Search (69 results, page 1 of 4)

  • × theme_ss:"Volltextretrieval"
  1. White, F.: ISYS 3.01 : a review (1993) 0.06
    0.060124356 = product of:
      0.12024871 = sum of:
        0.07356817 = weight(_text_:wide in 2052) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07356817 = score(doc=2052,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18785246 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.3916274 = fieldWeight in 2052, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2052)
        0.034289423 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2052) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034289423 = score(doc=2052,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 2052, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2052)
        0.012391115 = product of:
          0.037173342 = sum of:
            0.037173342 = weight(_text_:system in 2052) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037173342 = score(doc=2052,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13353272 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042397358 = queryNorm
                0.27838376 = fieldWeight in 2052, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2052)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Abstract
    Reviews ISYS, a full text retrieval system from Odyssey developments. ISYS supports a wide variety of wordprocessor, text and spreadsheet formats. A programming interface is included for developers to integrate ISYS into their own applications. Describes how to use ISYS to create a database index for a set of documents and then query that index to locate, retrieve and display information from the indexed documents. Discusses configuration options, precedence of operators, displaying and manipulating search results, the advanced menu, ease of learning and use, documentation and library applications
  2. Salton, G.: Another look at automatic text-retrieval systems (1986) 0.06
    0.055154096 = product of:
      0.16546229 = sum of:
        0.09584185 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09584185 = score(doc=1356,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.74731416 = fieldWeight in 1356, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1356)
        0.069620445 = product of:
          0.10443066 = sum of:
            0.046466675 = weight(_text_:system in 1356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046466675 = score(doc=1356,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13353272 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042397358 = queryNorm
                0.3479797 = fieldWeight in 1356, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1356)
            0.05796399 = weight(_text_:29 in 1356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05796399 = score(doc=1356,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14914064 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042397358 = queryNorm
                0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 1356, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1356)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Footnote
    Bezugnahme auf: Blair, D.C.: An evaluation of retrieval effectiveness for a full-text document-retrieval system. Comm. ACM 28(1985) S.280-299. - Vgl. auch: Blair, D.C.: Full text retrieval ... Int. Class. 13(1986) S.18-23; Blair, D.C., M.E. Maron: full-text information retrieval ... Inf. Proc. Man. 26(1990) S.437-447.
    Source
    Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery. 29(1986), S.648-656
  3. Blair, D.C.; Maron, M.E.: ¬An evaluation of retrieval effectiveness for a full-text document-retrieval system (1985) 0.05
    0.051781338 = product of:
      0.15534401 = sum of:
        0.08572356 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1345) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08572356 = score(doc=1345,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.6684181 = fieldWeight in 1345, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1345)
        0.069620445 = product of:
          0.10443066 = sum of:
            0.046466675 = weight(_text_:system in 1345) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046466675 = score(doc=1345,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13353272 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042397358 = queryNorm
                0.3479797 = fieldWeight in 1345, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1345)
            0.05796399 = weight(_text_:29 in 1345) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05796399 = score(doc=1345,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14914064 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042397358 = queryNorm
                0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 1345, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1345)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl. auch : Salton, G.: Another look ... Comm. ACM 29(1986) S.S.648-656; Blair, D.C.: Full text retrieval ... Int. Class. 13(1986) S.18-23: Blair, D.C., M.E. Maron: Full-text information retrieval ... Inf. proc. man. 26(1990) S.437-447.
  4. Albus, W.; Smulders, H.: Doeltreffend zoeken in volledige teksten : 1. full-text retrieval bij de HavenInformatieBank (1998) 0.05
    0.045439474 = product of:
      0.09087895 = sum of:
        0.03492303 = weight(_text_:web in 1682) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03492303 = score(doc=1682,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13836423 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 1682, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1682)
        0.042430993 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1682) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042430993 = score(doc=1682,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 1682, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1682)
        0.01352493 = product of:
          0.04057479 = sum of:
            0.04057479 = weight(_text_:29 in 1682) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04057479 = score(doc=1682,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14914064 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042397358 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 1682, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1682)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Abstract
    At Rotterdam Ports Authority in the Netherlands the Habour information database includes a press cuttings service and various online databases. To enable research staff to have direct access to information the POINT (Point Information Net) was begun in 1993. Using Verity software POINT provides simultaneously full text searching on a range of databases. The software uses current Web indexing technqiues to overcome the problems of excessive recall and low precision. A key element is the system's ability to recognise word combinations
    Date
    29. 7.1998 19:54:49
    Footnote
    Übers. d. Titels: Effective searching on full texts: 1. full-text-retrieval on the Harbour information database
  5. Dubois, C.P.R.: Free text vs. controlled vocabulary; a reassessment (1987) 0.04
    0.044319734 = product of:
      0.1329592 = sum of:
        0.07356817 = weight(_text_:wide in 2048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07356817 = score(doc=2048,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18785246 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.3916274 = fieldWeight in 2048, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2048)
        0.059391025 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059391025 = score(doc=2048,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.46309367 = fieldWeight in 2048, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2048)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Free text and controlled vocabulary searching can no longer be viewed as antagonistic techniques in information retrieval since they both display advantages and weaknesses dependent on a fairly wide range of context, with the option to use both increasingly favoured. An attempt is made to present a list of features associated with the two techniques and to suggest a methodology to assist in deciding on the optimal retrieval technique for a particular purpose. The relevance of the techniques in expert systems and full text contexts is also discussed. Finally, recommendations for further research are suggested, concentrating on survey techniques in real-life retrieval situations
  6. Laegreid, J.A.: SIFT: a Norwegian information retrieval system (1993) 0.04
    0.044317048 = product of:
      0.13295114 = sum of:
        0.059391025 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 7701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059391025 = score(doc=7701,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.46309367 = fieldWeight in 7701, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7701)
        0.07356011 = product of:
          0.11034016 = sum of:
            0.064386114 = weight(_text_:system in 7701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.064386114 = score(doc=7701,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.13353272 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042397358 = queryNorm
                0.48217484 = fieldWeight in 7701, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7701)
            0.045954052 = weight(_text_:22 in 7701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.045954052 = score(doc=7701,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14846832 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042397358 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7701, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7701)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Describes SIFT (Search in Free Text) an information retrieval system originally developed for administering governmental documents in Norway but which is now being applied alsewhere. SIFT handles structured information well. A library system, SIFT-BIBL, is now available. SIFT's retrieval engine and search facilities are powerful. Its user interface is limited but being imporved. An application programmer interface has been released which will allow programmers to develop their own interface. A Windows-based- client-server version is now being beta tested
    Date
    23. 1.1999 19:22:09
  7. Blair, D.C.: Full text retrieval : Evaluation and implications (1986) 0.04
    0.035658743 = product of:
      0.106976226 = sum of:
        0.057505112 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.057505112 = score(doc=2047,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.44838852 = fieldWeight in 2047, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2047)
        0.049471118 = product of:
          0.07420667 = sum of:
            0.03942828 = weight(_text_:system in 2047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03942828 = score(doc=2047,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.13353272 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042397358 = queryNorm
                0.29527056 = fieldWeight in 2047, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2047)
            0.034778394 = weight(_text_:29 in 2047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034778394 = score(doc=2047,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14914064 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042397358 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2047, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2047)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Recently, a detailed evaluation of a large, operational full-text document retrieval system was reported in the literature. Values of precision and recall were estimated usind traditional statistical sampling methods and blind evaluation procedures. The results of this evaluation demonstrated that the system tested was retrieving less then 20% of the relevant documents when the searchers believed it was retrieving over 75% of the relevant documents. This evaluation is described including some data not reported in the original article. Also discussed are the implications which this study has for how the subjects of documents should be represented, as well as the importance of rigorous retrieval evaluations for the furtherhance of information retrieval research
    Footnote
    Vgl.: Blair, D.C., M.E. Maron: An evaluation ... Comm. ACM 28(1985) S.280-299; Salton, G.: Another look ... Comm. ACM 29(1986) S.648-656; Blair, D.C., M.E. Maron: Full-text information retrieval ... Inf. Proc. Man. 26(1990) S.437-447.
  8. Wenzel, F.: Semantische Eingrenzung im Freitext-Retrieval auf der Basis morphologischer Segmentierungen (1980) 0.03
    0.031186705 = product of:
      0.093560115 = sum of:
        0.074238785 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2037) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.074238785 = score(doc=2037,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.5788671 = fieldWeight in 2037, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2037)
        0.01932133 = product of:
          0.05796399 = sum of:
            0.05796399 = weight(_text_:29 in 2037) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05796399 = score(doc=2037,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14914064 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042397358 = queryNorm
                0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 2037, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2037)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    The basic problem in freetext retrieval is that the retrieval language is not properly adapted to that of the author. Morphological segmentation, where words with the same root are grouped together in the inverted file, is a good eliminator of noise and information loss, providing high recall but low precision
    Source
    Nachrichten für Dokumentation. 31(1980) H.1, S.29-35
  9. Casale, M.: Full text retrieval for the Web (1996) 0.03
    0.030606538 = product of:
      0.091819614 = sum of:
        0.04938862 = weight(_text_:web in 6757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04938862 = score(doc=6757,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13836423 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.35694647 = fieldWeight in 6757, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6757)
        0.042430993 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042430993 = score(doc=6757,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 6757, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6757)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Reviews developments and improvements in techniques for searching the WWW that have been made access to full text databases a practical proposition (full text retrieval (FTR)). Reports results of interviews with 8 full text database vendors offering FTR via the WWW: Dataware (http://www.dataware.com); Excalibur (http://www.excalib.com); Fulcrum (http://www.fulcrum.com); Muscat (http://www.muscat.co.uk); Open Text (http://www.opentext.com); Personal Library Software (PLS) (http://www.pls.com); Verity (http://www.verity.com); and ZyLab (ZyIndex and ZyImage) (http://www.zylab.com). Compares the prices of the systems and lists the questions that publishers should ask before making a choice of systems for handling FTR on the Web
  10. Mallinson, P.: Developments in free text retrieval systems (1993) 0.03
    0.029909227 = product of:
      0.08972768 = sum of:
        0.074238785 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4931) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.074238785 = score(doc=4931,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.5788671 = fieldWeight in 4931, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4931)
        0.015488892 = product of:
          0.046466675 = sum of:
            0.046466675 = weight(_text_:system in 4931) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046466675 = score(doc=4931,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13353272 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042397358 = queryNorm
                0.3479797 = fieldWeight in 4931, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4931)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Describes a typical traditional 1989 free text system and discusses developments in data storage, in search strategy and in the storage and retrieval of real time data. Outlines the following areas in which free text systems are likely to develop: standards; integration; dynamic data exchange; improved user interfaces; and better retrieval methods
  11. Bernstein, L.M.; Williamson, R.E.: Testing of a natural language retrieval system for a full text knowledge base (1984) 0.03
    0.027230313 = product of:
      0.08169094 = sum of:
        0.06000649 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1803) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06000649 = score(doc=1803,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 1803, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1803)
        0.02168445 = product of:
          0.065053344 = sum of:
            0.065053344 = weight(_text_:system in 1803) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.065053344 = score(doc=1803,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13353272 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042397358 = queryNorm
                0.4871716 = fieldWeight in 1803, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1803)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
  12. Ashford, J.H.: Full text retrieval in document management : a review (1995) 0.03
    0.026989987 = product of:
      0.08096996 = sum of:
        0.06857885 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06857885 = score(doc=2054,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 2054, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2054)
        0.012391115 = product of:
          0.037173342 = sum of:
            0.037173342 = weight(_text_:system in 2054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037173342 = score(doc=2054,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13353272 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042397358 = queryNorm
                0.27838376 = fieldWeight in 2054, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2054)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Full text management which applied to document management tends to be centred on text storage and retrieval. Recent developments are concerned with integration with relational database management system products to deliver document management services offering both the flexibility of text retrieval and the ability to support process based funnctions. There has been a move towards client server architectures, more user friendly user interfaces and more flexible and easier to understand retrieval. Advocates caution in choosing tasks for full text methods. Identifies document management functions for which the combined use of database management systems or special purpose tools should be considered
  13. Magennis, M.: Expert rule-based query expansion (1995) 0.03
    0.026261926 = product of:
      0.07878578 = sum of:
        0.06000649 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06000649 = score(doc=5181,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 5181, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5181)
        0.018779285 = product of:
          0.056337852 = sum of:
            0.056337852 = weight(_text_:system in 5181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056337852 = score(doc=5181,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.13353272 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042397358 = queryNorm
                0.42190298 = fieldWeight in 5181, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5181)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Examines how, for term based free text retrieval, Interactive Query Expansion (IQE) provides better retrieval performance tahn Automatic Query Expansion (AQE) but the performance of IQE depends on the strategy employed by the user to select expansion terms. The aim is to build an expert query expansion system using term selection rules based on expert users' strategies. It is expected that such a system will achieve better performance for novice or inexperienced users that either AQE or IQE. The procedure is to discover expert IQE users' term selection strategies through observation and interrogation, to construct a rule based query expansion (RQE) system based on these and to compare the resulting retrieval performance with that of comparable AQE and IQE systems
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  14. Perez, E.: Text enhancement : Controlled vocabulary vs. free text (1982) 0.02
    0.02029456 = product of:
      0.06088368 = sum of:
        0.048492566 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1355) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048492566 = score(doc=1355,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.37811437 = fieldWeight in 1355, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1355)
        0.012391115 = product of:
          0.037173342 = sum of:
            0.037173342 = weight(_text_:system in 1355) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037173342 = score(doc=1355,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13353272 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042397358 = queryNorm
                0.27838376 = fieldWeight in 1355, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1355)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Full-text databases are becoming increasingly practical for publication and general use, since most publishers now use some form of computerized editorial and publication system. "Free text" retrieval from full-text databases is possible with many existing systems, but some information professionals are doubtful about the quality of information retrieval using this type of access. The "augmentation" or "enrichment" needed for practical operation of these systems is discussed
  15. Blair, D.C.; Maron, M.E.: Full-text information retrieval : further analysis and clarification (1990) 0.02
    0.02029456 = product of:
      0.06088368 = sum of:
        0.048492566 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2046) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048492566 = score(doc=2046,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.37811437 = fieldWeight in 2046, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2046)
        0.012391115 = product of:
          0.037173342 = sum of:
            0.037173342 = weight(_text_:system in 2046) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037173342 = score(doc=2046,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13353272 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042397358 = queryNorm
                0.27838376 = fieldWeight in 2046, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2046)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    In 1985, an article by Blair and Maron described a detailed evaluation of the effectiveness of an operational full text retrieval system used to support the defense of a large corporate lawsuit. The following year Salton published an article which called into question the conclusions of the 1985 study. The following article briefly reviews the initial study, replies to the objections raised by the secon article, and clarifies several confusions and misunderstandings of the 1985 study
  16. Muddamalle, M.R.: Natural language versus controlled vocabulary in information retrieval : a case study in soil mechanics (1998) 0.02
    0.020242492 = product of:
      0.060727473 = sum of:
        0.051434137 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1795) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051434137 = score(doc=1795,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 1795, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1795)
        0.0092933355 = product of:
          0.027880006 = sum of:
            0.027880006 = weight(_text_:system in 1795) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027880006 = score(doc=1795,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13353272 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042397358 = queryNorm
                0.20878783 = fieldWeight in 1795, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1795)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    The effectiveness ot two information retrieval tools, namely, thesaurus and natural language, in an information retrieval system has been studies. A database SOILSC was created using a HP3000/58 series minicomputer and MINISIS software. Records of articles totalling 17.918 published in various journals, received in the Central Water and Power Research Station (CWPRS) library (Pune, India) since 1988, have been stored. The information needs of a soil mechanics group have been formulated using thesaurus and natural language into 81 search strategies. In consultation with the user, relevance of the retrieved documents was assessed and, recall (R) and precision (P) values were calculated. Since both thesaurus and natural language have shown identical performance in information retrieval, a combination of these two have been suggested for making searches and providing relevant information
  17. Rösener, C.: ¬Die Stecknadel im Heuhaufen : Natürlichsprachlicher Zugang zu Volltextdatenbanken (2005) 0.02
    0.019075677 = product of:
      0.05722703 = sum of:
        0.024246283 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024246283 = score(doc=548,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.18905719 = fieldWeight in 548, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=548)
        0.032980748 = product of:
          0.049471118 = sum of:
            0.026285522 = weight(_text_:system in 548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026285522 = score(doc=548,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.13353272 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042397358 = queryNorm
                0.19684705 = fieldWeight in 548, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=548)
            0.023185596 = weight(_text_:29 in 548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023185596 = score(doc=548,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14914064 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042397358 = queryNorm
                0.15546128 = fieldWeight in 548, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=548)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Content
    Enthält die Kapitel: 2: Wissensrepräsentation 2.1 Deklarative Wissensrepräsentation 2.2 Klassifikationen des BMM 2.3 Thesauri und Ontologien: existierende kommerzielle Software 2.4 Erstellung eines Thesaurus im Rahmen des LeWi-Projektes 3: Analysekomponenten 3.1 Sprachliche Phänomene in der maschinellen Textanalyse 3.2 Analysekomponenten: Lösungen und Forschungsansätze 3.3 Die Analysekomponenten im LeWi-Projekt 4: Information Retrieval 4.1 Grundlagen des Information Retrieval 4.2 Automatische Indexierungsmethoden und -verfahren 4.3 Automatische Indexierung des BMM im Rahmen des LeWi-Projektes 4.4 Suchstrategien und Suchablauf im LeWi-Kontext
    Date
    29. 3.2009 11:11:45
    RSWK
    Volltextdatenbank / Natürlichsprachiges System
    Subject
    Volltextdatenbank / Natürlichsprachiges System
  18. Dow Jones unveils knowledge indexing system (1997) 0.02
    0.018583821 = product of:
      0.05575146 = sum of:
        0.034289423 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034289423 = score(doc=751,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 751, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=751)
        0.021462038 = product of:
          0.064386114 = sum of:
            0.064386114 = weight(_text_:system in 751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.064386114 = score(doc=751,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.13353272 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042397358 = queryNorm
                0.48217484 = fieldWeight in 751, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=751)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Dow Jones Interactive Publishing has developed a sophisticated automatic knowledge indexing system that will allow searchers of the Dow Jones News / Retrieval service to get highly targeted results from a search in the service's Publications Library. Instead of relying on a thesaurus of company names, the new system uses a combination of that basic algorithm plus unique rules based on the editorial styles of individual publications in the Library. Dow Jones have also announced its acceptance of the definitions of 'selected full text' and 'full text' from Bibliodata's Fulltext Sources Online directory
  19. Bernard, M.: Modelling the efficient access to full-text information (1996) 0.02
    0.01775774 = product of:
      0.053273216 = sum of:
        0.042430993 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5610) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042430993 = score(doc=5610,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 5610, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5610)
        0.010842225 = product of:
          0.032526672 = sum of:
            0.032526672 = weight(_text_:system in 5610) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032526672 = score(doc=5610,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13353272 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042397358 = queryNorm
                0.2435858 = fieldWeight in 5610, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5610)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Describes a research goal set by many offices within the US Department of Energy. Reviews efficient full text searching techniques being developed to better understand and meet this goal. Classical computer human interaction (CHI) approaches provided by commercial information retrieval engines fail to contextualize information in ways that facilitates timely decision making. Discusses the uses of advanced CHI techniques in combination with deductive database technology to augment the weaknesses found in the presentation capabilities of information retrieval engines. Presents various techniques employed in a WWW based prototype system currently under development
  20. Albus, W.; Smulders, H.: Doeltreffend zoeken in volledige teksten : 2. full-text retrieval bij de HavenInformatieBank (1998) 0.02
    0.01775774 = product of:
      0.053273216 = sum of:
        0.042430993 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042430993 = score(doc=2368,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 2368, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2368)
        0.010842225 = product of:
          0.032526672 = sum of:
            0.032526672 = weight(_text_:system in 2368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032526672 = score(doc=2368,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13353272 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042397358 = queryNorm
                0.2435858 = fieldWeight in 2368, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2368)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    At Rotterdam Port Authority an information database has been created with approx. 100.000 full text documents online. Topic software has been used to identify word groups and refine search strategies to optimize precision and recall. The software guides users from selected terms to other relevant word combinations. Although the system would benefit from further refinement, users are generally satisfied. The database includes a number of foreign language documents but lacks a thesaurus of foreign terms
    Footnote
    Übers. d. Titels: Effective searching on full texts: 1. full-text-retrieval on the Harbour information database

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 64
  • m 2
  • s 2
  • r 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…