Search (122 results, page 1 of 7)

  • × theme_ss:"Bibliographische Software"
  1. Schoonbaert, D.; Rosenberg, V.: Personal Bibliographic Systems (PBS) (2009) 0.06 
    0.064826705 = product of:
  0.12965341 = sum of:
    0.055176124 = weight(_text_:wide in 3860) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.055176124 = score(doc=3860,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18785246 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042397358 = queryNorm
        0.29372054 = fieldWeight in 3860, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3860)
    0.029934023 = weight(_text_:web in 3860) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029934023 = score(doc=3860,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13836423 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042397358 = queryNorm
        0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 3860, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3860)
    0.04454327 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3860) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04454327 = score(doc=3860,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042397358 = queryNorm
        0.34732026 = fieldWeight in 3860, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3860)
  0.5 = coord(3/6)
    Abstract
    Personal Bibliographic Systems (PBS) manage the input, storage, retrieval, and output of bibliographic references. The software allows for references to a number of different document types such as journal articles, books, book chapters, dissertations, reports, unpublished papers, electronic documents, etc. Unlike general-purpose database management packages, PBS are made for bibliographic information, featuring a variety of import profiles for records downloaded from the major international databases, and the automatic generation of dozens of different output styles, including those used by the world's leading scientific journals. Modern PBS are thoroughly integrated with word processors. The software provides for the import, storage, retrieval, and output of World Wide Web-based information. This survey focuses on the various options and characteristics of PBS. Special attention is paid to structural flexibility, retrieval options, input, display, and output formats.
  2. Buxton, A.; Hopkinson, A.: ¬The CDS/ISIS handbook (1994) 0.05 
    0.049984362 = product of:
  0.14995308 = sum of:
    0.08399159 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4482) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08399159 = score(doc=4482,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042397358 = queryNorm
        0.6549133 = fieldWeight in 4482, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4482)
    0.065961495 = product of:
      0.098942235 = sum of:
        0.052571043 = weight(_text_:system in 4482) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052571043 = score(doc=4482,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13353272 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.3936941 = fieldWeight in 4482, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4482)
        0.04637119 = weight(_text_:29 in 4482) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04637119 = score(doc=4482,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14914064 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 4482, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4482)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    COMPASS
    Information retrieval / Use of / On-line computers
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Program 29(1995) no.3, S.356-357 (A. Radwanski)
    LCSH
    ISIS (Information retrieval system) / Handbooks, manuals, etc.
    Information storage and retrieval systems / Handbooks, manuals, etc.
    Subject
    ISIS (Information retrieval system) / Handbooks, manuals, etc.
    Information storage and retrieval systems / Handbooks, manuals, etc.
    Information retrieval / Use of / On-line computers
  3. McMahon, T.E.: Procite 4: a look at the latest release in bibliographic management software (1998) 0.05 
    0.048299327 = product of:
  0.096598655 = sum of:
    0.055176124 = weight(_text_:wide in 2810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.055176124 = score(doc=2810,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18785246 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042397358 = queryNorm
        0.29372054 = fieldWeight in 2810, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2810)
    0.029934023 = weight(_text_:web in 2810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029934023 = score(doc=2810,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13836423 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042397358 = queryNorm
        0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 2810, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2810)
    0.011488512 = product of:
      0.034465536 = sum of:
        0.034465536 = weight(_text_:22 in 2810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034465536 = score(doc=2810,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14846832 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2810, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2810)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(3/6)
    Abstract
    On Nov 26, 1997, Research Information Systems released its newest version of the ProCite bibliographic management software. The most notable change to the programme is the retooling for compatibility with Windows 95 and NT. In addition to the Windows 95 upgrade, ProCite added 2 new workforms. These forms allow users to capture information about Web pages and e-mail messages. This latest release builds on the Cite While You Write feature that allows users to link citations in a single manuscript to records in multiple databases. The program simplifies the generation of bibliographies and endnotes while allowing users to create bibliographic databases using 28 distinct workforms. Workforms cover a wide range of materials to patents. While there are a few idiosyncrasies users should be aware of, this product is a solid addition to the librarian's toolkit and should be considered by those libraries that have a need for a small but powerful programme to catalogue resources and create bibliographies
    Date
    6. 3.1997 16:22:15
  4. Laegreid, J.A.: SIFT: a Norwegian information retrieval system (1993) 0.04 
    0.044317048 = product of:
  0.13295114 = sum of:
    0.059391025 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 7701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.059391025 = score(doc=7701,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042397358 = queryNorm
        0.46309367 = fieldWeight in 7701, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7701)
    0.07356011 = product of:
      0.11034016 = sum of:
        0.064386114 = weight(_text_:system in 7701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.064386114 = score(doc=7701,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.13353272 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.48217484 = fieldWeight in 7701, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7701)
        0.045954052 = weight(_text_:22 in 7701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045954052 = score(doc=7701,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14846832 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7701, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7701)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Describes SIFT (Search in Free Text) an information retrieval system originally developed for administering governmental documents in Norway but which is now being applied alsewhere. SIFT handles structured information well. A library system, SIFT-BIBL, is now available. SIFT's retrieval engine and search facilities are powerful. Its user interface is limited but being imporved. An application programmer interface has been released which will allow programmers to develop their own interface. A Windows-based- client-server version is now being beta tested
    Date
    23. 1.1999 19:22:09
  5. Chowdhury, S.; Chowdhury, G.G.: Text retrieval system : an overview (1992) 0.04 
    0.043412052 = product of:
  0.13023615 = sum of:
    0.060615707 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6508) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.060615707 = score(doc=6508,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042397358 = queryNorm
        0.47264296 = fieldWeight in 6508, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6508)
    0.069620445 = product of:
      0.10443066 = sum of:
        0.046466675 = weight(_text_:system in 6508) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046466675 = score(doc=6508,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13353272 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.3479797 = fieldWeight in 6508, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6508)
        0.05796399 = weight(_text_:29 in 6508) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05796399 = score(doc=6508,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14914064 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 6508, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6508)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Presents general guidelines for the evaluation of commercial text retrieval software packages: BASIS, BRS/SEARCH, CAIRS, CDS/ISIS, ideaList and STATUS
    Source
    Proceedings of the 15th National IASLIC Conference, Annamalainagar, Tamil Nadu, India, 26-29 December 1992. Ed. by A. Chatterjee et al
  6. Buxton, A.; Hopkinson, A.: ¬The CDS/ISIS for Windows handbook (2001) 0.04 
    0.04229803 = product of:
  0.12689409 = sum of:
    0.10498949 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 775) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10498949 = score(doc=775,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042397358 = queryNorm
        0.81864166 = fieldWeight in 775, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=775)
    0.021904603 = product of:
      0.06571381 = sum of:
        0.06571381 = weight(_text_:system in 775) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06571381 = score(doc=775,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13353272 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.49211764 = fieldWeight in 775, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=775)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    COMPASS
    Information retrieval / Use of / On-line computers
    LCSH
    ISIS (Information retrieval system) / Handbooks, manuals, etc.
    Information storage and retrieval systems / Handbooks, manuals, etc.
    Subject
    ISIS (Information retrieval system) / Handbooks, manuals, etc.
    Information storage and retrieval systems / Handbooks, manuals, etc.
    Information retrieval / Use of / On-line computers
  7. Delozier, E.P.: Bibliography management with Pro-Cite version 2.0 (1993) 0.04 
    0.03581637 = product of:
  0.10744911 = sum of:
    0.091960214 = weight(_text_:wide in 6502) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.091960214 = score(doc=6502,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18785246 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042397358 = queryNorm
        0.48953426 = fieldWeight in 6502, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6502)
    0.015488892 = product of:
      0.046466675 = sum of:
        0.046466675 = weight(_text_:system in 6502) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046466675 = score(doc=6502,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13353272 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.3479797 = fieldWeight in 6502, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6502)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Reviews Pro-Cite, a database management system specifically designed to manage bibliographic references. Pro-Cite provides a wide range of data manipulation capabilities. These include: creating, editing and deleting database records; querying for specific records; organizing databases; and printing selected records to a variety of devices
  8. Perez, E.: Industrial strength database publishing : Inmagic DB/Textworks WebPublisher (1997) 0.03 
    0.032626536 = product of:
  0.0978796 = sum of:
    0.04938862 = weight(_text_:web in 679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04938862 = score(doc=679,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.13836423 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042397358 = queryNorm
        0.35694647 = fieldWeight in 679, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=679)
    0.04849098 = product of:
      0.072736464 = sum of:
        0.032526672 = weight(_text_:system in 679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032526672 = score(doc=679,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13353272 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.2435858 = fieldWeight in 679, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=679)
        0.040209793 = weight(_text_:22 in 679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040209793 = score(doc=679,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14846832 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 679, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=679)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    The availability of powerful indexing and database products with easy Web connections means that libraries able to gather and edit their own data are emancipated from the large vendors. The Oregon State Library staff used the Data Magician translation utility as part of a complex, but speedy, database converison project. The Oregon Index database of approximately 300.000 records was converted from a BRS database host over to the Inmagic WebPublisher system. Describes the planning and action stepts used in producing the Web accessible index database of considerable size. Participants have high ratings to effectiveness of both the translation utility and the database engine
    Date
    6. 3.1997 16:22:15
  9. Kirkwood, H.P.: Ovid Web Gateway (1998) 0.03 
    0.03171403 = product of:
  0.09514208 = sum of:
    0.07982406 = weight(_text_:web in 2878) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07982406 = score(doc=2878,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.13836423 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042397358 = queryNorm
        0.5769126 = fieldWeight in 2878, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2878)
    0.015318017 = product of:
      0.045954052 = sum of:
        0.045954052 = weight(_text_:22 in 2878) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045954052 = score(doc=2878,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14846832 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2878, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2878)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Ovid has supported a sophisticated interface for searching bibliographic and full text databases for some time. It is now offering a Web based version of this interface that is capable of accessing Z39.50-compliant OPACs and databases anywhere in the world. The Ovid Web Gateway builds on the Ovid Server, thus allowing for a variety of functions and configurations at user, group and database-specific level. The Web Gateway has a selection of download formats and delivery options
    Date
    6. 3.1997 16:22:15
  10. Casale, M.: Full text retrieval for the Web (1996) 0.03 
    0.030606538 = product of:
  0.091819614 = sum of:
    0.04938862 = weight(_text_:web in 6757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04938862 = score(doc=6757,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.13836423 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042397358 = queryNorm
        0.35694647 = fieldWeight in 6757, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6757)
    0.042430993 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.042430993 = score(doc=6757,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042397358 = queryNorm
        0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 6757, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6757)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Reviews developments and improvements in techniques for searching the WWW that have been made access to full text databases a practical proposition (full text retrieval (FTR)). Reports results of interviews with 8 full text database vendors offering FTR via the WWW: Dataware (http://www.dataware.com); Excalibur (http://www.excalib.com); Fulcrum (http://www.fulcrum.com); Muscat (http://www.muscat.co.uk); Open Text (http://www.opentext.com); Personal Library Software (PLS) (http://www.pls.com); Verity (http://www.verity.com); and ZyLab (ZyIndex and ZyImage) (http://www.zylab.com). Compares the prices of the systems and lists the questions that publishers should ask before making a choice of systems for handling FTR on the Web
  11. Matthews, J.R.; Parker, M.R.: Microcomputer-based automated library systems : new series (1993) 0.03 
    0.030186728 = product of:
  0.18112037 = sum of:
    0.18112037 = sum of:
      0.06571381 = weight(_text_:system in 3073) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06571381 = score(doc=3073,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.13353272 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
            0.042397358 = queryNorm
          0.49211764 = fieldWeight in 3073, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3073)
      0.05796399 = weight(_text_:29 in 3073) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05796399 = score(doc=3073,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.14914064 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
            0.042397358 = queryNorm
          0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 3073, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3073)
      0.057442565 = weight(_text_:22 in 3073) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.057442565 = score(doc=3073,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.14846832 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.042397358 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3073, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3073)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Content
    Vorstellung von integrierten Bibliothekssystemen auf PC-Basis: DavexPlus; Bib-Base; BiblioFile; EloquentLibrarian; LibraryWorks; ProfessionalSeries; Alexandria; Columbia Library System; Manager Series; TheAssistant; TINLIB
    Date
    30.11.1995 20:53:22
    Object
    Columbia Library System
    Source
    Library technology reports. 29(1993), no.2
  12. Retrieval-Spezialist FAUST : dynamisches Archivierungssystem beschleunigt die Recherche (1993) 0.03 
    0.029909227 = product of:
  0.08972768 = sum of:
    0.074238785 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5351) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.074238785 = score(doc=5351,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042397358 = queryNorm
        0.5788671 = fieldWeight in 5351, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5351)
    0.015488892 = product of:
      0.046466675 = sum of:
        0.046466675 = weight(_text_:system in 5351) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046466675 = score(doc=5351,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13353272 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.3479797 = fieldWeight in 5351, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5351)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Eine Bewertung des Retrieval-Systems Faust der Fa. Land Software. Vor allem für Großunternehmen des wissenschaftlichen Sektors, Behörden und Institutionen mit umfassenden Retrieval-Aufgaben scheint das System geeignet zu sein. Zu seinen Stärken gehören: Dynamische Objektverwaltung, ein hierarchischer Thesaurus, Makroprogrammierung und Dublettenprüfung
  13. Delozier, E.P.: Bibliography management with Library Master version 2.0 (1994) 0.03 
    0.02967508 = product of:
  0.08902524 = sum of:
    0.07356817 = weight(_text_:wide in 6882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07356817 = score(doc=6882,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18785246 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042397358 = queryNorm
        0.3916274 = fieldWeight in 6882, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6882)
    0.015457064 = product of:
      0.04637119 = sum of:
        0.04637119 = weight(_text_:29 in 6882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04637119 = score(doc=6882,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14914064 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 6882, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6882)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Reviews Library Master, a bibliographic and textual database management software package: 1 of over 50 software packages intended to organize and track bibliographies and references. The software provides a wide range of data manipulation capabilities including: flexible inputting, editing, and deleting of references; sophisticated database querying capabilities; and flexible organization and output of bibliography lists
    Source
    Medical reference services quarterly. 13(1994) no.2, S.29-44
  14. Hyams, P.: Who's winning out in text retrieval? (1996) 0.02 
    0.023927381 = product of:
  0.07178214 = sum of:
    0.059391025 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4975) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.059391025 = score(doc=4975,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042397358 = queryNorm
        0.46309367 = fieldWeight in 4975, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4975)
    0.012391115 = product of:
      0.037173342 = sum of:
        0.037173342 = weight(_text_:system in 4975) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037173342 = score(doc=4975,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13353272 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.27838376 = fieldWeight in 4975, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4975)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Reports on the current state of the text retrieval system market, noting the comparative sales of 4 companies producing text retrieval systems: Fulcrum (sales: 13,1 million dollars, net income: 2,65 million dollars); Dataware (sales: 10,5 million dollars, net income: 133.000 dollars loss); Verity (sales: 8,0 million dollars, net income: 112.000 dollars); Excalibur (sales: 5,77 million dollars, net income: 110.000 dollars). Concludes that Fulcrum looks to be best placed in the market
  15. Griffith, C.: Creating full-text databases with ISYS (1997) 0.02 
    0.021642093 = product of:
  0.064926274 = sum of:
    0.03492303 = weight(_text_:web in 624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03492303 = score(doc=624,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13836423 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042397358 = queryNorm
        0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 624, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=624)
    0.030003246 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.030003246 = score(doc=624,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042397358 = queryNorm
        0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 624, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=624)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Reviews ISYS for Windows from Odyssey Development / The Denver Technological Center of Greenwood Village, CO. Explains how it can help users identify documents and create a full text index of the words in each document. This allows the user to create a full text database of the documents, for both personal and Web based use. The database can be created either manually or by using a wizard, which prompts the user with questions that moves them through the creation process. It provides a number of retrieval options, including Boolean searching and proximity options. It is easy to update, using built-in reindexing utilities. Reports no significant complaints
  16. Kiem, C.M.; Middleton, M.: ¬An evaluation of textual storage and retrieval software : CDS/ISIS and InMagic (1998) 0.02 
    0.021270197 = product of:
  0.06381059 = sum of:
    0.048492566 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1974) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.048492566 = score(doc=1974,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042397358 = queryNorm
        0.37811437 = fieldWeight in 1974, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1974)
    0.015318017 = product of:
      0.045954052 = sum of:
        0.045954052 = weight(_text_:22 in 1974) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045954052 = score(doc=1974,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14846832 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1974, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1974)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    A comparison was made between CDS/ISIS, ist Windows version WINISIS, and InMagic's INMAGIC and DB/TextWorks software. Packages were evaluated for their database creation, information retrieval and report production capabilities. Windows versions were found to provide significant enhancements over DOS versions of software. The evaluation aimed to determine the advantages to a developing country of creating bibliographic databases using commercial software
    Date
    22. 2.1999 13:54:49
  17. Brown, S.: Total recall from Dataware Technologies (1996) 0.02 
    0.02029456 = product of:
  0.06088368 = sum of:
    0.048492566 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.048492566 = score(doc=5808,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042397358 = queryNorm
        0.37811437 = fieldWeight in 5808, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5808)
    0.012391115 = product of:
      0.037173342 = sum of:
        0.037173342 = weight(_text_:system in 5808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037173342 = score(doc=5808,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13353272 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.27838376 = fieldWeight in 5808, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5808)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    During 1994, Dataware Technologies acquired the BRS/SEARCH text retrieval package from InfoPro Technologies, as well as exclusive worldwide marketing rights for the Total Recall application programming interface from Kinesis. The products are now being used to create information management applications which offer users the best of 2 very different worlds: the processing power of the relational database, together with the content based searching facilities of a text retrieval system. Discusses the advantages of this, noting also that the package can be used in setting up WWW sites
  18. Raper, D.: Selecting library housekeeping and information retrieval software (1993) 0.02 
    0.019450225 = product of:
  0.05835067 = sum of:
    0.04286178 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 48) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04286178 = score(doc=48,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042397358 = queryNorm
        0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 48, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=48)
    0.015488892 = product of:
      0.046466675 = sum of:
        0.046466675 = weight(_text_:system in 48) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046466675 = score(doc=48,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13353272 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.3479797 = fieldWeight in 48, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=48)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Describes how a review of the library and information services of D.J. Freeman was carried out, a soecification for a software package prepared, and the choice of the UNICORN system made. Points out that previous knowledge of available systems enabled the selection process to be condensed
  19. EndNote X (2006) 0.02 
    0.018913368 = product of:
  0.0567401 = sum of:
    0.036784086 = weight(_text_:wide in 3590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.036784086 = score(doc=3590,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18785246 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042397358 = queryNorm
        0.1958137 = fieldWeight in 3590, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3590)
    0.019956015 = weight(_text_:web in 3590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019956015 = score(doc=3590,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13836423 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042397358 = queryNorm
        0.14422815 = fieldWeight in 3590, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3590)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Mitteilungen VOEB 59(2006) H.4, S.81-88 (O. Oberhauser): ""Endnoten" erfüllen bekanntlich denselben Zweck wie Fußnoten, werden jedoch an das Ende des Werkes (Artikels, Kapitel, Buch usw.) gestellt, um die Textseiten nicht mit Zitaten und Anmerkungen zu überfrachten. EndNote hingegen ist ein Literaturverwaltungsprogramm für Windows und MacOSX, dessen Name sicher nicht ohne Grund gewählt wurde, zumal der Hauptzweck dieser Software darin besteht, die Erstellung von Literaturverzeichnissen und Zitaten beim Abfassen von wissenschaftlichen Arbeiten zu unterstützen. Solche Programme zur Literaturverwaltung, auch Bibliographieprogramme genannt, gibt es heute in großer Zahl. Viele sind kommerzielle Softwareprodukte, andere kostenlose oder auch Open Source-Programme. EndNote, ein Produkt von Thomson ISI ResearchSoft,' zählt zur ersteren Gattung und wird in unseren Breiten von der Adept Scientific GmbH (Frankfurt am Main)' vertrieben. Mit einem Preis von ungefähr 200 Euro - genauere Angaben müssen aufgrund wechselnder Aktionen der Homepage entnommen werden - liegt das Programm eher im oberen Bereich der Produktgruppe; de facto wird dies aber durch günstigere Studentenversionen, vor allem aber auch durch Campuslizenzen für die Angehörigen der meisten österreichischen Universitäten durchaus nach unten relativiert. EndNote ist schon seit langem ein Begriff, das Produkt gilt bereits als "Klassiker" unter den Literaturverwaltungsprogrammen und ist derzeit in Version X (bzw. X.0.2 nach einem rezenten Patch-Update) auf dem Markt. Schon vor etlichen Jahren konnte man einer immer noch lesenswerten Broschüre entnehmen, dass ein Bibliographieprogramm - grob gesprochen - zumindest folgende Aufgaben unterstützen müsse: (a) Eingabe von Literaturzitaten ("references"), (b) Editieren von Literaturzitaten, (c) Suche bzw. Wiederauffinden von Literaturzitaten, (d) Erstellung von Literaturverzeichnissen und (e) Unterstützung von Qualität und Integrität der Datensammlung. Diese Anforderungen gelten immer noch, wobei heute die Punkte (a) und (b) vor allem durch das seitdem hinzugekommene World Wide Web beeinflusst werden, während für Punkt (d) inzwischen auch noch die Anforderung einer Verknüpfung mit Textverarbeitungsprogrammen entstanden ist (Eingabe von Platzhaltern fürvorläufige Zitate, die später durch die endgültige Form ersetzt werden). Im folgenden soll das von mir selbst nach vielen Jahren des Verwendens bzw. Ausprobierens anderer Programme vor knapp einem Jahr für die persönliche Literaturverwaltung ausgewählte Produkt EndNote (Windows-Version) im Hinblick auf diese Kriterien näher beschrieben und beurteilt werden.
  20. Ellingen, D.: Inmagic DB/TextWorks : a windows 'textbase' with images (1996) 0.02 
    0.018583821 = product of:
  0.05575146 = sum of:
    0.034289423 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.034289423 = score(doc=4945,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042397358 = queryNorm
        0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 4945, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4945)
    0.021462038 = product of:
      0.064386114 = sum of:
        0.064386114 = weight(_text_:system in 4945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.064386114 = score(doc=4945,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.13353272 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.48217484 = fieldWeight in 4945, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4945)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    DB/TextWorks from Inmagic, Inc, is a Windows enabled textbase system which aims to combine the strengths of text retrieval systems, and field databases. Outlines reasons for switching to this product, and how it compares with Inmagic's DOS products. Explains how to install the system, reviews its features and reports on testing of the system

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 96
  • d 12
  • i 3
  • nl 3
  • ru 2
  • f 1
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 106
  • m 11
  • s 4
  • el 2
  • i 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications