Search (895 results, page 1 of 45)

  • × year_i:[1980 TO 1990}
  1. Smeaton, A.F.; Rijsbergen, C.J. van: ¬The retrieval effects of query expansion on a feedback document retrieval system (1983) 0.07
    0.06697209 = product of:
      0.20091626 = sum of:
        0.103934295 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.103934295 = score(doc=2134,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.8104139 = fieldWeight in 2134, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2134)
        0.09698196 = product of:
          0.14547293 = sum of:
            0.065053344 = weight(_text_:system in 2134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.065053344 = score(doc=2134,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13353272 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042397358 = queryNorm
                0.4871716 = fieldWeight in 2134, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2134)
            0.080419585 = weight(_text_:22 in 2134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.080419585 = score(doc=2134,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14846832 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042397358 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2134, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2134)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Date
    30. 3.2001 13:32:22
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  2. Teskey, F.N.: Enriched knowledge representation for information retrieval (1987) 0.06
    0.06359076 = product of:
      0.12718152 = sum of:
        0.06437215 = weight(_text_:wide in 698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06437215 = score(doc=698,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18785246 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.342674 = fieldWeight in 698, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=698)
        0.051967148 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051967148 = score(doc=698,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.40520695 = fieldWeight in 698, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=698)
        0.010842225 = product of:
          0.032526672 = sum of:
            0.032526672 = weight(_text_:system in 698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032526672 = score(doc=698,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13353272 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042397358 = queryNorm
                0.2435858 = fieldWeight in 698, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=698)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Abstract
    In this paper we identify the need for a new theory of information. An information model is developed which distinguishes between data, as directly observable facts, information, as structured collections of data, and knowledge as methods of using information. The model is intended to support a wide range of information systems. In the paper we develop the use of the model for a semantic information retrieval system using the concept of semantic categories. The likely benefits of this area discussed, though as yet no detailed evaluation has been conducted.
    Source
    SIGIR'87: Proceedings of the 10th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval
  3. Teskey, F.N.: User models and world models for data, information and knowledge (1989) 0.06
    0.060124356 = product of:
      0.12024871 = sum of:
        0.07356817 = weight(_text_:wide in 2163) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07356817 = score(doc=2163,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18785246 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.3916274 = fieldWeight in 2163, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2163)
        0.034289423 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2163) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034289423 = score(doc=2163,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 2163, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2163)
        0.012391115 = product of:
          0.037173342 = sum of:
            0.037173342 = weight(_text_:system in 2163) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037173342 = score(doc=2163,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13353272 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042397358 = queryNorm
                0.27838376 = fieldWeight in 2163, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2163)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Abstract
    In this article we identify the need for a new theory of data, information, and knowledge. A model is developed that distinguishes between data as directly observable facts, information as structured collections of data, and knowledge as methods of using information. The model is intended to support a wide range of information systems. In the article we develop the use of the model for a semantic information retrieval system using the concept of semantic categories. The likely benefits of this are discussed, though as yet no detailed evaluation has been conducted
  4. Salton, G.: Another look at automatic text-retrieval systems (1986) 0.06
    0.055154096 = product of:
      0.16546229 = sum of:
        0.09584185 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09584185 = score(doc=1356,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.74731416 = fieldWeight in 1356, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1356)
        0.069620445 = product of:
          0.10443066 = sum of:
            0.046466675 = weight(_text_:system in 1356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046466675 = score(doc=1356,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13353272 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042397358 = queryNorm
                0.3479797 = fieldWeight in 1356, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1356)
            0.05796399 = weight(_text_:29 in 1356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05796399 = score(doc=1356,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14914064 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042397358 = queryNorm
                0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 1356, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1356)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Footnote
    Bezugnahme auf: Blair, D.C.: An evaluation of retrieval effectiveness for a full-text document-retrieval system. Comm. ACM 28(1985) S.280-299. - Vgl. auch: Blair, D.C.: Full text retrieval ... Int. Class. 13(1986) S.18-23; Blair, D.C., M.E. Maron: full-text information retrieval ... Inf. Proc. Man. 26(1990) S.437-447.
    Source
    Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery. 29(1986), S.648-656
  5. Alkula, R.; Sormunen, E.: Problems and guidelines for database descriptions (1989) 0.05
    0.053950164 = product of:
      0.10790033 = sum of:
        0.06437215 = weight(_text_:wide in 2397) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06437215 = score(doc=2397,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18785246 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.342674 = fieldWeight in 2397, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2397)
        0.030003246 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2397) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030003246 = score(doc=2397,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 2397, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2397)
        0.01352493 = product of:
          0.04057479 = sum of:
            0.04057479 = weight(_text_:29 in 2397) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04057479 = score(doc=2397,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14914064 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042397358 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 2397, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2397)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Abstract
    An essential part of information retrieval knowledge is the knowledge of data base contents and structures. Currently, the variety of data bases is so wide that it is difficult to know the contents and structure of a particular data base and how they differ from those of other data bases. Because of the lack of commonly acknowledged guidelines for data base descriptions, each on-line service designs and produces printed manuals, on-line help texts and other user documentation in its own manner. For the presentation of exact information and knowledge on a data base, common, structured principles for data base descriptions are needed. Requirements and some solutions for such description principles are presented.
    Pages
    S.29-37
  6. Madelung, H.-O.: Subject searching in the social sciences : a comparison of PRECIS and KWIC indexes indexes to newspaper articles (1982) 0.05
    0.052608814 = product of:
      0.10521763 = sum of:
        0.06437215 = weight(_text_:wide in 5517) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06437215 = score(doc=5517,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18785246 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.342674 = fieldWeight in 5517, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5517)
        0.030003246 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5517) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030003246 = score(doc=5517,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 5517, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5517)
        0.010842225 = product of:
          0.032526672 = sum of:
            0.032526672 = weight(_text_:system in 5517) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032526672 = score(doc=5517,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13353272 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042397358 = queryNorm
                0.2435858 = fieldWeight in 5517, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5517)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Abstract
    89 articles from a small, Danish left-wing newspaper were indexed by PRECIS and KWIC. The articles cover a wide range of social science subjects. Controlled test searches in both indexes were carried out by 20 students of library science. The results obtained from this small-scale retrieval test were evaluated by a chi-square test. The PRECIS index led to more correct answers and fewer wrong answers than the KWIC index, i.e. it had both better recall and greater precision. Furthermore, the students were more confident in their judgement of the relevance of retrieved articles in the PRECIS index than in the KWIC index; and they generally favoured the PRECIS index in the subjective judgement they were asked to make
    Theme
    Preserved Context Index System (PRECIS)
  7. Blair, D.C.; Maron, M.E.: ¬An evaluation of retrieval effectiveness for a full-text document-retrieval system (1985) 0.05
    0.051781338 = product of:
      0.15534401 = sum of:
        0.08572356 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1345) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08572356 = score(doc=1345,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.6684181 = fieldWeight in 1345, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1345)
        0.069620445 = product of:
          0.10443066 = sum of:
            0.046466675 = weight(_text_:system in 1345) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046466675 = score(doc=1345,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13353272 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042397358 = queryNorm
                0.3479797 = fieldWeight in 1345, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1345)
            0.05796399 = weight(_text_:29 in 1345) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05796399 = score(doc=1345,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14914064 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042397358 = queryNorm
                0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 1345, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1345)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl. auch : Salton, G.: Another look ... Comm. ACM 29(1986) S.S.648-656; Blair, D.C.: Full text retrieval ... Int. Class. 13(1986) S.18-23: Blair, D.C., M.E. Maron: Full-text information retrieval ... Inf. proc. man. 26(1990) S.437-447.
  8. Devadason, F.J.: Postulate-Based Permuted Subject Indexing Language as a metalanguage for computer-aided generation of information retrieval thesaurus (1983) 0.05
    0.04951936 = product of:
      0.14855808 = sum of:
        0.051434137 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051434137 = score(doc=1637,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 1637, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1637)
        0.097123936 = sum of:
          0.027880006 = weight(_text_:system in 1637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.027880006 = score(doc=1637,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13353272 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                0.042397358 = queryNorm
              0.20878783 = fieldWeight in 1637, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1637)
          0.034778394 = weight(_text_:29 in 1637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.034778394 = score(doc=1637,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14914064 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.042397358 = queryNorm
              0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 1637, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1637)
          0.034465536 = weight(_text_:22 in 1637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.034465536 = score(doc=1637,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14846832 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.042397358 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1637, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1637)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    The development of the general theory of subject indexing language and of POPSI for organisation, storage and retrieval of subjects embodies in documents has a striking parallel in the search for and development of 'universal forms' and 'deep structure' in language and linguistic studies. This paper briefly traces the development of POPSI language as a metalanguage for information organisation and for generating information retrieval thesaurus. Also a computer-based system for generating an information retrieval thesaurus from modulated subject headings formulated according to POPSI which are enriched with certain codes for relating the terms in the subject headings is described. It is also mentioned that, if it is possible to form a table of equivalent terms in another language for the terms already used to generate the thesaurus, then it is possible to translate the thesaurus automatically into the other language
    Source
    International forum on information and documentation. 8(1983), S.22-29
  9. Dewey, M.: Decimal classification and relativ index : introduction (1985) 0.05
    0.045721397 = product of:
      0.09144279 = sum of:
        0.052020553 = weight(_text_:wide in 3628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052020553 = score(doc=3628,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18785246 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.2769224 = fieldWeight in 3628, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3628)
        0.024246283 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024246283 = score(doc=3628,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.18905719 = fieldWeight in 3628, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3628)
        0.015175953 = product of:
          0.045527857 = sum of:
            0.045527857 = weight(_text_:system in 3628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.045527857 = score(doc=3628,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.13353272 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042397358 = queryNorm
                0.3409491 = fieldWeight in 3628, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3628)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Abstract
    To those outside the field of library science, the name Melvil Dewey (1851-1931) is virtually synonymous with library classification. To those in the field, Dewey has been recognized as the premier classification maker. His enormously successful system (i.e., successful in terms of the wide adoption of the system around the world for over one hundred years) has now undergone nineteen editions. The Dewey Decimal Classification has been translated into more than twenty languages and is the most widely adopted classification scheme in the world. Even in its earliest manifestations, the Dewey Decimal Classification contained features that anticipated modern classification theory. Among these are the use of mnemonics and the commonly applied standard subdivisions, later called "common isolates" by S. R. Ranganathan (q.v.), which are the mainstays of facet analysis and synthesis. The device of standard subdivisions is an indication of the recognition of common aspects that pervade all subjects. The use of mnemonics, whereby recurring concepts in the scheme are represented by the same notation, for example, geographic concepts and language concepts, eased the transition of the Dewey Decimal Classification from a largely enumerative system to an increasingly faceted one. Another significant feature of the Dewey Decimal Classification is the use of the hierarchical notation based an the arabic numeral system. To a large extent, this feature accounts for the wide use and success of the system in the world across language barriers. With the prospect of increasing online information retrieval, the hierarchical notation will have a significant impact an the effectiveness of the Dewey Decimal Classification as an online retrieval tool. Because the notation is hierarchical, for example, with increasing digits in a number representing narrower subjects and decreasing digits indicating broader subjects, the Dewey Decimal Classification is particularly useful in generic searches for broadening or narrowing search results. In the preface to the second edition of his Decimal Classification Dewey explained the features of his "new" system. The excerpt below presents his ideas and theory concerning the rational basis of his classification, the standard subdivisions, the hierarchical notation based an decimal numbers, the use of mnemonics, the relative index, and relative location. It also reflects Dewey's lifelong interest in simplified spelling.
  10. Pejtersen, A.M.: Implications of users' value perception for the design of a bibliographic retrieval system (1986) 0.04
    0.044992894 = product of:
      0.13497868 = sum of:
        0.051434137 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2961) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051434137 = score(doc=2961,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 2961, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2961)
        0.08354454 = product of:
          0.1253168 = sum of:
            0.05576001 = weight(_text_:system in 2961) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05576001 = score(doc=2961,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13353272 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042397358 = queryNorm
                0.41757566 = fieldWeight in 2961, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2961)
            0.06955679 = weight(_text_:29 in 2961) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06955679 = score(doc=2961,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14914064 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042397358 = queryNorm
                0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 2961, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2961)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Date
    5. 8.2006 10:16:29
  11. Dubois, C.P.R.: Free text vs. controlled vocabulary; a reassessment (1987) 0.04
    0.044319734 = product of:
      0.1329592 = sum of:
        0.07356817 = weight(_text_:wide in 2048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07356817 = score(doc=2048,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18785246 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.3916274 = fieldWeight in 2048, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2048)
        0.059391025 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059391025 = score(doc=2048,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.46309367 = fieldWeight in 2048, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2048)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Free text and controlled vocabulary searching can no longer be viewed as antagonistic techniques in information retrieval since they both display advantages and weaknesses dependent on a fairly wide range of context, with the option to use both increasingly favoured. An attempt is made to present a list of features associated with the two techniques and to suggest a methodology to assist in deciding on the optimal retrieval technique for a particular purpose. The relevance of the techniques in expert systems and full text contexts is also discussed. Finally, recommendations for further research are suggested, concentrating on survey techniques in real-life retrieval situations
  12. Biebricher, N.; Fuhr, N.; Lustig, G.; Schwantner, M.; Knorz, G.: ¬The automatic indexing system AIR/PHYS : from research to application (1988) 0.04
    0.04329618 = product of:
      0.12988853 = sum of:
        0.060615707 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1952) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.060615707 = score(doc=1952,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.47264296 = fieldWeight in 1952, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1952)
        0.06927283 = product of:
          0.10390924 = sum of:
            0.046466675 = weight(_text_:system in 1952) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046466675 = score(doc=1952,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13353272 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042397358 = queryNorm
                0.3479797 = fieldWeight in 1952, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1952)
            0.057442565 = weight(_text_:22 in 1952) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.057442565 = score(doc=1952,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14846832 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042397358 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1952, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1952)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Date
    16. 8.1998 12:51:22
    Footnote
    Wiederabgedruckt in: Readings in information retrieval. Ed.: K. Sparck Jones u. P. Willett. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann 1997. S.513-517.
    Source
    Proceedings of the 11th annual conference on research and development in information retrieval. Ed.: Y. Chiaramella
  13. Fugmann, R.; Denk, W.: Variations in the order-creating power of interactive retrieval systems : treatise 8 on retrieval system theory (1980) 0.04
    0.04058912 = product of:
      0.12176736 = sum of:
        0.09698513 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4772) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09698513 = score(doc=4772,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.75622874 = fieldWeight in 4772, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4772)
        0.02478223 = product of:
          0.074346684 = sum of:
            0.074346684 = weight(_text_:system in 4772) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.074346684 = score(doc=4772,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13353272 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042397358 = queryNorm
                0.5567675 = fieldWeight in 4772, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4772)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
  14. Sparck Jones, K.: Retrieval system tests 1958-1978 (1981) 0.04
    0.04058912 = product of:
      0.12176736 = sum of:
        0.09698513 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09698513 = score(doc=3156,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.75622874 = fieldWeight in 3156, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3156)
        0.02478223 = product of:
          0.074346684 = sum of:
            0.074346684 = weight(_text_:system in 3156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.074346684 = score(doc=3156,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13353272 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042397358 = queryNorm
                0.5567675 = fieldWeight in 3156, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3156)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Source
    Information retrieval experiment. Ed.: K. Sparck Jones
  15. Greenwood, D.: OPAC research in the UK (1989) 0.04
    0.035952535 = product of:
      0.1078576 = sum of:
        0.07356817 = weight(_text_:wide in 887) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07356817 = score(doc=887,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18785246 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.3916274 = fieldWeight in 887, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=887)
        0.034289423 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 887) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034289423 = score(doc=887,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 887, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=887)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    The rapid pace of OPAC implementation in this country is providing a fruitful environment for research, with a wide range of projects currently being undertaken, including a number concerned with the application of advanced information retrieval techniques to OPAC systems. This article reviews the current situation and describes some of the more important research projects being undertaken, particularly those funded by the British Library Research and Development Department. A brief description of the British Library's own OPAC project is also provided. The article concludes with an examination of the value of OPAC research and a look at where further research effort might best be concentrated
  16. Blair, D.C.: Full text retrieval : Evaluation and implications (1986) 0.04
    0.035658743 = product of:
      0.106976226 = sum of:
        0.057505112 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.057505112 = score(doc=2047,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.44838852 = fieldWeight in 2047, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2047)
        0.049471118 = product of:
          0.07420667 = sum of:
            0.03942828 = weight(_text_:system in 2047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03942828 = score(doc=2047,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.13353272 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042397358 = queryNorm
                0.29527056 = fieldWeight in 2047, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2047)
            0.034778394 = weight(_text_:29 in 2047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034778394 = score(doc=2047,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14914064 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042397358 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2047, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2047)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Recently, a detailed evaluation of a large, operational full-text document retrieval system was reported in the literature. Values of precision and recall were estimated usind traditional statistical sampling methods and blind evaluation procedures. The results of this evaluation demonstrated that the system tested was retrieving less then 20% of the relevant documents when the searchers believed it was retrieving over 75% of the relevant documents. This evaluation is described including some data not reported in the original article. Also discussed are the implications which this study has for how the subjects of documents should be represented, as well as the importance of rigorous retrieval evaluations for the furtherhance of information retrieval research
    Footnote
    Vgl.: Blair, D.C., M.E. Maron: An evaluation ... Comm. ACM 28(1985) S.280-299; Salton, G.: Another look ... Comm. ACM 29(1986) S.648-656; Blair, D.C., M.E. Maron: Full-text information retrieval ... Inf. Proc. Man. 26(1990) S.437-447.
  17. Schabas, A.H.: Postcoordinate retrieval : a comparison of two retrieval languages (1982) 0.04
    0.035536755 = product of:
      0.10661026 = sum of:
        0.055176124 = weight(_text_:wide in 1202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055176124 = score(doc=1202,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18785246 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.29372054 = fieldWeight in 1202, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1202)
        0.051434137 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051434137 = score(doc=1202,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 1202, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1202)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    This article reports on a comparison of the postcoordinate retrieval effectiveness of two indexing languages: LCSH and PRECIS. The effect of augmenting each with title words was also studies. The database for the study was over 15.000 UK MARC records. Users returned 5.326 relevant judgements for citations retrieved for 61 SDI profiles, representing a wide variety of subjects. Results are reported in terms of precision and relative recall. Pure/applied sciences data and social science data were analyzed separately. Cochran's significance tests for ratios were used to interpret the findings. Recall emerged as the more important measure discriminating the behavior of the two languages. Addition of title words was found to improve recall of both indexing languages significantly. A direct relationship was observed between recall and exhaustivity. For the social sciences searches, recalls from PRECIS alone and from PRECIS with title words were significantly higher than those from LCSH alone and from LCSH with title words, respectively. Corresponding comparisons for the pure/applied sciences searches revealed no significant differences
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  18. Dack, D.: Australian attends conference on Dewey (1989) 0.03
    0.033486046 = product of:
      0.10045813 = sum of:
        0.051967148 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051967148 = score(doc=2509,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.40520695 = fieldWeight in 2509, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2509)
        0.04849098 = product of:
          0.072736464 = sum of:
            0.032526672 = weight(_text_:system in 2509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032526672 = score(doc=2509,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13353272 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042397358 = queryNorm
                0.2435858 = fieldWeight in 2509, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2509)
            0.040209793 = weight(_text_:22 in 2509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040209793 = score(doc=2509,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14846832 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042397358 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2509, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2509)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Edited version of a report to the Australian Library and Information Association on the Conference on classification theory in the computer age, Albany, New York, 18-19 Nov 88, and on the meeting of the Dewey Editorial Policy Committee which preceded it. The focus of the Editorial Policy Committee Meeting lay in the following areas: browsing; potential for improved subject access; system design; potential conflict between shelf location and information retrieval; and users. At the Conference on classification theory in the computer age the following papers were presented: Applications of artificial intelligence to bibliographic classification, by Irene Travis; Automation and classification, By Elaine Svenonious; Subject classification and language processing for retrieval in large data bases, by Diana Scott; Implications for information processing, by Carol Mandel; and implications for information science education, by Richard Halsey.
    Date
    8.11.1995 11:52:22
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  19. Voorhees, E.M.: Implementing agglomerative hierarchic clustering algorithms for use in document retrieval (1986) 0.03
    0.03307163 = product of:
      0.09921488 = sum of:
        0.06857885 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06857885 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
        0.030636035 = product of:
          0.091908105 = sum of:
            0.091908105 = weight(_text_:22 in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.091908105 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14846832 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042397358 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 22(1986) no.6, S.465-476
  20. Hill, J.S.: Online classification number access : some practical considerations (1984) 0.03
    0.03307163 = product of:
      0.09921488 = sum of:
        0.06857885 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 7684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06857885 = score(doc=7684,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 7684, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7684)
        0.030636035 = product of:
          0.091908105 = sum of:
            0.091908105 = weight(_text_:22 in 7684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.091908105 = score(doc=7684,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14846832 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042397358 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 7684, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7684)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Source
    Journal of academic librarianship. 10(1984), S.17-22
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval

Languages

  • e 675
  • d 200
  • m 9
  • f 4
  • nl 3
  • no 1
  • p 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 740
  • m 79
  • s 48
  • r 10
  • d 9
  • h 4
  • p 4
  • x 4
  • u 3
  • ? 2
  • b 2
  • n 2
  • i 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications