Search (8331 results, page 1 of 417)

  1. Bordogna, G.; Pagani, M.: ¬A flexible content-based image retrieval model and a customizable system for the retrieval of shapes (2010) 0.15
    0.14654942 = product of:
      0.36637354 = sum of:
        0.29881692 = weight(_text_:object's in 3450) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.29881692 = score(doc=3450,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.5460974 = queryWeight, product of:
              9.905128 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0551328 = queryNorm
            0.54718614 = fieldWeight in 3450, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              9.905128 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3450)
        0.06755662 = weight(_text_:system in 3450) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06755662 = score(doc=3450,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.17364366 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0551328 = queryNorm
            0.38905317 = fieldWeight in 3450, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3450)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    The authors describe a flexible model and a system for content-based image retrieval of objects' shapes. Flexibility is intended as the possibility of customizing the system behavior to the user's needs and perceptions. This is achieved by allowing users to modify the retrieval function. The system implementing this model uses multiple representations to characterize some macroscopic characteristics of the objects shapes. Specifically, the shape indexes describe the global features of the object's contour (represented by the Fourier coefficients), the contour's irregularities (represented by the multifractal spectrum), and the presence of concavities and convexities (represented by the contour scale space distribution). During a query formulation, the user can specify both the preference for the macroscopic shape aspects that he or she considers meaningful for the retrieval, and the desired level of accuracy of the matching, which means that the visual query shape must be considered with a given tolerance in representing the desired shapes. The evaluation experiments showed that this system can be suited to different retrieval behaviors, and that, generally, the combination of the multiple shape representations increases both recall and precision with respect to the application of any single representation.
  2. Egghe, L.: Properties of the n-overlap vector and n-overlap similarity theory (2006) 0.14
    0.14045842 = product of:
      0.35114604 = sum of:
        0.29881692 = weight(_text_:object's in 194) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.29881692 = score(doc=194,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.5460974 = queryWeight, product of:
              9.905128 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0551328 = queryNorm
            0.54718614 = fieldWeight in 194, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              9.905128 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=194)
        0.052329127 = weight(_text_:system in 194) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052329127 = score(doc=194,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.17364366 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0551328 = queryNorm
            0.30135927 = fieldWeight in 194, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=194)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    In the first part of this article the author defines the n-overlap vector whose coordinates consist of the fraction of the objects (e.g., books, N-grams, etc.) that belong to 1, 2, , n sets (more generally: families) (e.g., libraries, databases, etc.). With the aid of the Lorenz concentration theory, a theory of n-overlap similarity is conceived together with corresponding measures, such as the generalized Jaccard index (generalizing the well-known Jaccard index in case n 5 2). Next, the distributional form of the n-overlap vector is determined assuming certain distributions of the object's and of the set (family) sizes. In this section the decreasing power law and decreasing exponential distribution is explained for the n-overlap vector. Both item (token) n-overlap and source (type) n-overlap are studied. The n-overlap properties of objects indexed by a hierarchical system (e.g., books indexed by numbers from a UDC or Dewey system or by N-grams) are presented in the final section. The author shows how the results given in the previous section can be applied as well as how the Lorenz order of the n-overlap vector is respected by an increase or a decrease of the level of refinement in the hierarchical system (e.g., the value N in N-grams).
  3. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.12
    0.123005964 = product of:
      0.3075149 = sum of:
        0.2626965 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2626965 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4674165 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0551328 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.044818398 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044818398 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19306567 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0551328 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  4. Mas, S.; Marleau, Y.: Proposition of a faceted classification model to support corporate information organization and digital records management (2009) 0.12
    0.11958047 = product of:
      0.29895118 = sum of:
        0.2626965 = weight(_text_:3a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2626965 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4674165 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0551328 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
        0.03625468 = weight(_text_:system in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03625468 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17364366 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0551328 = queryNorm
            0.20878783 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?reload=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F4755313%2F4755314%2F04755480.pdf%3Farnumber%3D4755480&authDecision=-203.
    Source
    System Sciences, 2009. HICSS '09. 42nd Hawaii International Conference
  5. Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011) 0.11
    0.1050786 = product of:
      0.525393 = sum of:
        0.525393 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.525393 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4674165 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0551328 = queryNorm
            1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.
  6. Fachsystematik Bremen nebst Schlüssel 1970 ff. (1970 ff) 0.10
    0.10250497 = product of:
      0.25626242 = sum of:
        0.21891376 = weight(_text_:3a in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.21891376 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4674165 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0551328 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
        0.03734867 = weight(_text_:22 in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03734867 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19306567 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0551328 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Content
    1. Agrarwissenschaften 1981. - 3. Allgemeine Geographie 2.1972. - 3a. Allgemeine Naturwissenschaften 1.1973. - 4. Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Allgemeine Literaturwissenschaft 2.1971. - 6. Allgemeines. 5.1983. - 7. Anglistik 3.1976. - 8. Astronomie, Geodäsie 4.1977. - 12. bio Biologie, bcp Biochemie-Biophysik, bot Botanik, zoo Zoologie 1981. - 13. Bremensien 3.1983. - 13a. Buch- und Bibliothekswesen 3.1975. - 14. Chemie 4.1977. - 14a. Elektrotechnik 1974. - 15 Ethnologie 2.1976. - 16,1. Geowissenschaften. Sachteil 3.1977. - 16,2. Geowissenschaften. Regionaler Teil 3.1977. - 17. Germanistik 6.1984. - 17a,1. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hil. - 17a,2. Geschichte. Teilsystematik his Neuere Geschichte. - 17a,3. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hit Neueste Geschichte. - 18. Humanbiologie 2.1983. - 19. Ingenieurwissenschaften 1974. - 20. siehe 14a. - 21. klassische Philologie 3.1977. - 22. Klinische Medizin 1975. - 23. Kunstgeschichte 2.1971. - 24. Kybernetik. 2.1975. - 25. Mathematik 3.1974. - 26. Medizin 1976. - 26a. Militärwissenschaft 1985. - 27. Musikwissenschaft 1978. - 27a. Noten 2.1974. - 28. Ozeanographie 3.1977. -29. Pädagogik 8.1985. - 30. Philosphie 3.1974. - 31. Physik 3.1974. - 33. Politik, Politische Wissenschaft, Sozialwissenschaft. Soziologie. Länderschlüssel. Register 1981. - 34. Psychologie 2.1972. - 35. Publizistik und Kommunikationswissenschaft 1985. - 36. Rechtswissenschaften 1986. - 37. Regionale Geograpgie 3.1975. - 37a. Religionswissenschaft 1970. - 38. Romanistik 3.1976. - 39. Skandinavistik 4.1985. - 40. Slavistik 1977. - 40a. Sonstige Sprachen und Literaturen 1973. - 43. Sport 4.1983. - 44. Theaterwissenschaft 1985. - 45. Theologie 2.1976. - 45a. Ur- und Frühgeschichte, Archäologie 1970. - 47. Volkskunde 1976. - 47a. Wirtschaftswissenschaften 1971 // Schlüssel: 1. Länderschlüssel 1971. - 2. Formenschlüssel (Kurzform) 1974. - 3. Personenschlüssel Literatur 5. Fassung 1968
  7. System migration (1997) 0.09
    0.08968425 = product of:
      0.22421062 = sum of:
        0.119634345 = weight(_text_:system in 4446) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.119634345 = score(doc=4446,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17364366 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0551328 = queryNorm
            0.68896466 = fieldWeight in 4446, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4446)
        0.10457627 = weight(_text_:22 in 4446) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10457627 = score(doc=4446,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19306567 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0551328 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4446, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4446)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    22. 2.1999 13:37:59
    Footnote
    Special issue on system migration
  8. Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014) 0.09
    0.087565504 = product of:
      0.43782753 = sum of:
        0.43782753 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.43782753 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4674165 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0551328 = queryNorm
            0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
  9. Stojanovic, N.: Ontology-based Information Retrieval : methods and tools for cooperative query answering (2005) 0.09
    0.08679773 = product of:
      0.21699432 = sum of:
        0.17513101 = weight(_text_:3a in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17513101 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4674165 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0551328 = queryNorm
            0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
        0.041863304 = weight(_text_:system in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041863304 = score(doc=701,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.17364366 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0551328 = queryNorm
            0.24108742 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    By the explosion of possibilities for a ubiquitous content production, the information overload problem reaches the level of complexity which cannot be managed by traditional modelling approaches anymore. Due to their pure syntactical nature traditional information retrieval approaches did not succeed in treating content itself (i.e. its meaning, and not its representation). This leads to a very low usefulness of the results of a retrieval process for a user's task at hand. In the last ten years ontologies have been emerged from an interesting conceptualisation paradigm to a very promising (semantic) modelling technology, especially in the context of the Semantic Web. From the information retrieval point of view, ontologies enable a machine-understandable form of content description, such that the retrieval process can be driven by the meaning of the content. However, the very ambiguous nature of the retrieval process in which a user, due to the unfamiliarity with the underlying repository and/or query syntax, just approximates his information need in a query, implies a necessity to include the user in the retrieval process more actively in order to close the gap between the meaning of the content and the meaning of a user's query (i.e. his information need). This thesis lays foundation for such an ontology-based interactive retrieval process, in which the retrieval system interacts with a user in order to conceptually interpret the meaning of his query, whereas the underlying domain ontology drives the conceptualisation process. In that way the retrieval process evolves from a query evaluation process into a highly interactive cooperation between a user and the retrieval system, in which the system tries to anticipate the user's information need and to deliver the relevant content proactively. Moreover, the notion of content relevance for a user's query evolves from a content dependent artefact to the multidimensional context-dependent structure, strongly influenced by the user's preferences. This cooperation process is realized as the so-called Librarian Agent Query Refinement Process. In order to clarify the impact of an ontology on the retrieval process (regarding its complexity and quality), a set of methods and tools for different levels of content and query formalisation is developed, ranging from pure ontology-based inferencing to keyword-based querying in which semantics automatically emerges from the results. Our evaluation studies have shown that the possibilities to conceptualize a user's information need in the right manner and to interpret the retrieval results accordingly are key issues for realizing much more meaningful information retrieval systems.
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F1627&ei=tAtYUYrBNoHKtQb3l4GYBw&usg=AFQjCNHeaxKkKU3-u54LWxMNYGXaaDLCGw&sig2=8WykXWQoDKjDSdGtAakH2Q&bvm=bv.44442042,d.Yms.
  10. Ehrlich, U.: Bedeutungsanalyse in einem sprachverstehenden System unter Berücksichtigung pragmatischer Faktoren (1990) 0.09
    0.08647796 = product of:
      0.21619488 = sum of:
        0.09667915 = weight(_text_:system in 6132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09667915 = score(doc=6132,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17364366 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0551328 = queryNorm
            0.5567675 = fieldWeight in 6132, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6132)
        0.11951573 = weight(_text_:22 in 6132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11951573 = score(doc=6132,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19306567 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0551328 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6132, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6132)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Series
    Sprache und Information; 22
  11. Rademaker, C.A.: ¬The classification of plants in the United States Patent Classification System (2000) 0.09
    0.08647796 = product of:
      0.21619488 = sum of:
        0.09667915 = weight(_text_:system in 6200) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09667915 = score(doc=6200,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17364366 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0551328 = queryNorm
            0.5567675 = fieldWeight in 6200, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6200)
        0.11951573 = weight(_text_:22 in 6200) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11951573 = score(doc=6200,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19306567 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0551328 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6200, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6200)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Source
    World patent information. 22(2000), S.301-307
  12. Rademaker, C.A.: ¬The classification of ornamental designs in the United States Patent Classification System (2000) 0.09
    0.08647796 = product of:
      0.21619488 = sum of:
        0.09667915 = weight(_text_:system in 6308) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09667915 = score(doc=6308,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17364366 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0551328 = queryNorm
            0.5567675 = fieldWeight in 6308, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6308)
        0.11951573 = weight(_text_:22 in 6308) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11951573 = score(doc=6308,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19306567 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0551328 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6308, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6308)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Source
    World patent information. 22(2000), S.123-133
  13. Mari, H.: Dos fundamentos da significao a producao do sentido (1996) 0.08
    0.08366874 = product of:
      0.4183437 = sum of:
        0.4183437 = weight(_text_:object's in 819) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.4183437 = score(doc=819,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.5460974 = queryWeight, product of:
              9.905128 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0551328 = queryNorm
            0.7660606 = fieldWeight in 819, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              9.905128 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=819)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    An approach to establishing a relationship between knowing, informing and representing, using aspects of linguistic theory to clarify semantic theory as the basis for an overall theory of meaning. Linguistic knowledge is based on a conceptual matrix which defines convergence / divergence of the categories used to specify an object's parameters; work on the analysis of discourse emphasisis the social dimension of meaning, which is the basis of the theory of acts and speech. The evaluation criteria used to determine questions about the possibility of knowledge are necessarily decisive, this opens up promising perspectives if formulating a relationship between conceptual and pragmatic approaches
  14. Xiong, C.: Knowledge based text representations for information retrieval (2016) 0.08
    0.07972032 = product of:
      0.1993008 = sum of:
        0.17513101 = weight(_text_:3a in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17513101 = score(doc=5820,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4674165 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0551328 = queryNorm
            0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
        0.024169788 = weight(_text_:system in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024169788 = score(doc=5820,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17364366 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0551328 = queryNorm
            0.13919188 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    This proposal includes plans to improve the quality of relevant entities with a co-learning framework that learns from both entity labels and document labels. We also plan to develop a hybrid ranking system that combines word based and entity based representations together with their uncertainties considered. At last, we plan to enrich the text representations with connections between entities. We propose several ways to infer entity graph representations for texts, and to rank documents using their structure representations. This dissertation overcomes the limitation of word based representations with external and carefully curated information from knowledge bases. We believe this thesis research is a solid start towards the new generation of intelligent, semantic, and structured information retrieval.
    Content
    Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Language and Information Technologies. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cs.cmu.edu%2F~cx%2Fpapers%2Fknowledge_based_text_representation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0SaTSvhWLTh__Uz_HtOtl3.
  15. Recker, I.; Ronthaler, M.; Zillmann, H.: OSIRIS - Osnabrück Intelligent Research Information System : ein Hyperbase Front End System für OPACs (1996) 0.08
    0.07687221 = product of:
      0.19218051 = sum of:
        0.10254373 = weight(_text_:system in 4106) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10254373 = score(doc=4106,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17364366 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0551328 = queryNorm
            0.5905411 = fieldWeight in 4106, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4106)
        0.089636795 = weight(_text_:22 in 4106) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.089636795 = score(doc=4106,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19306567 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0551328 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4106, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4106)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    22. 4.1996 20:07:57
  16. Smeaton, A.F.; Rijsbergen, C.J. van: ¬The retrieval effects of query expansion on a feedback document retrieval system (1983) 0.08
    0.07566821 = product of:
      0.18917052 = sum of:
        0.08459426 = weight(_text_:system in 2134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08459426 = score(doc=2134,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17364366 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0551328 = queryNorm
            0.4871716 = fieldWeight in 2134, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2134)
        0.10457627 = weight(_text_:22 in 2134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10457627 = score(doc=2134,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19306567 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0551328 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2134, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2134)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    30. 3.2001 13:32:22
  17. Hatano, H.: ¬The image processing and database system in the National Museum of Western Art, Tokyo : an integrated system for art research (1996) 0.07
    0.07174224 = product of:
      0.17935559 = sum of:
        0.10465825 = weight(_text_:system in 6856) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10465825 = score(doc=6856,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.17364366 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0551328 = queryNorm
            0.60271853 = fieldWeight in 6856, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6856)
        0.07469734 = weight(_text_:22 in 6856) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07469734 = score(doc=6856,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19306567 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0551328 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 6856, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6856)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Describes a 4 year project started in 1994 to assemble and test a system utilizing machine readable thesauri and classification systems developed in Western countries in order to facilitate research into Western art
    Source
    Art libraries journal. 21(1996) no.1, S.18-22
  18. Simmonds, A.: ¬The 21st century ISBN (1997) 0.07
    0.07174224 = product of:
      0.17935559 = sum of:
        0.10465825 = weight(_text_:system in 1705) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10465825 = score(doc=1705,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.17364366 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0551328 = queryNorm
            0.60271853 = fieldWeight in 1705, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1705)
        0.07469734 = weight(_text_:22 in 1705) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07469734 = score(doc=1705,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19306567 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0551328 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1705, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1705)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    The Digital Object Identifier (DOI) system, launched in Oct 97, is a system for executing various processes on the Internet. Explains how it works and what it can do and discusses governance of the system warning of the need for wider investigation
    Source
    Bookseller. 1997, no.4798, S.20-22
  19. Rauber, A.: Digital preservation in data-driven science : on the importance of process capture, preservation and validation (2012) 0.07
    0.07171606 = product of:
      0.35858032 = sum of:
        0.35858032 = weight(_text_:object's in 469) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.35858032 = score(doc=469,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.5460974 = queryWeight, product of:
              9.905128 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0551328 = queryNorm
            0.65662336 = fieldWeight in 469, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              9.905128 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=469)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Current digital preservation is strongly biased towards data objects: digital files of document-style objects, or encapsulated and largely self-contained objects. To provide authenticity and provenance information, comprehensive metadata models are deployed to document information on an object's context. Yet, we claim that simply documenting an objects context may not be sufficient to ensure proper provenance and to fulfill the stated preservation goals. Specifically in e-Science and business settings, capturing, documenting and preserving entire processes may be necessary to meet the preservation goals. We thus present an approach for capturing, documenting and preserving processes, and means to assess their authenticity upon re-execution. We will discuss options as well as limitations and open challenges to achieve sound preservation, speci?cally within scientific processes.
  20. Schrodt, R.: Tiefen und Untiefen im wissenschaftlichen Sprachgebrauch (2008) 0.07
    0.07005241 = product of:
      0.35026202 = sum of:
        0.35026202 = weight(_text_:3a in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.35026202 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4674165 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0551328 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Content
    Vgl. auch: https://studylibde.com/doc/13053640/richard-schrodt. Vgl. auch: http%3A%2F%2Fwww.univie.ac.at%2FGermanistik%2Fschrodt%2Fvorlesung%2Fwissenschaftssprache.doc&usg=AOvVaw1lDLDR6NFf1W0-oC9mEUJf.

Authors

Languages

Types

Themes

Subjects

Classifications