Search (5551 results, page 1 of 278)

  1. Fernandez, C.W.: Semantic relationships between title phrases and LCSH (1991) 0.28
    0.28111464 = sum of:
      0.2467491 = product of:
        0.7402473 = sum of:
          0.7402473 = weight(_text_:lcshs in 509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.7402473 = score(doc=509,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.5478123 = queryWeight, product of:
                10.087449 = idf(docFreq=4, maxDocs=44218)
                0.054306325 = queryNorm
              1.3512791 = fieldWeight in 509, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                10.087449 = idf(docFreq=4, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=509)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.034365535 = product of:
        0.06873107 = sum of:
          0.06873107 = weight(_text_:searching in 509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06873107 = score(doc=509,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.21968491 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
                0.054306325 = queryNorm
              0.31286204 = fieldWeight in 509, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=509)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Successful subject searching depends upon the terminology of the search query. This paper compares the terminology of book titles with that of LCSH on a semantic level. Methods of analyzing titles into title phrases that serve as matching units are described. Guidelines used to choose LCSHs with the closest semantic matches to title phrases are set forth. The pairing of title phrases with semantically related LCSHs constitutes the data of the study. Categories representing the types of semantic relationships holding between pairs of terms are defined. Results of the study show that the most common semantic relationship holding between title phrases and LCSH is a hierarchical one where title phrases are more specific than LCSHs
  2. Jascó, P.: Searching for images by similarity online (1998) 0.16
    0.16179332 = product of:
      0.32358664 = sum of:
        0.32358664 = sum of:
          0.15709959 = weight(_text_:searching in 393) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.15709959 = score(doc=393,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.21968491 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
                0.054306325 = queryNorm
              0.7151132 = fieldWeight in 393, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=393)
          0.16648704 = weight(_text_:22 in 393) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.16648704 = score(doc=393,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.1901715 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.054306325 = queryNorm
              0.8754574 = fieldWeight in 393, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=393)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    29.11.2004 13:03:22
    Source
    Online. 22(1998) no.6, S.99-102
  3. Alvarado, R.U.: Cataloging Pierre Bourdieu's books (1994) 0.14
    0.1441824 = sum of:
      0.12210913 = product of:
        0.36632738 = sum of:
          0.36632738 = weight(_text_:lcshs in 894) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.36632738 = score(doc=894,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.5478123 = queryWeight, product of:
                10.087449 = idf(docFreq=4, maxDocs=44218)
                0.054306325 = queryNorm
              0.6687097 = fieldWeight in 894, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                10.087449 = idf(docFreq=4, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=894)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.02207327 = product of:
        0.04414654 = sum of:
          0.04414654 = weight(_text_:22 in 894) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04414654 = score(doc=894,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1901715 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.054306325 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 894, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=894)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Subject headings do not always adequately express the subject content of books and other library materials. Whether due to cataloguer error or inadequacy in the authority list, this deficiency makes it difficult for users to access information. In an attempt to solve this problem, the study evaluated the adequacy of the LoC Subject Headings assigned to the 23 books of Pierre Bourdieu, whose philosophical ideas were judged likely to form a good test of the ability of the subject headings to reflect the ideas proposed by the author. The study examined the subject headings given to 22 books, and their translations into English, Spanish, Portuguese, and German, comprising 88 records in OCLC as of Dec 91. It was found that most of the books received headings not corresponding to their content, as the headings were assigned from the functionalist paradigm. In general, LCSHs ignore the conceptual categories of other paradigms, do not match the current vocabulary used by social scientists, and are ideologically biased
  4. Miller, D.J.: Advanced Freestyle searching with Lexis-Nexis (1997) 0.14
    0.13741185 = product of:
      0.2748237 = sum of:
        0.2748237 = sum of:
          0.15709959 = weight(_text_:searching in 4225) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.15709959 = score(doc=4225,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.21968491 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
                0.054306325 = queryNorm
              0.7151132 = fieldWeight in 4225, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4225)
          0.11772411 = weight(_text_:22 in 4225) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.11772411 = score(doc=4225,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1901715 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.054306325 = queryNorm
              0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4225, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4225)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    5. 1.1999 18:18:22
  5. Piternick, A.B.: What's in a name? : use of names and titles in subject searching (1985) 0.14
    0.13741185 = product of:
      0.2748237 = sum of:
        0.2748237 = sum of:
          0.15709959 = weight(_text_:searching in 4482) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.15709959 = score(doc=4482,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.21968491 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
                0.054306325 = queryNorm
              0.7151132 = fieldWeight in 4482, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4482)
          0.11772411 = weight(_text_:22 in 4482) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.11772411 = score(doc=4482,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1901715 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.054306325 = queryNorm
              0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4482, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4482)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Database. 8(1985) no.4, S.22-28
  6. Corbett, M.: Indexing and searching in statutory text (1995) 0.14
    0.13741185 = product of:
      0.2748237 = sum of:
        0.2748237 = sum of:
          0.15709959 = weight(_text_:searching in 6811) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.15709959 = score(doc=6811,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.21968491 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
                0.054306325 = queryNorm
              0.7151132 = fieldWeight in 6811, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6811)
          0.11772411 = weight(_text_:22 in 6811) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.11772411 = score(doc=6811,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1901715 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.054306325 = queryNorm
              0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6811, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6811)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    8. 3.1997 10:22:27
  7. Jascó, P.: Don't kiss Boolean goodbye : it's AND not OR, let alone XOR (1994) 0.13
    0.12746118 = product of:
      0.25492236 = sum of:
        0.25492236 = sum of:
          0.16662927 = weight(_text_:searching in 7159) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.16662927 = score(doc=7159,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.21968491 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
                0.054306325 = queryNorm
              0.7584921 = fieldWeight in 7159, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7159)
          0.08829308 = weight(_text_:22 in 7159) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08829308 = score(doc=7159,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1901715 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.054306325 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 7159, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7159)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Gently criticizes the recent trend away from Boolean searching and towards natural language searching in online systems
    Source
    Information today. 11(1994) no.2, S.22-24
  8. Shubert, S.B.: Critical views of LCSH - ten years later : a bibliographic essay (1992) 0.13
    0.12630442 = sum of:
      0.10175761 = product of:
        0.30527282 = sum of:
          0.30527282 = weight(_text_:lcshs in 5737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.30527282 = score(doc=5737,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.5478123 = queryWeight, product of:
                10.087449 = idf(docFreq=4, maxDocs=44218)
                0.054306325 = queryNorm
              0.55725807 = fieldWeight in 5737, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                10.087449 = idf(docFreq=4, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5737)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.02454681 = product of:
        0.04909362 = sum of:
          0.04909362 = weight(_text_:searching in 5737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04909362 = score(doc=5737,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.21968491 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
                0.054306325 = queryNorm
              0.22347288 = fieldWeight in 5737, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5737)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Pauline Cochrane and Monika Kirtland's "Critical views of LCSH-Library of Congress Subject Headings: a bibliographic and bibliometric essay" published in 'Cataloging & classification quarterly 1(1982) S.71-93' has been widely cited as a source for discussion and complaints about LCSH. Cochrane and Kirtland cover the literature from 1944-1979. The present work provides a critique of the Cochrane/Kirtland study and a survey of the literature concerning the LCSHs during the 1980s. The classified bibliography is arranged according to the format of the Cochrane/Kirtland study to facilitate comparison. Criticism of LCSH reiterates the same points over and over again, whether it is sparseness, bias or currency of the subject headings. Significant trends which emerged in the 1980s include an increased emphasis on the use of LCSH as an online searching tool, concern for the syndetic structure of LCSH and the role of subdivisions, as well as repeated calls for the development of coherent standards to ensure LCSH evolves and is applied in a consistent manner
  9. Weiner, M.L.; Rusch, P.F.: New searching technologies and interfaces (1997) 0.12
    0.12023537 = product of:
      0.24047074 = sum of:
        0.24047074 = sum of:
          0.13746214 = weight(_text_:searching in 321) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.13746214 = score(doc=321,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.21968491 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
                0.054306325 = queryNorm
              0.6257241 = fieldWeight in 321, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=321)
          0.1030086 = weight(_text_:22 in 321) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.1030086 = score(doc=321,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1901715 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.054306325 = queryNorm
              0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 321, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=321)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    30. 7.1997 12:22:32
  10. Tomaiuolo, N.G.; Parker, J.: Maximizing relevant retrieval : keyword and natural language searching (1998) 0.12
    0.12023537 = product of:
      0.24047074 = sum of:
        0.24047074 = sum of:
          0.13746214 = weight(_text_:searching in 6418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.13746214 = score(doc=6418,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.21968491 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
                0.054306325 = queryNorm
              0.6257241 = fieldWeight in 6418, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6418)
          0.1030086 = weight(_text_:22 in 6418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.1030086 = score(doc=6418,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1901715 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.054306325 = queryNorm
              0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6418, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6418)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Online. 22(1998) no.6, S.57-58
  11. Dalrymple, P.W.: Retrieval by reformulation in two library catalogs : toward a cognitive model of searching behavior (1990) 0.12
    0.12023537 = product of:
      0.24047074 = sum of:
        0.24047074 = sum of:
          0.13746214 = weight(_text_:searching in 5089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.13746214 = score(doc=5089,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.21968491 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
                0.054306325 = queryNorm
              0.6257241 = fieldWeight in 5089, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5089)
          0.1030086 = weight(_text_:22 in 5089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.1030086 = score(doc=5089,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1901715 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.054306325 = queryNorm
              0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5089, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5089)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:43:54
  12. ¬The Eleventh Text Retrieval Conference, TREC 2002 (2003) 0.12
    0.11725237 = product of:
      0.23450474 = sum of:
        0.23450474 = sum of:
          0.17564268 = weight(_text_:searching in 4049) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.17564268 = score(doc=4049,freq=10.0), product of:
              0.21968491 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
                0.054306325 = queryNorm
              0.7995209 = fieldWeight in 4049, product of:
                3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                  10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4049)
          0.058862057 = weight(_text_:22 in 4049) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.058862057 = score(doc=4049,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1901715 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.054306325 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4049, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4049)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Proceedings of the llth TREC-conference held in Gaithersburg, Maryland (USA), November 19-22, 2002. Aim of the conference was discussion an retrieval and related information-seeking tasks for large test collection. 93 research groups used different techniques, for information retrieval from the same large database. This procedure makes it possible to compare the results. The tasks are: Cross-language searching, filtering, interactive searching, searching for novelty, question answering, searching for video shots, and Web searching.
  13. Joss, M.W.; Wszola, S.: ¬The engines that can : text search and retrieval software, their strategies, and vendors (1996) 0.11
    0.11044179 = product of:
      0.22088358 = sum of:
        0.22088358 = sum of:
          0.17673704 = weight(_text_:searching in 5123) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.17673704 = score(doc=5123,freq=18.0), product of:
              0.21968491 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
                0.054306325 = queryNorm
              0.80450237 = fieldWeight in 5123, product of:
                4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                  18.0 = termFreq=18.0
                4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5123)
          0.04414654 = weight(_text_:22 in 5123) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04414654 = score(doc=5123,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1901715 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.054306325 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5123, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5123)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Traces the development of text searching and retrieval software designed to cope with the increasing demands made by the storage and handling of large amounts of data, recorded on high data storage media, from CD-ROM to multi gigabyte storage media and online information services, with particular reference to the need to cope with graphics as well as conventional ASCII text. Includes details of: Boolean searching, fuzzy searching and matching; relevance ranking; proximity searching and improved strategies for dealing with text searching in very large databases. Concludes that the best searching tools for CD-ROM publishers are those optimized for searching and retrieval on CD-ROM. CD-ROM drives have relatively lower random seek times than hard discs and so the software most appropriate to the medium is that which can effectively arrange the indexes and text on the CD-ROM to avoid continuous random access searching. Lists and reviews a selection of software packages designed to achieve the sort of results required for rapid CD-ROM searching
    Date
    12. 9.1996 13:56:22
  14. Trotman, A.: Searching structured documents (2004) 0.11
    0.10993017 = product of:
      0.21986035 = sum of:
        0.21986035 = sum of:
          0.16835605 = weight(_text_:searching in 2538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.16835605 = score(doc=2538,freq=12.0), product of:
              0.21968491 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
                0.054306325 = queryNorm
              0.76635236 = fieldWeight in 2538, product of:
                3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                  12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2538)
          0.0515043 = weight(_text_:22 in 2538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0515043 = score(doc=2538,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1901715 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.054306325 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2538, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2538)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Structured document interchange formats such as XML and SGML are ubiquitous, however, information retrieval systems supporting structured searching are not. Structured searching can result in increased precision. A search for the author "Smith" in an unstructured corpus of documents specializing in iron-working could have a lower precision than a structured search for "Smith as author" in the same corpus. Analysis of XML retrieval languages identifies additional functionality that must be supported including searching at, and broken across multiple nodes in the document tree. A data structure is developed to support structured document searching. Application of this structure to information retrieval is then demonstrated. Document ranking is examined and adapted specifically for structured searching.
    Date
    14. 8.2004 10:39:22
  15. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.11
    0.10832611 = sum of:
      0.08625284 = product of:
        0.25875852 = sum of:
          0.25875852 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.25875852 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.4604096 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.054306325 = queryNorm
              0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.02207327 = product of:
        0.04414654 = sum of:
          0.04414654 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04414654 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1901715 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.054306325 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  16. Conhaim, W.W.: Search tools (1996) 0.11
    0.107980825 = product of:
      0.21596165 = sum of:
        0.21596165 = sum of:
          0.15709959 = weight(_text_:searching in 4738) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.15709959 = score(doc=4738,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.21968491 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
                0.054306325 = queryNorm
              0.7151132 = fieldWeight in 4738, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4738)
          0.058862057 = weight(_text_:22 in 4738) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.058862057 = score(doc=4738,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1901715 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.054306325 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4738, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4738)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the 3 most popular searching tools for the WWW: InfoSeek, Yahoo and Lycos. Searching Internet directories can also be a useful search technique. Lists other searching engines. Points out a number of evaluations of these search engines published on the WWW. A number of search tools are available for specialized areas. Sites are available that enable parallel searching using several tools at once. Describes WWW pages with information about search engines
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:39:31
  17. CannCasciato, D.: ¬The OLUC from a NACO point of view : eliminating derived search keys (1994) 0.11
    0.107980825 = product of:
      0.21596165 = sum of:
        0.21596165 = sum of:
          0.15709959 = weight(_text_:searching in 6575) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.15709959 = score(doc=6575,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.21968491 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
                0.054306325 = queryNorm
              0.7151132 = fieldWeight in 6575, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6575)
          0.058862057 = weight(_text_:22 in 6575) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.058862057 = score(doc=6575,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1901715 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.054306325 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6575, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6575)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Explains how the current resurgence of cooperative cataloguing initiatives require that OCLC Online Union Catalog (OLUC) search keys evolve to allow more precise searching. Describes the results achieved by searching personal and corporate authors by word and phrase to obtain guidance on deciding about heading formation and necessary references. Concludes that phrase searching needs to be brought into existence in OLUC search mechanisms as quickly as possible to speed up cataloguing, and that OCLC needs to take note of these requirements by eliminating limitations on searching
    Source
    OCLC systems and services. 10(1994) no.4, S.22-25
  18. Wallace, P.M.: Periodical title searching in online catalogues (1997) 0.11
    0.107980825 = product of:
      0.21596165 = sum of:
        0.21596165 = sum of:
          0.15709959 = weight(_text_:searching in 1628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.15709959 = score(doc=1628,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.21968491 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
                0.054306325 = queryNorm
              0.7151132 = fieldWeight in 1628, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1628)
          0.058862057 = weight(_text_:22 in 1628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.058862057 = score(doc=1628,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1901715 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.054306325 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1628, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1628)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Reports on a dramatic shift from subject to periodical title searching at Colorado University Libraries. States possible reasons for the change, examines problems encountered by users with searching the periodical title index and suggests how this change in online catalogue searching may affect future catalogue design and bibliographic instruction
    Date
    29. 7.1998 10:57:22
  19. Bostian, R.; Robbins, A.: Effective instruction for searching CD-ROM indexes (1990) 0.11
    0.10621765 = product of:
      0.2124353 = sum of:
        0.2124353 = sum of:
          0.13885774 = weight(_text_:searching in 7552) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.13885774 = score(doc=7552,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.21968491 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
                0.054306325 = queryNorm
              0.6320768 = fieldWeight in 7552, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7552)
          0.073577575 = weight(_text_:22 in 7552) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.073577575 = score(doc=7552,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1901715 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.054306325 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 7552, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7552)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Describes an experiment that examined the relationship between successful searching of CD-ROM databases by undergraduate students and various types of instruction provided by the library staff. The findings indicate that the only level of instruction that resulted in a significant difference was a live demonstration of searches.
    Date
    21. 3.2008 13:22:03
  20. Lambert, N.: ORBIT'S PowerSearch : what's great, what's missing (1994) 0.11
    0.10621765 = product of:
      0.2124353 = sum of:
        0.2124353 = sum of:
          0.13885774 = weight(_text_:searching in 2700) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.13885774 = score(doc=2700,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.21968491 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
                0.054306325 = queryNorm
              0.6320768 = fieldWeight in 2700, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2700)
          0.073577575 = weight(_text_:22 in 2700) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.073577575 = score(doc=2700,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1901715 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.054306325 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2700, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2700)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Reviews the PowerSearch multifile searching software introduced by ORBIT Search Service as it is used for searching patent databases. Looks at its useful features: deduping, patent family grouping, merge, and virtual file merging. Looks at some possible improvements to both PowerSearch itself and to the ORBIT system to accomodate PowerSearch
    Source
    Searcher. 2(1994) no.5, S.18-22

Authors

Languages

Types

  • a 4719
  • m 468
  • el 242
  • s 207
  • b 41
  • r 40
  • x 37
  • i 28
  • ? 8
  • p 8
  • d 7
  • n 4
  • u 2
  • z 2
  • au 1
  • h 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications