Search (98 results, page 1 of 5)

  • × theme_ss:"Register"
  1. Broccoli, K.; Ravenswaay, G.V.: Web indexing : anchors away! (2000) 0.05
    0.049945276 = product of:
      0.14983582 = sum of:
        0.055176124 = weight(_text_:wide in 219) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055176124 = score(doc=219,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18785246 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.29372054 = fieldWeight in 219, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=219)
        0.09465969 = weight(_text_:web in 219) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09465969 = score(doc=219,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.13836423 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.6841342 = fieldWeight in 219, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=219)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    In this chapter we turn to embedded indexing for the Internet, frequently called Web indexing. We will define Web indexes; describe the structure of entries for Web indexes; present some of the challenges that Web indexers face; and compare Web indexes to search engines. One of the difficulties in defining Web indexes is their relative newness. The first pages were placed on the World Wide Web in 1991 when Tim Berners Lee, its founder, uploaded four files. We are in a period of transition, moving from using well-established forms of writing and communications to others that are still in their infancy. Paramount among these is the Web. For indexers, this is an uncharted voyage where we must jettison firmly established ideas while developing new ones. Where the voyage will end is anyone's guess.
    Issue
    Beyond book indexing: how to get started in Web indexing, embedded indexing and other computer-based media. Ed. by D. Brenner u. M. Rowland.
  2. Connolly, D.A.: ¬The many uses of Email discussion lists (2000) 0.04
    0.04283307 = product of:
      0.12849921 = sum of:
        0.055176124 = weight(_text_:wide in 216) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055176124 = score(doc=216,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18785246 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.29372054 = fieldWeight in 216, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=216)
        0.073323086 = weight(_text_:web in 216) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.073323086 = score(doc=216,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.13836423 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.5299281 = fieldWeight in 216, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=216)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    If you want to let other indexers know about a great new medical dictionary, discuss the pros and cons of using prepositions in subentries, find an indexer in Phoenix, or maybe share some marketing tips, then consider joining an email discussion list. Email discussion lists provide numerous tools and opportunities for indexers, especially for freelancers. Despite the rapid growth of Web- and graphical-based communication, email remains the linchpin of electronic communication. While the World Wide Web has become ubiquitous in our society, email remains the most reliable form of electronic communication. Email access is more prevalent than Web access, less cumbersome, and some would say, more egalitarian. Despite improvements over time, Web access is not available in equal quality or proportion to email access, especially in poorer or developing areas. Indeed, many users who have access to both restrict their use of the Web for important research efforts, and maintain nearconstant connection with their email servers for daily business
    Issue
    Beyond book indexing: how to get started in Web indexing, embedded indexing and other computer-based media. Ed. by D. Brenner u. M. Rowland.
  3. Holbert, S.: How to index Windows-based online help (2000) 0.03
    0.032472212 = product of:
      0.064944424 = sum of:
        0.029934023 = weight(_text_:web in 224) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029934023 = score(doc=224,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13836423 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 224, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=224)
        0.025717068 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 224) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025717068 = score(doc=224,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 224, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=224)
        0.0092933355 = product of:
          0.027880006 = sum of:
            0.027880006 = weight(_text_:system in 224) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027880006 = score(doc=224,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13353272 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042397358 = queryNorm
                0.20878783 = fieldWeight in 224, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=224)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Abstract
    Today, more and more software packages come with online documentation. Some have complete manuals as well. Others have basic documentation on paper and more advanced information online. I recently purchased a computer that came with 20 software programs and not one page of written documentation. More and more, users have to find information by searching online. Most documentation teams focus on writing and ignore the problems of information retrieval, making information in printed documents difficult to find, and online information impossible to find. With online Help, you cannot browse the documentation. You cannot even browse more than a couple of inches of the index at a time. If online users do not get superb guidance into the jungle of online Help, they go away like the hero of Joseph Conrad's Heart of Darkness, saying "Oh, the horror! The horror!" How does an online Help index work? The following examples are based on the Windows 95 Help-type system, but do not represent actual Help screens
    Issue
    Beyond book indexing: how to get started in Web indexing, embedded indexing and other computer-based media. Ed. by D. Brenner u. M. Rowland.
  4. Gratch, B.; Settel, B.; Atherton, P.: Characteristics of book indexes for subject retrieval in the humanities and social sciences (1978) 0.03
    0.028937673 = product of:
      0.08681302 = sum of:
        0.06000649 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06000649 = score(doc=1061,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 1061, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1061)
        0.02680653 = product of:
          0.080419585 = sum of:
            0.080419585 = weight(_text_:22 in 1061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.080419585 = score(doc=1061,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14846832 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042397358 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1061, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1061)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 11(1978), S.14-22
  5. Moncrief, L.: Indexing computer-related documents (2000) 0.03
    0.028370049 = product of:
      0.08511014 = sum of:
        0.055176124 = weight(_text_:wide in 214) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055176124 = score(doc=214,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18785246 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.29372054 = fieldWeight in 214, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=214)
        0.029934023 = weight(_text_:web in 214) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029934023 = score(doc=214,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13836423 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 214, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=214)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    The explosion in personal computing and in computer technology has brought a wealth of opportunities for indexers. Annually, traditional publishers produce numerous books on computer topics, while software and hardware companies constantly issue new products with manuals that require indexes. Indexers can find work with these high-technology publishers or can subcontract with technical documentation firms or with freelance technical writers. The range of audiences for computer-related documents is wide and varied, as is the range of topics. These documents are not limited to end-user software manuals, but include programming, Internet, and networking topics among others. Hardware companies, in addition to computer manufacturers, are also a good potential source of clients. Many hardware products have a sizeable software component that requires its own set of indexed manuals. There are advantages and disadvantages to working with high-technology companies (and their contractors) vs. working with traditional publishers. It is simply a matter of personal taste which type of client you prefer. I have truly enjoyed working with both.
    Issue
    Beyond book indexing: how to get started in Web indexing, embedded indexing and other computer-based media. Ed. by D. Brenner u. M. Rowland.
  6. Hert, C.A.; Jacob, E.K.; Dawson, P.: ¬A usability assessment of online indexing structures in the networked environment (2000) 0.03
    0.027511153 = product of:
      0.08253346 = sum of:
        0.06110257 = weight(_text_:web in 5158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06110257 = score(doc=5158,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.13836423 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.4416067 = fieldWeight in 5158, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5158)
        0.02143089 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02143089 = score(doc=5158,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 5158, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5158)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Usability of Web sites has become an increasingly important area of research as Web sites proliferate and problems with use are noted. Generally, aspects of Web sites that have been investigated focus on such areas as overall design and navigation. The exploratory study reported on here investigates one specific component of a Web site-the index structure. By employing index usability metrics developed by Liddy and Jörgensen (1993; Jörgensen & Liddy, 1996) and modified to accommodate a hypertext environment, the study compared the effectiveness and efficiency of 20 subjects who used one existing index (the A-Z index on the FedStats Web site at http://www.fedstats.gov) and three experimental variants to complete five researcher-generated tasks. User satisfaction with the indexes was also evaluated. The findings indicate that a hypertext index with multiple access points for each concept, all linked to the same resource, led to greater effectiveness and efficiency of retrieval on almost all measures. Satisfaction measures were more variable. The study offers insight into potential improvements in the design of Web-based indexes and provides preliminary assessment of the validity of the measures employed
  7. Bennion, B.C.: Performance testing of a book and its index as an information retrieval system (1980) 0.03
    0.027230313 = product of:
      0.08169094 = sum of:
        0.06000649 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 7763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06000649 = score(doc=7763,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 7763, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7763)
        0.02168445 = product of:
          0.065053344 = sum of:
            0.065053344 = weight(_text_:system in 7763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.065053344 = score(doc=7763,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13353272 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042397358 = queryNorm
                0.4871716 = fieldWeight in 7763, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7763)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
  8. Software for Indexing (2003) 0.03
    0.025034612 = product of:
      0.050069224 = sum of:
        0.022990054 = weight(_text_:wide in 2294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022990054 = score(doc=2294,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18785246 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.122383565 = fieldWeight in 2294, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2294)
        0.021603022 = weight(_text_:web in 2294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021603022 = score(doc=2294,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.13836423 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.15613155 = fieldWeight in 2294, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2294)
        0.0054761507 = product of:
          0.016428452 = sum of:
            0.016428452 = weight(_text_:system in 2294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.016428452 = score(doc=2294,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.13353272 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042397358 = queryNorm
                0.12302941 = fieldWeight in 2294, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2294)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Knowledge organization 30(2003) no.2, S.115-116 (C. Jacobs): "This collection of articles by indexing practitioners, software designers and vendors is divided into five sections: Dedicated Software, Embedded Software, Online and Web Indexing Software, Database and Image Software, and Voice-activated, Automatic, and Machine-aided Software. This diversity is its strength. Part 1 is introduced by two chapters an choosing dedicated software, highlighting the issues involved and providing tips an evaluating requirements. The second chapter includes a fourteen page chart that analyzes the attributes of Authex Plus, three versions of CINDEX 1.5, MACREX 7, two versions of SKY Index (5.1 and 6.0) and wINDEX. The lasting value in this chart is its utility in making the prospective user aware of the various attributes/capabilities that are possible and that should be considered. The following chapters consist of 16 testimonials for these software packages, completed by a final chapter an specialized/customized software. The point is made that if a particular software function could increase your efficiency, it can probably be created. The chapters in Part 2, Embedded Software, go into a great deal more detail about how the programs work, and are less reviews than illustrations of functionality. Perhaps this is because they are not really stand-alones, but are functions within, or add-ons used with larger word processing or publishing programs. The software considered are Microsoft Word, FrameMaker, PageMaker, IndexTension 3.1.5 that is used with QuarkXPress, and Index Tools Professional and IXgen that are used with FrameMaker. The advantages and disadvantages of embedded indexing are made very clear, but the actual illustrations are difficult to follow if one has not worked at all with embedded software. Nonetheless, the section is valuable as it highlights issues and provides pointers an solutions to embedded indexing problems.
    Part 3, Online and Web Indexing Software, opens with a chapter in which the functionalities of HTML/Prep, HTML Indexer, and RoboHELP HTML Edition are compared. The following three chapters look at them individually. This section helps clarify the basic types of non-database web indexing - that used for back-of-the-book style indexes, and that used for online help indexes. The first chapter of Part 4, Database and image software, begins with a good discussion of what database indexing is, but falls to carry through with any listing of general characteristics, problems and attributes that should be considered when choosing database indexing software. It does include the results of an informal survey an the Yahoogroups database indexing site, as well as three short Gase studies an database indexing projects. The survey provides interesting information about freelancing, but it is not very useful if you are trying to gather information about different software. For example, the most common type of software used by those surveyed turns out to be word-processing software. This seems an odd/awkward choice, and it would have been helpful to know how and why the non-specialized software is being used. The survey serves as a snapshot of a particular segment of database indexing practice, but is not helpful if you are thinking about purchasing, adapting, or commissioning software. The three case studies give an idea of the complexity of database indexing and there is a helpful bibliography.
    A chapter an image indexing starts with a useful discussion of the elements of bibliographic description needed for visual materials and of the variations in the functioning and naming of functions in different software packaltes. Sample features are discussed in light of four different software systems: MAVIS, Convera Screening Room, CONTENTdm, and Virage speech and pattern recognition programs. The chapter concludes with an overview of what one has to consider when choosing a system. The last chapter in this section is an oddball one an creating a back-ofthe-book index using Microsoft Excel. The author warns: "It is not pretty, and it is not recommended" (p.209). A curiosity, but it should have been included as a counterpoint in the first part, not as part of the database indexing section. The final section begins with an excellent article an voice recognition software (Dragon Naturally Speaking Preferred), followed by a look at "automatic indexing" through a critique of Sonar Bookends Automatic Indexing Generator. The final two chapters deal with Data Harmony's Machine Aided Indexer; one of them refers specifically to a news content indexing system. In terms of scope, this reviewer would have liked to see thesaurus management software included since thesaurus management and the integration of thesauri with database indexing software are common and time-consuming concerns. There are also a few editorial glitches, such as the placement of the oddball article and inconsistent uses of fonts and caps (eg: VIRAGE and Virage), but achieving consistency with this many authors is, indeed, a difficult task. More serious is the fact that the index is inconsistent. It reads as if authors submitted their own keywords which were then harmonized, so that the level of indexing varies by chapter. For example, there is an entry for "controlled vocabulary" (p.265) (singular) with one locator, no cross-references. There is an entry for "thesaurus software" (p.274) with two locators, plus a separate one for "Thesaurus Master" (p.274) with three locators. There are also references to thesauri/ controlled vocabularies/taxonomies that are not mentioned in the index (e.g., the section Thesaurus management an p.204). This is sad. All too often indexing texts have poor indexes, I suppose because we are as prone to having to work under time pressures as the rest of the authors and editors in the world. But a good index that meets basic criteria should be a highlight in any book related to indexing. Overall this is a useful, if uneven, collection of articles written over the past few years. Because of the great variation between articles both in subject and in approach, there is something for everyone. The collection will be interesting to anyone who wants to be aware of how indexing software works and what it can do. I also definitely recommend it for information science teaching collections since the explanations of the software carry implicit in them descriptions of how the indexing process itself is approached. However, the book's utility as a guide to purchasing choices is limited because of the unevenness; the vendor-written articles and testimonials are interesting and can certainly be helpful, but there are not nearly enough objective reviews. This is not a straight listing and comparison of software packaltes, but it deserves wide circulation since it presents an overall picture of the state of indexing software used by freelancers."
  9. Wool, G.: Filing and precoordination : how subject headings are displayed in online catalogs and why it matters (2000) 0.02
    0.022496447 = product of:
      0.06748934 = sum of:
        0.025717068 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025717068 = score(doc=5612,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 5612, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5612)
        0.04177227 = product of:
          0.0626584 = sum of:
            0.027880006 = weight(_text_:system in 5612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027880006 = score(doc=5612,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13353272 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042397358 = queryNorm
                0.20878783 = fieldWeight in 5612, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5612)
            0.034778394 = weight(_text_:29 in 5612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034778394 = score(doc=5612,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14914064 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042397358 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 5612, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5612)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Series
    Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.29, nos.1/2
    Source
    The LCSH century: one hundred years with the Library of Congress Subject Headings system. Ed.: A.T. Stone
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  10. Clarke, M.: Retrieving information from scientific periodicals (1996) 0.02
    0.020727703 = product of:
      0.06218311 = sum of:
        0.04286178 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 7185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04286178 = score(doc=7185,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 7185, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7185)
        0.01932133 = product of:
          0.05796399 = sum of:
            0.05796399 = weight(_text_:29 in 7185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05796399 = score(doc=7185,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14914064 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042397358 = queryNorm
                0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 7185, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7185)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Considers the indexing of scientific and medical periodicals, covering the need for indexes, the effect on information retrieval of the electronic revolution, types of journals and entries, the process of indexing, cumulation and publisher-indexer relations
    Date
    25. 2.1997 10:29:16
  11. Craven, T.C.: Adapting of string indexing systems for retrieval using proximity operators (1988) 0.02
    0.02029456 = product of:
      0.06088368 = sum of:
        0.048492566 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 705) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048492566 = score(doc=705,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.37811437 = fieldWeight in 705, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=705)
        0.012391115 = product of:
          0.037173342 = sum of:
            0.037173342 = weight(_text_:system in 705) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037173342 = score(doc=705,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13353272 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042397358 = queryNorm
                0.27838376 = fieldWeight in 705, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=705)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    This article explores the idea of using a conventional string indexing source description, together with a special phrase generator, to generate multiple descriptor phrases for inclusion in a database record for online retrieval. For use with proximity operators, these multiple descriptor phrases should attempt to meet such objectives as bringing together groups of syntactically related words. Software for generating multiple descriptor phrases from source descriptions in a specific existing string indexing system is briefly described
  12. Weinberg, B.H.: Book indexes in France : medieval specimens and modern practices (2000) 0.02
    0.01795213 = product of:
      0.107712775 = sum of:
        0.107712775 = product of:
          0.16156916 = sum of:
            0.08114958 = weight(_text_:29 in 486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08114958 = score(doc=486,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14914064 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042397358 = queryNorm
                0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 486, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=486)
            0.080419585 = weight(_text_:22 in 486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.080419585 = score(doc=486,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14846832 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042397358 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 486, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=486)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    20. 4.2002 19:29:54
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.2-13
  13. Mauer, P.: Embedded indexing : pros and cons for the indexer (2000) 0.02
    0.01795213 = product of:
      0.107712775 = sum of:
        0.107712775 = product of:
          0.16156916 = sum of:
            0.08114958 = weight(_text_:29 in 488) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08114958 = score(doc=488,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14914064 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042397358 = queryNorm
                0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 488, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=488)
            0.080419585 = weight(_text_:22 in 488) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.080419585 = score(doc=488,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14846832 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042397358 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 488, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=488)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    21. 4.2002 9:29:38
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.27-28
  14. Walker, D.: Web indexing prize 1997 (1998) 0.02
    0.017282419 = product of:
      0.103694506 = sum of:
        0.103694506 = weight(_text_:web in 3765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.103694506 = score(doc=3765,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.13836423 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.7494315 = fieldWeight in 3765, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3765)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Briefly describes the 20 entries to the 1997 AusSI web indexing prize, with a discussion of trends in web and online indexing
  15. Mulvany, N.C.: Back-of-the-book indexing (2009) 0.02
    0.017271034 = product of:
      0.051813103 = sum of:
        0.034289423 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034289423 = score(doc=3749,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 3749, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3749)
        0.017523682 = product of:
          0.052571043 = sum of:
            0.052571043 = weight(_text_:system in 3749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.052571043 = score(doc=3749,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.13353272 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042397358 = queryNorm
                0.3936941 = fieldWeight in 3749, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3749)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    The book index occupies a special niche in the information retrieval world. Each index is a unique, authored work. Each book is a closed system. The text presented in a book does not change; the material is stable and fixed. Book indexers provide readers with a nonlinear way to access information in a text. Even though closed-system indexing predates the development of the printing press, a book index can be thought of as hypertext.
  16. Maislin, S.: Ripping out the pages (2000) 0.02
    0.016983498 = product of:
      0.05095049 = sum of:
        0.043206044 = weight(_text_:web in 220) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043206044 = score(doc=220,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.13836423 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.3122631 = fieldWeight in 220, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=220)
        0.007744446 = product of:
          0.023233337 = sum of:
            0.023233337 = weight(_text_:system in 220) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023233337 = score(doc=220,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13353272 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042397358 = queryNorm
                0.17398985 = fieldWeight in 220, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=220)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    When the Web was invented, it was touted as a novel nonlinear medium for the written word. No longer would we be constrained by linear presentations! Hyperlinks would allow us to jump haphazardly from page to page, chapter to chapter, idea to idea! Texts would no longer need to run from beginning to end! This is misleading. A printed book is also multidimensional and potentially nonlinear. We can open it to any page, from any other page, for any reason. We can open several books at once. In fact, what makes a book special is its combination of linear structure (the order of the words) and nonlinear physicality (the bound papers). This linear/nonlinear duality is enhanced further by the index, which maps linearly sequenced pages in a nonlinear, informationally ordered structure (architecture). In truth, the online environment is crippled by an absence of linear structure. Imagine selecting a hard cover book, tearing off the covers, ripping pages into small pieces, and throwing them in a box. That box is like a computer file system, and the paper scraps are Web documents. Only one scrap can be retrieved from the box at a time, and it must be replaced before another can be accessed. Page numbers are meaningless. Global context is destroyed. And without page numbers or context, what happens to the index?
    Issue
    Beyond book indexing: how to get started in Web indexing, embedded indexing and other computer-based media. Ed. by D. Brenner u. M. Rowland.
  17. BIOSIS introduces new relational indexing scheme and additional information in 1998 (1998) 0.02
    0.01556018 = product of:
      0.04668054 = sum of:
        0.034289423 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2595) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034289423 = score(doc=2595,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 2595, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2595)
        0.012391115 = product of:
          0.037173342 = sum of:
            0.037173342 = weight(_text_:system in 2595) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037173342 = score(doc=2595,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13353272 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042397358 = queryNorm
                0.27838376 = fieldWeight in 2595, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2595)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    In 1998 BIOSIS will introduce a new relational indexing system to provide more specific natural language retrieval for its electronic products. Printed publications will have a redesigned subject index to replace the KWIC index and an organism index, replacing the current generic and biosystematic indexes, will allow hierarchical access to kingdom, family and common genus species names
  18. Rowland, M.J.: Plunging in : creating a Web site index for an online newsletter (2000) 0.01
    0.014990091 = product of:
      0.08994055 = sum of:
        0.08994055 = weight(_text_:web in 221) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08994055 = score(doc=221,freq=26.0), product of:
            0.13836423 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.65002745 = fieldWeight in 221, product of:
              5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
                26.0 = termFreq=26.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=221)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Creating an online index for a Web site is not a job for the timid. Those contemplating this form of Web indexing should already be accomplished indexers and should have strong experience in Web page creation. Knowledge of HTML is essential. In fact, depending on the nature of a Web indexing job, you may find that it requires more HTML knowledge than indexing skill. Like embedded indexing, Web site indexing is far more work than traditional indexing: the choice of terms is constrained, and the indexing process itself is slower and more challenging. Entries must be carefully chosen because the editing process can be tedious and time-consuming, sometimes more time-consuming than making the original entries. Hypertext links and anchors must be added, and the index itself must be tested to make sure that links work as intended. Adequate compensation for your project is imperative. Web indexing does have its rewards, though, especially for indexers who are intrigued by the Web and Web page design, for those who like a challenge, and, of course, for those who like to have their work online for all the world to see. This article provides a look at the process of creating a Web index for an online newsletter. It is also applicable to other forms of Web site indexing, and should give the beginning Web site indexer an idea of what to expect on that first job
    Issue
    Beyond book indexing: how to get started in Web indexing, embedded indexing and other computer-based media. Ed. by D. Brenner u. M. Rowland.
  19. Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Evolution towards ISO 25964 : an international standard with guidelines for thesauri and other types of controlled vocabulary (2007) 0.01
    0.014468837 = product of:
      0.04340651 = sum of:
        0.030003246 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030003246 = score(doc=749,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 749, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=749)
        0.013403265 = product of:
          0.040209793 = sum of:
            0.040209793 = weight(_text_:22 in 749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040209793 = score(doc=749,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14846832 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042397358 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 749, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=749)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Die geschichtliche Entwicklung von ISO 2788: Documentation - Guidelines for the establishment and development of monolingual thesauri und ISO 5964: Documentation - Guidelines for the establishment and development of multilingual thesauri wird kurz beschrieben. 2001 begann die Arbeit an der Entwicklung von BS 8723: Structured Vocabularies for Information Retrieval - Guide, einer fünfteiligen Norm, die konzipiert wurde, um die internationalen Normen zu aktualisieren, insbesondere mit Hinblick auf Interoperabilität. Der Verfahrensablauf zur Übernahme von BS 8723 als internationale Norm hat begonnen.
    Date
    8.12.2007 19:25:22
  20. Walker, D.: Subject-oriented Web indexing (2000) 0.01
    0.014111035 = product of:
      0.08466621 = sum of:
        0.08466621 = weight(_text_:web in 218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08466621 = score(doc=218,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.13836423 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.6119082 = fieldWeight in 218, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=218)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    My goal in this short article is to bring you up to speed on Web indexing. I assume you are a person with good word skills and an inquisitive mind. Also, I assume you have good keyboard skills, access to the Internet, and have already created some HTML pages using, say, Netscape Composer. You may need help from your Internet Service Provider (ISP) to upload pages onto your Web site. This article is based on my experience teaching an online interactive course in Web indexing for my company, WWWalker Web Development, in 1998. We develop Web sites, support Linux and Windows NT, write technical articles, and specialize in Web indexing.
    Issue
    Beyond book indexing: how to get started in Web indexing, embedded indexing and other computer-based media. Ed. by D. Brenner u. M. Rowland.

Languages

  • e 94
  • d 3
  • f 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 81
  • m 15
  • s 2
  • n 1
  • r 1
  • More… Less…