Search (8 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Hudon, M."
  • × language_ss:"e"
  1. Hudon, M.: Expanding audiences for education-related information and resources : classificatory structures (2003) 0.04
    0.03737321 = product of:
      0.11211963 = sum of:
        0.057803504 = weight(_text_:wide in 5521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.057803504 = score(doc=5521,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19679762 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044416238 = queryNorm
            0.29372054 = fieldWeight in 5521, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5521)
        0.054316122 = weight(_text_:web in 5521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.054316122 = score(doc=5521,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.14495286 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044416238 = queryNorm
            0.37471575 = fieldWeight in 5521, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5521)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Education is a culturally and politically branded domain of knowledge and practice, and education specialists have traditionally remained somewhat isolated, communicating mainly on the general level of "basic educational principles." The expansion of the World Wide Web could change this situation; there exist on the Web a substantial number of education-related resources which have become accessible to international audiences. In this paper, the authors look at how these resources are organized with a view to answering two questions: (1) In a context of global exchanges, are education-related resources available on the Web organized in such a way as to maximize efficiency of identification and retrieval? (2) In virtual libraries with specialized collections on education, do categorization schemes and terminology reflect anything other than local perspectives and systems?
  2. Hudon, M.: KO and classification education in the light of Benjamin Bloom's Taxonomy of learning objectives (2014) 0.02
    0.022508971 = product of:
      0.13505383 = sum of:
        0.13505383 = sum of:
          0.09894711 = weight(_text_:programs in 1468) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09894711 = score(doc=1468,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.25748047 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.79699 = idf(docFreq=364, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044416238 = queryNorm
              0.38428974 = fieldWeight in 1468, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.79699 = idf(docFreq=364, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1468)
          0.03610672 = weight(_text_:22 in 1468) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03610672 = score(doc=1468,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1555381 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044416238 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1468, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1468)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    In a research project focusing on knowledge organization and classification education, 407 learning objectives proposed in courses entirely or partially dedicated to these subjects in North American Library and Information Science programs were categorized with the help of the Benjamin Bloom's Taxonomy of cognitive objectives. The analysis reveals that the vast majority of course objectives remain at the lower levels of the Taxonomy. These results tend to reinforce observations made over the past 30 years in relation to KO and classification education. While KO and classification educators recognize the necessity for students to develop high-level analytic and evaluative skills, there are few references to those skills in current course objectives.
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  3. Hudon, M.: ¬The status of knowledge organization in library and information science master's programs (2021) 0.02
    0.019239716 = product of:
      0.11543829 = sum of:
        0.11543829 = product of:
          0.23087658 = sum of:
            0.23087658 = weight(_text_:programs in 697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.23087658 = score(doc=697,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.25748047 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.79699 = idf(docFreq=364, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044416238 = queryNorm
                0.89667606 = fieldWeight in 697, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  5.79699 = idf(docFreq=364, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=697)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    The content of master's programs accredited by the American Library Association was examined to assess the status of knowledge organization (KO) as a subject in current training. Data collected show that KO remains very visible in a majority of programs, mainly in the form of required and electives courses focusing on descriptive cataloging, classification, and metadata. Observed tendencies include, however, the recent elimination of the required KO course in several programs, the reality that one third of KO electives listed in course catalogs have not been scheduled in the past three years, and the fact that two-thirds of those teaching KO specialize in other areas of information science.
  4. Hudon, M.: Teaching classification in the 21st century (2011) 0.01
    0.014281786 = product of:
      0.085690714 = sum of:
        0.085690714 = product of:
          0.17138143 = sum of:
            0.17138143 = weight(_text_:programs in 4616) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.17138143 = score(doc=4616,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.25748047 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.79699 = idf(docFreq=364, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044416238 = queryNorm
                0.6656094 = fieldWeight in 4616, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  5.79699 = idf(docFreq=364, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4616)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Cataloguing and classification were at the core of the first librarian training programs In 2011, LIS educators continue to believe in the importance of teaching the basics of the classification process to all future information professionals. Information on classification instruction was collected through a survey of instructors in ALA-accredited LIS masters' programs. The survey was structured around issues touching several dimensions of any teaching endeavour, with an emphasis on the tools used to help students develop several types of skills involved in the classification process. This article presents quantitative data provided by respondents representing 31 distinct LIS masters' programs. We hope it can be used as foundation to pursue the examination of classification instruction in an ever changing information world.
  5. Hudon, M.: True and tested products : thesauri on the Web (2003) 0.01
    0.012195333 = product of:
      0.073171996 = sum of:
        0.073171996 = weight(_text_:web in 746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.073171996 = score(doc=746,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14495286 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044416238 = queryNorm
            0.50479853 = fieldWeight in 746, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=746)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
  6. Hudon, M.: Subject access to Web resources in education (2003) 0.01
    0.009855317 = product of:
      0.059131898 = sum of:
        0.059131898 = weight(_text_:web in 3958) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059131898 = score(doc=3958,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14495286 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044416238 = queryNorm
            0.4079388 = fieldWeight in 3958, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3958)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Introduction to various classificatory structures currently used to organize and make collections of Web-based resources in education more accessible to educators, education specialists, and the general public. Presentation of other models which could also be useful.
  7. Hudon, M.: Innovation and tradition in knowledge organization schemes on the Internet, or, Finding one's way in the virtual library (2000) 0.01
    0.0073914872 = product of:
      0.04434892 = sum of:
        0.04434892 = weight(_text_:web in 116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04434892 = score(doc=116,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14495286 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044416238 = queryNorm
            0.3059541 = fieldWeight in 116, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=116)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Because of the nature, number, and extreme mobility of resources available on electronic networks, access instruments that will allow information seekers to find relevant Web pages or sites are essential. While virtual libraries without clear collection development policies continue to be established, ad hoc knowledge organization schemes also continue to be conceived and implemented; these so-called innovative classification tools are generally structured around loose categories representing a mix of disciplines, subjects, forms of presentation, and audiences. This paper discusses a few examples of Web-based organization schemes, suggesting that their degree of intuitiveness, user-friendliness and efficiency is very possibly overrated
  8. Hudon, M.; Mas, E.S.: Structure, logic, and semantics for Web-based collections in education (2006) 0.01
    0.0073914872 = product of:
      0.04434892 = sum of:
        0.04434892 = weight(_text_:web in 4391) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04434892 = score(doc=4391,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14495286 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044416238 = queryNorm
            0.3059541 = fieldWeight in 4391, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4391)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Results of a project focusing on six Web-based collections in education. Our analysis of homegrown classification structures considers three dimensions. "Structure" is described through quantitative data (e.g. Number of main categories, Number of hierarchical levels, etc.). "Logic" concentrates on two aspects of the subdividing process: division principle, and type of hierarchical relation. "Semantics" relates to concepts and their representation in the form of terms. In our sample, the classification structures are hierarchical, not overly complex and not very specific. The choice, arrangement and sequence of classes are logical. Conceptual and terminological inconsistencies are due to significant gaps in conceptual coverage and lack of terminological control.