-
McIlwaine, I.C.: ¬The UDC and the World Wide Web (2003)
0.10
0.10197869 = product of:
0.15296803 = sum of:
0.065025695 = weight(_text_:wide in 3814) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.065025695 = score(doc=3814,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18785246 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.042397358 = queryNorm
0.34615302 = fieldWeight in 3814, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3814)
0.04989004 = weight(_text_:web in 3814) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04989004 = score(doc=3814,freq=8.0), product of:
0.13836423 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.042397358 = queryNorm
0.36057037 = fieldWeight in 3814, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3814)
0.030307854 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3814) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030307854 = score(doc=3814,freq=4.0), product of:
0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.042397358 = queryNorm
0.23632148 = fieldWeight in 3814, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3814)
0.007744446 = product of:
0.023233337 = sum of:
0.023233337 = weight(_text_:system in 3814) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023233337 = score(doc=3814,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13353272 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.042397358 = queryNorm
0.17398985 = fieldWeight in 3814, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3814)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.6666667 = coord(4/6)
- Abstract
- The paper examines the potentiality of the Universal Decimal Classification as a means for retrieving subjects from the World Wide Web. The analytico-synthetic basis of the scheme provides the facility to link concepts at the input or search stage and to isolate concepts via the notation so as to retrieve the separate parts of a compound subject individually if required. Its notation permits hierarchical searching and overrides the shortcomings of natural language. Recent revisions have been constructed with this purpose in mind, the most recent being for Management. The use of the classification embedded in metadata, as in the GERHARD system or as a basis for subject trees is discussed. Its application as a gazetteer is another Web application to which it is put. The range of up to date editions in many languages and the availability of a Web-based version make its use as a switching language increasingly valuable.
- Source
- Subject retrieval in a networked environment: Proceedings of the IFLA Satellite Meeting held in Dublin, OH, 14-16 August 2001 and sponsored by the IFLA Classification and Indexing Section, the IFLA Information Technology Section and OCLC. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine
- Theme
- Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
-
McIlwaine, I.C.: Subject control : the British viewpoint (1995)
0.02
0.017271034 = product of:
0.051813103 = sum of:
0.034289423 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034289423 = score(doc=1632,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.042397358 = queryNorm
0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 1632, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1632)
0.017523682 = product of:
0.052571043 = sum of:
0.052571043 = weight(_text_:system in 1632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052571043 = score(doc=1632,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13353272 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.042397358 = queryNorm
0.3936941 = fieldWeight in 1632, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1632)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Footnote
- Enthält das Ergebnis einer Befragung. 0 hielten das System für sehr gut; 13 für gut; 11 für halbwegs gut; 7 für halbwegs gut; 11 für schlecht. 8,9% der Befragten würden das System übernehmen, 47,5% nicht, 43,6% vielleicht
- Theme
- Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
-
McIlwaine, I.C.; Williamson, N.J.: Class 61 - Medicine : restructuring progress in 2004 (2004)
0.01
0.01392409 = product of:
0.08354454 = sum of:
0.08354454 = product of:
0.1253168 = sum of:
0.05576001 = weight(_text_:system in 3026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05576001 = score(doc=3026,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13353272 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.042397358 = queryNorm
0.41757566 = fieldWeight in 3026, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3026)
0.06955679 = weight(_text_:29 in 3026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06955679 = score(doc=3026,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14914064 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.042397358 = queryNorm
0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 3026, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3026)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- Proposal for the restructuring of UDC class 617.6/.9 - Nervous system. Neurology
- Date
- 11. 8.2005 12:29:36
-
McIlwaine, I.C.; Broughton, V.: ¬The Classification Research Group : then and now (2000)
0.01
0.013494994 = product of:
0.04048498 = sum of:
0.034289423 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034289423 = score(doc=6089,freq=8.0), product of:
0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.042397358 = queryNorm
0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 6089, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=6089)
0.0061955573 = product of:
0.018586671 = sum of:
0.018586671 = weight(_text_:system in 6089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018586671 = score(doc=6089,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13353272 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.042397358 = queryNorm
0.13919188 = fieldWeight in 6089, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=6089)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- The genesis of the Group: In 1948, as part of the post-war renewal of library services in the United Kingdom, the Royal Society organized a Conference on Scientific Information.' What, at the time, must have seemed a minute part of the grand plan, but was later to have a transforming effect on the theory of knowledge organization throughout the remainder of the century, was the setting up of a standing committee of a small group of specialists to investigate the organization and retrieval of scientific information. In 1950, the secretary of that committee, J.D. Bernal, suggested that it might be appropriate to ask a group of librarians to do a study of the problem. After a couple of years of informal discussion it was agreed, in February 1952, to form a Classification Research Group - the CRG as it has become known to subsequent generations. The Group published a brief corporate statement of its views in the Library Association Record in June 1953 and submitted a memorandum to the Library Association Research Committee in May 1955, entitled "The need for a faceted classification as the basis of all methods of information retrieval". This memorandum was published in the proceedings of what has become known as the "Dorking Conference" in 1957. Of the original fifteen members, four still belong to the Group, three of whom are in regular attendance: Eric Coates, Douglas Foskett and Jack Mills. Brian Vickery ceased attending regularly in the 1960s but has retained his interest in their doings: he was present at the 150th celebratory meeting in 1984 and played an active part in the "Dorking revisited" conference held in 1997. The stated aim of the Group was 'To review the basic principles of bibliographic classification, unhampered by allegiance to any particular published scheme' and it can truly be stated that the work of its members has had a fundamental influence on the teaching and practice of information retrieval. It is paradoxical that this collection of people has exerted such a strong theoretical sway because their aims were from the outset and remain essentially practical. This fact is sometimes overlooked in the literature on knowledge organization: there is a tendency to get carried away, and for researchers of today to concentrate so hard on what might be that they overlook what is needed, useful and practical - the entire objective of any retrieval system.
-
McIlwaine, I.C.; Buxton, A.: Guide to the use of UDC : an introductory guide to the use and application of the Universal Decimal Classification (1993)
0.01
0.010728693 = product of:
0.06437215 = sum of:
0.06437215 = weight(_text_:wide in 4638) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06437215 = score(doc=4638,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18785246 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.042397358 = queryNorm
0.342674 = fieldWeight in 4638, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4638)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- For practical purposes this 'Guide' replaces the British Standards Institution's BS 1000C: 1963. Guide to the UDC, by Jack Mills. This earlier guide was important as an aid to users of UDC world-wide and was important for its clear discussion of the underlying principles of classification in general as well as its helpful guidance in the practical application of UDC
-
McIlwaine, I.C.: ¬A question of place (2004)
0.01
0.010363852 = product of:
0.031091554 = sum of:
0.02143089 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02143089 = score(doc=2650,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.042397358 = queryNorm
0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 2650, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2650)
0.009660665 = product of:
0.028981995 = sum of:
0.028981995 = weight(_text_:29 in 2650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028981995 = score(doc=2650,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14914064 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.042397358 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 2650, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2650)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- This paper looks at the problems raised by maintaining an Area Table in a general scheme of classification. It examines the tools available to assist in producing a standardized listing and demonstrates how recent developments in the Universal Decimal Classification enable users to have a retrieval tool suitable for use in a networked environment which acts as both a gazetteer and a classification.
- Date
- 29. 8.2004 14:17:11
-
McIlwaine, I.C.: Brian Vickery : 11th September 1918-17 th October 2009 (2010)
0.01
0.010334884 = product of:
0.03100465 = sum of:
0.02143089 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02143089 = score(doc=3692,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.042397358 = queryNorm
0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 3692, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3692)
0.009573761 = product of:
0.028721282 = sum of:
0.028721282 = weight(_text_:22 in 3692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028721282 = score(doc=3692,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14846832 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042397358 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3692, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3692)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- The death of Brian Vickery sees a great era of classification research coming towards an end. Born in Australia, he completed his schooling in England, before going up to Brasenose to read Chemistry just before the outbreak of the Second World War. Brian was never in the services, but after Oxford he worked as a chemist in the Royal Ordnance Factory from 1941-45. After the War he became a librarian at Imperial Chemical Industries (ICI). He was a delegate at the Royal Society Scientific Information Conference held in 1948. One of the offshoots of that conference was the formation of a small committee of scientists under the leadership of Professor J.D. Bernal, to make a study of library classification. After two years of discussions, they elicited the assistance of Jack Wells, then editor of the British National Bibliography, and Brian. They circularized a group of colleagues and convened a meeting in February 1952 which led to the formation of the Classification Research Group. As is well known, this Group, all practising librarians, were to exert a groundbreaking influence on the organization and retrieval of information.
- Date
- 22. 7.2010 19:32:06
-
McIlwaine, I.C.: UDC: the present state and future prospects (1995)
0.01
0.00808183 = product of:
0.04849098 = sum of:
0.04849098 = product of:
0.072736464 = sum of:
0.032526672 = weight(_text_:system in 1899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032526672 = score(doc=1899,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13353272 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.042397358 = queryNorm
0.2435858 = fieldWeight in 1899, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1899)
0.040209793 = weight(_text_:22 in 1899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040209793 = score(doc=1899,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14846832 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042397358 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1899, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1899)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- Survey on the activities going to develop the UDC into a fully faceted classification system according to the Recommendations of the UDC Management Board. A Master Reference File (MRF) has been created from which any publisher or insitution may develop its own versions according to the requests of its clientele. The UDC Technical Director at the FID Headquarters in The Hague maintains the file. An Editorial Board and an Editor in Chief was appointed. Extensions and Corrections are being published. Examples are given on ongoing revision work in the classes for Astronomy, Linguistics and Philology as well as in Medicine. Cooperation with the Editors of the Bliss Classification and the DDC exists
- Source
- Knowledge organization. 22(1995) no.2, S.64-69
-
McIlwaine, I.C.: Where have all the flowers gone? : An investigation into the fate of some special classification schemes (2003)
0.01
0.00778009 = product of:
0.02334027 = sum of:
0.017144712 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2764) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017144712 = score(doc=2764,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.042397358 = queryNorm
0.13368362 = fieldWeight in 2764, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2764)
0.0061955573 = product of:
0.018586671 = sum of:
0.018586671 = weight(_text_:system in 2764) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018586671 = score(doc=2764,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13353272 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.042397358 = queryNorm
0.13919188 = fieldWeight in 2764, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2764)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Prior to the OPAC many institutions devised classifications to suit their special needs. Others expanded or altered general schemes to accommodate specific approaches. A driving force in the creation of these classifications was the Classification Research Group, celebrating its golden jubilee in 2002, whose work created a framework and body of principles that remain valid for the retrieval needs of today. The paper highlights some of these special schemes and highlights the fundamental principles which remain valid. 1. Introduction The distinction between a general and a special classification scheme is made frequently in the textbooks, but is one that it is sometimes difficult to draw. The Library of Congress classification could be described as the special classification par excellence. Normally, however, a special classification is taken to be one that is restricted to a specific subject, and quite often used in one specific context only, either a library or a bibliographic listing or for a specific purpose such as a search engine and it is in this sense that I propose to examine some of these schemes. Today, there is a widespread preference for searching an words as a supplement to the use of a standard system, usually the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC). This is enhanced by the ability to search documents full-text in a computerized environment, a situation that did not exist 20 or 30 years ago. Today's situation is a great improvement in many ways, but it does depend upon the words used by the author and the searcher corresponding, and often presupposes the use of English. In libraries, the use of co-operative services and precatalogued records already provided with classification data has also spelt the demise of the special scheme. In many instances, the survival of a special classification depends upon its creaior and, with the passage of time, this becomes inevitably more precarious.
-
McIlwaine, I.C.: ¬The Universal Decimal Classification : a guide to its use (2000)
0.01
0.0076633515 = product of:
0.045980107 = sum of:
0.045980107 = weight(_text_:wide in 161) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045980107 = score(doc=161,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18785246 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.042397358 = queryNorm
0.24476713 = fieldWeight in 161, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=161)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- This book is an extension and total revision of the author's earlier Guide to the use of UDC. The original was written in 1993 and in the intervening years much has happened with the classification. In particular, a much more rigorous approach has been undertaken in revision to ensure that the scheme is able to handle the requirements of a networked world. The book outlines the history and development of the Universal Decimal Classification, provides practical hints on its application and works through all the auxiliary and main tables highlighting aspects that need to be noted in applying the scheme. It also provides guidance on the use of the Master Reference File and discusses the ways in which the classification is used in the 21st century and its suitability as an aid to subject description in tagging metadata and consequently for application on the Internet. It is intended as a source for information about the scheme, for practical usage by classifiers in their daily work and as a guide to the student learning how to apply the classification. It is amply provided with examples to illustrate the many ways in which the scheme can be applied and will be a useful source for a wide range of information workers
-
McIlwaine, I.C.; Mitchell, J.S.: Preface to special issue "What is knowledge organization" (2008)
0.01
0.0061306814 = product of:
0.036784086 = sum of:
0.036784086 = weight(_text_:wide in 2130) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036784086 = score(doc=2130,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18785246 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.042397358 = queryNorm
0.1958137 = fieldWeight in 2130, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2130)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- The aim of this special issue of Knowledge Organization is to explore the definition of the interdisciplinary field of "knowledge organization" through historical and contemporary perspectives. The goal is to provide a shared framework of terminology, theories, methodologies, and approaches to stimulate research. The International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO) is the premier international scholarly society devoted to the theory and practice of knowledge organization. At the Ninth International ISKO Conference in Vienna in July 2006, it became clear during informal conversations and discussions within the Scientific Advisory Council that there was a need to present a shared definition of the field of knowledge organization. While a majority of ISKO members are drawn from the field of library and information science (LIS), interest in knowledge organization is not limited to the LIS field. Indeed, contributors to Knowledge Organization (the society's journal) and to ISKO conferences represent areas of interdisciplinary research and application well beyond LIS itself. The excitement engendered by wide interest from many disciplines in the field of knowledge organization has also caused some confusion about the meaning of "knowledge organization" and its relationship to other fields such as "knowledge management." We have invited a group of authors drawn widely from the ISKO community and who among them span a half century of research in the field to address such questions as:
-
McIlwaine, I.C.: Some problems of context and terminology (1998)
0.01
0.005714904 = product of:
0.034289423 = sum of:
0.034289423 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4495) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034289423 = score(doc=4495,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.042397358 = queryNorm
0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 4495, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4495)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- Points out that designers of information systems for subject retrieval aiming at some kind of uinversal usage face the major problem of context, as a word by itself is not meaningful; and inseparable from this problem is that of the terminology used. This problem is most evident in systems that rely totally on words, rather than a systematic structure of some kind
-
McIlwaine, I.C.; Williamson, N.J.: Class 61 - Medicine : restructuring progress in 2003 (2003)
0.01
0.0053655095 = product of:
0.032193057 = sum of:
0.032193057 = product of:
0.09657917 = sum of:
0.09657917 = weight(_text_:system in 3788) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09657917 = score(doc=3788,freq=6.0), product of:
0.13353272 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.042397358 = queryNorm
0.72326225 = fieldWeight in 3788, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3788)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- Contains the proposed table for 617 Cardiovascular System. Nervous System. Glandular System
-
McIlwaine, I.C.; Williamson, N.J.: Class 61 - Medicine : restructuring progress 2000 (2000)
0.00
0.004467755 = product of:
0.02680653 = sum of:
0.02680653 = product of:
0.080419585 = sum of:
0.080419585 = weight(_text_:22 in 1012) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.080419585 = score(doc=1012,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14846832 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042397358 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1012, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1012)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Extensions and corrections to the UDC. 22(2000), S.49-75
-
McIlwaine, I.C.: Interdisciplinarity : a new retrieval problem? (2000)
0.00
0.0042861784 = product of:
0.025717068 = sum of:
0.025717068 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 124) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025717068 = score(doc=124,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.042397358 = queryNorm
0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 124, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=124)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
-
McIlwaine, I.C.: New wine in old bottles : problems of maintaining classification schemes (1996)
0.00
0.0035718149 = product of:
0.02143089 = sum of:
0.02143089 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02143089 = score(doc=5168,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.042397358 = queryNorm
0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 5168, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5168)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Theme
- Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
-
Vickery, B.C.; McIlwaine, I.C.: Structuring and switching: a discussion of the Broad System of Ordering (1979)
0.00
0.0029206136 = product of:
0.017523682 = sum of:
0.017523682 = product of:
0.052571043 = sum of:
0.052571043 = weight(_text_:system in 1866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052571043 = score(doc=1866,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13353272 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.042397358 = queryNorm
0.3936941 = fieldWeight in 1866, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1866)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- After a short presentation of major background principles used in BSO construction, the authors consider the most important structural peculiarities and spheres of application of this system. Some specific remarks deal with subdivisions within several major headings. In general, the BSO is viewed as a reasonable and up-to-date structural outline of modern knowledge and a useful tool to interconnect or switch between information systems
-
McIlwaine, I.C.: Africa in the UDC (1994)
0.00
0.0025761775 = product of:
0.015457064 = sum of:
0.015457064 = product of:
0.04637119 = sum of:
0.04637119 = weight(_text_:29 in 3120) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04637119 = score(doc=3120,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14914064 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.042397358 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 3120, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3120)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 29. 1.1996 16:58:02
-
McIlwaine, I.C.: UDC: the present state and future developments (1994)
0.00
0.0025761775 = product of:
0.015457064 = sum of:
0.015457064 = product of:
0.04637119 = sum of:
0.04637119 = weight(_text_:29 in 2635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04637119 = score(doc=2635,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14914064 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.042397358 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 2635, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2635)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 23(1994) no.5, S.29-33
-
McIlwaine, I.C.; Williamson, N.J.: International trends in subject analysis research (1999)
0.00
0.0025761775 = product of:
0.015457064 = sum of:
0.015457064 = product of:
0.04637119 = sum of:
0.04637119 = weight(_text_:29 in 4117) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04637119 = score(doc=4117,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14914064 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.042397358 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 4117, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4117)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Knowledge organization. 26(1999) no.1, S.23-29
