Search (119 results, page 1 of 6)

  • × theme_ss:"Dokumentenmanagement"
  1. Medien-Informationsmanagement : Archivarische, dokumentarische, betriebswirtschaftliche, rechtliche und Berufsbild-Aspekte ; [Frühjahrstagung der Fachgruppe 7 im Jahr 2000 in Weimar und Folgetagung 2001 in Köln] (2003) 0.05 
    0.050796967 = product of:
  0.07619545 = sum of:
    0.027588062 = weight(_text_:wide in 1833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027588062 = score(doc=1833,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18785246 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042397358 = queryNorm
        0.14686027 = fieldWeight in 1833, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1833)
    0.014967011 = weight(_text_:web in 1833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014967011 = score(doc=1833,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13836423 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042397358 = queryNorm
        0.108171105 = fieldWeight in 1833, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1833)
    0.012858534 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012858534 = score(doc=1833,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042397358 = queryNorm
        0.10026272 = fieldWeight in 1833, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1833)
    0.020781849 = product of:
      0.031172771 = sum of:
        0.013940003 = weight(_text_:system in 1833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013940003 = score(doc=1833,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13353272 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.104393914 = fieldWeight in 1833, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1833)
        0.017232768 = weight(_text_:22 in 1833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017232768 = score(doc=1833,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14846832 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 1833, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1833)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.6666667 = coord(4/6)
    Abstract
    Als in den siebziger Jahren des vergangenen Jahrhunderts immer häufiger die Bezeichnung Informationsmanager für Leute propagiert wurde, die bis dahin als Dokumentare firmierten, wurde dies in den etablierten Kreisen der Archivare und Bibliothekare gelegentlich belächelt und als Zeichen einer Identitätskrise oder jedenfalls einer Verunsicherung des damit überschriebenen Berufsbilds gewertet. Für den Berufsstand der Medienarchivare/Mediendokumentare, die sich seit 1960 in der Fachgruppe 7 des Vereins, später Verbands deutscher Archivare (VdA) organisieren, gehörte diese Verortung im Zeichen neuer inhaltlicher Herausforderungen (Informationsflut) und Technologien (EDV) allerdings schon früh zu den Selbstverständlichkeiten des Berufsalltags. "Halt, ohne uns geht es nicht!" lautete die Überschrift eines Artikels im Verbandsorgan "Info 7", der sich mit der Einrichtung von immer mächtigeren Leitungsnetzen und immer schnelleren Datenautobahnen beschäftigte. Information, Informationsgesellschaft: diese Begriffe wurden damals fast nur im technischen Sinne verstanden. Die informatisierte, nicht die informierte Gesellschaft stand im Vordergrund - was wiederum Kritiker auf den Plan rief, von Joseph Weizenbaum in den USA bis hin zu den Informations-Ökologen in Bremen. Bei den nationalen, manchmal auch nur regionalen Projekten und Modellversuchen mit Datenautobahnen - auch beim frühen Btx - war nie so recht deutlich geworden, welche Inhalte in welcher Gestalt durch diese Netze und Straßen gejagt werden sollten und wer diese Inhalte eigentlich selektieren, portionieren, positionieren, kurz: managen sollte. Spätestens mit dem World Wide Web sind diese Projekte denn auch obsolet geworden, jedenfalls was die Hardware und Software anging. Geblieben ist das Thema Inhalte (neudeutsch: Content). Und - immer drängender im nicht nur technischen Verständnis - das Thema Informationsmanagement. MedienInformationsManagement war die Frühjahrstagung der Fachgruppe 7 im Jahr 2000 in Weimar überschrieben, und auch die Folgetagung 2001 in Köln, die der multimedialen Produktion einen dokumentarischen Pragmatismus gegenüber stellte, handelte vom Geschäftsfeld Content und von Content-Management-Systemen. Die in diesem 6. Band der Reihe Beiträge zur Mediendokumentation versammelten Vorträge und Diskussionsbeiträge auf diesen beiden Tagungen beleuchten das Titel-Thema aus den verschiedensten Blickwinkeln: archivarischen, dokumentarischen, kaufmännischen, berufsständischen und juristischen. Deutlich wird dabei, daß die Berufsbezeichnung Medienarchivarln/Mediendokumentarln ziemlich genau für all das steht, was heute mit sog. alten wie neuen Medien im organisatorischen, d.h. ordnenden und vermittelnden Sinne geschieht. Im besonderen Maße trifft dies auf das Internet und die aus ihm geborenen Intranets zu. Beide bedürfen genauso der ordnenden Hand, die sich an den alten Medien, an Buch, Zeitung, Tonträger, Film etc. geschult hat, denn sie leben zu großen Teilen davon. Daß das Internet gleichwohl ein Medium sui generis ist und die alten Informationsberufe vor ganz neue Herausforderungen stellt - auch das durchzieht die Beiträge von Weimar und Köln.
    Content
    Enthält u.a. die Beiträge (Dokumentarische Aspekte): Günter Perers/Volker Gaese: Das DocCat-System in der Textdokumentation von Gr+J (Weimar 2000) Thomas Gerick: Finden statt suchen. Knowledge Retrieval in Wissensbanken. Mit organisiertem Wissen zu mehr Erfolg (Weimar 2000) Winfried Gödert: Aufbereitung und Rezeption von Information (Weimar 2000) Elisabeth Damen: Klassifikation als Ordnungssystem im elektronischen Pressearchiv (Köln 2001) Clemens Schlenkrich: Aspekte neuer Regelwerksarbeit - Multimediales Datenmodell für ARD und ZDF (Köln 2001) Josef Wandeler: Comprenez-vous only Bahnhof'? - Mehrsprachigkeit in der Mediendokumentation (Köln 200 1)
    Date
    11. 5.2008 19:49:22
  2. Huang, T.; Mehrotra, S.; Ramchandran, K.: Multimedia Access and Retrieval System (MARS) project (1997) 0.04 
    0.04339397 = product of:
  0.13018191 = sum of:
    0.06000649 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06000649 = score(doc=758,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042397358 = queryNorm
        0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 758, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=758)
    0.070175424 = product of:
      0.10526314 = sum of:
        0.065053344 = weight(_text_:system in 758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.065053344 = score(doc=758,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.13353272 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.4871716 = fieldWeight in 758, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=758)
        0.040209793 = weight(_text_:22 in 758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040209793 = score(doc=758,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14846832 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 758, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=758)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Reports results of the MARS project, conducted at Illinois University, to bring together researchers in the fields of computer vision, compression, information management and database systems with the goal of developing an effective multimedia database management system. Describes the first step, involving the design and implementation of an image retrieval system incorporating novel approaches to image segmentation, representation, browsing and information retrieval supported by the developed system. Points to future directions for the MARS project
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
    Source
    Digital image access and retrieval: Proceedings of the 1996 Clinic on Library Applications of Data Processing, 24-26 Mar 1996. Ed.: P.B. Heidorn u. B. Sandore
  3. Parer, D.; Parrott, K.: Management practices in the electronic records environment (1994) 0.04 
    0.037035912 = product of:
  0.11110774 = sum of:
    0.091960214 = weight(_text_:wide in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.091960214 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18785246 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042397358 = queryNorm
        0.48953426 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
    0.019147523 = product of:
      0.057442565 = sum of:
        0.057442565 = weight(_text_:22 in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.057442565 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14846832 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Describes 3 records management approaches to electronic records and assesses the archival interests involved in each. Suggests utilizing the Information Management methodology to devise an organization wide Information Management Plan, incorporating records management and archival requirements, to facilitate the identification of records of value to the organization to be managed as any other corporate asset
    Source
    Archives and manuscripts. 22(1994) no.1, S.106-122
  4. Mas, S.; Marleau, Y.: Proposition of a faceted classification model to support corporate information organization and digital records management (2009) 0.04 
    0.036370173 = product of:
  0.10911051 = sum of:
    0.06733824 = product of:
      0.20201473 = sum of:
        0.20201473 = weight(_text_:3a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20201473 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.35944527 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.04177227 = product of:
      0.0626584 = sum of:
        0.027880006 = weight(_text_:system in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027880006 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13353272 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.20878783 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
        0.034778394 = weight(_text_:29 in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034778394 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14914064 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Date
    29. 8.2009 21:15:48
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?reload=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F4755313%2F4755314%2F04755480.pdf%3Farnumber%3D4755480&authDecision=-203.
    Source
    System Sciences, 2009. HICSS '09. 42nd Hawaii International Conference
  5. Merve, N. v.d.: ¬The integration of document image processing and text retrieval principles (1993) 0.03 
    0.033838425 = product of:
  0.10151527 = sum of:
    0.08399159 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08399159 = score(doc=6564,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042397358 = queryNorm
        0.6549133 = fieldWeight in 6564, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6564)
    0.017523682 = product of:
      0.052571043 = sum of:
        0.052571043 = weight(_text_:system in 6564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052571043 = score(doc=6564,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13353272 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.3936941 = fieldWeight in 6564, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6564)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Only 10% of information used by an organisation is in electronic form hence the need to examine ways of processing and loading paper documents automatically in an electronic database. Discusses the principles of a document image processing (DIP) system; the difference between text retrieval and DIP; text retrieval systems and concept retrieval. Describes the TOPIC intelligent text retrieval system based on concept retrieval. Covers the TYPO operator developed for mispellings, character transpositions and 'dirty' text retrieved as output form OCR processes. Refers to an electronic news clipping service application
  6. Vasudevan, M.C.; Mohan, M.; Kapoor, A.: Information system for knowledge management in the specialized division of a hospital (2006) 0.03 
    0.033474006 = product of:
  0.10042201 = sum of:
    0.030003246 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.030003246 = score(doc=1499,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042397358 = queryNorm
        0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 1499, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1499)
    0.07041876 = product of:
      0.10562813 = sum of:
        0.065053344 = weight(_text_:system in 1499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.065053344 = score(doc=1499,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.13353272 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.4871716 = fieldWeight in 1499, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1499)
        0.04057479 = weight(_text_:29 in 1499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04057479 = score(doc=1499,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14914064 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 1499, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1499)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Information systems are essential support for knowledge management in all types of enterprises. This paper describes the evolution and development of a specialized hospital information system. The system is designed to integrate for access and retrieval from databases of patients' case records, and related images - CATSCAN, MRI, X-Ray - and to enable online access to full text of relevant papers on the Internet/WWW. The generation of information products and services from the system is briefly described.
    Date
    29. 2.2008 17:26:51
  7. Alexander, J.: Customs and excise process 2.5 million documents (1997) 0.03 
    0.03341697 = product of:
  0.100250915 = sum of:
    0.034289423 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.034289423 = score(doc=2427,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042397358 = queryNorm
        0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 2427, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2427)
    0.065961495 = product of:
      0.098942235 = sum of:
        0.052571043 = weight(_text_:system in 2427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052571043 = score(doc=2427,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13353272 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.3936941 = fieldWeight in 2427, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2427)
        0.04637119 = weight(_text_:29 in 2427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04637119 = score(doc=2427,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14914064 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 2427, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2427)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    The HM Customs and Excise operation in Salford, Manchster, UK, has installed an electronic document management system from Graphic Data to streamline handling of import entries. It aims was to reduce filing and storage and improve access to documentation. The system involves scanning documents and CD storage and retrieval. Because of legal admissibility issues, documentation is retained in its paper format in deep storage
    Date
    31.12.1998 9:53:29
  8. Celentano, A.; Fugini, M.G.; Pozzi, S.: Knowledge-based document retrieval in office environments : the Kabiria system (1995) 0.03 
    0.03209541 = product of:
  0.09628622 = sum of:
    0.06857885 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3224) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06857885 = score(doc=3224,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042397358 = queryNorm
        0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 3224, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3224)
    0.027707374 = product of:
      0.08312212 = sum of:
        0.08312212 = weight(_text_:system in 3224) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08312212 = score(doc=3224,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.13353272 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.62248504 = fieldWeight in 3224, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3224)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Proposes a document retrieval model and system on the representation of knowledge describing the semantic contents of dicuments, the way in which the documents are managed by producers and by people in the office, and the application domain where the office operates. Discusses the knowledge representation issues needed for the document retrieval system and presents a document retrieval model that captures these issues. Describes such a system named Kabiria. Covers the querying and browsing environments and the architecture of the system
  9. Mas, S.; Zaher, L'H.; Zacklad, M.: Design & evaluation of multi-viewed knowledge system for administrative electronic document organization (2008) 0.03 
    0.029995263 = product of:
  0.08998579 = sum of:
    0.034289423 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2480) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.034289423 = score(doc=2480,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042397358 = queryNorm
        0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 2480, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2480)
    0.05569636 = product of:
      0.08354454 = sum of:
        0.037173342 = weight(_text_:system in 2480) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037173342 = score(doc=2480,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13353272 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.27838376 = fieldWeight in 2480, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2480)
        0.04637119 = weight(_text_:29 in 2480) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04637119 = score(doc=2480,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14914064 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 2480, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2480)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    This communication describes part of a current research carried out at the Université de Technologie de Troyes and funded by a postdoctoral grant from the Fonds québécois de la recherche sur la société et la culture. Under the title "Design and evaluation of a faceted classification for uniform and personal organization of administrative electronic documents", our research investigates the feasibility of creating a faceted and multi-points-of-view classification scheme for administrative document organization and retrieval in online environments.
    Date
    29. 8.2009 21:15:48
  10. Schardt-Sahelijo, L.P.; Pastowsky, M.: ¬Der iARD-Marktreport : optoelektronische Systeme für Imageverarbeitung, Archivierung, Information Retrieval, Dokumenten-Management (1994) 0.03 
    0.029018786 = product of:
  0.08705635 = sum of:
    0.06000649 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06000649 = score(doc=3103,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042397358 = queryNorm
        0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 3103, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3103)
    0.02704986 = product of:
      0.08114958 = sum of:
        0.08114958 = weight(_text_:29 in 3103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08114958 = score(doc=3103,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14914064 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 3103, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3103)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Date
    29. 1.1996 10:05:39
  11. Levasseur, D.: ¬Les solutions reseau pour optimiser la gestion des documents et leur diffusion dans les organisations (Groupware, Workflow, Intranet) (1998) 0.03 
    0.028370049 = product of:
  0.08511014 = sum of:
    0.055176124 = weight(_text_:wide in 5111) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.055176124 = score(doc=5111,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18785246 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042397358 = queryNorm
        0.29372054 = fieldWeight in 5111, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5111)
    0.029934023 = weight(_text_:web in 5111) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029934023 = score(doc=5111,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13836423 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042397358 = queryNorm
        0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 5111, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5111)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Part 3 of a 3-part series on the electronic management of documents parts 1 and 2 of which appeared in Argus 26(3) 1997 and 27(1) 1998 respectively. Looks at 3 concepts relating to the management and communication of electronic documents within the corporate network: groupware, or the automation of work in groups; workflow, or the management of the flow of information to be treated; and intranet, which indicates the private network of an organization supplying internally the technologies responsible for the success of Internet and the World Wide Web. Considers the advantages of the electronic document operated on computer networks over paper handled through traditional channels focusing on intranet because of the importance it is given as an infrastructure for integration of document management activities and because it represents a major challenge for the information professionals of today
  12. Ashford, J.H.: Full text retrieval in document management : a review (1995) 0.03 
    0.026989987 = product of:
  0.08096996 = sum of:
    0.06857885 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06857885 = score(doc=2054,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042397358 = queryNorm
        0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 2054, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2054)
    0.012391115 = product of:
      0.037173342 = sum of:
        0.037173342 = weight(_text_:system in 2054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037173342 = score(doc=2054,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13353272 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.27838376 = fieldWeight in 2054, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2054)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Full text management which applied to document management tends to be centred on text storage and retrieval. Recent developments are concerned with integration with relational database management system products to deliver document management services offering both the flexibility of text retrieval and the ability to support process based funnctions. There has been a move towards client server architectures, more user friendly user interfaces and more flexible and easier to understand retrieval. Advocates caution in choosing tasks for full text methods. Identifies document management functions for which the combined use of database management systems or special purpose tools should be considered
  13. Koulopoulos, T.M.; Frappaolo, C.: Electronic document management systems : where are they today? (1993) 0.03 
    0.025977176 = product of:
  0.07793152 = sum of:
    0.0670893 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 982) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0670893 = score(doc=982,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042397358 = queryNorm
        0.5231199 = fieldWeight in 982, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=982)
    0.010842225 = product of:
      0.032526672 = sum of:
        0.032526672 = weight(_text_:system in 982) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032526672 = score(doc=982,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13353272 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.2435858 = fieldWeight in 982, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=982)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Reports results of a market study to determine the changes that have taken place in text retrieval and imaging systems: the 2 dominant components of electronic document management systems (EDMS). Organizations are focusing on integrated technologies, a sign that imaging and text retrieval are making their way towards the mainstream of information management. Reports data for: text retrieval market revenue by customer segment (industry, government and library); components of an integrated image based EDMS; component platforms of the text retreival system (PC, Macintosh atc.); areas of improvement for current imaging systems; importance of key benefits to implementing text retrieval within the organization; and areas of improvement for current text retrieval systems
  14. Boeri, R.J.; Hensel, M.: Set up a winning text retrieval system : carefully (1995) 0.03 
    0.025638236 = product of:
  0.076914705 = sum of:
    0.059391025 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2809) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.059391025 = score(doc=2809,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042397358 = queryNorm
        0.46309367 = fieldWeight in 2809, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2809)
    0.017523682 = product of:
      0.052571043 = sum of:
        0.052571043 = weight(_text_:system in 2809) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052571043 = score(doc=2809,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13353272 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.3936941 = fieldWeight in 2809, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2809)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Considers some of the practical issues involved when a company plans to develop an in house computerized document management system: conversion of paper to electronic form via optical character recognition (OCR) or rekeying; coding of document elements using SGML; indexing for information searching and retrieval (including proximity searching); and hybrid CD-ROM and online information retrieval systems
  15. Rapke, K.: Automatische Indexierung von Volltexten für die Gruner+Jahr Pressedatenbank (2001) 0.03 
    0.025378816 = product of:
  0.07613645 = sum of:
    0.06299369 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06299369 = score(doc=6386,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042397358 = queryNorm
        0.49118498 = fieldWeight in 6386, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6386)
    0.01314276 = product of:
      0.03942828 = sum of:
        0.03942828 = weight(_text_:system in 6386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03942828 = score(doc=6386,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13353272 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.29527056 = fieldWeight in 6386, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6386)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Retrieval Tests sind die anerkannteste Methode, um neue Verfahren der Inhaltserschließung gegenüber traditionellen Verfahren zu rechtfertigen. Im Rahmen einer Diplomarbeit wurden zwei grundsätzlich unterschiedliche Systeme der automatischen inhaltlichen Erschließung anhand der Pressedatenbank des Verlagshauses Gruner + Jahr (G+J) getestet und evaluiert. Untersucht wurde dabei natürlichsprachliches Retrieval im Vergleich zu Booleschem Retrieval. Bei den beiden Systemen handelt es sich zum einen um Autonomy von Autonomy Inc. und DocCat, das von IBM an die Datenbankstruktur der G+J Pressedatenbank angepasst wurde. Ersteres ist ein auf natürlichsprachlichem Retrieval basierendes, probabilistisches System. DocCat demgegenüber basiert auf Booleschem Retrieval und ist ein lernendes System, das auf Grund einer intellektuell erstellten Trainingsvorlage indexiert. Methodisch geht die Evaluation vom realen Anwendungskontext der Textdokumentation von G+J aus. Die Tests werden sowohl unter statistischen wie auch qualitativen Gesichtspunkten bewertet. Ein Ergebnis der Tests ist, dass DocCat einige Mängel gegenüber der intellektuellen Inhaltserschließung aufweist, die noch behoben werden müssen, während das natürlichsprachliche Retrieval von Autonomy in diesem Rahmen und für die speziellen Anforderungen der G+J Textdokumentation so nicht einsetzbar ist
  16. Yorke, S.: Strategies for the records manager (1997) 0.03 
    0.02507146 = product of:
  0.07521438 = sum of:
    0.06437215 = weight(_text_:wide in 3339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06437215 = score(doc=3339,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18785246 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042397358 = queryNorm
        0.342674 = fieldWeight in 3339, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3339)
    0.010842225 = product of:
      0.032526672 = sum of:
        0.032526672 = weight(_text_:system in 3339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032526672 = score(doc=3339,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13353272 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.2435858 = fieldWeight in 3339, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3339)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Discusses some of the options for approaches to disaster management in organizations as it relates to risk management. At the organisation or business level, the starting point is to identify the risks faced by the business area and functional activities. The Australian / New Zealand Standard on managing rsik proposes a 6 step process for carrying out risk management: identification of the organisational context, risk identification, risk analysis, assessment amd prioritisation of risks, treatment of risks and the monitoring and review of the system. Such strategies can be of limited value in a wide area disaster. Offers advice on coping with a major disaster
  17. Murthy, S.S.: ¬The National Tuberculosis Institute, Bangalore : recent development in library and information services (2006) 0.02 
    0.023967069 = product of:
  0.0719012 = sum of:
    0.05644414 = weight(_text_:web in 1502) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05644414 = score(doc=1502,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.13836423 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042397358 = queryNorm
        0.4079388 = fieldWeight in 1502, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1502)
    0.015457064 = product of:
      0.04637119 = sum of:
        0.04637119 = weight(_text_:29 in 1502) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04637119 = score(doc=1502,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14914064 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 1502, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1502)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Briefly describes the information products and services, the related databases, development of digital library and web-resources and web-based services, vocabulary control tools, networking, and other projects of the Library of the National Tuberculosis Institute (NTI), Bangalore. Acknowledges the involvement of and advice and assistance provided by Prof. A. Neelameghan to these programmes and projects.
    Date
    29. 2.2008 17:39:54
  18. Sugimoto, M.: ¬A document retrieval system for assisting creative research (1995) 0.02 
    0.02334027 = product of:
  0.07002081 = sum of:
    0.051434137 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3143) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.051434137 = score(doc=3143,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042397358 = queryNorm
        0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 3143, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3143)
    0.018586671 = product of:
      0.05576001 = sum of:
        0.05576001 = weight(_text_:system in 3143) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05576001 = score(doc=3143,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13353272 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.41757566 = fieldWeight in 3143, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3143)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
  19. Black, K.: ELISE: an online image retrieval system (1993) 0.02 
    0.022005416 = product of:
  0.06601625 = sum of:
    0.048492566 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.048492566 = score(doc=6631,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042397358 = queryNorm
        0.37811437 = fieldWeight in 6631, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6631)
    0.017523682 = product of:
      0.052571043 = sum of:
        0.052571043 = weight(_text_:system in 6631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052571043 = score(doc=6631,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13353272 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.3936941 = fieldWeight in 6631, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6631)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Research at De Montfort Univ., Division of Learning Development, in Leicester, is focused on promoting the idea of the electronic library. Describes the Electronic Library Image Service for Europe (ELISE) project funded by the Commission for the European Communities, its overall aim and lists the 5 main challenges for the project team which include: identifying image bank technical requirements; exploring storage and retrieval mechanisms; exploring client needs and design user interfaces; the production of a pilot system; and devising a model for the international interconnection of systems
  20. Masiero, P.C.: Authoring and searching in dynamically growing hypertext databases (1994) 0.02 
    0.022005416 = product of:
  0.06601625 = sum of:
    0.048492566 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1575) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.048492566 = score(doc=1575,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042397358 = queryNorm
        0.37811437 = fieldWeight in 1575, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1575)
    0.017523682 = product of:
      0.052571043 = sum of:
        0.052571043 = weight(_text_:system in 1575) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052571043 = score(doc=1575,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13353272 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.3936941 = fieldWeight in 1575, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1575)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Shows how an application in office information systems can be modelled so that a dynamically growing database of hypertext documents is created and automatically extended, as well as easily searched. Proposes a method for analyzing office applications which relies on a model based on statecharts to record the flow of documents within the system. A prototype implementation is described of a hypertext system to support the creation, storage and retrieval of documents associated with formal face to face meetings. Special features to be incorporated into hypertext systems aimed at supporting the storage and retrieval of office documents are also identified

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 79
  • d 35
  • f 3
  • a 1
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 98
  • m 10
  • x 6
  • s 3
  • r 2
  • el 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications