-
Breuer, T.; Tavakolpoursaleh, N.; Schaer, P.; Hienert, D.; Schaible, J.; Castro, L.J.: Online Information Retrieval Evaluation using the STELLA Framework (2022)
0.04
0.03779839 = product of:
0.07559678 = sum of:
0.029934023 = weight(_text_:web in 640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029934023 = score(doc=640,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13836423 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.042397358 = queryNorm
0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 640, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=640)
0.036369424 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036369424 = score(doc=640,freq=4.0), product of:
0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.042397358 = queryNorm
0.2835858 = fieldWeight in 640, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=640)
0.0092933355 = product of:
0.027880006 = sum of:
0.027880006 = weight(_text_:system in 640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027880006 = score(doc=640,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13353272 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.042397358 = queryNorm
0.20878783 = fieldWeight in 640, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=640)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(3/6)
- Abstract
- Involving users in early phases of software development has become a common strategy as it enables developers to consider user needs from the beginning. Once a system is in production, new opportunities to observe, evaluate and learn from users emerge as more information becomes available. Gathering information from users to continuously evaluate their behavior is a common practice for commercial software, while the Cranfield paradigm remains the preferred option for Information Retrieval (IR) and recommendation systems in the academic world. Here we introduce the Infrastructures for Living Labs STELLA project which aims to create an evaluation infrastructure allowing experimental systems to run along production web-based academic search systems with real users. STELLA combines user interactions and log files analyses to enable large-scale A/B experiments for academic search.
-
Robertson, S.E.: OKAPI at TREC (1994)
0.03
0.025368199 = product of:
0.076104596 = sum of:
0.060615707 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 7952) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060615707 = score(doc=7952,freq=4.0), product of:
0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.042397358 = queryNorm
0.47264296 = fieldWeight in 7952, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7952)
0.015488892 = product of:
0.046466675 = sum of:
0.046466675 = weight(_text_:system in 7952) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046466675 = score(doc=7952,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13353272 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.042397358 = queryNorm
0.3479797 = fieldWeight in 7952, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7952)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Paper presented at the Text Retrieval Conference (TREC), Washington, DC, Nov 1992. Describes the OKAPI experimental text information retrieval system in terms of its design principles: the use of simple, robust and easy to use techniques which use best match searching and avoid Boolean logic
-
Robertson, S.E.: OKAPI at TREC-3 (1995)
0.02
0.020936457 = product of:
0.06280937 = sum of:
0.051967148 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051967148 = score(doc=5694,freq=6.0), product of:
0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.042397358 = queryNorm
0.40520695 = fieldWeight in 5694, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5694)
0.010842225 = product of:
0.032526672 = sum of:
0.032526672 = weight(_text_:system in 5694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032526672 = score(doc=5694,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13353272 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.042397358 = queryNorm
0.2435858 = fieldWeight in 5694, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5694)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Reports text information retrieval experiments performed as part of the 3 rd round of Text Retrieval Conferences (TREC) using the Okapi online catalogue system at City University, UK. The emphasis in TREC-3 was: further refinement of term weighting functions; an investigation of run time passage determination and searching; expansion of ad hoc queries by terms extracted from the top documents retrieved by a trial search; new methods for choosing query expansion terms after relevance feedback, now split into methods of ranking terms prior to selection and subsequent selection procedures; and the development of a user interface procedure within the new TREC interactive search framework
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Robertson, S.E.: OKAPI at TREC-1 (1994)
0.02
0.019450225 = product of:
0.05835067 = sum of:
0.04286178 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 7953) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04286178 = score(doc=7953,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.042397358 = queryNorm
0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 7953, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7953)
0.015488892 = product of:
0.046466675 = sum of:
0.046466675 = weight(_text_:system in 7953) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046466675 = score(doc=7953,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13353272 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.042397358 = queryNorm
0.3479797 = fieldWeight in 7953, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7953)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Describes the work carried out on the TREC-2 project following the results of the TREC-1 project. Experiments were conducted on the OKAPI experimental text information retrieval system which investigated a number of alternative probabilistic term weighting functions in place of the 'standard' Robertson Sparck Jones weighting functions used in TREC-1
-
Panzer, M.: Dewey Web services : overview (2009)
0.02
0.016630014 = product of:
0.09978008 = sum of:
0.09978008 = weight(_text_:web in 7190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09978008 = score(doc=7190,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13836423 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.042397358 = queryNorm
0.72114074 = fieldWeight in 7190, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=7190)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
-
Pejtersen, A.M.; Jensen, H.; Speck, P.; Villumsen, S.; Weber, S.: Catalogs for children : the Book House project on visualization of database retrieval and classification (1993)
0.02
0.015265582 = product of:
0.045796745 = sum of:
0.030307854 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6232) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030307854 = score(doc=6232,freq=4.0), product of:
0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.042397358 = queryNorm
0.23632148 = fieldWeight in 6232, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6232)
0.015488892 = product of:
0.046466675 = sum of:
0.046466675 = weight(_text_:system in 6232) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046466675 = score(doc=6232,freq=8.0), product of:
0.13353272 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.042397358 = queryNorm
0.3479797 = fieldWeight in 6232, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6232)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- This paper describes the Book House system which is designed to support children's information retrieval in libraries as part of their education. It is a shareware program available on CD-ROM and discs, and comprises functionality for database searching as well as for the classification and storage of book information in the database. The system concept is based on an understanding of children's domain structures and their capabilities for categorization of information needs in connection with their activities in public libraries, in school libraries or in schools. These structures are visualized in the interface by using metaphors and multimedia technology. Through the use of text, images and animation, the Book House supports children - even at a very early age - to learn by doing in an enjoyable way which plays on their previous experiences with computer games. Both words and pictures can be used for searching; this makes the system suitable for all age groups. Even children who have not yet learned to read properly can by selecting pictures search for and find books they would like to have read aloud. Thus at the very beginning of their school period, they can learn to search for books on their own. For the library community itself, such a system will provide an extended service which will increase the number of children's own searches and also improve the relevance, quality and utilization of the collections in the libraries. A market research on the need for an annual indexing service for books in the Book House format is in preparation by the Danish Library Center
-
Isaac, A.; Raemy, J.A.; Meijers, E.; Valk, S. De; Freire, N.: Metadata aggregation via linked data : results of the Europeana Common Culture project (2020)
0.01
0.0138422735 = product of:
0.04152682 = sum of:
0.029934023 = weight(_text_:web in 39) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029934023 = score(doc=39,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13836423 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.042397358 = queryNorm
0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 39, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=39)
0.011592798 = product of:
0.034778394 = sum of:
0.034778394 = weight(_text_:29 in 39) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034778394 = score(doc=39,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14914064 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.042397358 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 39, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=39)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Digital cultural heritage resources are widely available on the web through the digital libraries of heritage institutions. To address the difficulties of discoverability in cultural heritage, the common practice is metadata aggregation, where centralized efforts like Europeana facilitate discoverability by collecting the resources' metadata. We present the results of the linked data aggregation task conducted within the Europeana Common Culture project, which attempted an innovative approach to aggregation based on linked data made available by cultural heritage institutions. This task ran for one year with participation of eleven organizations, involving the three member roles of the Europeana network: data providers, intermediary aggregators, and the central aggregation hub, Europeana. We report on the challenges that were faced by data providers, the standards and specifications applied, and the resulting aggregated metadata.
- Date
- 17.11.2020 11:29:00
-
Peponakis, M.; Mastora, A.; Kapidakis, S.; Doerr, M.: Expressiveness and machine processability of Knowledge Organization Systems (KOS) : an analysis of concepts and relations (2020)
0.01
0.011965774 = product of:
0.035897322 = sum of:
0.02494502 = weight(_text_:web in 5787) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02494502 = score(doc=5787,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13836423 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.042397358 = queryNorm
0.18028519 = fieldWeight in 5787, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5787)
0.010952301 = product of:
0.032856904 = sum of:
0.032856904 = weight(_text_:system in 5787) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032856904 = score(doc=5787,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13353272 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.042397358 = queryNorm
0.24605882 = fieldWeight in 5787, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5787)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- This study considers the expressiveness (that is the expressive power or expressivity) of different types of Knowledge Organization Systems (KOS) and discusses its potential to be machine-processable in the context of the Semantic Web. For this purpose, the theoretical foundations of KOS are reviewed based on conceptualizations introduced by the Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD) and the Simple Knowledge Organization System (SKOS); natural language processing techniques are also implemented. Applying a comparative analysis, the dataset comprises a thesaurus (Eurovoc), a subject headings system (LCSH) and a classification scheme (DDC). These are compared with an ontology (CIDOC-CRM) by focusing on how they define and handle concepts and relations. It was observed that LCSH and DDC focus on the formalism of character strings (nomens) rather than on the modelling of semantics; their definition of what constitutes a concept is quite fuzzy, and they comprise a large number of complex concepts. By contrast, thesauri have a coherent definition of what constitutes a concept, and apply a systematic approach to the modelling of relations. Ontologies explicitly define diverse types of relations, and are by their nature machine-processable. The paper concludes that the potential of both the expressiveness and machine processability of each KOS is extensively regulated by its structural rules. It is harder to represent subject headings and classification schemes as semantic networks with nodes and arcs, while thesauri are more suitable for such a representation. In addition, a paradigm shift is revealed which focuses on the modelling of relations between concepts, rather than the concepts themselves.
-
Slavic, A.: Interface to classification : some objectives and options (2006)
0.01
0.011670135 = product of:
0.035010405 = sum of:
0.025717068 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2131) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025717068 = score(doc=2131,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.042397358 = queryNorm
0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 2131, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2131)
0.0092933355 = product of:
0.027880006 = sum of:
0.027880006 = weight(_text_:system in 2131) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027880006 = score(doc=2131,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13353272 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.042397358 = queryNorm
0.20878783 = fieldWeight in 2131, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2131)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- This is a preprint to be published in the Extensions & Corrections to the UDC. The paper explains the basic functions of browsing and searching that need to be supported in relation to analytico-synthetic classifications such as Universal Decimal Classification (UDC), irrespective of any specific, real-life implementation. UDC is an example of a semi-faceted system that can be used, for instance, for both post-coordinate searching and hierarchical/facet browsing. The advantages of using a classification for IR, however, depend on the strength of the GUI, which should provide a user-friendly interface to classification browsing and searching. The power of this interface is in supporting visualisation that will 'convert' what is potentially a user-unfriendly indexing language based on symbols, to a subject presentation that is easy to understand, search and navigate. A summary of the basic functions of searching and browsing a classification that may be provided on a user-friendly interface is given and examples of classification browsing interfaces are provided.
- Theme
- Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
-
Williamson, N.J.: Online Klassifikation : Gegenwart und Zukunft (1988)
0.01
0.011429808 = product of:
0.06857885 = sum of:
0.06857885 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06857885 = score(doc=765,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.042397358 = queryNorm
0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 765, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=765)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Theme
- Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
-
Noever, D.; Ciolino, M.: ¬The Turing deception (2022)
0.01
0.0112230405 = product of:
0.06733824 = sum of:
0.06733824 = product of:
0.20201473 = sum of:
0.20201473 = weight(_text_:3a in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20201473 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
0.35944527 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.042397358 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2212.06721&usg=AOvVaw3i_9pZm9y_dQWoHi6uv0EN
-
Gödert, W.: Navigation und Retrieval in Datenbanken und Informationsnetzen (1995)
0.01
0.010001082 = product of:
0.06000649 = sum of:
0.06000649 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06000649 = score(doc=2113,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.042397358 = queryNorm
0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 2113, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2113)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
-
Jaenecke, P.: Knowledge organization due to theory formation (1995)
0.01
0.009282727 = product of:
0.05569636 = sum of:
0.05569636 = product of:
0.08354454 = sum of:
0.037173342 = weight(_text_:system in 3751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037173342 = score(doc=3751,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13353272 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.042397358 = queryNorm
0.27838376 = fieldWeight in 3751, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3751)
0.04637119 = weight(_text_:29 in 3751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04637119 = score(doc=3751,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14914064 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.042397358 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 3751, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3751)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- Theory formation is regarded as a process of domain-internal knowledge organization. Misunderstandings about the concept 'theory' are explained. A theory is considered as a systematical representation of a domain realized by three closely related theory-forming actions: establishment of a suitable system of basic concepts, ordering of the experience or given experimental results, synthesizing of conflicting hypotheses. In this view, theory formation means an ambitious kind of knowledge representation. Its consequences are summarized and its importance for the human sciences and for society is emphasized
- Date
- 29. 3.1996 17:26:47
-
Aydin, Ö.; Karaarslan, E.: OpenAI ChatGPT generated literature review: : digital twin in healthcare (2022)
0.01
0.008670093 = product of:
0.052020553 = sum of:
0.052020553 = weight(_text_:wide in 851) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052020553 = score(doc=851,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18785246 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.042397358 = queryNorm
0.2769224 = fieldWeight in 851, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=851)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- Literature review articles are essential to summarize the related work in the selected field. However, covering all related studies takes too much time and effort. This study questions how Artificial Intelligence can be used in this process. We used ChatGPT to create a literature review article to show the stage of the OpenAI ChatGPT artificial intelligence application. As the subject, the applications of Digital Twin in the health field were chosen. Abstracts of the last three years (2020, 2021 and 2022) papers were obtained from the keyword "Digital twin in healthcare" search results on Google Scholar and paraphrased by ChatGPT. Later on, we asked ChatGPT questions. The results are promising; however, the paraphrased parts had significant matches when checked with the Ithenticate tool. This article is the first attempt to show the compilation and expression of knowledge will be accelerated with the help of artificial intelligence. We are still at the beginning of such advances. The future academic publishing process will require less human effort, which in turn will allow academics to focus on their studies. In future studies, we will monitor citations to this study to evaluate the academic validity of the content produced by the ChatGPT. 1. Introduction OpenAI ChatGPT (ChatGPT, 2022) is a chatbot based on the OpenAI GPT-3 language model. It is designed to generate human-like text responses to user input in a conversational context. OpenAI ChatGPT is trained on a large dataset of human conversations and can be used to create responses to a wide range of topics and prompts. The chatbot can be used for customer service, content creation, and language translation tasks, creating replies in multiple languages. OpenAI ChatGPT is available through the OpenAI API, which allows developers to access and integrate the chatbot into their applications and systems. OpenAI ChatGPT is a variant of the GPT (Generative Pre-trained Transformer) language model developed by OpenAI. It is designed to generate human-like text, allowing it to engage in conversation with users naturally and intuitively. OpenAI ChatGPT is trained on a large dataset of human conversations, allowing it to understand and respond to a wide range of topics and contexts. It can be used in various applications, such as chatbots, customer service agents, and language translation systems. OpenAI ChatGPT is a state-of-the-art language model able to generate coherent and natural text that can be indistinguishable from text written by a human. As an artificial intelligence, ChatGPT may need help to change academic writing practices. However, it can provide information and guidance on ways to improve people's academic writing skills.
-
Tramullas, J.; Garrido-Picazo, P.; Sánchez-Casabón, A.I.: Use of Wikipedia categories on information retrieval research : a brief review (2020)
0.01
0.008572357 = product of:
0.051434137 = sum of:
0.051434137 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051434137 = score(doc=5365,freq=8.0), product of:
0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.042397358 = queryNorm
0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 5365, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5365)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- Wikipedia categories, a classification scheme built for organizing and describing Wikpedia articles, are being applied in computer science research. This paper adopts a systematic literature review approach, in order to identify different approaches and uses of Wikipedia categories in information retrieval research. Several types of work are identified, depending on the intrinsic study of the categories structure, or its use as a tool for the processing and analysis of other documentary corpus different to Wikipedia. Information retrieval is identified as one of the major areas of use, in particular its application in the refinement and improvement of search expressions, and the construction of textual corpus. However, the set of available works shows that in many cases research approaches applied and results obtained can be integrated into a comprehensive and inclusive concept of information retrieval.
-
Lange, C.; Ion, P.; Dimou, A.; Bratsas, C.; Sperber, W.; Kohlhasel, M.; Antoniou, I.: Getting mathematics towards the Web of Data : the case of the Mathematics Subject Classification (2012)
0.01
0.0072010076 = product of:
0.043206044 = sum of:
0.043206044 = weight(_text_:web in 111) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043206044 = score(doc=111,freq=6.0), product of:
0.13836423 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.042397358 = queryNorm
0.3122631 = fieldWeight in 111, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=111)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- The Mathematics Subject Classification (MSC), maintained by the American Mathematical Society's Mathematical Reviews (MR) and FIZ Karlsruhe's Zentralblatt für Mathematik (Zbl), is a scheme for classifying publications in mathematics according to their subjects. While it is widely used, its traditional, idiosyncratic conceptualization and representation requires custom implementations of search, query and annotation support. This did not encourage people to create and explore connections of mathematics to subjects of related domains (e.g. science), and it made the scheme hard to maintain. We have reimplemented the current version of MSC2010 as a Linked Open Dataset using SKOS and our focus is concentrated on turning it into the new MSC authority. This paper explains the motivation, and details of our design considerations and how we realized them in the implementation. We present in-the-field use cases and point out how e-science applications can take advantage of the MSC LOD set. We conclude with a roadmap for bootstrapping the presence of mathematical and mathematics-based science, technology, and engineering knowledge on the Web of Data, where it has been noticeably underrepresented so far, starting from MSC/SKOS as a seed.
- Footnote
- Vgl. auch den publizierten Beitrag u.d.T.: Bringing mathematics towards the Web of Data: the case of the Mathematics Subject Classification
-
Smith, R.: Nationalbibliographien auf CD-ROM : Entwicklung eines gemeinsamen Ansatzes (1993)
0.01
0.005714904 = product of:
0.034289423 = sum of:
0.034289423 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6231) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034289423 = score(doc=6231,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.042397358 = queryNorm
0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 6231, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6231)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- Dieses Papier beschreibt, wie ein EG-finanziertes Projekt, unter Einbeziehung von 7 Nationalbibliotheken, die Entwicklung gemeinsamer Problemansätze bei CD-ROM Veröffentlichungen gefördert hat. Das Projekt als ganzes wird beschrieben und auf die Hauptergebnisse hingewiesen, einschließlich der Formulierung einer allgemeinen RetrievalSchnittstelle und der Entwicklung eines UNIMARC-Pilotprojektes auf CD-ROM unter Einbeziehung von 4 Nationalbibliographien. Das Papier beschreibt weiterhin in detaillierter Form die Hauptaspekte der Retrieval-Schnittstelle und die Methodologie für die Entwicklung einer CD-ROM von 4 unterschiedlichen bibliographischen Daten mit jeweils verschiedenen Formaten und Zeichensätzen
-
Jansen, B.; Browne, G.M.: Navigating information spaces : index / mind map / topic map? (2021)
0.01
0.005714904 = product of:
0.034289423 = sum of:
0.034289423 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 436) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034289423 = score(doc=436,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.042397358 = queryNorm
0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 436, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=436)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Großjohann, K.: Gathering-, Harvesting-, Suchmaschinen (1996)
0.01
0.0054157376 = product of:
0.032494426 = sum of:
0.032494426 = product of:
0.09748327 = sum of:
0.09748327 = weight(_text_:22 in 3227) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09748327 = score(doc=3227,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14846832 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042397358 = queryNorm
0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 3227, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3227)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 7. 2.1996 22:38:41
- Pages
- 22 S
-
Austin, D.: PRECIS: Grundprinzipien, Funktion und Anwendung (1983)
0.00
0.004130372 = product of:
0.02478223 = sum of:
0.02478223 = product of:
0.074346684 = sum of:
0.074346684 = weight(_text_:system in 1001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.074346684 = score(doc=1001,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13353272 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.042397358 = queryNorm
0.5567675 = fieldWeight in 1001, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1001)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Theme
- Preserved Context Index System (PRECIS)
