Search (109 results, page 1 of 6)

  1. Best practices in teaching digital literacies (2018) 0.21
    0.21348473 = product of:
      0.38427252 = sum of:
        0.006991014 = weight(_text_:information in 5039) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006991014 = score(doc=5039,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07208913 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041065242 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 5039, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5039)
        0.09765651 = weight(_text_:literary in 5039) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09765651 = score(doc=5039,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2694327 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041065242 = queryNorm
            0.36245233 = fieldWeight in 5039, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5039)
        0.058744483 = weight(_text_:study in 5039) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.058744483 = score(doc=5039,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.13351972 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041065242 = queryNorm
            0.4399686 = fieldWeight in 5039, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5039)
        0.20092233 = weight(_text_:teaching in 5039) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20092233 = score(doc=5039,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.22312753 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.433489 = idf(docFreq=524, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041065242 = queryNorm
            0.900482 = fieldWeight in 5039, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              5.433489 = idf(docFreq=524, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5039)
        0.019958198 = product of:
          0.039916396 = sum of:
            0.039916396 = weight(_text_:evaluation in 5039) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039916396 = score(doc=5039,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1722564 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041065242 = queryNorm
                0.23172665 = fieldWeight in 5039, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5039)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5555556 = coord(5/9)
    
    Abstract
    The almost universal reliance upon digital tools for social, academic, and career development will only become more pronounced in the years to come. Teacher education programs remain ill-equipped to adequately prepare educators with the pedagogies needed to foster digital literacies. What is needed is a set of best practices towards teaching digital literacies so that teachers can better meet the emerging needs of their students in today's classrooms. Where should teachers begin? What are the essentials of digital literacies within K-12 contexts? And how might we reimagine teacher education programs to optimally prepare teachers for working with technologically connected youth, whose literacies are more complex, interconnected, and diverse than ever?This edited volume provides a practical framework for teacher education programs to develop K-12 students' digital literacies. It serves as a set of best practices in teaching digital literacies that promotes access to research-based pedagogies for immediate implementation in their classrooms
    LCSH
    Language and languages / Study and teaching
    Media literacy / Study and teaching
    Internet literacy / Study and teaching
    Series
    Literary research, practice and evaluation; 9
    Subject
    Language and languages / Study and teaching
    Media literacy / Study and teaching
    Internet literacy / Study and teaching
    Theme
    Information
  2. Creanor, L.; Durndell, H.; Primrose, C.: Library and study skills using hypertext : the TILT experience (1996) 0.18
    0.17763275 = product of:
      0.31973892 = sum of:
        0.00978742 = weight(_text_:information in 401) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00978742 = score(doc=401,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07208913 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041065242 = queryNorm
            0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 401, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=401)
        0.072123855 = weight(_text_:resource in 401) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.072123855 = score(doc=401,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19569293 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.765415 = idf(docFreq=1023, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041065242 = queryNorm
            0.36855626 = fieldWeight in 401, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.765415 = idf(docFreq=1023, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=401)
        0.047482606 = weight(_text_:study in 401) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047482606 = score(doc=401,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13351972 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041065242 = queryNorm
            0.3556224 = fieldWeight in 401, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=401)
        0.1624036 = weight(_text_:teaching in 401) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1624036 = score(doc=401,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.22312753 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.433489 = idf(docFreq=524, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041065242 = queryNorm
            0.72785103 = fieldWeight in 401, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              5.433489 = idf(docFreq=524, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=401)
        0.027941478 = product of:
          0.055882957 = sum of:
            0.055882957 = weight(_text_:evaluation in 401) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055882957 = score(doc=401,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1722564 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041065242 = queryNorm
                0.32441732 = fieldWeight in 401, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=401)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5555556 = coord(5/9)
    
    Abstract
    When the Glasgow University Teaching with Independent Learning Technologies (TILT) project began in Jan 1993, its main aim was to demonstrate how IT could be successfully incorporated into university teaching within a single institution. 4 years later, TILT has demonstrated its value in many areas, particularly in library and study skills. More than 130 institutions both in the UK and overseas are now using the 5 hypertext information skills modules as a resource in their undergraduate teaching, and detailed evaluations of their effectiveness have been carried out. Discusses the development and evaluation of the courseware and details its transformation from Guide through Toolbook to WWW
  3. Herring, J.E.: Teaching information skills in schools (1996) 0.13
    0.13285317 = product of:
      0.29891962 = sum of:
        0.020549301 = weight(_text_:information in 795) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020549301 = score(doc=795,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.07208913 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041065242 = queryNorm
            0.2850541 = fieldWeight in 795, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=795)
        0.05755761 = weight(_text_:study in 795) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05755761 = score(doc=795,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.13351972 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041065242 = queryNorm
            0.43107945 = fieldWeight in 795, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=795)
        0.19686288 = weight(_text_:teaching in 795) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19686288 = score(doc=795,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.22312753 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.433489 = idf(docFreq=524, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041065242 = queryNorm
            0.8822886 = fieldWeight in 795, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              5.433489 = idf(docFreq=524, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=795)
        0.023949841 = product of:
          0.047899682 = sum of:
            0.047899682 = weight(_text_:evaluation in 795) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047899682 = score(doc=795,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1722564 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041065242 = queryNorm
                0.278072 = fieldWeight in 795, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=795)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.44444445 = coord(4/9)
    
    Abstract
    Combines theory and practice of library user training into a framework for teaching information skills in school libraries. The main focus is on in secondary schools (ages 11-18) but teachers and librarians in upper primary and secondary schools and in further education colleges can bebefit from the work. The PLUS model proposed covers: purpose; location; use; and self evaluation. The intention is not to suggest that the PLUS model is radically different from other but to provide an integrated framework to be used both by pupils and those who support them
    LCSH
    Information technology / Study and teaching (Secondary) / Great Britain
    Information resources / Study and teaching (Secondary) / Great Britain
    Subject
    Information technology / Study and teaching (Secondary) / Great Britain
    Information resources / Study and teaching (Secondary) / Great Britain
  4. Henderson, L.; Tallman, J.I.: Stimulated recall and mental models : tools for teaching and learning computer information literacy (2006) 0.11
    0.11296309 = product of:
      0.20333354 = sum of:
        0.014412344 = weight(_text_:information in 1717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014412344 = score(doc=1717,freq=34.0), product of:
            0.07208913 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041065242 = queryNorm
            0.19992396 = fieldWeight in 1717, product of:
              5.8309517 = tf(freq=34.0), with freq of:
                34.0 = termFreq=34.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1717)
        0.03642805 = weight(_text_:resource in 1717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03642805 = score(doc=1717,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19569293 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.765415 = idf(docFreq=1023, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041065242 = queryNorm
            0.18614903 = fieldWeight in 1717, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.765415 = idf(docFreq=1023, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1717)
        0.037919402 = weight(_text_:study in 1717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037919402 = score(doc=1717,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.13351972 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041065242 = queryNorm
            0.28399852 = fieldWeight in 1717, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1717)
        0.10046116 = weight(_text_:teaching in 1717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10046116 = score(doc=1717,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.22312753 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.433489 = idf(docFreq=524, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041065242 = queryNorm
            0.450241 = fieldWeight in 1717, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              5.433489 = idf(docFreq=524, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1717)
        0.014112579 = product of:
          0.028225157 = sum of:
            0.028225157 = weight(_text_:evaluation in 1717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028225157 = score(doc=1717,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1722564 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041065242 = queryNorm
                0.1638555 = fieldWeight in 1717, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1717)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5555556 = coord(5/9)
    
    Content
    Inhalt: The research study - Mental models - Stimulated recall methodology - Mental models emphasizing procedural and product goals - Mental models facilitating procedural and conceptual understanding - The role of stimulated recall in identifying the effects of mental models on teaching - Use of mental models to analyze and understand teachers' pedagogies
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIST 58(2007) no.3, S.456-457 (D. Cook): "In February 2006, the Educational Testing Service (ETS) announced the release of its brand new core academic assessment of its Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Literacy Assessment. The core assessment is designed to assess the information literacy of high school students transitioning to higher education. Many of us already know ETS for some of its other assessment tools like the SAT and GRE. But ETS's latest test comes on the heels of its 2005 release of an advanced level of its ICT Literacy Assessment for college students progressing to their junior and senior year of undergraduate studies. Neither test, ETS insists, is designed to be an entrance examination. Rather, they are packaged and promoted as diagnostic assessments. We are in the grips of the Information Age where information literacy is a prized skill. Knowledge is power. However, information literacy is not merely creating flawless documents or slick PowerPoint presentations on a home PC. It is more than being able to send photos and text messages via cell phone. Instead, information literacy is gauged by one's ability to skillfully seek, access, and retrieve valid information from credible and reliable sources and using that information appropriately. It involves strong online search strategies and advanced critical thinking skills. And, although it is not clear whether they seized the opportunity or inherited it by default, librarians are in the vanguard of teaching information literacy to the next generation of would-be power brokers.
    The release of Stimulated Recall and Mental Models, therefore, could not have been timelier. It describes an empirical qualitative, case study research conducted by authors Lyn Henderson and Julie Tallman in which they studied the mental models of school librarians teaching K-12 students how to use electronic databases. In this research, funded by the Spencer Foundation, Henderson and Tallman studied and analyzed the mental models of their subjects, six American and four Australian school librarians, as they went about the task of teaching students one-on-one how to access and retrieve the information they needed for class assignments from electronic databases. Each librarian and student underwent a structured pre-lesson interview to ascertain their mental models (the sum of their prior learning and experiences) regarding the upcoming lesson. The lesson followed immediately and was carefully video- and audio-recorded, with the full knowledge of the librarian and her student. After the lessons, both student and librarian were interviewed with the intent of learning what each were thinking and feeling at specific points during the lesson, using the recordings as memory joggers. After the first librarian-pupil session, the student was freed but the librarian was re-studied tutoring a second learner. Again, the teacher and new student were preinterviewed, their lesson was recorded, and they were debriefed using the recordings for stimulated recall. It is important to note here the use of the recordings to create stimulated recall. Though considered a dubious practice by many respected researchers, Henderson and Tallman expend considerable time and effort in this book trying to establish the credibility of stimulated recall as a valid research tool. I find it interesting that the authors report that their realization of the value of stimulated recall was a collateral benefit of their study; they claim the original objective of their research was to analyze and compare the pre- and post-lesson mental models of the teacher-librarians (p.15). Apparently, this realization provided the inspiration for this book (pp. I & 208). Hence, its place of importance in the book's title.
    This book is evidence that Henderson and Tallman were meticulous in following their established protocols and especially in their record keeping while conducting their research. There are, however, a few issues in the study's framework and methodology that are worth noting. First, although the research was conducted in two different countries - the United Slates and Australia - it is not clear from the writing if the librarian-pupil pairs of each country hailed from the same schools (making the population opportunistic) or if the sampling was indeed more randomly selected. Readers do know, though, that the librarians were free to select the students they tutored from within their respective schools. Thus, there appears to he no randomness. Second, "[t]he data collection tools and questionnaires were grounded in a [single] pilot study with a [single] teacher-Iibrarian" (p. 7). Neither the procedures used nor the data collected from the pilot study are presented to establish its reliability and validity. Therefore, readers are left with only limited confidence in the study's instrumentation. Further, it is obvious from the reading, and admitted by the researchers, that the recording equipment in open view of the study's subjects skewed the data. That is, one of the librarians tinder study confessed that were it not for the cameras, she would have completely deserted one of her lessons when encountering what she perceived to be overwhelming obstacles: a classic example of the Hawthorne Effect in research. Yet. despite these issues, researchers Henderson and Tallman make a respectable ease in this book for the validity of both mental models and stimulated recall. The mental models developed during the prelesson interviews seem remarkably accurate when observing the school librarians during the lessons. Additionally, while the librarians were able to adapt their lessons based on situations, they generally did so within their mental models of what constitutes good teachers and good teaching.
    As for the value of reflecting on their teaching performance, the authors report the not-so-startling denouement that while it is easy to identify and define malpractice and to commit to changing performance errors, it is often difficult to actually implement those improvements. Essentially, what is first learned is best learned and what is most used is best used. In the end, however, the authors rightfully call for further study to be conducted by themselves and others. ETS's core ICT Literacy Assessment is not currently a mandatory college entrance examination. Neither is the advanced ICT Literacy Assessment a mandatory examination for promotion to upper level undergraduate studies. But it would be naïve not to expect some enterprising institutions of higher education to at least consider making them so in the very near future. Consequently, librarians of all stripes (public. academic, school, or others) would do well to read and study Stimulated Recall and Mental Models if they are truly committed to leading the charge on advancing information literacy in the Information Age. In this book are some valuable how-tos for instructing patrons on searching electronic databases. And some of those same principles could be applicable to other areas of information literacy instruction."
    LCSH
    Electronic information resource literacy / Study and teaching / Evaluation
    Series
    Research methods in library and information studies ; 2
    Subject
    Electronic information resource literacy / Study and teaching / Evaluation
  5. Handbuch Informationskompetenz (2016) 0.11
    0.10534505 = product of:
      0.18962108 = sum of:
        0.012505907 = weight(_text_:information in 4361) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012505907 = score(doc=4361,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.07208913 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041065242 = queryNorm
            0.1734784 = fieldWeight in 4361, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4361)
        0.04121363 = weight(_text_:resource in 4361) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04121363 = score(doc=4361,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19569293 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.765415 = idf(docFreq=1023, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041065242 = queryNorm
            0.21060358 = fieldWeight in 4361, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.765415 = idf(docFreq=1023, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4361)
        0.027132917 = weight(_text_:study in 4361) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027132917 = score(doc=4361,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13351972 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041065242 = queryNorm
            0.2032128 = fieldWeight in 4361, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4361)
        0.092802055 = weight(_text_:teaching in 4361) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.092802055 = score(doc=4361,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.22312753 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.433489 = idf(docFreq=524, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041065242 = queryNorm
            0.41591486 = fieldWeight in 4361, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              5.433489 = idf(docFreq=524, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4361)
        0.015966559 = product of:
          0.031933118 = sum of:
            0.031933118 = weight(_text_:evaluation in 4361) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031933118 = score(doc=4361,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1722564 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041065242 = queryNorm
                0.18538132 = fieldWeight in 4361, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4361)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5555556 = coord(5/9)
    
    Content
    Zur Einführung: Neudefinition von Informationskompetenz notwendig? -- Grundlagen, Methoden, Technologien -- Informationskompetenz anders denken - zum epistemologischen Kern von information literacy" -- Standards der Informationskompetenz - neue Entwicklungen in Deutschland, Großbritannien und den USA -- Referenzrahmen Informationskompetenz für alle Bildungsebenen -- Empirische Erfassung von Informationskompetenz -- Informationskompetenz in ethischer Perspektive -- Informationskompetenz und Rhetorik Informationspsychologische Grundlagen der Informationskompetenz -- Mobil, vernetzt, always on" - Lebenswelten junger Menschen und Informationskompetenzförderung der Bibliotheken -- Big Data - neue Herausforderungen für Informationskompetenz und Bildung -- Resource Discovery Systeme -- Suchmaschinenkompetenz als Baustein der Informationskompetenz -- Förderung von Informationskompetenz durch E-Learning: Wie viel Technik soll es sein? -- Vorschule und Schule -- Informationskompetenz bei Kindergartenkindern
    Förderung von Informationskompetenz als Aufgabe von Schule -- Das kooperative Schulungsmodell zur Förderung von Informationskompetenz - am Beispiel der Teaching Library Vorarlberg -- Die Förderung der Informationskompetenz zusammen mit Lehrkräften -- ASK UB - Evaluation und Weiterentwicklung eines Schulungskonzeptes für Informationskompetenz -- Hochschulstudium -- Förderung wissenschaftlicher Informationskompetenz in deutschen Hochschulen -- Informationskompetenz an Massenuniversitäten - Wherever, Whenever! Bibliotheken an Hochschulen in Bayern: Bestandsaufnahme und Modell Ansbach -- Informationskompetenz und forschungsorientiertes Studium - ein Beitrag aus der Hochschuldidaktik -- Grenzverschiebungen: Wissenschaftliches Schreiben, Schreibwerkstätten und Informationskompetenz Förderung von Informationskompetenz in der KIT-Bibliothek unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Ausbildung von Lernkompetenz als zentraler Komponente von Informationskompetenz -- Fit für die Bachelorarbeit - wie Institutsbibliotheken Blended Learning einsetzen können -- Informationskompetenz institutionell verankern am Beispiel der Universitätsbibliothek Bern -- Wissenschaft und Forschung -- Informationskompetenz im Wissenschaftssystem Informationsservices auf Augenhöhe - So können Bibliotheken den Forschungsprozess proaktiv unterstützen DOI: 10.1515/9783110403367
    LCSH
    Information literacy
    Information literacy / Study and teaching
    Subject
    Information literacy
    Information literacy / Study and teaching
  6. Matusiak, K.K.: Image and multimedia resources in an academic environment : a qualitative study of students' experiences and literacy practices (2013) 0.10
    0.10387327 = product of:
      0.23371485 = sum of:
        0.008389217 = weight(_text_:information in 1002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008389217 = score(doc=1002,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07208913 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041065242 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 1002, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1002)
        0.061820444 = weight(_text_:resource in 1002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061820444 = score(doc=1002,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19569293 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.765415 = idf(docFreq=1023, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041065242 = queryNorm
            0.31590536 = fieldWeight in 1002, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.765415 = idf(docFreq=1023, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1002)
        0.049846355 = weight(_text_:study in 1002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049846355 = score(doc=1002,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.13351972 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041065242 = queryNorm
            0.37332577 = fieldWeight in 1002, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1002)
        0.11365884 = weight(_text_:teaching in 1002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11365884 = score(doc=1002,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.22312753 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.433489 = idf(docFreq=524, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041065242 = queryNorm
            0.5093896 = fieldWeight in 1002, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.433489 = idf(docFreq=524, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1002)
      0.44444445 = coord(4/9)
    
    Abstract
    The digital environment provides an abundance of images and multimedia and offers a new potential for using resources in multiple modes of representation for teaching and learning. This article reports the findings of a case study that investigated the use of image and multimedia resources in an undergraduate classroom. The study assumed a contextual approach and focused on different class contexts and students' literacy practices. The class, which took place in a resource-rich, multimodal environment, was perceived by students as a positive learning experience. The distribution of resources and their role in teaching and learning varied and depended on the context of use. The findings indicate that images fulfilled important descriptive and mnemonic functions when students were introduced to new concepts, but their role was limited in practices that required students to analyze and synthesize knowledge.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.8, S.1577-1589
  7. Pattuelli, M.C.: Modeling a domain ontology for cultural heritage resources : a user-centered approach (2011) 0.10
    0.10212556 = product of:
      0.183826 = sum of:
        0.009886787 = weight(_text_:information in 4194) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009886787 = score(doc=4194,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07208913 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041065242 = queryNorm
            0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 4194, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4194)
        0.051517036 = weight(_text_:resource in 4194) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051517036 = score(doc=4194,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19569293 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.765415 = idf(docFreq=1023, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041065242 = queryNorm
            0.26325446 = fieldWeight in 4194, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.765415 = idf(docFreq=1023, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4194)
        0.041538626 = weight(_text_:study in 4194) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041538626 = score(doc=4194,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.13351972 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041065242 = queryNorm
            0.3111048 = fieldWeight in 4194, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4194)
        0.06697411 = weight(_text_:teaching in 4194) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06697411 = score(doc=4194,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22312753 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.433489 = idf(docFreq=524, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041065242 = queryNorm
            0.30016068 = fieldWeight in 4194, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.433489 = idf(docFreq=524, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4194)
        0.013909433 = product of:
          0.027818866 = sum of:
            0.027818866 = weight(_text_:22 in 4194) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027818866 = score(doc=4194,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14380348 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041065242 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4194, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4194)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5555556 = coord(5/9)
    
    Abstract
    The use of primary source materials is recognized as key to supporting history and social studies education. The extensive digitization of library, museum, and other cultural heritage collections represents an important teaching resource. Yet, searching and selecting digital primary sources appropriate for classroom use can be difficult and time-consuming. This study investigates the design requirements and the potential usefulness of a domain-specific ontology to facilitate access to, and use of, a collection of digital primary source materials developed by the Library of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. During a three-phase study, an ontology model was designed and evaluated with the involvement of social studies teachers. The findings revealed that the design of the ontology was appropriate to support the information needs of the teachers and was perceived as a potentially useful tool to enhance collection access. The primary contribution of this study is the introduction of an approach to ontology development that is user-centered and designed to facilitate access to digital cultural heritage materials. Such an approach should be considered on a case-by-case basis in relation to the size of the ontology being built, the nature of the knowledge domain, and the type of end users targeted.
    Date
    22. 1.2011 14:11:34
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.2, S.314-342
  8. Moreira dos Santos Macula, B.C.: ¬The Universal Decimal Classification in the organization of knowledge : representing the concept of ethics (2023) 0.10
    0.10195813 = product of:
      0.22940579 = sum of:
        0.051517036 = weight(_text_:resource in 1128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051517036 = score(doc=1128,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19569293 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.765415 = idf(docFreq=1023, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041065242 = queryNorm
            0.26325446 = fieldWeight in 1128, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.765415 = idf(docFreq=1023, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1128)
        0.023982337 = weight(_text_:study in 1128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023982337 = score(doc=1128,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13351972 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041065242 = queryNorm
            0.17961644 = fieldWeight in 1128, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1128)
        0.13394822 = weight(_text_:teaching in 1128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13394822 = score(doc=1128,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.22312753 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.433489 = idf(docFreq=524, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041065242 = queryNorm
            0.60032135 = fieldWeight in 1128, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              5.433489 = idf(docFreq=524, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1128)
        0.019958198 = product of:
          0.039916396 = sum of:
            0.039916396 = weight(_text_:evaluation in 1128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039916396 = score(doc=1128,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1722564 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041065242 = queryNorm
                0.23172665 = fieldWeight in 1128, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1128)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.44444445 = coord(4/9)
    
    Abstract
    Training in knowl­edge organization (KO) involves an understanding of theories for the construction, maintenance, use, and evaluation of logical documentary languages. Teaching these KO concepts in LIS programs are related basically to accessing documents and retrieving their intellectual content. This study focuses on access to documents and exploring the ethical theme in all its dimensions as applied to the teaching of an undergraduate discipline as part of a Bachelor of Library Science degree offered at the Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG). As a methodology, a Project-based Pedagogy strategy is used in the teaching of a discipline called "Classification Systems: UDC" for students to classify a documentary resource from a collection on ethics. The teaching of bibliographic classification requires students to learn how to use the mechanisms available to form a notation as well as to use a syntax schema (tables) appropriately. Students also learn to determine a place for the document in the collection, considering the knowl­edge represented in the collection as a whole. Altogether, such a practice can help students to understand the theory underlying a classification system. The results show that the students were able to understand the basic concepts of knowl­edge organization. The students were also able to observe that the elements of the different tables of a classification tool are essential mechanisms for the organization of knowl­edge in other contexts, especially for specific purposes.
  9. Stacey, Alison; Stacey, Adrian: Effective information retrieval from the Internet : an advanced user's guide (2004) 0.10
    0.09694994 = product of:
      0.17450988 = sum of:
        0.022371246 = weight(_text_:information in 4497) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022371246 = score(doc=4497,freq=32.0), product of:
            0.07208913 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041065242 = queryNorm
            0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 4497, product of:
              5.656854 = tf(freq=32.0), with freq of:
                32.0 = termFreq=32.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4497)
        0.04121363 = weight(_text_:resource in 4497) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04121363 = score(doc=4497,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19569293 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.765415 = idf(docFreq=1023, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041065242 = queryNorm
            0.21060358 = fieldWeight in 4497, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.765415 = idf(docFreq=1023, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4497)
        0.019185869 = weight(_text_:study in 4497) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019185869 = score(doc=4497,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13351972 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041065242 = queryNorm
            0.14369315 = fieldWeight in 4497, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4497)
        0.07577256 = weight(_text_:teaching in 4497) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07577256 = score(doc=4497,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.22312753 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.433489 = idf(docFreq=524, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041065242 = queryNorm
            0.33959305 = fieldWeight in 4497, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.433489 = idf(docFreq=524, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4497)
        0.015966559 = product of:
          0.031933118 = sum of:
            0.031933118 = weight(_text_:evaluation in 4497) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031933118 = score(doc=4497,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1722564 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041065242 = queryNorm
                0.18538132 = fieldWeight in 4497, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4497)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5555556 = coord(5/9)
    
    Abstract
    This book provides practical strategies which enable the advanced web user to locate information effectively and to form a precise evaluation of the accuracy of that information. Although the book provides a brief but thorough review of the technologies which are currently available for these purposes, most of the book concerns practical `future-proof' techniques which are independent of changes in the tools available. For example, the book covers: how to retrieve salient information quickly; how to remove or compensate for bias; and tuition of novice Internet users.
    Content
    Key Features - Importantly, the book enables readers to develop strategies which will continue to be useful despite the rapidly-evolving state of the Internet and Internet technologies - it is not about technological `tricks'. - Enables readers to be aware of and compensate for bias and errors which are ubiquitous an the Internet. - Provides contemporary information an the deficiencies in web skills of novice users as well as practical techniques for teaching such users. The Authors Dr Alison Stacey works at the Learning Resource Centre, Cambridge Regional College. Dr Adrian Stacey, formerly based at Cambridge University, is a software programmer. Readership The book is aimed at a wide range of librarians and other information professionals who need to retrieve information from the Internet efficiently, to evaluate their confidence in the information they retrieve and/or to train others to use the Internet. It is primarily aimed at intermediate to advanced users of the Internet. Contents Fundamentals of information retrieval from the Internet - why learn web searching technique; types of information requests; patterns for information retrieval; leveraging the technology: Search term choice: pinpointing information an the web - why choose queries carefully; making search terms work together; how to pick search terms; finding the 'unfindable': Blas an the Internet - importance of bias; sources of bias; usergenerated bias: selecting information with which you already agree; assessing and compensating for bias; case studies: Query reformulation and longer term strategies - how to interact with your search engine; foraging for information; long term information retrieval: using the Internet to find trends; automating searches: how to make your machine do your work: Assessing the quality of results- how to assess and ensure quality: The novice user and teaching internet skills - novice users and their problems with the web; case study: research in a college library; interpreting 'second hand' web information.
  10. Barité, M.; Parentelli, V.; Rodríguez Casaballe, N.; Suárez, M.V.: Interdisciplinarity and postgraduate teaching of knowledge organization (KO) : elements for a necessary dialogue (2023) 0.09
    0.09092234 = product of:
      0.20457527 = sum of:
        0.006991014 = weight(_text_:information in 1125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006991014 = score(doc=1125,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07208913 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041065242 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 1125, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1125)
        0.033916146 = weight(_text_:study in 1125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033916146 = score(doc=1125,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13351972 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041065242 = queryNorm
            0.25401598 = fieldWeight in 1125, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1125)
        0.14975868 = weight(_text_:teaching in 1125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14975868 = score(doc=1125,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.22312753 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.433489 = idf(docFreq=524, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041065242 = queryNorm
            0.6711798 = fieldWeight in 1125, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              5.433489 = idf(docFreq=524, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1125)
        0.013909433 = product of:
          0.027818866 = sum of:
            0.027818866 = weight(_text_:22 in 1125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027818866 = score(doc=1125,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14380348 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041065242 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1125, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1125)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.44444445 = coord(4/9)
    
    Abstract
    Interdisciplinarity implies the previous existence of disciplinary fields and not their dissolution. As a general objective, we propose to establish an initial approach to the emphasis given to interdisciplinarity in the teaching of KO, through the teaching staff responsible for postgraduate courses focused on -or related to the KO, in Ibero-American universities. For conducting the research, the framework and distribution of a survey addressed to teachers is proposed, based on four lines of action: 1. The way teachers manage the concept of interdisciplinarity. 2. The place that teachers give to interdisciplinarity in KO. 3. Assessment of interdisciplinary content that teachers incorporate into their postgraduate courses. 4. Set of teaching strategies and resources used by teachers to include interdisciplinarity in the teaching of KO. The study analyzed 22 responses. Preliminary results show that KO teachers recognize the influence of other disciplines in concepts, theories, methods, and applications, but no consensus has been reached regarding which disciplines and authors are the ones who build interdisciplinary bridges. Among other conclusions, the study strongly suggests that environmental and social tensions are reflected in subject representation, especially in the construction of friendly knowl­edge organization systems with interdisciplinary visions, and in the expressions through which information is sought.
  11. Education for library cataloging : international perspectives (2006) 0.09
    0.09065396 = product of:
      0.16317713 = sum of:
        0.0060543963 = weight(_text_:information in 207) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0060543963 = score(doc=207,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.07208913 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041065242 = queryNorm
            0.083984874 = fieldWeight in 207, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=207)
        0.025758518 = weight(_text_:resource in 207) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025758518 = score(doc=207,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19569293 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.765415 = idf(docFreq=1023, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041065242 = queryNorm
            0.13162723 = fieldWeight in 207, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.765415 = idf(docFreq=1023, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=207)
        0.02681307 = weight(_text_:study in 207) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02681307 = score(doc=207,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.13351972 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041065242 = queryNorm
            0.20081729 = fieldWeight in 207, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=207)
        0.0947157 = weight(_text_:teaching in 207) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0947157 = score(doc=207,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.22312753 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.433489 = idf(docFreq=524, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041065242 = queryNorm
            0.42449132 = fieldWeight in 207, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              5.433489 = idf(docFreq=524, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=207)
        0.009835455 = product of:
          0.01967091 = sum of:
            0.01967091 = weight(_text_:22 in 207) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01967091 = score(doc=207,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.14380348 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041065242 = queryNorm
                0.13679022 = fieldWeight in 207, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=207)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5555556 = coord(5/9)
    
    Classification
    025.3/071 22
    Content
    Inhalt: Education and training for cataloguing at the University of Botswana Library : an overview / Rose Tiny Kgosiemang -- The relevance of cataloguing in library science curriculum in Cross River State of Nigeria in this technological age / J.I. Iwe -- The education and training of cataloguing students in South Africa through distance education / Linda M. Cloete -- Education of cataloging and classification in China / Zhanghua Ma -- The status quo and future development of cataloging and classification education in China / Li Si -- Education for knowledge organization : the Indian scene / K.S. Raghavan -- Current status of cataloging and classification education in Japan / Shoichi Taniguchi -- A study on the job training and self-training of the cataloging and classification librarians working in South Korean academic libraries / Chul-Wan Kwak -- Beyond our expectations : a review of an independent learning module in descriptive cataloguing at the Queensland University of for cataloguing and classification in Australia / Ross Harvey, Susan Reynolds -- Education for cataloging and classification in Austria and Germany / Monika Münnich, Heidi Zotter-Straka, Petra Hauke -- Education and training on studies and professional librarianship schools / Anna Sitarska -- Cataloging education on the sunny side of the Alps / Jerry D. Saye, Alenka ^Sauperl -- Education for cataloging in Spanish universities : a descriptive and López-Cózar -- Education and training for cataloguing and classification in the British Isles / J.H. Bowman -- The teaching of information processing in the University of Buenos Aires, Argentina / Elsa E. Barber, Silvia L. Pisano -- Education for cataloging and classification in Mexico / Filiberto Felipe Martínez Arellano -- Education for cataloging and related areas in Peru / Ana María Talavera Ibarra -- Cataloging and classification education in Egypt : stressing the fundamentals while moving toward automated applications / Mohammed Fat'hy Abdel Hady, Ali Kamal Shaker -- An account of cataloging and classification education in Iranian universities / Mortaza Kokabi -- Cataloging instruction in Israel / Snunith Shoham -- Continuing education for catalogers in Saudi Arabia / Zahiruddin Khurshid.
    DDC
    025.3/071 22
    Footnote
    Rez. in: KO 33(2006) no.2, S.119-20 (S.S. Intner): "This survey of cataloging education around the world offers readers a rich menu of experiences, educational offerings, and approaches to the subject of cataloging education as it is currently practiced in 24 countries of the world, excluding the United States and Canada. The exclusion does not mean that English-speaking countries are entirely absent from the book, however. Two nations outside North America, South Africa (in one chapter) and Australia (in two chapters), are covered. The chapters are organized geographically, beginning with the African continent, and followed by several each under headings for Asia, Australia (two chapters), Europe, Latin America, and the Middle East. Nations whose cataloging education programs are described include (in order of presentation) Botswana, Nigeria, South Africa, China (both the People's Republic of China and Taiwan), India, Japan, South Korea, Australia, Austria and Germany (described together in one chapter), Poland, Slovenia, Spain, the British Isles (England, Scotland, and Wales), Argentina, Mexico, Peru, Egypt, Iran, Israel, and Saudi Arabia. As readers might expect, many chapters reflect common experiences among the countries, particularly regarding the proliferation of subjects in competition with cataloging and classification in library school curricula. There are also some common problems, such as dealing with the changes in education and training prompted by automation. Generally, computer-based cataloging is not a new issue anywhere, although in some areas of the world, catalogers still work with manual systems. Describing cataloging education in Nigeria, J. I. Iwe states: "... the card catalogue is still being used in all libraries, including the University of Calabar library where the only library school in the state exists (p. 33)." In other places, computer infrastructure has developed to a level that supports coursework online. As Linda M. Cloete writes, "The ultimate goal of the training resource program is to develop an online, fully interactive course: an online virtual cataloging classroom (p. 66)."
    The eternal debate in the teaching of cataloging over theory versus practice emerges in this volume. As Li Si suggests in describing cataloging education in the People's Republic of China, the matter might be laid at the door of the faculty, stating, "Although the majority of teaching faculty members in the library and information science programs have a solid theoretical foundation from their school education and training, they do not normally possess practical work experience in their field of specialty and they are not familiar with the application of technologies in the field. In order to enhance their practical skills, these faculty members should be given the opportunity to work in libraries... This way, they would be able to put theory into practice and gain rich, practical field experience, thus improving the relevance and quality of their teaching (p. 97)." One wonders how warmly faculty members would welcome that kind of opportunity! On the other hand, in many places, onthe-job training is weak, as Shoichi Taniguchi describes it in Japan, "on the job training and continuing education are neither encouraged nor promoted (p. 132)." Among the most interesting and important aspects of this book are the tables of hard data it presents. Almost every chapter reports on surveys done by the authors on the state of library education in general and/or the kinds of offerings in cataloging and classification available within their countries. Some authors also include statistics on the numbers of persons receiving certificates, diplomas, and/or master's degrees, which is useful in understanding the different levels of expertise being developed over time. While one could argue that there are gaps in coverage, with large, influential countries such as France and Italy in Europe, Brazil, Bolivia, and Chile in South America, and Thailand and Myanmar in Asia, left out of the book, for the most part there is good representation from different parts of the globe. Education for Library Cataloging is a good choice as a textbook for coursework in International Librarianship as well as a primer in what to expect if one's information center is affiliated with partners outside the United States and Canada. This book should be seen as an important "must read" for all library students and practitioners concerned about issues of increasing globalization in bibliographic control. It is highly recommended."
    LCSH
    Cataloging / Study and teaching
    Classification / Study and teaching
    Subject
    Cataloging / Study and teaching
    Classification / Study and teaching
  12. Lux, C.; Sühl-Strohmenger, W.: Teaching Library in Deutschland : Vermittlung von Informationsund Medienkompetenz als Kernaufgabe für Öffentliche und Wissenschaftliche Bibliotheken (2004) 0.09
    0.08736003 = product of:
      0.19656007 = sum of:
        0.015818859 = weight(_text_:information in 1427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015818859 = score(doc=1427,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.07208913 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041065242 = queryNorm
            0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 1427, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1427)
        0.038371738 = weight(_text_:study in 1427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038371738 = score(doc=1427,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.13351972 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041065242 = queryNorm
            0.2873863 = fieldWeight in 1427, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1427)
        0.13124192 = weight(_text_:teaching in 1427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13124192 = score(doc=1427,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.22312753 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.433489 = idf(docFreq=524, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041065242 = queryNorm
            0.5881924 = fieldWeight in 1427, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              5.433489 = idf(docFreq=524, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1427)
        0.011127546 = product of:
          0.022255093 = sum of:
            0.022255093 = weight(_text_:22 in 1427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022255093 = score(doc=1427,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14380348 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041065242 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1427, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1427)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.44444445 = coord(4/9)
    
    Abstract
    "Teaching Library" - dies ist nicht nur der Titel dieses Buches, sondern vor allem auch eine selbstbewusste Behauptung in einem Land, in dem die Politik die Bibliotheken als Partner des Lernens noch nicht entdeckt hat, in dem die kommunalen Gremien in Zeiten des Sparens die Ausgaben für Bibliotheken als angeblich freiwillige Leistungen in dem Feld der Kultur neben Museen und Theatern munter kürzen. Dabei belegen die internationalen Studien (PISA, TIMSS etc.) zur Leistungsfähigkeit von Bildungssystemen bereits jetzt schon erhebliche Defizite des deutschen Bildungswesens, insbesondere hinsichtlich der Schlüsselqualifikationen, die unter "Literacy" gefasst werden. Als notwendige Antwort auf dieses Defizit empfehlen die Autoren dieses Buches die viel pointiertere Einbindung der gesamten Bibliotheken in Deutschland in unser Bildungssystem, um sowohl die Unentbehrlichkeit zu unterstreichen, als auch Synergien mit anderen Bildungsträgern zu nutzen. Das vorliegende Buch zeigt eindrucksvoll die erstaunliche Vielfalt der Initiativen und den Einfallsreichtum der Bibliothekare in dieser Hinsicht.
    Classification
    AN 76400 Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft / Bibliothekswesen / Bibliotheksbenutzung / Auskunft, Information
    Date
    22. 2.2008 14:17:00
    LCSH
    Information literacy / Study and teaching / Germany
    Information retrieval / Study and teaching / Germany
    RSWK
    Bibliothekswesen / Information / Medienkompetenz (ÖVK)
    RVK
    AN 76400 Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft / Bibliothekswesen / Bibliotheksbenutzung / Auskunft, Information
    Subject
    Bibliothekswesen / Information / Medienkompetenz (ÖVK)
    Information literacy / Study and teaching / Germany
    Information retrieval / Study and teaching / Germany
  13. Borgman, C.L.; Smart, L.J.; Millwood, K.A.; Finley, J.R.; Champeny, L.; Gilliland, A.J.; Leazer, G.H.: Comparing faculty information seeking in teaching and research : implications for the design of digital libraries (2005) 0.09
    0.086914696 = product of:
      0.19555807 = sum of:
        0.013699533 = weight(_text_:information in 3231) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013699533 = score(doc=3231,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.07208913 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041065242 = queryNorm
            0.19003606 = fieldWeight in 3231, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3231)
        0.019185869 = weight(_text_:study in 3231) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019185869 = score(doc=3231,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13351972 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041065242 = queryNorm
            0.14369315 = fieldWeight in 3231, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3231)
        0.15154512 = weight(_text_:teaching in 3231) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15154512 = score(doc=3231,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.22312753 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.433489 = idf(docFreq=524, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041065242 = queryNorm
            0.6791861 = fieldWeight in 3231, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              5.433489 = idf(docFreq=524, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3231)
        0.011127546 = product of:
          0.022255093 = sum of:
            0.022255093 = weight(_text_:22 in 3231) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022255093 = score(doc=3231,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14380348 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041065242 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3231, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3231)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.44444445 = coord(4/9)
    
    Abstract
    ADEPT is a 5-year project whose goals are to develop, deploy, and evaluate inquiry learning capabilities for the Alexandria Digital Library, an extant digital library of primary sources in geography. We interviewed nine geography faculty members who teach undergraduate courses about their information seeking for research and teaching and their use of information resources in teaching. These data were supplemented by interviews with four faculty members from another ADEPT study about the nature of knowledge in geography. Among our key findings are that geography faculty are more likely to encounter useful teaching resources while seeking research resources than vice versa, although the influence goes in both directions. Their greatest information needs are for research data, maps, and images. They desire better searching by concept or theme, in addition to searching by location and place name. They make extensive use of their own research resources in their teaching. Among the implications for functionality and architecture of geographic digital libraries for educational use are that personal digital libraries are essential, because individual faculty members have personalized approaches to selecting, collecting, and organizing teaching resources. Digital library services for research and teaching should include the ability to import content from common office software and to store content in standard formats that can be exported to other applications. Digital library services can facilitate sharing among faculty but cannot overcome barriers such as intellectual property rights, access to proprietary research data, or the desire of individuals to maintain control over their own resources. Faculty use of primary and secondary resources needs to be better understood if we are to design successful digital libraries for research and teaching.
    Date
    3. 6.2005 20:40:22
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 56(2005) no.6, S.636-657
    Theme
    Information Gateway
  14. Börner, K.: Atlas of knowledge : anyone can map (2015) 0.08
    0.08436776 = product of:
      0.18982746 = sum of:
        0.011864144 = weight(_text_:information in 3355) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011864144 = score(doc=3355,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07208913 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041065242 = queryNorm
            0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 3355, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3355)
        0.040699374 = weight(_text_:study in 3355) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040699374 = score(doc=3355,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13351972 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041065242 = queryNorm
            0.3048192 = fieldWeight in 3355, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3355)
        0.11365884 = weight(_text_:teaching in 3355) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11365884 = score(doc=3355,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.22312753 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.433489 = idf(docFreq=524, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041065242 = queryNorm
            0.5093896 = fieldWeight in 3355, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.433489 = idf(docFreq=524, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3355)
        0.023605091 = product of:
          0.047210183 = sum of:
            0.047210183 = weight(_text_:22 in 3355) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047210183 = score(doc=3355,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.14380348 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041065242 = queryNorm
                0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 3355, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3355)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.44444445 = coord(4/9)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2017 16:54:03
    22. 1.2017 17:10:56
    LCSH
    Information visualization
    Science / Study and teaching / Graphic methods
    Subject
    Information visualization
    Science / Study and teaching / Graphic methods
  15. Fisher, S.; Oulton, T.; Wood, T.: Teaching and training of the information profession using SuperJANET (1994) 0.08
    0.08111664 = product of:
      0.24334991 = sum of:
        0.019374069 = weight(_text_:information in 7870) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019374069 = score(doc=7870,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.07208913 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041065242 = queryNorm
            0.2687516 = fieldWeight in 7870, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7870)
        0.038371738 = weight(_text_:study in 7870) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038371738 = score(doc=7870,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13351972 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041065242 = queryNorm
            0.2873863 = fieldWeight in 7870, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7870)
        0.18560411 = weight(_text_:teaching in 7870) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18560411 = score(doc=7870,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.22312753 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.433489 = idf(docFreq=524, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041065242 = queryNorm
            0.8318297 = fieldWeight in 7870, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              5.433489 = idf(docFreq=524, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7870)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Abstract
    Outlines a research project being carried out at the Department of Library and Information Studies at Manchester Metropolitan University to study electronic access to remote CD-ROM networks and to integrated library systems for teaching students of library and information studies via the SuperJANET computer network. Gives a brief background to SuperJANET and teaching applications. Describes the aims and specific objectives of the project, details its context, anticipated benefits and outlines project management
  16. Gopinath, M.A.: Curricula in teaching classification and indexing in advanced courses in library and information science : a case study (1999) 0.08
    0.08067459 = product of:
      0.24202377 = sum of:
        0.023728289 = weight(_text_:information in 6821) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023728289 = score(doc=6821,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07208913 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041065242 = queryNorm
            0.3291521 = fieldWeight in 6821, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6821)
        0.05755761 = weight(_text_:study in 6821) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05755761 = score(doc=6821,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13351972 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041065242 = queryNorm
            0.43107945 = fieldWeight in 6821, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6821)
        0.16073787 = weight(_text_:teaching in 6821) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16073787 = score(doc=6821,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22312753 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.433489 = idf(docFreq=524, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041065242 = queryNorm
            0.7203857 = fieldWeight in 6821, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.433489 = idf(docFreq=524, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6821)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Source
    Library science with a slant to documentation and information studies. 36(1999) no.1, S.3-9
  17. Scalise, K.; Bernbaum, D.J.; Timms, M.; Harrell, S.V.; Burmester, K.; Kennedy, C.A.; Wilson, M.: Adaptive technology for e-learning : principles and case studies of an emerging field (2007) 0.08
    0.07767854 = product of:
      0.1747767 = sum of:
        0.008389217 = weight(_text_:information in 1323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008389217 = score(doc=1323,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07208913 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041065242 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 1323, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1323)
        0.028778804 = weight(_text_:study in 1323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028778804 = score(doc=1323,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13351972 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041065242 = queryNorm
            0.21553972 = fieldWeight in 1323, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1323)
        0.11365884 = weight(_text_:teaching in 1323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11365884 = score(doc=1323,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.22312753 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.433489 = idf(docFreq=524, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041065242 = queryNorm
            0.5093896 = fieldWeight in 1323, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.433489 = idf(docFreq=524, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1323)
        0.023949841 = product of:
          0.047899682 = sum of:
            0.047899682 = weight(_text_:evaluation in 1323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047899682 = score(doc=1323,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1722564 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041065242 = queryNorm
                0.278072 = fieldWeight in 1323, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1323)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.44444445 = coord(4/9)
    
    Abstract
    This article discusses the rapidly emerging field of computer-based assessment for adaptive content in e-learning (National Research Council, 2001), which we call differentiated e-learning. In e-learning products, a variety of assessment approaches are being used for such diverse purposes as adaptive delivery of content, individualizing learning materials, dynamic feedback, cognitive diagnosis, score reporting, and course placement (Gifford, 2001). A recent paper at the General Teaching Council Conference in London, England, on teaching, learning, and accountability described assessment for personalized learning through e-learning products as a quiet revolution taking place in education (Hopkins, 2004). In our study, we examine approaches for the use of assessment evidence in e-learning in four case studies. The products in the case studies were selected for exhibiting at least one exemplary aspect regarding assessment and measurement. The principles of the Berkeley Evaluation & Assessment Research Center Assessment System (Wilson & Sloane, 2000) are used as a framework of analysis for these products with respect to key measurement principles.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 58(2007) no.14, S.2295-2309
  18. Laurie, B.A.E.; Roberts, S.A.: ¬The convergence of information systems and information management : environmental changes and pedagogical challenges (2008) 0.07
    0.07156144 = product of:
      0.21468432 = sum of:
        0.02516765 = weight(_text_:information in 2567) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02516765 = score(doc=2567,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.07208913 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041065242 = queryNorm
            0.34911853 = fieldWeight in 2567, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2567)
        0.028778804 = weight(_text_:study in 2567) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028778804 = score(doc=2567,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13351972 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041065242 = queryNorm
            0.21553972 = fieldWeight in 2567, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2567)
        0.16073787 = weight(_text_:teaching in 2567) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16073787 = score(doc=2567,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.22312753 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.433489 = idf(docFreq=524, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041065242 = queryNorm
            0.7203857 = fieldWeight in 2567, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              5.433489 = idf(docFreq=524, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2567)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - This paper aims to provide a reflection on the issue of convergence of information systems and information management using a historical perspective and the experiences of two practitioners from different disciplines working together to deliver first degree and Master's teaching in this area. Design/methodology/approach - The paper situates the teaching of business strategy and information strategy in a historical context and combines this with a reflection on teaching the subject in practice. Findings - The paper finds that there is a need for exchange of perspectives and skills between information science and information management students which can be mutually beneficial and add value to their skill set. Practical implications - In terms of curriculum design for information professional education, information systems students need a strong background in the business and user environment to leverage the technologies for business value. Originality/value - The paper presents a case study of practice with a commentary on the dynamics of teaching the theme.
  19. Walton, G.; Hepworth, M.: ¬A longitudinal study of changes in learners' cognitive states during and following an information literacy teaching intervention (2011) 0.07
    0.071109794 = product of:
      0.15999703 = sum of:
        0.017686022 = weight(_text_:information in 4543) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017686022 = score(doc=4543,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.07208913 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041065242 = queryNorm
            0.2453355 = fieldWeight in 4543, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4543)
        0.019185869 = weight(_text_:study in 4543) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019185869 = score(doc=4543,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13351972 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041065242 = queryNorm
            0.14369315 = fieldWeight in 4543, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4543)
        0.10715858 = weight(_text_:teaching in 4543) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10715858 = score(doc=4543,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.22312753 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.433489 = idf(docFreq=524, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041065242 = queryNorm
            0.4802571 = fieldWeight in 4543, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              5.433489 = idf(docFreq=524, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4543)
        0.015966559 = product of:
          0.031933118 = sum of:
            0.031933118 = weight(_text_:evaluation in 4543) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031933118 = score(doc=4543,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1722564 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041065242 = queryNorm
                0.18538132 = fieldWeight in 4543, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4543)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.44444445 = coord(4/9)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - This paper seeks to identify the changes in cognition associated with becoming information-literate, specifically, in relation to the evaluation of information. Additionally, it puts forward a model for a teaching and learning intervention that engages the learner and leads to higher order information literacy (IL) thinking. From a theoretical perspective the research integrates ideas from the fields of IL, teaching and learning, e-learning and information behaviour (IB). Design/methodology/approach - Three interventions were designed to develop the information literacies of first-year undergraduates studying Sport and Exercise at Staffordshire University, to teach and test IL. Interventions took a blended approach and combined face-to-face and online social network learning (OSNL) - also referred to as social media learning (SML) - and focused on one aspect of information literacy: the ability to evaluate source material. Data were captured via interviews, focus groups and from the online discussion that was analysed thematically and categorised using task, behaviour, cognitive states, affective states, cognitive states and knowledge. This helped to evaluate the efficacy of the interventions and provided data for further analysis. This paper focuses on the cognitive data and their transitions during the interventions and, in particular, among those respondents who experienced OSNL. Findings - The changing cognitive states, associated with IL learning were modelled and made evident key cognitive states and transitions. This is represented in the paper in diagrammatic and mathematical notation. The findings indicate the complexity of the information behaviours associated with IL including the cognitive, behavioural, cognitive and affective elements. Although the cognitive transitions are the focus of this paper, an insight is also given into an IL intervention that fosters the capability to interact critically and reflectively with information. The pedagogy that underpins these changes is indicated. The intervention, which incorporated OSNL, proved the most successful. Research limitations/implications - Undergraduate students' IB can be changed and IL developed. Additional long-term data would have indicated whether this intervention had a lasting impact on the undergraduates. Practical implications - IL practitioners should consider incorporating OSNL and assessment in their interventions. Incorporating discussion, reflection and peer-to-peer assessment is likely to lead to deeper learning when teaching IL. Originality/value - The research adds detail to the understanding of the cognitive, behavioural, affective and cognitive states associated with IL and makes explicit how these may change, as the learner becomes information-literate.
  20. Andretta, S.: Information literacy : a practitioner's guide (2004) 0.07
    0.070168845 = product of:
      0.12630391 = sum of:
        0.016395383 = weight(_text_:information in 589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016395383 = score(doc=589,freq=44.0), product of:
            0.07208913 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041065242 = queryNorm
            0.2274321 = fieldWeight in 589, product of:
              6.6332498 = tf(freq=44.0), with freq of:
                44.0 = termFreq=44.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=589)
        0.025758518 = weight(_text_:resource in 589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025758518 = score(doc=589,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19569293 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.765415 = idf(docFreq=1023, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041065242 = queryNorm
            0.13162723 = fieldWeight in 589, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.765415 = idf(docFreq=1023, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=589)
        0.02681307 = weight(_text_:study in 589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02681307 = score(doc=589,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.13351972 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041065242 = queryNorm
            0.20081729 = fieldWeight in 589, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=589)
        0.04735785 = weight(_text_:teaching in 589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04735785 = score(doc=589,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.22312753 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.433489 = idf(docFreq=524, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041065242 = queryNorm
            0.21224566 = fieldWeight in 589, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.433489 = idf(docFreq=524, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=589)
        0.009979099 = product of:
          0.019958198 = sum of:
            0.019958198 = weight(_text_:evaluation in 589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019958198 = score(doc=589,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1722564 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041065242 = queryNorm
                0.11586332 = fieldWeight in 589, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=589)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5555556 = coord(5/9)
    
    Abstract
    This book explores two main models of Information Literacy or IL: the SCONUL (Society of College, National and University Libraries) Seven Pillars of Information Skills and the IL competencies identified by the ALA (American Library Association). Practical examples for the development of IL skills identified by these models are illustrated using printed and web-based resources. The process of integrating IL provision within a programme of study is outlined to illustrate two strategies underpinning this integration at generic-skills level, the 'plug & play' approach, and at subject-specific level, the 'research skills approach'. A range of diagnostic and assessment methods, to monitor the iterative process of IL skills development, are also included.
    Content
    Key Features - Explores practical applications of two major IL models - Explores strategies to integrate IL provision in a multi-disciplinary environment - Offers a range of learning and evaluation strategies appropriate for, as well as resources associated with, IL provision - Provides a gateway to generic and subject specific IL resources by complementing the publication with web-based access to an online collection relevant to Information Research and a range of web-based tutorials (existing and customised) to develop IL skills for online environments Readership Information practitioners operating in teaching as well as library support roles who are interested, or required, to develop IL. Academics in management positions responsible for the implementation of learning and teaching strategies. Contents Introduction From user education to IL: national and international perspectives - technological advancements and access to information; changes in higher education institutions: the student-centred learning approach; information practitioner as facilitator ('Sage an the stage vs. Guide an the side') IL models - SCONUUs Seven Pillars of Information Skills principles of progressions and iteration; ALA/ALRC: information competency standards for higher education (principle of self-directed learning); comparative analysis of the two models Practical applications of IL - provision through the level of competence: the plug & play approach (assessing IL skills); provision through integration by subject: the research skills approach; IL and pedagogy (studentcentred learning; transferability of skills) Challenges - IL and the 'what do I do now?' Syndrome; design and resource implications of IL provision
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Mitteilungen VOEB 59(2006) H.4, S.74-76 (M. Katzmayr): "Information Literacy (IL) bzw. Informationskompetenz ist in aller Munde, wird sie doch als Schlüsselqualifikation angesehen, um an der so genannten Informationsgesellschaft teilzuhaben. Susie Andretta, Dozentin für Informationsmanagement an der London Metropolitan University, hat nun einen praxisorientierten Leitfaden zur IL vorgelegt, worin zwei Aspekte im Vordergrund stehen: einerseits die Vermittlung der IL in der universitären Lehre, womit andererseits auch ein erfolgreiches lebenslanges Lernen nach Verlassen der Universität ermöglicht werden soll. Das Buch beginnt mit einer theoretischen Einführung. Dort ist zu lesen, dass sich die Vermittlung von IL aus Kursen zur Bibliotheksbenutzung entwickelt habe - doch während letztere traditionell den effektiven Umgang mit Bibliotheksressourcen vermitteln und somit auf die Bibliothek beschränkt seien, beinhalte IL auch Herangehensweisen zur Lösung komplexer Problemstellungen. Drei prominente IL-Konzeptionen folgender Organisationen werden anschließend ausführlicher vorgestellt und verglichen: die der US-amerikanischen "Association of Colleges and Research Libraries" (ACRL), des "Australian and New Zealand Institute for information Literacy" (ANZIIL) und der britischen "Society of College, National and University Libraries" (SCONUL). In allen drei besteht IL zumindest aus dem Wahrnehmen eines Informationsbedarfes, Methoden zum Erhalt dieser Information und schließlich ihrer Bewertung, um die Fragen zu beantworten, die zum Informationsbedarf geführt haben. Alle drei gehen über die rein technologische Kompetenz (IT-Kompetenz) hinaus und umfassen u. a. Medien-, Bibliotheks-, und Recherchekompetenzen, um nur einige zu nennen. Allerdings gehen zwei dieser Konzeptionen noch wesentlich weiter - so fordert die ANZIIL von einer informationskompetenten Person u.a. folgende Fähigkeit: "the information-literate person applies prior and new information to construct new concepts or create new understandings" (S. 157), der Lernzielkatalog der SCONUL beinhaltet: "The ability to synthesise and build upon existing information, contributing to the creation of new knowledge" (S. 162).
    Was hier auffällt, ist der äußerst weit reichende inhaltliche Anspruch dieser Sichtweise von IL. Inwieweit dadurch eine Abgrenzung zum Themenund Lehrgebiet des "wissenschaftlichen Arbeitens" bzw. zu den Charakteristika umfassender Bildung überhaupt noch sinnvoll möglich ist, wird von der Autorin leider nicht behandelt. Interessant ist der Stellenwert der Bibliotheken in der Lehre der IL: In allen drei Konzeptionen wird eine Kooperation zwischen Bibliothek und Wissenschaftsbetrieb empfohlen, ja erfolge die Vermittlung von IL idealiter im jeweiligen Fachstudium durch die problemlösungsorientierte Bearbeitung spezifischer Fragestellungen. So gesehen könne also nicht von einem Monopol der Bibliotheken ausgegangen werden, ihre Rolle sei vielmehr mit dem Motto "information literacy is an issue for the library but not of the library" (S. 53) angemessen umschrieben. In Großbritannien gehe dabei die Initiative meist von den Bibliotheken aus, in den USA und Australien eher vom Wissenschaftsbetrieb. In beiden Fällen funktioniere diese Partnerschaft aber nicht immer reibungslos. Die Beweggründe von Bibliotheken, sich hierzu engagieren, werden von der Autorin jedoch keiner tiefer gehenden Analyse unterzogen. Dies wurde vielleicht nicht völlig unbeabsichtigt unterlassen, da daran nämlich eine - im vorliegenden Werk ausgeblendete - grundsätzliche und weit verbreitete Kritik an der IL anknüpfen könnte. Ein Blick in die relevante Literatur zeigt nämlich, dass Bibliothekarinnen nicht nur hehre Motive zugeschrieben werden, wenn sie sich am IL-Hype beteiligen bzw. ihn vorantreiben. Neben Erfahrungen mit der dürftigen Informationskompetenz vieler Studierender werden ihnen auch ganz andere, pragmatischere Beweggründe zugedacht'. Ein Beispiel: Die zunehmende institutionelle Marginalisierung von Bibliotheken und ihren Mitarbeiterinnen im Universitätsbetrieb mag eine kreative Vorwärtsverteidigung unter dem Deckmantel der IL als zweckmäßig erscheinen lassen' - überspitzt formuliert: IL als Konstrukt oder zumindest willkommene Gelegenheit, um den Bibliotheken auch weiterhin eine zentrale Rolle an den Universitäten zu sichern. Zum Glück gelingt es Andretta, anhand der relevanten Literatur und eigener Erfahrungen als Dozentin plausibel zu argumentieren, dass der Mangel vieler Studierender an Informationskompetenz tatsächlich eklatant und somit ein Handlungsbedarf gegeben ist. Welche Motive die Bibliotheken hier sonst noch haben mögen, kann so gesehen ruhig im Dunkeln bleiben.
    LCSH
    Information literacy / Examinations / Study guides
    Information science / Examinations / Study guides
    Series
    Chandos Information Professional Series
    Subject
    Information literacy / Examinations / Study guides
    Information science / Examinations / Study guides
    Theme
    Information

Years

Languages

  • e 102
  • d 6
  • f 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 80
  • m 23
  • s 7
  • el 3
  • b 1
  • r 1
  • More… Less…

Subjects

Classifications