Search (174 results, page 1 of 9)

0.36371398 = product of:
  0.72742796 = sum of:
    0.10391828 = product of:
      0.31175482 = sum of:
        0.31175482 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.31175482 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.33282363 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039257277 = queryNorm
            0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.31175482 = weight(_text_:2f in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.31175482 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.33282363 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.039257277 = queryNorm
        0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
    0.31175482 = weight(_text_:2f in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.31175482 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.33282363 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.039257277 = queryNorm
        0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
  0.5 = coord(3/6)

Source

http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja

0.29097116 = product of:
  0.5819423 = sum of:
    0.08313462 = product of:
      0.24940385 = sum of:
        0.24940385 = weight(_text_:3a in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.24940385 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.33282363 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039257277 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.24940385 = weight(_text_:2f in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.24940385 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.33282363 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.039257277 = queryNorm
        0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
    0.24940385 = weight(_text_:2f in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.24940385 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.33282363 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.039257277 = queryNorm
        0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
  0.5 = coord(3/6)

Source

https%3A%2F%2Ftannerlectures.utah.edu%2F_documents%2Fa-to-z%2Fp%2Fpopper80.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3f4QRTEH-OEBmoYr2J_c7H

0.18185699 = product of:
  0.36371398 = sum of:
    0.05195914 = product of:
      0.15587741 = sum of:
        0.15587741 = weight(_text_:3a in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15587741 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.33282363 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039257277 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.15587741 = weight(_text_:2f in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15587741 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.33282363 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.039257277 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
    0.15587741 = weight(_text_:2f in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15587741 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.33282363 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.039257277 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
  0.5 = coord(3/6)

Footnote

Vgl. unter: https://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwizweHljdbcAhVS16QKHXcFD9QQFjABegQICRAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.researchgate.net%2Fpublication%2F271200105_Die_Autonomie_des_Menschen_und_der_Maschine_-_gegenwartige_Definitionen_von_Autonomie_zwischen_philosophischem_Hintergrund_und_technologischer_Umsetzbarkeit_Redigierte_Version_der_Magisterarbeit_Karls&usg=AOvVaw06orrdJmFF2xbCCp_hL26q.

0.032665685 = product of:
  0.1959941 = sum of:
    0.1959941 = weight(_text_:1989 in 478) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1959941 = score(doc=478,freq=5.0), product of:
        0.19158144 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8801513 = idf(docFreq=912, maxDocs=44218)
          0.039257277 = queryNorm
        1.0230328 = fieldWeight in 478, product of:
          2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
            5.0 = termFreq=5.0
          4.8801513 = idf(docFreq=912, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=478)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Source

Mind and language. 4(1989) no.1/2, S.7-16

Year

1989

0.029519852 = product of:
  0.1771191 = sum of:
    0.1771191 = weight(_text_:1989 in 8985) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1771191 = score(doc=8985,freq=3.0), product of:
        0.19158144 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8801513 = idf(docFreq=912, maxDocs=44218)
          0.039257277 = queryNorm
        0.9245108 = fieldWeight in 8985, product of:
          1.7320508 = tf(freq=3.0), with freq of:
            3.0 = termFreq=3.0
          4.8801513 = idf(docFreq=912, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8985)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Year

1989

0.028608857 = product of:
  0.17165314 = sum of:
    0.17165314 = weight(_text_:politics in 829) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.17165314 = score(doc=829,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.27611402 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.033448 = idf(docFreq=105, maxDocs=44218)
          0.039257277 = queryNorm
        0.62167484 = fieldWeight in 829, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          7.033448 = idf(docFreq=105, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=829)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Abstract

Constructivism in the social sciences has known several ups and downs over the last decades. It was successful rather early in sociology but hotly contested in International Politics/Relations (IR). Oddly enough, just at the moments it made important inroads into the research agenda and became accepted by the mainstream, the enthusiasm for it waned. Many constructivists-as did mainstream scholars-moved from "grand theory" or even "meta-theory" toward "normal science," or experimented with other (eclectic) approaches, of which the turns to practices, to emotions, to new materialism, to the visual, and to the queer are some of the latest manifestations. In a way, constructivism was "successful," on the one hand, by introducing norms, norm-dynamics, and diffusion; the role of new actors in world politics; and the changing role of institutions into the debates, while losing, on the other hand, much of its critical potential. The latter survived only on the fringes-and in Europe more than in the United States. In IR, curiously, constructivism, which was rooted in various European traditions (philosophy, history, linguistics, social analysis), was originally introduced in Europe via the disciplinary discussions taking place in the United States. Yet, especially in its critical version, it has found a more conducive environment in Europe than in the United States.
In the United States, soon after its emergence, constructivism became "mainstreamed" by having its analysis of norms reduced to "variable research." In such research, positive examples of for instance the spread of norms were included, but strangely empirical evidence of counterexamples of norm "deaths" (preventive strikes, unlawful combatants, drone strikes, extrajudicial killings) were not. The elective affinity of constructivism and humanitarianism seemed to have transformed the former into the Enlightenment project of "progress." Even Kant was finally pressed into the service of "liberalism" in the U.S. discussion, and his notion of the "practical interest of reason" morphed into the political project of an "end of history." This "slant" has prevented a serious conceptual engagement with the "history" of law and (inter-)national politics and the epistemological problems that are raised thereby. This bowdlerization of constructivism is further buttressed by the fact that in the "knowledge industry" none of the "leading" U.S. departments has a constructivist on board, ensuring thereby the narrowness of conceptual and methodological choices to which the future "professionals" are exposed. This article contextualizes constructivism and its emergence within a changing world and within the evolution of the discipline. The aim is not to provide a definition or a typology of constructivism, since such efforts go against the critical dimension of constructivism. An application of this critique on constructivism itself leads to a reflection on truth, knowledge, and the need for (re-)orientation.

Source

Oxford research encyclopedia of politics

0.021456642 = product of:
  0.12873985 = sum of:
    0.12873985 = weight(_text_:politics in 4097) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12873985 = score(doc=4097,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.27611402 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.033448 = idf(docFreq=105, maxDocs=44218)
          0.039257277 = queryNorm
        0.46625614 = fieldWeight in 4097, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.033448 = idf(docFreq=105, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4097)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Abstract

A challenge of managing and extracting useful knowledge from social media data sources has attracted much attention from academic and industry. To address this challenge, semantic analysis of textual data is focused in this paper. We propose an ontology-based approach to extract semantics of textual data and define the domain of data. In other words, we semantically analyse the social data at two levels i.e. the entity level and the domain level. We have chosen Twitter as a social channel challenge for a purpose of concept proof. Domain knowledge is captured in ontologies which are then used to enrich the semantics of tweets provided with specific semantic conceptual representation of entities that appear in the tweets. Case studies are used to demonstrate this approach. We experiment and evaluate our proposed approach with a public dataset collected from Twitter and from the politics domain. The ontology-based approach leverages entity extraction and concept mappings in terms of quantity and accuracy of concept identification.

0.020659592 = product of:
  0.123957545 = sum of:
    0.123957545 = weight(_text_:1989 in 4451) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.123957545 = score(doc=4451,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19158144 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8801513 = idf(docFreq=912, maxDocs=44218)
          0.039257277 = queryNorm
        0.6470227 = fieldWeight in 4451, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8801513 = idf(docFreq=912, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4451)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Abstract

Enthält ca. 400.000 englischsprachige Buchtitel mit dem Erscheinungsjahr 1989 ff.

0.017880535 = product of:
  0.107283205 = sum of:
    0.107283205 = weight(_text_:politics in 5709) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.107283205 = score(doc=5709,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.27611402 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.033448 = idf(docFreq=105, maxDocs=44218)
          0.039257277 = queryNorm
        0.38854676 = fieldWeight in 5709, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.033448 = idf(docFreq=105, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5709)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

0.017880535 = product of:
  0.107283205 = sum of:
    0.107283205 = weight(_text_:politics in 5853) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.107283205 = score(doc=5853,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.27611402 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.033448 = idf(docFreq=105, maxDocs=44218)
          0.039257277 = queryNorm
        0.38854676 = fieldWeight in 5853, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.033448 = idf(docFreq=105, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5853)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Abstract

COVID-19 is an unprecedented global health crisis that will have immeasurable consequences for our economic and social well-being. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, the director general of the World Health Organization, stated "We're not just fighting an epidemic; we're fighting an infodemic". Currently, there is no robust scientific basis to the existing definitions of false information used in the fight against the COVID-19infodemic. The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate how the use of a novel taxonomy and related model (based upon a conceptual framework that synthesizes insights from information science, philosophy, media studies and politics) can produce new scientific definitions of mis-, dis- and malinformation. We undertake our analysis from the viewpoint of information systems research. The conceptual approach to defining mis-,dis- and malinformation can be applied to a wide range of empirical examples and, if applied properly, may prove useful in fighting the COVID-19 infodemic. In sum, our research suggests that: (i) analyzing all types of information is important in the battle against the COVID-19 infodemic; (ii) a scientific approach is required so that different methods are not used by different studies; (iii) "misinformation", as an umbrella term, can be confusing and should be dropped from use; (iv) clear, scientific definitions of information types will be needed going forward; (v) malinformation is an overlooked phenomenon involving reconfigurations of the truth.

0.017216329 = product of:
  0.103297964 = sum of:
    0.103297964 = weight(_text_:1989 in 3468) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.103297964 = score(doc=3468,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19158144 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8801513 = idf(docFreq=912, maxDocs=44218)
          0.039257277 = queryNorm
        0.53918564 = fieldWeight in 3468, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8801513 = idf(docFreq=912, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3468)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Issue

1989/93 [Version 2].

0.014304428 = product of:
  0.08582657 = sum of:
    0.08582657 = weight(_text_:politics in 3312) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08582657 = score(doc=3312,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.27611402 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.033448 = idf(docFreq=105, maxDocs=44218)
          0.039257277 = queryNorm
        0.31083742 = fieldWeight in 3312, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.033448 = idf(docFreq=105, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3312)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Abstract

If you are an academic researcher but did not earn (yet) your Nobel prize or your retirement, it is unlikely you never heard about research metrics. These metrics aim at quantifying various aspects of the research process, at the level of individual researchers (e.g. h-index, altmetrics), scientific journals (e.g. impact factors) or entire universities/ countries (e.g. rankings). Although such "measurements" have existed in a simple form for a long time, their widespread calculation was enabled by the advent of the digital era (large amount of data available worldwide in a computer-compatible format). And in this new era, what becomes technically possible will be done, and what is done and appears to simplify our lives will be used. As a result, a rapidly growing number of statistics-based numerical indices are nowadays fed into decisionmaking processes. This is true in nearly all aspects of society (politics, economy, education and private life), and in particular in research, where metrics play an increasingly important role in determining positions, funding, awards, research programs, career choices, reputations, etc.

0.012051429 = product of:
  0.07230857 = sum of:
    0.07230857 = weight(_text_:1989 in 2820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07230857 = score(doc=2820,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19158144 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8801513 = idf(docFreq=912, maxDocs=44218)
          0.039257277 = queryNorm
        0.37742993 = fieldWeight in 2820, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8801513 = idf(docFreq=912, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2820)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Footnote

Originalausgabe München: Knaur 1989

0.012051429 = product of:
  0.07230857 = sum of:
    0.07230857 = weight(_text_:1989 in 4764) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07230857 = score(doc=4764,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19158144 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8801513 = idf(docFreq=912, maxDocs=44218)
          0.039257277 = queryNorm
        0.37742993 = fieldWeight in 4764, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8801513 = idf(docFreq=912, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4764)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Abstract

Mit der Veröffentlichung der ersten Website 1989 am CERN gab Timothy J. Berners-Lee den Startschuss für das WorldWideWeb, diesem ständig expandierenden Konvolut aus digitalisierten Daten, vernetzten Maschinen und Menschen. Mittlerweile nimmt das Netz für sich in Anspruch, das Weltwissen zu repräsentieren und hat in seiner Gesamtheit längst die klassische Vorstellung von einer Enzyklopädie abgelöst und übertroffen. Andererseits ist das Netz trotz geballter Wissensansammlung und Rechenpower immer noch dumm. Seit fast einer Dekade ist nun das "verständige" Internet in der Diskussion, die Semantic Web Days in München und die Semantics in Wien zogen eine Zwischenbilanz und zeigten ein mittlerweile weites Spektrum von Praxisanwendungen.

0.010329796 = product of:
  0.061978772 = sum of:
    0.061978772 = weight(_text_:1989 in 1061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.061978772 = score(doc=1061,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19158144 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8801513 = idf(docFreq=912, maxDocs=44218)
          0.039257277 = queryNorm
        0.32351136 = fieldWeight in 1061, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8801513 = idf(docFreq=912, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1061)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Abstract

The object of Information Retrieval is to retrieve all relevant documents for a user query and only those relevant documents. Much research has focused on achieving this objective with little regard for storage overhead or performance. In the paper we evaluate the use of Part of Speech Tagging to improve, the index storage overhead and general speed of the system with only a minimal reduction to precision recall measurements. We tagged 500Mbs of the Los Angeles Times 1990 and 1989 document collection provided by TREC for parts of speech. We then experimented to find the most relevant part of speech to index. We show that 90% of precision recall is achieved with 40% of the document collections terms. We also show that this is a improvement in overhead with only a 1% reduction in precision recall.

0.008659856 = product of:
  0.05195914 = sum of:
    0.05195914 = product of:
      0.15587741 = sum of:
        0.15587741 = weight(_text_:3a in 5669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15587741 = score(doc=5669,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.33282363 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039257277 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5669, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5669)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Content

"Die Englischsprachige Wikipedia verfügt jetzt über mehr als 6 Millionen Artikel. An zweiter Stelle kommt die deutschsprachige Wikipedia mit 2.3 Millionen Artikeln, an dritter Stelle steht die französischsprachige Wikipedia mit 2.1 Millionen Artikeln (via Researchbuzz: Firehose <https://rbfirehose.com/2020/01/24/techcrunch-wikipedia-now-has-more-than-6-million-articles-in-english/> und Techcrunch <https://techcrunch.com/2020/01/23/wikipedia-english-six-million-articles/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Techcrunch+%28TechCrunch%29&guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly9yYmZpcmVob3NlLmNvbS8yMDIwLzAxLzI0L3RlY2hjcnVuY2gtd2lraXBlZGlhLW5vdy1oYXMtbW9yZS10aGFuLTYtbWlsbGlvbi1hcnRpY2xlcy1pbi1lbmdsaXNoLw&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAK0zHfjdDZ_spFZBF_z-zDjtL5iWvuKDumFTzm4HvQzkUfE2pLXQzGS6FGB_y-VISdMEsUSvkNsg2U_NWQ4lwWSvOo3jvXo1I3GtgHpP8exukVxYAnn5mJspqX50VHIWFADHhs5AerkRn3hMRtf_R3F1qmEbo8EROZXp328HMC-o>). 250120 via digithek ch = #fineBlog s.a.: Angesichts der Veröffentlichung des 6-millionsten Artikels vergangene Woche in der englischsprachigen Wikipedia hat die Community-Zeitungsseite "Wikipedia Signpost" ein Moratorium bei der Veröffentlichung von Unternehmensartikeln gefordert. Das sei kein Vorwurf gegen die Wikimedia Foundation, aber die derzeitigen Maßnahmen, um die Enzyklopädie gegen missbräuchliches undeklariertes Paid Editing zu schützen, funktionierten ganz klar nicht. *"Da die ehrenamtlichen Autoren derzeit von Werbung in Gestalt von Wikipedia-Artikeln überwältigt werden, und da die WMF nicht in der Lage zu sein scheint, dem irgendetwas entgegenzusetzen, wäre der einzige gangbare Weg für die Autoren, fürs erste die Neuanlage von Artikeln über Unternehmen zu untersagen"*, schreibt der Benutzer Smallbones in seinem Editorial <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2020-01-27/From_the_editor> zur heutigen Ausgabe."

0.008608164 = product of:
  0.051648982 = sum of:
    0.051648982 = weight(_text_:1989 in 2529) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.051648982 = score(doc=2529,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19158144 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8801513 = idf(docFreq=912, maxDocs=44218)
          0.039257277 = queryNorm
        0.26959282 = fieldWeight in 2529, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8801513 = idf(docFreq=912, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2529)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Abstract

It was from 1895 onwards, the year in which the First International Bibliography Conference was held and the Decimal System began to be primarily implemented on a European scale, that it first began to be disseminated in Spain . The introduction of the UDC (Universal Decimal Classification) scheme was initially subject to numerous difficulties owing to isolated incidents with librarians, but it subsequently received the support of the Spanish Administration. It was in 1939 that the UDC was officially implemented in all Spanish libraries although what was introduced in the decree was the 1934 German version. Nevertheless, in its practical implementation in libraries, the latest version of the UDC tables was introduced. Finally, from 1989 onwards, the compulsoriness of using the UDC to classify collections and catalogues was repealed, although its implementation in libraries, catalogues and bibliographies is almost complete. The UDC is taught within the framework of regulated Library and Information Science courses, both from a theoretical and from a practical point of view. Research in Spain on the UDC is already quite important; translations, adaptations and versions of the tables have been undertaken and there are also analytical works on different aspects of the UDC system.

0.0070917597 = product of:
  0.042550556 = sum of:
    0.042550556 = product of:
      0.08510111 = sum of:
        0.08510111 = weight(_text_:22 in 5449) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08510111 = score(doc=5449,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1374723 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039257277 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5449, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5449)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Date

22. 2.1997 19:26:34

0.0070917597 = product of:
  0.042550556 = sum of:
    0.042550556 = product of:
      0.08510111 = sum of:
        0.08510111 = weight(_text_:22 in 5837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08510111 = score(doc=5837,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1374723 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039257277 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5837, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5837)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Date

30.11.1996 13:22:37

0.0070917597 = product of:
  0.042550556 = sum of:
    0.042550556 = product of:
      0.08510111 = sum of:
        0.08510111 = weight(_text_:22 in 4085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08510111 = score(doc=4085,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1374723 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039257277 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4085, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4085)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Date

7.11.1999 18:22:39