Search (3862 results, page 1 of 194)

  1. Thomas, A.R.: ¬The Work-Wide Web : a cataloging career for every librarian? (1997) 0.12 
    0.118723914 = product of:
  0.23744783 = sum of:
    0.23744783 = sum of:
      0.180131 = weight(_text_:managers in 5118) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.180131 = score(doc=5118,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.32828063 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.2079496 = idf(docFreq=241, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052880686 = queryNorm
          0.5487104 = fieldWeight in 5118, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.2079496 = idf(docFreq=241, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5118)
      0.057316825 = weight(_text_:22 in 5118) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.057316825 = score(doc=5118,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18517916 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052880686 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5118, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5118)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Reviews the consequences of the traditional division of library staff into Technical Services and Reader Services and if decreased interest in cataloguing by library managers. Notes ways in which non cataloguers have had limited involvement in cataloguing. Describes different forms of a holistic approach to library practice and suggests advantages of a holistic work plan. Considers problems of a holistic work plan, advances some solutions and identifies implications for education in cataloguing in library schools
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 24(1997) nos.1/2, S.5-22
  2. McLeod, J.; Hare, C.H.; Webster, B.: Records management today (1998) 0.12 
    0.118723914 = product of:
  0.23744783 = sum of:
    0.23744783 = sum of:
      0.180131 = weight(_text_:managers in 3627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.180131 = score(doc=3627,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.32828063 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.2079496 = idf(docFreq=241, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052880686 = queryNorm
          0.5487104 = fieldWeight in 3627, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.2079496 = idf(docFreq=241, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3627)
      0.057316825 = weight(_text_:22 in 3627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.057316825 = score(doc=3627,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18517916 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052880686 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3627, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3627)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Examines the challenges associated with records management in an electronic environment. These include: the impact of professionalization; the explosion of information created and disseminated in electronic form; increased personal responsibility and the creation of ethical codes regulating the coduct of records managers; commitment to and recognition by society at large; and the need to redefine the skills and knowledge required to fulfil the new role of records manager
    Date
    15. 5.1999 20:22:49
  3. ¬The role of the information professional in the 'knowledge economy' (1998) 0.12 
    0.118723914 = product of:
  0.23744783 = sum of:
    0.23744783 = sum of:
      0.180131 = weight(_text_:managers in 3697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.180131 = score(doc=3697,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.32828063 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.2079496 = idf(docFreq=241, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052880686 = queryNorm
          0.5487104 = fieldWeight in 3697, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.2079496 = idf(docFreq=241, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3697)
      0.057316825 = weight(_text_:22 in 3697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.057316825 = score(doc=3697,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18517916 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052880686 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3697, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3697)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Report of inerviews with 7 members of the Editorial Board of 'Electronic Library' to determine their views on how information professionals should position themselves and what new and different things ought they to do in the face of the rise of the Knowledge Economy and in the face of incursions into the information field by other professional groups, such as accountants and information technology managers
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:59:16
  4. Su, F.P.; Lai, K.K.; Sharma, R.R.K.; Kuo, T.H.: Patent priority network : linking patent portfolio to strategic goals (2009) 0.12 
    0.11702269 = product of:
  0.23404539 = sum of:
    0.23404539 = sum of:
      0.19105777 = weight(_text_:managers in 3170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.19105777 = score(doc=3170,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.32828063 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.2079496 = idf(docFreq=241, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052880686 = queryNorm
          0.58199525 = fieldWeight in 3170, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            6.2079496 = idf(docFreq=241, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3170)
      0.04298762 = weight(_text_:22 in 3170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04298762 = score(doc=3170,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18517916 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052880686 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3170, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3170)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    When applying for patents, companies should consider performing patent portfolios as a means of integrating their patent strategy to shape their overall business strategy. This is an important issue for any company in pursuit of enhanced operational performance because the whole raison d'être behind the application of patents is the anticipation of achieving maximum competitive advantage. A prerequisite for such a company is a decision analysis model of patent portfolios because this has the added advantage of being readily applicable to the evaluation of the quality of its competitors' portfolios; thus, by understanding both itself and its competitors, a company can attain a superior position. To demonstrate this, we examine patent priority networks (PPNs) formed through patent family members and claimed priority patents, performing a model of patent portfolio analysis and then going on to determine the algorithms. We suggest that information retrieved from this network can provide a useful reference tool for decision-making by company CEOs, CTOs, R&D managers, and intellectual property managers.
    Date
    5.11.2009 20:35:22
  5. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.11 
    0.105482355 = sum of:
  0.08398855 = product of:
    0.25196564 = sum of:
      0.25196564 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.25196564 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.44832304 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052880686 = queryNorm
          0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.02149381 = product of:
    0.04298762 = sum of:
      0.04298762 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04298762 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18517916 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052880686 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  6. Smet, E. de: Evaluation of a computerised community information system through transaction analysis and user survey (1995) 0.10 
    0.103883415 = product of:
  0.20776683 = sum of:
    0.20776683 = sum of:
      0.15761462 = weight(_text_:managers in 2304) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.15761462 = score(doc=2304,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.32828063 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.2079496 = idf(docFreq=241, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052880686 = queryNorm
          0.4801216 = fieldWeight in 2304, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.2079496 = idf(docFreq=241, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2304)
      0.05015222 = weight(_text_:22 in 2304) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05015222 = score(doc=2304,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18517916 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052880686 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2304, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2304)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Reports on the results of a transaction analysis and user survey, evaluating a pilot system for computerized community information in a public library, based on the GDIS system (Gemeenschaps Informatie Documentair System). The non hierarchical and global approach to the integrated database proved to be useful for novice users. Out of many parameters only frequency of use correlates with retrieval success. The online questionnaire proved to be worthwhile although restricted in scope. The logbook transaction analysis yielded a rich amount of useful management information for the systems managers. The user survey yielded a rich set of data on which to perform statistical analyses according to social science practice, from which some interesting relations could be detected
    Date
    23.10.1995 19:22:11
  7. Falkingham, L.T.; Reeves, R.: Context analysis : a technique for analysing research in a field, applied to literature on the management of R&D at the section level (1998) 0.10 
    0.103883415 = product of:
  0.20776683 = sum of:
    0.20776683 = sum of:
      0.15761462 = weight(_text_:managers in 3689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.15761462 = score(doc=3689,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.32828063 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.2079496 = idf(docFreq=241, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052880686 = queryNorm
          0.4801216 = fieldWeight in 3689, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.2079496 = idf(docFreq=241, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3689)
      0.05015222 = weight(_text_:22 in 3689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05015222 = score(doc=3689,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18517916 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052880686 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3689, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3689)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Context analysis is a new method for appraising a body of publications. the process consists of creating a database of attributes assigned to each paper by the reviewer and then looking for interesting relationships in the data. Assigning the attributes requires an understanding of the subject matter of the papers. Presents findings about one particular research field, Management of R&D at the Section Level. The findings support the view that this body of academic publications does not meet the needs of practitioner R&D managers. Discusses practical aspects of how to apply the method in other fields
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:18:46
  8. Hammwöhner, R.: TransRouter revisited : Decision support in the routing of translation projects (2000) 0.10 
    0.103883415 = product of:
  0.20776683 = sum of:
    0.20776683 = sum of:
      0.15761462 = weight(_text_:managers in 5483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.15761462 = score(doc=5483,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.32828063 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.2079496 = idf(docFreq=241, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052880686 = queryNorm
          0.4801216 = fieldWeight in 5483, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.2079496 = idf(docFreq=241, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5483)
      0.05015222 = weight(_text_:22 in 5483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05015222 = score(doc=5483,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18517916 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052880686 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5483, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5483)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This paper gives an outline of the final results of the TransRouter project. In the scope of this project a decision support system for translation managers has been developed, which will support the selection of appropriate routes for translation projects. In this paper emphasis is put on the decision model, which is based on a stepwise refined assessment of translation routes. The workflow of using this system is considered as well
    Date
    10.12.2000 18:22:35
  9. Xia, J.: GIS in the management of library pick-up books (2004) 0.10 
    0.103883415 = product of:
  0.20776683 = sum of:
    0.20776683 = sum of:
      0.15761462 = weight(_text_:managers in 2853) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.15761462 = score(doc=2853,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.32828063 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.2079496 = idf(docFreq=241, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052880686 = queryNorm
          0.4801216 = fieldWeight in 2853, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.2079496 = idf(docFreq=241, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2853)
      0.05015222 = weight(_text_:22 in 2853) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05015222 = score(doc=2853,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18517916 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052880686 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2853, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2853)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The management of library "pick-up books" - a phrase that refers to books pulled off the shelves by readers, discarded in the library after use, and picked up by library assistants for reshelving - is an issue for many collection managers. This research attempts to use geographic information system (GIS) software as a tool to monitor the use of such books so that their distributions by book shelf-ranges can be displayed visually. With GIS, library floor layouts are drawn as maps. This research produces some explanations of the habits of library patrons browsing shelved materials, and makes suggestions to librarians on the expansion of library collections and the rearrangement potential for library space.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.209-216
  10. Charbonneau, M.D.: Production benchmarks for catalogers in academic libraries : are we there yet? (2005) 0.10 
    0.103883415 = product of:
  0.20776683 = sum of:
    0.20776683 = sum of:
      0.15761462 = weight(_text_:managers in 128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.15761462 = score(doc=128,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.32828063 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.2079496 = idf(docFreq=241, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052880686 = queryNorm
          0.4801216 = fieldWeight in 128, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.2079496 = idf(docFreq=241, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=128)
      0.05015222 = weight(_text_:22 in 128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05015222 = score(doc=128,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18517916 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052880686 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 128, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=128)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This paper examines existing library and personnel literature to determine whether any strides have been made among academic libraries in determining cataloging productivity benchmarks. The perceived importance of performance evaluations based on quantitative and qualitative standards is explored, as is the intended effect of established cataloging production norms. The pros and cons of cataloging benchmarks are analyzed from four different perspectives: library administration, library human resources, cataloging managers, and cataloging staff. The paper concludes that additional research is needed in order to determine whether established production cataloging benchmarks are feasible and meaningful within academic libraries.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  11. Brunt, R.: Old rules for a new game : Cutter revisited (1998) 0.10 
    0.103883415 = product of:
  0.20776683 = sum of:
    0.20776683 = sum of:
      0.15761462 = weight(_text_:managers in 771) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.15761462 = score(doc=771,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.32828063 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.2079496 = idf(docFreq=241, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052880686 = queryNorm
          0.4801216 = fieldWeight in 771, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.2079496 = idf(docFreq=241, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=771)
      0.05015222 = weight(_text_:22 in 771) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05015222 = score(doc=771,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18517916 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052880686 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 771, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=771)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    It is contended that while there are considerable numbers of people interested in the application of information retrieval (IR) software on their home computers in their professional, working and recreational activities, they are not very well served in using it to best advantage. Describes the writer's attempts to transfer some of the recorded good practice of the first information managers to contemporary problems. Data input standards devoted to library organisation may be developed to establish a set of principles to encourage the consistent organisation of the entire range of objects which might be represented in databases. Specific areas of difficulty are examined.
    Date
    24. 1.2007 19:38:22
  12. Broady, J.E.: Costing of bibliographic services (1997) 0.10 
    0.097945966 = product of:
  0.19589193 = sum of:
    0.19589193 = sum of:
      0.13509825 = weight(_text_:managers in 648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.13509825 = score(doc=648,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.32828063 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.2079496 = idf(docFreq=241, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052880686 = queryNorm
          0.41153282 = fieldWeight in 648, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.2079496 = idf(docFreq=241, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=648)
      0.06079368 = weight(_text_:22 in 648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06079368 = score(doc=648,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.18517916 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052880686 = queryNorm
          0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 648, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=648)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Although traditionally, costing is an activity which information professionals have not needed to undertake, increasing emphasis on demonstrating value for money in service provision has led to a growing awareness of the need to cost service activity. Discusses the basics of costing library activities, noting types of costs (direct costs and indirect costs; fixed costs and variable costs). Describes 2 basic approaches to costing: marginal costing; and total absorption or absorption costing and illustrates the principles involved using library based examples. Argues that, although librarians focus on the needs of their users, they must have a knowledge of and an ability to undertake costing if they are to provide services that are effectively designed and delivered. Concludes that, without such knowledge and ability, library managers must eventually lose their central role in the planning and control of these services
    Date
    9. 2.1997 18:44:22
    22. 9.1997 18:41:15
  13. Matthews, J.R.: Public access to online catalogs : a planning guide for managers (1982) 0.09 
    0.0900655 = product of:
  0.180131 = sum of:
    0.180131 = product of:
      0.360262 = sum of:
        0.360262 = weight(_text_:managers in 1974) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.360262 = score(doc=1974,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.32828063 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.2079496 = idf(docFreq=241, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052880686 = queryNorm
            1.0974208 = fieldWeight in 1974, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.2079496 = idf(docFreq=241, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1974)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  14. Sessions, B.; Herrling, P.: Ize: the all-terrain vehicle of database managers (1990) 0.09 
    0.0900655 = product of:
  0.180131 = sum of:
    0.180131 = product of:
      0.360262 = sum of:
        0.360262 = weight(_text_:managers in 3228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.360262 = score(doc=3228,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.32828063 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.2079496 = idf(docFreq=241, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052880686 = queryNorm
            1.0974208 = fieldWeight in 3228, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.2079496 = idf(docFreq=241, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3228)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  15. Bent, D.H.; McLachlan, J.S.: Demand for information managers : a Canadian survey (1994) 0.09 
    0.0900655 = product of:
  0.180131 = sum of:
    0.180131 = product of:
      0.360262 = sum of:
        0.360262 = weight(_text_:managers in 1394) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.360262 = score(doc=1394,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.32828063 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.2079496 = idf(docFreq=241, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052880686 = queryNorm
            1.0974208 = fieldWeight in 1394, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              6.2079496 = idf(docFreq=241, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1394)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Reports results of a questionnaire survey of senoir information managers in Canada was undertaken by the Graduate School of Library and Information Science at Western Ontario University to estimate the employment demand for graduates in information management. Carefull attention was necessary to distinguish between information managers and other kinds of information professionals. The responses showed acceptance of the importance of information management education and indicated that opportunities will exist for graduates. The respondents provided guidance on what skills and attributes woulb be considered appropriate for information managers
  16. Borgman, C.L.: Will the global information infrastructure be the library of the future? : Central and Eastern Europe as a case example (1996) 0.09 
    0.08904293 = product of:
  0.17808586 = sum of:
    0.17808586 = sum of:
      0.13509825 = weight(_text_:managers in 5507) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.13509825 = score(doc=5507,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.32828063 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.2079496 = idf(docFreq=241, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052880686 = queryNorm
          0.41153282 = fieldWeight in 5507, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.2079496 = idf(docFreq=241, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5507)
      0.04298762 = weight(_text_:22 in 5507) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04298762 = score(doc=5507,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18517916 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052880686 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5507, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5507)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Addresses the technical and policy issues in the development of an international infrastructure for the flow of information by studying the emerging national information infrastructures in 6 post communist countries in Central and Eastern Europe. The study consisted of interviews with over 300 library managers, computing network administrators, government policy makers and other information professionals conducted in 1993 and 1994 in Croatia, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Slovakia and Slovenia, plus a 1994 mail survey of research libraries in these countries. After presenting the principles under which the G-7 leading industrialized countries have agreed to collaborate on constructing a Global Information Infrastructure (GII), presents examples from the survey on how the GII pronciples might be addressed. Results of the longitudinal study were reported at greater length in the Proceedings of the 58th Meeting of the ASIS, 1995, S.27-34
    Source
    IFLA journal. 22(1996) no.2, S.121-127
  17. Wu, I.-L.; Lin, H.-C.: ¬A strategy-based process for implementing knowledge management : an integrative view and empirical study (2009) 0.09 
    0.08904293 = product of:
  0.17808586 = sum of:
    0.17808586 = sum of:
      0.13509825 = weight(_text_:managers in 2764) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.13509825 = score(doc=2764,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.32828063 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.2079496 = idf(docFreq=241, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052880686 = queryNorm
          0.41153282 = fieldWeight in 2764, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.2079496 = idf(docFreq=241, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2764)
      0.04298762 = weight(_text_:22 in 2764) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04298762 = score(doc=2764,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18517916 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052880686 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2764, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2764)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Knowledge resource is unique and valuable for a link to competitive advantage based on the knowledge-based perspective. Effective knowledge management is the major concern of contemporary business managers. The key determinant of effective knowledge management is the firm's competitive strategy. The link between business strategy and knowledge management, while often discussed, has been widely ignored in practice. Moreover, while knowledge management is complex in nature, it is difficult to directly translate a firm's competitive strategy into the specific knowledge management activities. This requires first defining knowledge strategy to guide further information technology (IT)-supported implementation approaches. Finally, the ultimate goal of knowledge management lies in the realization of firm performance. Previous studies have just discussed partial relationship among these relevant knowledge concepts rather than in an integrative manner. Thus, this research proposes a complete process-based model with four components: competitive strategy, knowledge strategy, implementation approach, and firm performance. Empirical results have shown positive relationships between any two consecutive components and useful insight for knowledge implementation practice.
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:08:51
  18. Anderson, J.D.; Pérez-Carballo, J.: Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) (2009) 0.09 
    0.08904293 = product of:
  0.17808586 = sum of:
    0.17808586 = sum of:
      0.13509825 = weight(_text_:managers in 3837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.13509825 = score(doc=3837,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.32828063 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.2079496 = idf(docFreq=241, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052880686 = queryNorm
          0.41153282 = fieldWeight in 3837, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.2079496 = idf(docFreq=241, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3837)
      0.04298762 = weight(_text_:22 in 3837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04298762 = score(doc=3837,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18517916 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052880686 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3837, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3837)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Library of Congress Subject Headings (LSCH), which celebrated its 100th birthday in 1998, is the largest cataloging and indexing language in the world for the indication of the topics and formats of books and similar publications. It consists of a controlled list of main headings, many with subdivisions, with a rich system of cross references. It is supported by the U.S. government, and undergoes systematic revision. In recent decades its managers have begun to confront challenges such as biased terminology, complicated syntax (how terms are put together to form headings), and effective displays in electronic media. Many suggestions have been made for its improvement, including moving to a fully faceted system.
    Date
    27. 8.2011 14:22:13
  19. Eschenfelder, K.R.; Johnson, A.: Managing the data commons : controlled sharing of scholarly data (2014) 0.09 
    0.08904293 = product of:
  0.17808586 = sum of:
    0.17808586 = sum of:
      0.13509825 = weight(_text_:managers in 1341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.13509825 = score(doc=1341,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.32828063 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.2079496 = idf(docFreq=241, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052880686 = queryNorm
          0.41153282 = fieldWeight in 1341, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.2079496 = idf(docFreq=241, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1341)
      0.04298762 = weight(_text_:22 in 1341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04298762 = score(doc=1341,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18517916 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052880686 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1341, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1341)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This paper describes the range and variation in access and use control policies and tools used by 24 web-based data repositories across a variety of fields. It also describes the rationale provided by repositories for their decisions to control data or provide means for depositors to do so. Using a purposive exploratory sample, we employed content analysis of repository website documentation, a web survey of repository managers, and selected follow-up interviews to generate data. Our results describe the range and variation in access and use control policies and tools employed, identifying both commonalities and distinctions across repositories. Using concepts from commons theory as a guiding theoretical framework, our analysis describes the following five dimensions of repository rules, or data commons boundaries: locus of decision making (depositor vs. repository), degree of variation in terms of use within the repository, the mission of the repository in relation to its scholarly field, what use means in relation to specific sorts of data, and types of exclusion.
    Date
    22. 8.2014 16:56:41
  20. Thelwall, M.; Sud, P.: Mendeley readership counts : an investigation of temporal and disciplinary differences (2016) 0.09 
    0.08904293 = product of:
  0.17808586 = sum of:
    0.17808586 = sum of:
      0.13509825 = weight(_text_:managers in 3211) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.13509825 = score(doc=3211,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.32828063 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.2079496 = idf(docFreq=241, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052880686 = queryNorm
          0.41153282 = fieldWeight in 3211, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.2079496 = idf(docFreq=241, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3211)
      0.04298762 = weight(_text_:22 in 3211) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04298762 = score(doc=3211,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18517916 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052880686 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3211, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3211)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Scientists and managers using citation-based indicators to help evaluate research cannot evaluate recent articles because of the time needed for citations to accrue. Reading occurs before citing, however, and so it makes sense to count readers rather than citations for recent publications. To assess this, Mendeley readers and citations were obtained for articles from 2004 to late 2014 in five broad categories (agriculture, business, decision science, pharmacy, and the social sciences) and 50 subcategories. In these areas, citation counts tended to increase with every extra year since publication, and readership counts tended to increase faster initially but then stabilize after about 5 years. The correlation between citations and readers was also higher for longer time periods, stabilizing after about 5 years. Although there were substantial differences between broad fields and smaller differences between subfields, the results confirm the value of Mendeley reader counts as early scientific impact indicators.
    Date
    16.11.2016 11:07:22

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 3214
  • m 382
  • el 170
  • s 150
  • b 39
  • x 36
  • i 23
  • r 18
  • ? 8
  • p 4
  • d 3
  • n 3
  • u 2
  • z 2
  • au 1
  • h 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications