Search (312 results, page 1 of 16)

0.103821084 = product of:
  0.31146324 = sum of:
    0.14655139 = weight(_text_:computer in 2330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14655139 = score(doc=2330,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.16231956 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044416238 = queryNorm
        0.90285724 = fieldWeight in 2330, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2330)
    0.16491184 = product of:
      0.32982367 = sum of:
        0.32982367 = weight(_text_:programs in 2330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.32982367 = score(doc=2330,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.25748047 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.79699 = idf(docFreq=364, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044416238 = queryNorm
            1.2809658 = fieldWeight in 2330, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              5.79699 = idf(docFreq=364, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2330)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

LCSH

Cataloging of computer programs
Cataloging of computer programs / Specimens

Subject

Cataloging of computer programs
Cataloging of computer programs / Specimens

0.083719015 = product of:
  0.25115705 = sum of:
    0.11122468 = weight(_text_:computer in 2595) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11122468 = score(doc=2595,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.16231956 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044416238 = queryNorm
        0.6852205 = fieldWeight in 2595, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2595)
    0.13993235 = product of:
      0.2798647 = sum of:
        0.2798647 = weight(_text_:programs in 2595) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2798647 = score(doc=2595,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.25748047 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.79699 = idf(docFreq=364, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044416238 = queryNorm
            1.0869356 = fieldWeight in 2595, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.79699 = idf(docFreq=364, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2595)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

LCSH

TeX (Computer system)

PRECIS

Phototypesetting / Applications of microcomputer systems / Programs: TeX

Subject

TeX (Computer system)
Phototypesetting / Applications of microcomputer systems / Programs: TeX

0.07838307 = product of:
  0.2351492 = sum of:
    0.0587873 = product of:
      0.1763619 = sum of:
        0.1763619 = weight(_text_:3a in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1763619 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.37656134 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044416238 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.1763619 = weight(_text_:2f in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1763619 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.37656134 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044416238 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Source

http%3A%2F%2Fcogprints.org%2F1380%2F1%2FvdM_correlation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0g7DvZbQPb2U7dYb49b9v_

0.06976585 = product of:
  0.20929754 = sum of:
    0.09268724 = weight(_text_:computer in 478) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09268724 = score(doc=478,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.16231956 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044416238 = queryNorm
        0.5710171 = fieldWeight in 478, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=478)
    0.11661029 = product of:
      0.23322058 = sum of:
        0.23322058 = weight(_text_:programs in 478) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.23322058 = score(doc=478,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.25748047 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.79699 = idf(docFreq=364, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044416238 = queryNorm
            0.90577966 = fieldWeight in 478, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.79699 = idf(docFreq=364, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=478)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

LCSH

Indexing / Computer programs / Evaluation

Subject

Indexing / Computer programs / Evaluation

0.06375247 = product of:
  0.19125742 = sum of:
    0.13107955 = weight(_text_:computer in 6143) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13107955 = score(doc=6143,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16231956 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044416238 = queryNorm
        0.8075401 = fieldWeight in 6143, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=6143)
    0.06017787 = product of:
      0.12035574 = sum of:
        0.12035574 = weight(_text_:22 in 6143) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12035574 = score(doc=6143,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1555381 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044416238 = queryNorm
            0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 6143, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=6143)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Source

Computer. 16(1983) no.10, S.22-27

0.04580146 = product of:
  0.13740438 = sum of:
    0.087930836 = weight(_text_:computer in 4175) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.087930836 = score(doc=4175,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.16231956 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044416238 = queryNorm
        0.5417144 = fieldWeight in 4175, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4175)
    0.049473554 = product of:
      0.09894711 = sum of:
        0.09894711 = weight(_text_:programs in 4175) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09894711 = score(doc=4175,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25748047 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.79699 = idf(docFreq=364, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044416238 = queryNorm
            0.38428974 = fieldWeight in 4175, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.79699 = idf(docFreq=364, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4175)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Abstract

Chaitin, the inventor of algorithmic information theory, presents in this book the strongest possible version of Gödel's incompleteness theorem, using an information theoretic approach based on the size of computer programs. One half of the book is concerned with studying the halting probability of a universal computer if its program is chosen by tossing a coin. The other half is concerned with encoding the halting probability as an algebraic equation in integers, a so-called exponential diophantine equation.

LCSH

LISP (Computer program language)

Series

Cambridge tracts in theoretical computer science ; 1

Subject

LISP (Computer program language)

0.044626735 = product of:
  0.1338802 = sum of:
    0.09175568 = weight(_text_:computer in 2134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09175568 = score(doc=2134,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16231956 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044416238 = queryNorm
        0.56527805 = fieldWeight in 2134, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2134)
    0.04212451 = product of:
      0.08424902 = sum of:
        0.08424902 = weight(_text_:22 in 2134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08424902 = score(doc=2134,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1555381 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044416238 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2134, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2134)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Date

30. 3.2001 13:32:22

Source

Computer journal. 26(1983), S.239-246

0.042707097 = product of:
  0.12812129 = sum of:
    0.07864773 = weight(_text_:computer in 971) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07864773 = score(doc=971,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.16231956 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044416238 = queryNorm
        0.48452407 = fieldWeight in 971, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=971)
    0.049473554 = product of:
      0.09894711 = sum of:
        0.09894711 = weight(_text_:programs in 971) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09894711 = score(doc=971,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25748047 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.79699 = idf(docFreq=364, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044416238 = queryNorm
            0.38428974 = fieldWeight in 971, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.79699 = idf(docFreq=364, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=971)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Abstract

This paper examines how classification schemes provide subject access. Concept arrangement before computers is compared to its role after machine-based exact match techniques have evolved. The change in retrieval techniques corresponds to a change in philosophy of knowledge. Classification schemes, emerging from Aristotelian philosophy, provide conceptual frameworks for direct human interaction to foster reference and communication. Computer-based systems provide access with a different emphasis on conceptual arrangement. Employing a philosophy of knowledge as facets, computer programs use word-frequency analyses, uncontrolled vocabulary, and feedback procedures to define subject access. Classification for machine processing optimizes the power of these systems. Though the influence of Aristotelian philosophy declines, structures for concept communication continue to be instrumental in the efficient operation of computer-based systems. Ongoing classification work can help direct vague inquiries and reflect human and social relationships to knowledge

Source

Classification theory in the computer age: conversations across the disciplines. Proc. from the Conf. 18.-19.11.1988, Albany, NY

0.042501684 = product of:
  0.12750505 = sum of:
    0.04587784 = weight(_text_:computer in 5688) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04587784 = score(doc=5688,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16231956 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044416238 = queryNorm
        0.28263903 = fieldWeight in 5688, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5688)
    0.081627205 = product of:
      0.16325441 = sum of:
        0.16325441 = weight(_text_:programs in 5688) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16325441 = score(doc=5688,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.25748047 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.79699 = idf(docFreq=364, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044416238 = queryNorm
            0.6340458 = fieldWeight in 5688, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.79699 = idf(docFreq=364, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5688)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Abstract

On 23 June 88 Gütersloh City Library hosted an in-service training session on BASIS (Library Analytical System for Information Storage) programs for acquisitioning and cataloguing as well as on Gütersloh's own integrated book issue system called AVALON, organised through the Scool for Library & Documentation at Cologne Polytechnic. Discusses the programs installed at Gütersloh for BASIS in the early 70s by the North Rhine Westphalia Automation Working Group along with computer personnel and librarians, as well as link-up possibilities with main frame computers issuing book overdues, time and staff implications, the development of AVALON wich, though integrated into BASIS, can still be installed without BASIS, and a glimpse at possible library applications and the requirements of hardware and software linked with this.

0.041718856 = product of:
  0.12515657 = sum of:
    0.067437425 = weight(_text_:wide in 2834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.067437425 = score(doc=2834,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19679762 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044416238 = queryNorm
        0.342674 = fieldWeight in 2834, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2834)
    0.057719145 = product of:
      0.11543829 = sum of:
        0.11543829 = weight(_text_:programs in 2834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11543829 = score(doc=2834,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25748047 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.79699 = idf(docFreq=364, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044416238 = queryNorm
            0.44833803 = fieldWeight in 2834, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.79699 = idf(docFreq=364, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2834)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Abstract

The challenge facing the library profession is not only to learn how to identify information needs, but also to create new services and reshape existing service delivery patterns around them. Provides a brief examination of the literature of information needs and information seeking behaviour. Examines problems arising from meeting information needs in an electronic age, and describes a few societal changes that directly affect the way libraries attempt to meet information needs. Emphasises that the challenge of the 1990s is to design research that will help librarians and the information systems with which they work to anticipate a wide range of information needs.

Footnote

Excerpt from 'Rethinking the Library in the Information Age', vol.2, a study conducted by the US Department of Education, Office of Library Programs, Oct. 88.

0.04086674 = product of:
  0.12260021 = sum of:
    0.06488107 = weight(_text_:computer in 652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06488107 = score(doc=652,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.16231956 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044416238 = queryNorm
        0.39971197 = fieldWeight in 652, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=652)
    0.057719145 = product of:
      0.11543829 = sum of:
        0.11543829 = weight(_text_:programs in 652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11543829 = score(doc=652,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25748047 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.79699 = idf(docFreq=364, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044416238 = queryNorm
            0.44833803 = fieldWeight in 652, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.79699 = idf(docFreq=364, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=652)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Abstract

The index to the second edition of The Canadian Encyclopedia was prepared on an IBM PC-XT personal computer using the IBM Professional Editor, custom programs written in IBM Pascal, and TeX a high quality typesetting program developed by Donald E. Knuth of Stanford University in California. The entries were chosen and keyed in by the indexer, and then alphabetized, formatted, and typeset by the computer. An unusual data entry format together with good typesetting software made possible the delivery to the printer of the 372 page camera ready index less than two weeks after the indexer received the final pages of text. TeX provides fully automatic pagination.

0.03453233 = product of:
  0.103596985 = sum of:
    0.04587784 = weight(_text_:computer in 1636) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04587784 = score(doc=1636,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16231956 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044416238 = queryNorm
        0.28263903 = fieldWeight in 1636, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1636)
    0.057719145 = product of:
      0.11543829 = sum of:
        0.11543829 = weight(_text_:programs in 1636) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11543829 = score(doc=1636,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25748047 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.79699 = idf(docFreq=364, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044416238 = queryNorm
            0.44833803 = fieldWeight in 1636, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.79699 = idf(docFreq=364, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1636)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Abstract

The Deep Structure Indexing System is based on: (1) a set of postulated elementary categories of the elements fit to form componentes of names of subjects; (2) a set of syntax rules with reference to the categories; (3) a vocabulary control tool such as Classaurus; (4) a set of indicator digits to denote the categories and their subdivisions; and (5) a set of codes to denote a few of the decisions of the indexer. Names of subjects formulated on the basis mentioned above are input to a set of computer programs to generate several different types of subject index entires. This paper describes briefly the Deep Structure Index System

0.030271526 = product of:
  0.18162915 = sum of:
    0.18162915 = weight(_text_:computer in 7385) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18162915 = score(doc=7385,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.16231956 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044416238 = queryNorm
        1.1189604 = fieldWeight in 7385, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7385)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Source

Journal of computer-based instruction. 13(1986), S.94-97

Theme

Computer Based Training

0.030011963 = product of:
  0.18007177 = sum of:
    0.18007177 = sum of:
      0.13192947 = weight(_text_:programs in 2830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.13192947 = score(doc=2830,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.25748047 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.79699 = idf(docFreq=364, maxDocs=44218)
            0.044416238 = queryNorm
          0.5123863 = fieldWeight in 2830, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.79699 = idf(docFreq=364, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2830)
      0.048142295 = weight(_text_:22 in 2830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.048142295 = score(doc=2830,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1555381 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.044416238 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2830, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2830)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Abstract

The PRO-CITE and BIBLIO-LINK software packages make the process of compiling bibliographies and internal data bases much easier than when all the steps in the process were manual (compiling, typing). The 2 programs work on records that have been downloaded from on-line data bases. BIBLIO-LINK analyses the downloaded records to determine document type and stores the data in the appropriate PRO-CITE workform, putting fields from the downloaded record into the correct PRO-CITE fields.

Source

Computers in libraries. 9(1989) no.4, S.22-24

0.029599141 = product of:
  0.08879742 = sum of:
    0.039323866 = weight(_text_:computer in 418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.039323866 = score(doc=418,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16231956 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044416238 = queryNorm
        0.24226204 = fieldWeight in 418, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=418)
    0.049473554 = product of:
      0.09894711 = sum of:
        0.09894711 = weight(_text_:programs in 418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09894711 = score(doc=418,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25748047 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.79699 = idf(docFreq=364, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044416238 = queryNorm
            0.38428974 = fieldWeight in 418, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.79699 = idf(docFreq=364, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=418)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Abstract

The successful development of computer technology for automating Chinese, Japanese, and Korean (CIK) vernacular scripts and the completion of the RLIN CJK system in 1983 marked the beginning of online operations of East Asian libraries in North America and helped keep them in the mainstream of library automation. The RLIN CJK system and the subsequently developed OCLC CJK system are building CJK bibliographic databases which have made East Asian cooperative cataloging and resources sharing a true reality. The emergence, features, current conditions, and future plans of the two CJK systems are discussed. So are the automated programs of national libraries in East Asia in terms of their building national databases for vernacular materials and designing and producing national MARCs for exchange of bibliographic information among libraries. The outlook of cooperation between the CJK systems and international exchange of CJK bibliographic information is also examined.

0.028647777 = product of:
  0.08594333 = sum of:
    0.06488107 = weight(_text_:computer in 2509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06488107 = score(doc=2509,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.16231956 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044416238 = queryNorm
        0.39971197 = fieldWeight in 2509, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2509)
    0.021062255 = product of:
      0.04212451 = sum of:
        0.04212451 = weight(_text_:22 in 2509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04212451 = score(doc=2509,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1555381 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044416238 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2509, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2509)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Abstract

Edited version of a report to the Australian Library and Information Association on the Conference on classification theory in the computer age, Albany, New York, 18-19 Nov 88, and on the meeting of the Dewey Editorial Policy Committee which preceded it. The focus of the Editorial Policy Committee Meeting lay in the following areas: browsing; potential for improved subject access; system design; potential conflict between shelf location and information retrieval; and users. At the Conference on classification theory in the computer age the following papers were presented: Applications of artificial intelligence to bibliographic classification, by Irene Travis; Automation and classification, By Elaine Svenonious; Subject classification and language processing for retrieval in large data bases, by Diana Scott; Implications for information processing, by Carol Mandel; and implications for information science education, by Richard Halsey.

Date

8.11.1995 11:52:22

0.028647777 = product of:
  0.08594333 = sum of:
    0.06488107 = weight(_text_:computer in 5001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06488107 = score(doc=5001,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.16231956 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044416238 = queryNorm
        0.39971197 = fieldWeight in 5001, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5001)
    0.021062255 = product of:
      0.04212451 = sum of:
        0.04212451 = weight(_text_:22 in 5001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04212451 = score(doc=5001,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1555381 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044416238 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5001, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5001)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Abstract

A study was done to test the effectiveness of retrieval using title word searching. It was based on actual search profiles used in the Mechanized Information Center at Ohio State University, in order ro replicate as closely as possible actual searching conditions. Fewer than 50% of the relevant titles were retrieved by keywords in titles. The low rate of retrieval can be attributes to three sources: titles themselves, user and information specialist ignorance of the subject vocabulary in use, and to general language problems. Across fields it was found that the social sciences had the best retrieval rate, with science having the next best, and arts and humanities the lowest. Ways to enhance and supplement keyword in title searching on the computer and in printed indexes are discussed.

Date

14. 3.1996 13:22:21

0.02621591 = product of:
  0.15729547 = sum of:
    0.15729547 = weight(_text_:computer in 6223) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15729547 = score(doc=6223,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.16231956 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044416238 = queryNorm
        0.96904814 = fieldWeight in 6223, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6223)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

LCSH

Computer networks

PRECIS

Computer systems / Networks

Subject

Computer networks
Computer systems / Networks

0.02550099 = product of:
  0.07650297 = sum of:
    0.05243182 = weight(_text_:computer in 2502) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05243182 = score(doc=2502,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16231956 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044416238 = queryNorm
        0.32301605 = fieldWeight in 2502, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2502)
    0.024071148 = product of:
      0.048142295 = sum of:
        0.048142295 = weight(_text_:22 in 2502) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048142295 = score(doc=2502,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1555381 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044416238 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2502, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2502)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Abstract

Examines a simpler cataloguing format offered by PCs, without disturbing compatibility, using A-Z cataloguing rules for data input, category codes for tagging and computer-supported data input through windows. Gives numerous examples of catalogue entries, basing techniques on certain category schemes set out by Klaus Haller and Hans Popst. Examines catalogue entries in respect of categories of data bases for authors and corporate names, titles, single volume works, serial issues of collected works, and limited editions of works in several volumes.

Source

Bibliotheksdienst. 22(1988) H.9, S.841-856

0.02550099 = product of:
  0.07650297 = sum of:
    0.05243182 = weight(_text_:computer in 4165) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05243182 = score(doc=4165,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16231956 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044416238 = queryNorm
        0.32301605 = fieldWeight in 4165, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4165)
    0.024071148 = product of:
      0.048142295 = sum of:
        0.048142295 = weight(_text_:22 in 4165) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048142295 = score(doc=4165,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1555381 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044416238 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4165, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4165)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Abstract

This paper reports on the successful introduction of a sophisticated online catalogue system at the library of the Scott Polar Research Institute, Cambridge, using the Muscat program package. The system provides to both end-users and library staff a choice between boolean searching on keywords and access using relevance feedback based on free text in English, mixed with UDC classification numbers. The system is implemented on an IBM 3084 computer. Significant benefits from the application of relevance feedback are reported with 10,000 records on file.

Source

Program. 22(1988), S.1-20