Search (3875 results, page 1 of 194)

  1. Neely, T.Y.: Using subject terminology & classification to provide effective reference service to diverse populations (1995) 0.15 
    0.14664775 = product of:
  0.2932955 = sum of:
    0.2932955 = sum of:
      0.22158456 = weight(_text_:matter in 5560) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.22158456 = score(doc=5560,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.32580847 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.155624 = idf(docFreq=254, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052928586 = queryNorm
          0.6801068 = fieldWeight in 5560, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.155624 = idf(docFreq=254, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5560)
      0.07171093 = weight(_text_:22 in 5560) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07171093 = score(doc=5560,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18534689 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052928586 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5560, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5560)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Discusses the current classification system and historical treatment of subject matter relating to African American subjects. Gives examples of carrying out searches on CARL catalogues, INFOTRAC, the Reader's Guide to Periodical Literature, and Education Index
    Source
    Colorado libraries. 21(1995) no.2, S.22-26
  2. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.11 
    0.1055779 = sum of:
  0.084064625 = product of:
    0.25219387 = sum of:
      0.25219387 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.25219387 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.44872913 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052928586 = queryNorm
          0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.021513278 = product of:
    0.043026555 = sum of:
      0.043026555 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.043026555 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18534689 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052928586 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  3. Falkingham, L.T.; Reeves, R.: Context analysis : a technique for analysing research in a field, applied to literature on the management of R&D at the section level (1998) 0.10 
    0.102653414 = product of:
  0.20530683 = sum of:
    0.20530683 = sum of:
      0.15510918 = weight(_text_:matter in 3689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.15510918 = score(doc=3689,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.32580847 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.155624 = idf(docFreq=254, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052928586 = queryNorm
          0.47607476 = fieldWeight in 3689, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.155624 = idf(docFreq=254, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3689)
      0.050197646 = weight(_text_:22 in 3689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.050197646 = score(doc=3689,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18534689 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052928586 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3689, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3689)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Context analysis is a new method for appraising a body of publications. the process consists of creating a database of attributes assigned to each paper by the reviewer and then looking for interesting relationships in the data. Assigning the attributes requires an understanding of the subject matter of the papers. Presents findings about one particular research field, Management of R&D at the Section Level. The findings support the view that this body of academic publications does not meet the needs of practitioner R&D managers. Discusses practical aspects of how to apply the method in other fields
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:18:46
  4. Ranganathan, S.R.: Classification and communication (2006) 0.10 
    0.102653414 = product of:
  0.20530683 = sum of:
    0.20530683 = sum of:
      0.15510918 = weight(_text_:matter in 1469) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.15510918 = score(doc=1469,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.32580847 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.155624 = idf(docFreq=254, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052928586 = queryNorm
          0.47607476 = fieldWeight in 1469, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.155624 = idf(docFreq=254, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1469)
      0.050197646 = weight(_text_:22 in 1469) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.050197646 = score(doc=1469,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18534689 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052928586 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1469, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1469)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Inhalt: Part I ---Classification and Its Evolution 11. First sense --Primitive use 12. Second sense---Common use 13. Third sense--- Library classification 14. Field of knowledge 15. Enumerative classification 16. Analytico-synthetic classification 17. Uses of analytico-synthetic classification 18. Depth -classification --Confession of a faith Part 2---Communication 21. Co-operative living 22. Communication and language 23. Commercial contact 24. Political understanding 25. Literary exchange 26. Spiritual communion 27. Cultural concord 28. Intellectual team -work Part 3---Classification and Its Future 31. Domains in communication 32. Domain of classification 33. Time-and Space-Facets 34. Preliminary schedules 35. Energy-Facet 36. Matter-Facet 37. Personality -Facet 38. Research and Organisation
  5. Garfield, E.: Long-term vs. short-term journal impact : does it matter? (1998) 0.09 
    0.08863382 = product of:
  0.17726764 = sum of:
    0.17726764 = product of:
      0.35453528 = sum of:
        0.35453528 = weight(_text_:matter in 1852) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.35453528 = score(doc=1852,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.32580847 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.155624 = idf(docFreq=254, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052928586 = queryNorm
            1.0881709 = fieldWeight in 1852, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.155624 = idf(docFreq=254, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1852)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  6. Li, Y.-O.; Leung, S.W.: Computer cataloging of electronic Journals in unstable Aggregator Databases the Hong Kong Baptist University Library experience (2001) 0.09 
    0.08798864 = product of:
  0.17597727 = sum of:
    0.17597727 = sum of:
      0.13295072 = weight(_text_:matter in 164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.13295072 = score(doc=164,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.32580847 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.155624 = idf(docFreq=254, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052928586 = queryNorm
          0.40806407 = fieldWeight in 164, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.155624 = idf(docFreq=254, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=164)
      0.043026555 = weight(_text_:22 in 164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.043026555 = score(doc=164,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18534689 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052928586 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 164, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=164)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The growth and use of aggregator databases have presented libraries with both new opportunities for collection enhancement and new challenges of bibliographic control. How to integrate full-text electronic journal titles in unstable aggregator databases into a library's OPAC (Online Public Access Catalog) has been an especially taxing matter for libraries. This article describes the Hong Kong Baptist University Library's effort to integrate full-text electronic journal titles from three large, unstable aggregator databases into its INNOPAC-based OPAC. The library's electronic journal computer program (EJCOP) does this in a simple, direct, consistent, and accurate manner and addresses some of the issues elaborated in the January 2000 Final Report of the Task Group on Journals in Aggregator Databases of the Standing Committee on Automation of the Library of Congress Program for Cooperative Cataloging.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  7. Alonso Lifante, M.P.; Molero Madrid, F.J.: Enhancing OPAC records : evaluating and fitting within cataloguing standards a new proposal of description parameters for historical astronomical resources (2015) 0.09 
    0.08798864 = product of:
  0.17597727 = sum of:
    0.17597727 = sum of:
      0.13295072 = weight(_text_:matter in 2611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.13295072 = score(doc=2611,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.32580847 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.155624 = idf(docFreq=254, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052928586 = queryNorm
          0.40806407 = fieldWeight in 2611, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.155624 = idf(docFreq=254, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2611)
      0.043026555 = weight(_text_:22 in 2611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.043026555 = score(doc=2611,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18534689 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052928586 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2611, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2611)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Enhancing content description of specialized resources, particularly astronomical resources, is a matter that is still unresolved in library and information science. In this paper, the authors outline deficiencies in some fields and elements of cataloging standards for description of historical astronomical resources, mainly star atlases and catalogs. Furthermore, they review their recent proposal of astronomical parameters for a better description and propose an approach for accommodating these parameters in the current criteria of MARC 21, the International Standard Bibliographic Description, and Resource Description and Access. Fourteen new parameters are considered, and recommendations are provided to standards developers for the addition of elements to accommodate attributes of celestial cartographic resources. This would improve bibliographic records for such resources in astronomical libraries' OPACs, which will have a beneficial effect on information retrieval.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  8. Lardera, M.; Gnoli, C.; Rolandi, C.; Trzmielewski, M.: Developing SciGator, a DDC-based library browsing tool (2017) 0.09 
    0.08798864 = product of:
  0.17597727 = sum of:
    0.17597727 = sum of:
      0.13295072 = weight(_text_:matter in 4144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.13295072 = score(doc=4144,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.32580847 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.155624 = idf(docFreq=254, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052928586 = queryNorm
          0.40806407 = fieldWeight in 4144, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.155624 = idf(docFreq=254, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4144)
      0.043026555 = weight(_text_:22 in 4144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.043026555 = score(doc=4144,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18534689 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052928586 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4144, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4144)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Exploring collections by their subject matter is an important functionality for library users. We developed an online tool called SciGator in order to allow users to browse the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) classes used in different libraries at the University of Pavia and to perform different types of search in the OPAC. Besides navigation of DDC hierarchies, SciGator suggests "see-also" relationships with related classes and maps equivalent classes in local shelving schemes, thus allowing the expansion of search queries to include subjects contiguous to the initial one. We are developing new features, including the possibility to expand searches even more to national and international catalogues.
    Content
    Beitrag eines Special Issue: ISKO-Italy: 8' Incontro ISKO Italia, Università di Bologna, 22 maggio 2017, Bologna, Italia.
  9. Malsburg, C. von der: Concerning the neuronal code (2018) 0.09 
    0.08798864 = product of:
  0.17597727 = sum of:
    0.17597727 = sum of:
      0.13295072 = weight(_text_:matter in 73) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.13295072 = score(doc=73,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.32580847 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.155624 = idf(docFreq=254, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052928586 = queryNorm
          0.40806407 = fieldWeight in 73, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.155624 = idf(docFreq=254, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=73)
      0.043026555 = weight(_text_:22 in 73) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.043026555 = score(doc=73,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18534689 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052928586 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 73, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=73)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The central problem with understanding brain and mind is the neural code issue: understanding the matter of our brain as basis for the phenomena of our mind. The richness with which our mind represents our environment, the parsimony of genetic data, the tremendous efficiency with which the brain learns from scant sensory input and the creativity with which our mind constructs mental worlds all speak in favor of mind as an emergent phenomenon. This raises the further issue of how the neural code supports these processes of organization. The central point of this communication is that the neural code has the form of structured net fragments that are formed by network self-organization, activate and de-activate on the functional time scale, and spontaneously combine to form larger nets with the same basic structure.
    Date
    27.12.2020 16:56:22
  10. Fachsystematik Bremen nebst Schlüssel 1970 ff. (1970 ff) 0.09 
    0.0879816 = sum of:
  0.07005386 = product of:
    0.21016157 = sum of:
      0.21016157 = weight(_text_:3a in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.21016157 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.44872913 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052928586 = queryNorm
          0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.017927732 = product of:
    0.035855465 = sum of:
      0.035855465 = weight(_text_:22 in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.035855465 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18534689 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052928586 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    1. Agrarwissenschaften 1981. - 3. Allgemeine Geographie 2.1972. - 3a. Allgemeine Naturwissenschaften 1.1973. - 4. Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Allgemeine Literaturwissenschaft 2.1971. - 6. Allgemeines. 5.1983. - 7. Anglistik 3.1976. - 8. Astronomie, Geodäsie 4.1977. - 12. bio Biologie, bcp Biochemie-Biophysik, bot Botanik, zoo Zoologie 1981. - 13. Bremensien 3.1983. - 13a. Buch- und Bibliothekswesen 3.1975. - 14. Chemie 4.1977. - 14a. Elektrotechnik 1974. - 15 Ethnologie 2.1976. - 16,1. Geowissenschaften. Sachteil 3.1977. - 16,2. Geowissenschaften. Regionaler Teil 3.1977. - 17. Germanistik 6.1984. - 17a,1. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hil. - 17a,2. Geschichte. Teilsystematik his Neuere Geschichte. - 17a,3. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hit Neueste Geschichte. - 18. Humanbiologie 2.1983. - 19. Ingenieurwissenschaften 1974. - 20. siehe 14a. - 21. klassische Philologie 3.1977. - 22. Klinische Medizin 1975. - 23. Kunstgeschichte 2.1971. - 24. Kybernetik. 2.1975. - 25. Mathematik 3.1974. - 26. Medizin 1976. - 26a. Militärwissenschaft 1985. - 27. Musikwissenschaft 1978. - 27a. Noten 2.1974. - 28. Ozeanographie 3.1977. -29. Pädagogik 8.1985. - 30. Philosphie 3.1974. - 31. Physik 3.1974. - 33. Politik, Politische Wissenschaft, Sozialwissenschaft. Soziologie. Länderschlüssel. Register 1981. - 34. Psychologie 2.1972. - 35. Publizistik und Kommunikationswissenschaft 1985. - 36. Rechtswissenschaften 1986. - 37. Regionale Geograpgie 3.1975. - 37a. Religionswissenschaft 1970. - 38. Romanistik 3.1976. - 39. Skandinavistik 4.1985. - 40. Slavistik 1977. - 40a. Sonstige Sprachen und Literaturen 1973. - 43. Sport 4.1983. - 44. Theaterwissenschaft 1985. - 45. Theologie 2.1976. - 45a. Ur- und Frühgeschichte, Archäologie 1970. - 47. Volkskunde 1976. - 47a. Wirtschaftswissenschaften 1971 // Schlüssel: 1. Länderschlüssel 1971. - 2. Formenschlüssel (Kurzform) 1974. - 3. Personenschlüssel Literatur 5. Fassung 1968
  11. Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011) 0.08 
    0.084064625 = product of:
  0.16812925 = sum of:
    0.16812925 = product of:
      0.50438774 = sum of:
        0.50438774 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.50438774 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.44872913 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052928586 = queryNorm
            1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.
  12. Weizsäcker, C.F. von: Geist und Natur (1989) 0.08 
    0.07834197 = product of:
  0.15668394 = sum of:
    0.15668394 = product of:
      0.31336787 = sum of:
        0.31336787 = weight(_text_:matter in 269) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.31336787 = score(doc=269,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.32580847 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.155624 = idf(docFreq=254, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052928586 = queryNorm
            0.96181625 = fieldWeight in 269, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.155624 = idf(docFreq=254, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=269)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Eröffnet mit dem Sprachspiel: "What is mind? No matter. What ist matter? Never mind!"
  13. Mandal, A.: ¬A comparative study of POPSI-Table with fundamental categories and phase relations in Colon Classification (1995) 0.08 
    0.07755459 = product of:
  0.15510918 = sum of:
    0.15510918 = product of:
      0.31021836 = sum of:
        0.31021836 = weight(_text_:matter in 3354) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.31021836 = score(doc=3354,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.32580847 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.155624 = idf(docFreq=254, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052928586 = queryNorm
            0.9521495 = fieldWeight in 3354, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              6.155624 = idf(docFreq=254, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3354)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Reports results of a comparative study to correlate the handling of concepts and subject analysis in POOPSI and Colon Classification, 7th ed. with particular reference to fundamental categories and phase relations: Studies reveal that in both cases, the concept of Basic Class and Discipline must be indicated whether the Basic Class or Discipline is explicit or implicit in the title under consideration. Also reveals that Entity in POPSI many equate with Personality, Matter Material and Matter Property in CC7. Action of POPSI may correlate with Energy, Matter Property of CC7 and Property of POPSI may correlate with Matter Property of CC7
  14. Fuchs-Kittowski, K.: Information neither matter nor mind : on the essence and on the evolutionary stage conception of information (1997) 0.08 
    0.07755459 = product of:
  0.15510918 = sum of:
    0.15510918 = product of:
      0.31021836 = sum of:
        0.31021836 = weight(_text_:matter in 1335) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.31021836 = score(doc=1335,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.32580847 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.155624 = idf(docFreq=254, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052928586 = queryNorm
            0.9521495 = fieldWeight in 1335, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.155624 = idf(docFreq=254, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1335)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  15. Hlava, M.M.: Automatic indexing : a matter of degree (2002) 0.08 
    0.07755459 = product of:
  0.15510918 = sum of:
    0.15510918 = product of:
      0.31021836 = sum of:
        0.31021836 = weight(_text_:matter in 2501) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.31021836 = score(doc=2501,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.32580847 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.155624 = idf(docFreq=254, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052928586 = queryNorm
            0.9521495 = fieldWeight in 2501, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.155624 = idf(docFreq=254, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2501)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  16. Hartley, J.: Do structured abstracts take more space? : And does it matter? (2002) 0.08 
    0.07755459 = product of:
  0.15510918 = sum of:
    0.15510918 = product of:
      0.31021836 = sum of:
        0.31021836 = weight(_text_:matter in 582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.31021836 = score(doc=582,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.32580847 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.155624 = idf(docFreq=254, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052928586 = queryNorm
            0.9521495 = fieldWeight in 582, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.155624 = idf(docFreq=254, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=582)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  17. Fidel, R.; Crandall, M.: ¬The role of subject access in information filtering (1998) 0.07 
    0.073323876 = product of:
  0.14664775 = sum of:
    0.14664775 = sum of:
      0.11079228 = weight(_text_:matter in 2336) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11079228 = score(doc=2336,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.32580847 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.155624 = idf(docFreq=254, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052928586 = queryNorm
          0.3400534 = fieldWeight in 2336, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.155624 = idf(docFreq=254, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2336)
      0.035855465 = weight(_text_:22 in 2336) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.035855465 = score(doc=2336,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18534689 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052928586 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2336, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2336)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The sheer amount of electronic information makes filtering a vital component of contemporary information work. Field observations of managers and engineers at the Boeing Company who received filtered information about computer-related topics revealed criteria they used to select, and those they used to reject, documents within their subject interest. Responses to a questionnaire indicated that some criteria are used more frequently and are more important than others. The few criteria that related to the subject matter of the documents were not limited to a subject domain. Other criteria addressed the form of the documents, their content, and writing style. In addition, some criteria were stable and somewhat objective and others were situational and subjective. An examination of these criteria shows that many of them could be used in filtering, in addition to subject-based mechanisms, and that they might be particularly useful for systems with multiple sources because they can provide a useful filter that is not based on the subject domain
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
  18. Connell, T.H.; Prabha, C.: Characteristics of resources represented in the OCLC CORC database (2002) 0.07 
    0.073323876 = product of:
  0.14664775 = sum of:
    0.14664775 = sum of:
      0.11079228 = weight(_text_:matter in 162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11079228 = score(doc=162,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.32580847 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.155624 = idf(docFreq=254, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052928586 = queryNorm
          0.3400534 = fieldWeight in 162, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.155624 = idf(docFreq=254, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=162)
      0.035855465 = weight(_text_:22 in 162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.035855465 = score(doc=162,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18534689 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052928586 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 162, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=162)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    More and more libraries are providing access to Web resources through OCLC's (Online Computer Resource Center) Cooperative Online Resource Catalog (CORC) and, by extension, OCLC's WorldCat database. The ability to use a database to its maximum potential depends upon understanding what a database contains and the guidelines for its construction. This study examines the characteristics of Web resources in CORC in terms of their subject matter, the source of the content, publication patterns, and the units of information chosen for representation in the database. The majority of the 414 resources in the sample belonged to the social sciences. Academic libraries and government agencies contributed more than 90% of the records for resources in the sample. Using the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, 2d edition (AACR2) definitions for publication patterns that are part of the upcoming 2002 amendments reveals that nearly half of the sample fell into the category of integrating resources. Identifying units of representation of the resources described was more difficult. Existing definitions for Web units in development are not adequate to describe all of the resources in the sample. In addition, there is wide variability in the units of representation chosen for inclusion by the libraries contributing records, resulting in little predictability in what units of information might be found in the database.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  19. Srinivasan, R.; Boast, R.; Becvar, K.M.; Furner, J.: Blobgects : digital museum catalogs and diverse user communities (2009) 0.07 
    0.073323876 = product of:
  0.14664775 = sum of:
    0.14664775 = sum of:
      0.11079228 = weight(_text_:matter in 2754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11079228 = score(doc=2754,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.32580847 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.155624 = idf(docFreq=254, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052928586 = queryNorm
          0.3400534 = fieldWeight in 2754, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.155624 = idf(docFreq=254, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2754)
      0.035855465 = weight(_text_:22 in 2754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.035855465 = score(doc=2754,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18534689 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052928586 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2754, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2754)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This article presents an exploratory study of Blobgects, an experimental interface for an online museum catalog that enables social tagging and blogging activity around a set of cultural heritage objects held by a preeminent museum of anthropology and archaeology. This study attempts to understand not just whether social tagging and commenting about these objects is useful but rather whose tags and voices matter in presenting different expert perspectives around digital museum objects. Based on an empirical comparison between two different user groups (Canadian Inuit high-school students and museum studies students in the United States), we found that merely adding the ability to tag and comment to the museum's catalog does not sufficiently allow users to learn about or engage with the objects represented by catalog entries. Rather, the specialist language of the catalog provides too little contextualization for users to enter into the sort of dialog that proponents of Web 2.0 technologies promise. Overall, we propose a more nuanced application of Web 2.0 technologies within museums - one which provides a contextual basis that gives users a starting point for engagement and permits users to make sense of objects in relation to their own needs, uses, and understandings.
    Date
    22. 3.2009 18:52:32
  20. Bidwell, S.: Curiosities of light and sight (1899) 0.07 
    0.073323876 = product of:
  0.14664775 = sum of:
    0.14664775 = sum of:
      0.11079228 = weight(_text_:matter in 5783) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11079228 = score(doc=5783,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.32580847 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.155624 = idf(docFreq=254, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052928586 = queryNorm
          0.3400534 = fieldWeight in 5783, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.155624 = idf(docFreq=254, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5783)
      0.035855465 = weight(_text_:22 in 5783) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.035855465 = score(doc=5783,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18534689 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052928586 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5783, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5783)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The following chapters are based upon notes of several unconnected lectures addressed to audiences of very different classes in the theatres of the Royal Institution, the London Institution, the Leeds Philosophical and Literary Society, and Caius House, Battersea. In preparing the notes for publication the matter has been re-arranged with the object of presenting it, as far as might be, in methodical order; additions and omissions have been freely made, and numerous diagrams, illustrative of the apparatus and experiments described, have been provided. I do not know that any apology is needed for offering the collection as thus re-modelled to a larger public. Though the essays are, for the most part, of a popular and informal character, they touch upon a number of curious matters of which no readily accessible account has yet appeared, while, even in the most elementary parts, an attempt has been made to handle the subject with some degree of freshness. The interesting subjective phenomena which are associated with the sense of vision do not appear to have received in this country the attention they deserve. This little book may perhaps be of some slight service in suggesting to experimentalists, both professional and amateur, an attractive field of research which has hitherto been only partially explored.
    Date
    6. 3.2020 17:58:22

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 3237
  • m 375
  • el 174
  • s 144
  • b 39
  • x 35
  • i 26
  • r 18
  • ? 8
  • p 5
  • d 3
  • n 3
  • u 2
  • z 2
  • au 1
  • h 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications