Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Informationsmittel"
  • × author_ss:"Stock, W.G."
  1. Stock, M.; Stock, W.G.: Intellectual property information : A comparative analysis of main information providers (2006) 0.02 
    0.016504062 = product of:
  0.049512185 = sum of:
    0.036369424 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 210) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.036369424 = score(doc=210,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042397358 = queryNorm
        0.2835858 = fieldWeight in 210, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=210)
    0.01314276 = product of:
      0.03942828 = sum of:
        0.03942828 = weight(_text_:system in 210) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03942828 = score(doc=210,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13353272 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.29527056 = fieldWeight in 210, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=210)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    After modeling expert user needs with regard to intellectual property information, we analyze and compare the main providers in this specific information area (Thomson DIALOG, Esp@cenet by the European Patent Office, Questel-Orbit, and STN International) in terms of system content and system functionality. The key question is whether the main providers are able to satisfy these expert user needs. For patent information, some special retrieval features such as chemical structure search (including Markush search), patent family references and citations search, biosequence search, and basic informetric functionality such as ranking, mapping, and visualization of information flows are realized. Considering the results of information science research, the practice of patent information shows unexhausted improvement opportunities (e.g., the application of bibliographic patent coupling and co-patent-citation for mapping patents, patent assignees, and technology specialties). For trademark search, users need multiple truncated search (realized) as well as phonetic search and image retrieval (not realized yet).
  2. Stock, M.; Stock, W.G.: Online-Hosts für Wissenschaft, Technik und Medizin auf dem deutschen Informationsmarkt : Eine komparative Analyse (2005) 0.01 
    0.009407356 = product of:
  0.05644414 = sum of:
    0.05644414 = weight(_text_:web in 3335) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05644414 = score(doc=3335,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.13836423 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042397358 = queryNorm
        0.4079388 = fieldWeight in 3335, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3335)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Wir vergleichen die Content-Aggregatoren DataStar, DIALOG, DIMDI, FIZ Karlsruhe (STN International), FIZ Technik, Ovid, Questel-Orbit and Thomson Scientific's Web of Knowledge hinsichtlich ihrer Stellung auf dem Markt elektronischer Informationsdienste in Deutschland. Besprochen werden die Wettbewerbssituation sowie die Kooperationen, die Stärken bzw. Alleinstellungsmerkmale der Informationsanbieter und die kritischen Erfolgsfaktoren der WTMHosts. Marktführer ist in Deutschland eindeutig STN.
    Object
    Thomson Scientific's Web of Knowledge
  3. Stock, W.G.: Endnutzersystem für internationale Geschäftsinformationen (1998) 0.00 
    0.004467755 = product of:
  0.02680653 = sum of:
    0.02680653 = product of:
      0.080419585 = sum of:
        0.080419585 = weight(_text_:22 in 2407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.080419585 = score(doc=2407,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14846832 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2407, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2407)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Password. 1998, H.10, S.22-28
  4. Schumann, L.; Stock, W.G.: ¬Ein umfassendes ganzheitliches Modell für Evaluation und Akzeptanzanalysen von Informationsdiensten : Das Information Service Evaluation (ISE) Modell (2014) 0.00 
    0.0022338775 = product of:
  0.013403265 = sum of:
    0.013403265 = product of:
      0.040209793 = sum of:
        0.040209793 = weight(_text_:22 in 1492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040209793 = score(doc=1492,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14846832 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1492, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1492)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    22. 9.2014 18:56:46

Authors

Years

Languages