Search (43 results, page 2 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Indexierungsstudien"
  1. Soergel, D.: Indexing and retrieval performance : the logical evidence (1997) 0.01 
    0.005714904 = product of:
  0.034289423 = sum of:
    0.034289423 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 578) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.034289423 = score(doc=578,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042397358 = queryNorm
        0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 578, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=578)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
  2. Saarti, J.: Consistency of subject indexing of novels by public library professionals and patrons (2002) 0.01 
    0.005714904 = product of:
  0.034289423 = sum of:
    0.034289423 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4473) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.034289423 = score(doc=4473,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042397358 = queryNorm
        0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 4473, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4473)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    The paper discusses the consistency of fiction indexing of library professionals and patrons based on an empirical test. Indexing was carried out with a Finnish fictional thesaurus and all of the test persons indexed the same five novels. The consistency of indexing was determined to be low; several reasons are postulated. Also an algorithm for typified indexing of fiction is given as well as some suggestions for the development of fiction information retrieval systems and content representation.
  3. Wolfram, D.; Zhang, J.: ¬An investigation of the influence of indexing exhaustivity and term distributions on a document space (2002) 0.01 
    0.0050513092 = product of:
  0.030307854 = sum of:
    0.030307854 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5238) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.030307854 = score(doc=5238,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042397358 = queryNorm
        0.23632148 = fieldWeight in 5238, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5238)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Wolfram and Zhang are interested in the effect of different indexing exhaustivity, by which they mean the number of terms chosen, and of different index term distributions and different term weighting methods on the resulting document cluster organization. The Distance Angle Retrieval Environment, DARE, which provides a two dimensional display of retrieved documents was used to represent the document clusters based upon a document's distance from the searcher's main interest, and on the angle formed by the document, a point representing a minor interest, and the point representing the main interest. If the centroid and the origin of the document space are assigned as major and minor points the average distance between documents and the centroid can be measured providing an indication of cluster organization. in the form of a size normalized similarity measure. Using 500 records from NTIS and nine models created by intersecting low, observed, and high exhaustivity levels (based upon a negative binomial distribution) with shallow, observed, and steep term distributions (based upon a Zipf distribution) simulation runs were preformed using inverse document frequency, inter-document term frequency, and inverse document frequency based upon both inter and intra-document frequencies. Low exhaustivity and shallow distributions result in a more dense document space and less effective retrieval. High exhaustivity and steeper distributions result in a more diffuse space.
  4. Larson, R.R.: Experiments in automatic Library of Congress Classification (1992) 0.00 
    0.0042861784 = product of:
  0.025717068 = sum of:
    0.025717068 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025717068 = score(doc=1054,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042397358 = queryNorm
        0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 1054, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1054)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    This article presents the results of research into the automatic selection of Library of Congress Classification numbers based on the titles and subject headings in MARC records. The method used in this study was based on partial match retrieval techniques using various elements of new recors (i.e., those to be classified) as "queries", and a test database of classification clusters generated from previously classified MARC records. Sixty individual methods for automatic classification were tested on a set of 283 new records, using all combinations of four different partial match methods, five query types, and three representations of search terms. The results indicate that if the best method for a particular case can be determined, then up to 86% of the new records may be correctly classified. The single method with the best accuracy was able to select the correct classification for about 46% of the new records.
  5. Prasher, R.G.: Evaluation of indexing system (1989) 0.00 
    0.004130372 = product of:
  0.02478223 = sum of:
    0.02478223 = product of:
      0.074346684 = sum of:
        0.074346684 = weight(_text_:system in 4998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.074346684 = score(doc=4998,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.13353272 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.5567675 = fieldWeight in 4998, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4998)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Describes information system and its various components-index file construstion, query formulation and searching. Discusses an indexing system, and brings out the need for its evaluation. Explains the concept of the efficiency of indexing systems and discusses factors which control this efficiency. Gives criteria for evaluation. Discusses recall and precision ratios, as also noise ratio, novelty ratio, and exhaustivity and specificity and the impact of each on the efficiency of indexing system. Mention also various steps for evaluation.
  6. Cleverdon, C.W.: ASLIB Cranfield Research Project : Report on the first stage of an investigation into the comparative efficiency of indexing systems (1960) 0.00 
    0.0038295041 = product of:
  0.022977024 = sum of:
    0.022977024 = product of:
      0.06893107 = sum of:
        0.06893107 = weight(_text_:22 in 6158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06893107 = score(doc=6158,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14846832 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6158, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6158)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: College and research libraries 22(1961) no.3, S.228 (G. Jahoda)
  7. Ballard, R.M.: Indexing and its relevance to technical processing (1993) 0.00 
    0.0035718149 = product of:
  0.02143089 = sum of:
    0.02143089 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 554) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02143089 = score(doc=554,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042397358 = queryNorm
        0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 554, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=554)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    The development of regional on-line catalogs and in-house information systems for retrieval of references provide examples of the impact of indexing theory and applications on technical processing. More emphasis must be given to understanding the techniques for evaluating the effectiveness of a file, irrespective of whether that file was created as a library catalog or an index to information sources. The most significant advances in classification theory in recent decades has been as a result of efforts to improve effectiveness of indexing systems. Library classification systems are indexing languages or systems. Courses offered for the preparation of indexers in the United States and the United Kingdom are reviewed. A point of congruence for both the indexer and the library classifier would appear to be the need for a thorough preparation in the techniques of subject analysis. Any subject heading list will suffer from omissions as well as the inclusion of terms which the patron will never use. Indexing theory has provided the technical services department with methods for evaluation of effectiveness. The writer does not believe that these techniques are used, nor do current courses, workshops, and continuing education programs stress them. When theory is totally subjugated to practice, critical thinking and maximum effectiveness will suffer.
  8. Lu, K.; Mao, J.: ¬An automatic approach to weighted subject indexing : an empirical study in the biomedical domain (2015) 0.00 
    0.0035718149 = product of:
  0.02143089 = sum of:
    0.02143089 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4005) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02143089 = score(doc=4005,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042397358 = queryNorm
        0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 4005, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4005)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Subject indexing is an intellectually intensive process that has many inherent uncertainties. Existing manual subject indexing systems generally produce binary outcomes for whether or not to assign an indexing term. This does not sufficiently reflect the extent to which the indexing terms are associated with the documents. On the other hand, the idea of probabilistic or weighted indexing was proposed a long time ago and has seen success in capturing uncertainties in the automatic indexing process. One hurdle to overcome in implementing weighted indexing in manual subject indexing systems is the practical burden that could be added to the already intensive indexing process. This study proposes a method to infer automatically the associations between subject terms and documents through text mining. By uncovering the connections between MeSH descriptors and document text, we are able to derive the weights of MeSH descriptors manually assigned to documents. Our initial results suggest that the inference method is feasible and promising. The study has practical implications for improving subject indexing practice and providing better support for information retrieval.
  9. Moreiro-González, J.-A.; Bolaños-Mejías, C.: Folksonomy indexing from the assignment of free tags to setup subject : a search analysis into the domain of legal history (2018) 0.00 
    0.0035718149 = product of:
  0.02143089 = sum of:
    0.02143089 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02143089 = score(doc=4640,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042397358 = queryNorm
        0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 4640, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4640)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    The behaviour and lexical quality of the folksonomies is examined by comparing two online social networks: Library-Thing (for books) and Flickr (for photos). We presented a case study that combines quantitative and qualitative elements, singularized by the lexical and functional framework. Our query was made by "Legal History" and by the synonyms "Law History" and "History of Law." We then examined the relevance, consistency and precision of the tags attached to the retrieved documents, in addition to their lexical composition. We identified the difficulties caused by free tagging and some of the folksonomy solutions that have been found to solve them. The results are presented in comparative tables, giving special attention to related tags within each retrieved document. Although the number of ambiguous or inconsistent tags is not very large, these do nevertheless represent the most obvious problem to search and retrieval in folksonomies. Relevance is high when the terms are assigned by especially competent taggers. Even with less expert taggers, ambiguity is often successfully corrected by contextualizing the concepts within related tags. A propinquity to associative and taxonomic lexical semantic knowledge is reached via contextual relationships.
  10. Ladewig, C.; Rieger, M.: Ähnlichkeitsmessung mit und ohne aspektische Indexierung (1998) 0.00 
    0.0025761775 = product of:
  0.015457064 = sum of:
    0.015457064 = product of:
      0.04637119 = sum of:
        0.04637119 = weight(_text_:29 in 2526) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04637119 = score(doc=2526,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14914064 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 2526, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2526)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    4. 1.1999 19:31:29
  11. Bade, D.: ¬The creation and persistence of misinformation in shared library catalogs : language and subject knowledge in a technological era (2002) 0.00 
    0.0025645902 = product of:
  0.015387541 = sum of:
    0.015387541 = product of:
      0.02308131 = sum of:
        0.011592798 = weight(_text_:29 in 1858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011592798 = score(doc=1858,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14914064 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.07773064 = fieldWeight in 1858, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1858)
        0.011488513 = weight(_text_:22 in 1858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011488513 = score(doc=1858,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14846832 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.07738023 = fieldWeight in 1858, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1858)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
    Footnote
    Arguing that catalogers need to work both quickly and accurately, Bade maintains that employing specialists is the most efficient and effective way to achieve this outcome. Far less compelling than these arguments are Bade's concluding remarks, in which he offers meager suggestions for correcting the problems as he sees them. Overall, this essay is little more than a curmudgeon's diatribe. Addressed primarily to catalogers and library administrators, the analysis presented is too superficial to assist practicing catalogers or cataloging managers in developing solutions to any systemic problems in current cataloging practice, and it presents too little evidence of pervasive problems to convince budget-conscious library administrators of a need to alter practice or to increase their investment in local cataloging operations. Indeed, the reliance upon anecdotal evidence and the apparent nit-picking that dominate the essay might tend to reinforce a negative image of catalogers in the minds of some. To his credit, Bade does provide an important reminder that it is the intellectual contributions made by thousands of erudite catalogers that have made shared cataloging a successful strategy for improving cataloging efficiency. This is an important point that often seems to be forgotten in academic libraries when focus centers an cutting costs. Had Bade focused more narrowly upon the issue of deintellectualization of cataloging and written a carefully structured essay to advance this argument, this essay might have been much more effective." - KO 29(2002) nos.3/4, S.236-237 (A. Sauperl)
  12. Veenema, F.: To index or not to index (1996) 0.00 
    0.002553003 = product of:
  0.015318017 = sum of:
    0.015318017 = product of:
      0.045954052 = sum of:
        0.045954052 = weight(_text_:22 in 7247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045954052 = score(doc=7247,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14846832 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7247, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7247)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Canadian journal of information and library science. 21(1996) no.2, S.1-22
  13. Booth, A.: How consistent is MEDLINE indexing? (1990) 0.00 
    0.0022338775 = product of:
  0.013403265 = sum of:
    0.013403265 = product of:
      0.040209793 = sum of:
        0.040209793 = weight(_text_:22 in 3510) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040209793 = score(doc=3510,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14846832 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3510, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3510)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Health libraries review. 7(1990) no.1, S.22-26
  14. Neshat, N.; Horri, A.: ¬A study of subject indexing consistency between the National Library of Iran and Humanities Libraries in the area of Iranian studies (2006) 0.00 
    0.0022338775 = product of:
  0.013403265 = sum of:
    0.013403265 = product of:
      0.040209793 = sum of:
        0.040209793 = weight(_text_:22 in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040209793 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14846832 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    4. 1.2007 10:22:26
  15. Iivonen, M.; Kivimäki, K.: Common entities and missing properties : similarities and differences in the indexing of concepts (1998) 0.00 
    0.001932133 = product of:
  0.011592798 = sum of:
    0.011592798 = product of:
      0.034778394 = sum of:
        0.034778394 = weight(_text_:29 in 3074) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034778394 = score(doc=3074,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14914064 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 3074, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3074)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    24. 2.1999 21:29:51
  16. Hudon, M.: Conceptual compatibility in controlled language tools used to index and access the content of moving image collections (2004) 0.00 
    0.001932133 = product of:
  0.011592798 = sum of:
    0.011592798 = product of:
      0.034778394 = sum of:
        0.034778394 = weight(_text_:29 in 2655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034778394 = score(doc=2655,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14914064 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2655, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2655)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    29. 8.2004 16:17:19
  17. Taniguchi, S.: Recording evidence in bibliographic records and descriptive metadata (2005) 0.00 
    0.0019147521 = product of:
  0.011488512 = sum of:
    0.011488512 = product of:
      0.034465536 = sum of:
        0.034465536 = weight(_text_:22 in 3565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034465536 = score(doc=3565,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14846832 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3565, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3565)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    18. 6.2005 13:16:22
  18. Leininger, K.: Interindexer consistency in PsychINFO (2000) 0.00 
    0.0019147521 = product of:
  0.011488512 = sum of:
    0.011488512 = product of:
      0.034465536 = sum of:
        0.034465536 = weight(_text_:22 in 2552) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034465536 = score(doc=2552,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14846832 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2552, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2552)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    9. 2.1997 18:44:22
  19. Ansari, M.: Matching between assigned descriptors and title keywords in medical theses (2005) 0.00 
    0.0016101109 = product of:
  0.009660665 = sum of:
    0.009660665 = product of:
      0.028981995 = sum of:
        0.028981995 = weight(_text_:29 in 4739) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028981995 = score(doc=4739,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14914064 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 4739, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4739)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    3.12.2005 19:38:29
  20. Lee, D.H.; Schleyer, T.: Social tagging is no substitute for controlled indexing : a comparison of Medical Subject Headings and CiteULike tags assigned to 231,388 papers (2012) 0.00 
    0.0016101109 = product of:
  0.009660665 = sum of:
    0.009660665 = product of:
      0.028981995 = sum of:
        0.028981995 = weight(_text_:29 in 383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028981995 = score(doc=383,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14914064 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 383, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=383)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    26. 8.2012 14:29:37

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 40
  • chi 1
  • d 1
  • f 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 41
  • m 1
  • r 1
  • More… Less…

Themes