691 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044112243 = queryNorm
                0.4656509 = fieldWeight in 4486, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4486)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Science mapping aims to build bibliometric maps that describe how specific disciplines, scientific domains, or research fields are conceptually, intellectually, and socially structured. Different techniques and software tools have been proposed to carry out science mapping analysis. The aim of this article is to review, analyze, and compare some of these software tools, taking into account aspects such as the bibliometric techniques available and the different kinds of analysis.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.7, S.1382-1402
  19. Eibl, M.: Visualisierung im Document Retrieval : Theoretische und praktische Zusammenführung von Softwareergonomie und Graphik Design (2003) 0.01
    0.005685942 = product of:
      0.017057825 = sum of:
        0.017057825 = product of:
          0.051173475 = sum of:
            0.051173475 = weight(_text_:29 in 5996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.051173475 = score(doc=5996,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15517308 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044112243 = queryNorm
                0.3297832 = fieldWeight in 5996, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5996)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    29. 1.2005 19:19:29
  20. Kocijan, K.: Visualizing natural language resources (2015) 0.01
    0.0053138286 = product of:
      0.015941486 = sum of:
        0.015941486 = product of:
          0.047824454 = sum of:
            0.047824454 = weight(_text_:science in 2995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047824454 = score(doc=2995,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.11619691 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044112243 = queryNorm
                0.41158113 = fieldWeight in 2995, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2995)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Re:inventing information science in the networked society: Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on Information Science, Zadar/Croatia, 19th-21st May 2015. Eds.: F. Pehar, C. Schloegl u. C. Wolff

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 77
  • d 16
  • a 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 79
  • m 10
  • el 5
  • x 4
  • s 2
  • b 1
  • More… Less…

Subjects