Search (3654 results, page 1 of 183)

0.098017596 = sum of:
  0.07804486 = product of:
    0.23413457 = sum of:
      0.23413457 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.23413457 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.41659617 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04913843 = queryNorm
          0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.019972736 = product of:
    0.039945472 = sum of:
      0.039945472 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.039945472 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1720744 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04913843 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.

Date

8. 1.2013 10:22:32

0.0912531 = product of:
  0.1825062 = sum of:
    0.1825062 = product of:
      0.3650124 = sum of:
        0.3650124 = weight(_text_:translational in 3228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3650124 = score(doc=3228,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.47914773 = queryWeight, product of:
              9.7509775 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04913843 = queryNorm
            0.7617951 = fieldWeight in 3228, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              9.7509775 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3228)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

F1000 recommendations were assessed as a potential data source for research evaluation, but the reasons for differences between F1000 Article Factor (FFa scores) and citations remain unexplored. By linking recommendations for 28,254 publications in F1000 with citations in Scopus, we investigated the effect of research level (basic, clinical, mixed) and article type on the internal consistency of assessments based on citations and FFa scores. The research level has little impact on the differences between the 2 evaluation tools, while article type has a big effect. These 2 measures differ significantly for 2 groups: (a) nonprimary research or evidence-based research are more highly cited but not highly recommended, while (b) translational research or transformative research are more highly recommended but have fewer citations. This can be expected, since citation activity is usually practiced by academic authors while the potential for scientific revolutions and the suitability for clinical practice of an article should be investigated from a practitioners' perspective. We conclude with a recommendation that the application of bibliometric approaches in research evaluation should consider the proportion of 3 types of publications: evidence-based research, transformative research, and translational research. The latter 2 types are more suitable for assessment through peer review.

0.090335965 = product of:
  0.18067193 = sum of:
    0.18067193 = product of:
      0.36134386 = sum of:
        0.36134386 = weight(_text_:translational in 228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.36134386 = score(doc=228,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.47914773 = queryWeight, product of:
              9.7509775 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04913843 = queryNorm
            0.7541387 = fieldWeight in 228, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              9.7509775 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=228)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Die gegenwärtigen Kulturwissenschaften bilden eine ausgeprägte Theorie- und Forschungslandschaft. Ihre Dynamik entspringt vor allem dem Spannungsfeld wechselnder "cultural turns" quer durch die Disziplinen: interpretive turn, performative turn, reflexive turn/literary turn, postcolonial turn, translational turn, spatial turn, iconic turn. Der Band stellt diese "Wenden" in ihren systematischen Fragestellungen, Erkenntnisumbrüchen sowie Wechselbeziehungen vor und zeigt ihre Anwendung in konkreten Forschungsfeldern. Damit wird eine "Kartierung" der neueren Kulturwissenschaften geleistet und zugleich ein umfassender Überblick über ihre Entwicklungen und Ausrichtungen geboten - mit einer Fülle verarbeiteter internationaler Forschungsliteratur.

0.08168133 = sum of:
  0.065037385 = product of:
    0.19511214 = sum of:
      0.19511214 = weight(_text_:3a in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.19511214 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.41659617 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04913843 = queryNorm
          0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.016643947 = product of:
    0.033287894 = sum of:
      0.033287894 = weight(_text_:22 in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.033287894 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1720744 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04913843 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

1. Agrarwissenschaften 1981. - 3. Allgemeine Geographie 2.1972. - 3a. Allgemeine Naturwissenschaften 1.1973. - 4. Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Allgemeine Literaturwissenschaft 2.1971. - 6. Allgemeines. 5.1983. - 7. Anglistik 3.1976. - 8. Astronomie, Geodäsie 4.1977. - 12. bio Biologie, bcp Biochemie-Biophysik, bot Botanik, zoo Zoologie 1981. - 13. Bremensien 3.1983. - 13a. Buch- und Bibliothekswesen 3.1975. - 14. Chemie 4.1977. - 14a. Elektrotechnik 1974. - 15 Ethnologie 2.1976. - 16,1. Geowissenschaften. Sachteil 3.1977. - 16,2. Geowissenschaften. Regionaler Teil 3.1977. - 17. Germanistik 6.1984. - 17a,1. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hil. - 17a,2. Geschichte. Teilsystematik his Neuere Geschichte. - 17a,3. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hit Neueste Geschichte. - 18. Humanbiologie 2.1983. - 19. Ingenieurwissenschaften 1974. - 20. siehe 14a. - 21. klassische Philologie 3.1977. - 22. Klinische Medizin 1975. - 23. Kunstgeschichte 2.1971. - 24. Kybernetik. 2.1975. - 25. Mathematik 3.1974. - 26. Medizin 1976. - 26a. Militärwissenschaft 1985. - 27. Musikwissenschaft 1978. - 27a. Noten 2.1974. - 28. Ozeanographie 3.1977. -29. Pädagogik 8.1985. - 30. Philosphie 3.1974. - 31. Physik 3.1974. - 33. Politik, Politische Wissenschaft, Sozialwissenschaft. Soziologie. Länderschlüssel. Register 1981. - 34. Psychologie 2.1972. - 35. Publizistik und Kommunikationswissenschaft 1985. - 36. Rechtswissenschaften 1986. - 37. Regionale Geograpgie 3.1975. - 37a. Religionswissenschaft 1970. - 38. Romanistik 3.1976. - 39. Skandinavistik 4.1985. - 40. Slavistik 1977. - 40a. Sonstige Sprachen und Literaturen 1973. - 43. Sport 4.1983. - 44. Theaterwissenschaft 1985. - 45. Theologie 2.1976. - 45a. Ur- und Frühgeschichte, Archäologie 1970. - 47. Volkskunde 1976. - 47a. Wirtschaftswissenschaften 1971 // Schlüssel: 1. Länderschlüssel 1971. - 2. Formenschlüssel (Kurzform) 1974. - 3. Personenschlüssel Literatur 5. Fassung 1968

0.07804486 = product of:
  0.15608972 = sum of:
    0.15608972 = product of:
      0.46826914 = sum of:
        0.46826914 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.46826914 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.41659617 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04913843 = queryNorm
            1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.

0.06590667 = product of:
  0.13181335 = sum of:
    0.13181335 = product of:
      0.2636267 = sum of:
        0.2636267 = weight(_text_:22 in 219) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2636267 = score(doc=219,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1720744 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04913843 = queryNorm
            1.5320505 = fieldWeight in 219, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.21875 = fieldNorm(doc=219)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 5.1998 20:02:22

0.06590667 = product of:
  0.13181335 = sum of:
    0.13181335 = product of:
      0.2636267 = sum of:
        0.2636267 = weight(_text_:22 in 1386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2636267 = score(doc=1386,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1720744 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04913843 = queryNorm
            1.5320505 = fieldWeight in 1386, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.21875 = fieldNorm(doc=1386)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 5.1998 20:02:22

0.06590667 = product of:
  0.13181335 = sum of:
    0.13181335 = product of:
      0.2636267 = sum of:
        0.2636267 = weight(_text_:22 in 2102) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2636267 = score(doc=2102,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1720744 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04913843 = queryNorm
            1.5320505 = fieldWeight in 2102, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.21875 = fieldNorm(doc=2102)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 5.1998 20:02:22

0.065037385 = product of:
  0.13007477 = sum of:
    0.13007477 = product of:
      0.39022428 = sum of:
        0.39022428 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.39022428 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.41659617 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04913843 = queryNorm
            0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja

0.064525686 = product of:
  0.12905137 = sum of:
    0.12905137 = product of:
      0.25810274 = sum of:
        0.25810274 = weight(_text_:translational in 2152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.25810274 = score(doc=2152,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.47914773 = queryWeight, product of:
              9.7509775 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04913843 = queryNorm
            0.5386705 = fieldWeight in 2152, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              9.7509775 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2152)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The decimal system is one system of a number of possible systems of ordering - and a very symbolic also. The ordering in ten chapters, themes, numbers, etc. you can find often in history. Indeed Dewey is not the genius-founder of decimal classification (against a number of authors)! For ordering and structuring separate schemes within a classification DDC creates a number of important negative solutions, e.g. in the main classes the 'lost' of physics and of medicine as special schemes: Nearly a catastrophe in the times of STM! And against an enormous tradition like Leibniz 1646 - 1716) et alii! Compare Bliss: The Bliss-Classification gives space for 6 numbers »sciences« in a context of 26 classes. Therefore the result in short: DDC (and UDC of course!) are »flowers« of the past, of the first decades of century 20! As a fact the Decimal Classification within the tradition of Melvil Dewey is not a final work: See the increasing number of newly constructed decimal classifications during the years 80 and 90 of the 20th century! Nevertheless DDC is a very great (problem and) solution in its development, internationality, reception - and edge-stone for many thinkers and librarians throughout the world - and an important example for modern translational work! Magda Heiner-Freiling has given to us a great stone for the edifice of Modern DDC: Requiescat in pace!

0.064525686 = product of:
  0.12905137 = sum of:
    0.12905137 = product of:
      0.25810274 = sum of:
        0.25810274 = weight(_text_:translational in 5048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.25810274 = score(doc=5048,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.47914773 = queryWeight, product of:
              9.7509775 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04913843 = queryNorm
            0.5386705 = fieldWeight in 5048, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              9.7509775 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5048)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Legal researchers, recruitment professionals, healthcare information professionals, and patent analysts all undertake work tasks where search forms a core part of their duties. In these instances, the search task is often complex and time-consuming and requires specialist expertise to identify relevant documents and insights within large domain-specific repositories and collections. Several studies have been made investigating the search practices of professionals such as these, but few have attempted to directly compare their professional practices and so it remains unclear to what extent insights and approaches from one domain can be applied to another. In this paper we describe the results of a survey of a purposive sample of 108 legal researchers, 64 recruitment professionals and 107 healthcare information professionals. Their responses are compared with results from a previous survey of 81 patent analysts. The survey investigated their search practices and preferences, the types of functionality they value, and their requirements for future information retrieval systems. The results reveal that these professions share many fundamental needs and face similar challenges. In particular a continuing preference to formulate queries as Boolean expressions, the need to manage, organise and re-use search strategies and results and an ambivalence toward the use of relevance ranking. The results stress the importance of recall and coverage for the healthcare and patent professionals, while precision and recency were more important to the legal and recruitment professionals. The results also highlight the need to ensure that search systems give confidence to the professional searcher and so trust, explainability and accountability remains a significant challenge when developing such systems. The findings suggest that translational research between the different areas could benefit professionals across domains.

0.064525686 = product of:
  0.12905137 = sum of:
    0.12905137 = product of:
      0.25810274 = sum of:
        0.25810274 = weight(_text_:translational in 5710) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.25810274 = score(doc=5710,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.47914773 = queryWeight, product of:
              9.7509775 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04913843 = queryNorm
            0.5386705 = fieldWeight in 5710, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              9.7509775 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5710)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to review and discuss Luciano Floridi's 2019 book The Logic of Information: A Theory of Philosophy as Conceptual Design, the latest instalment in his philosophy of information (PI) tetralogy, particularly with respect to its implications for library and information studies (LIS). Design/methodology/approach Nine scholars with research interests in philosophy and LIS read and responded to the book, raising critical and heuristic questions in the spirit of scholarly dialogue. Floridi responded to these questions. Findings Floridi's PI, including this latest publication, is of interest to LIS scholars, and much insight can be gained by exploring this connection. It seems also that LIS has the potential to contribute to PI's further development in some respects. Research limitations/implications Floridi's PI work is technical philosophy for which many LIS scholars do not have the training or patience to engage with, yet doing so is rewarding. This suggests a role for translational work between philosophy and LIS. Originality/value The book symposium format, not yet seen in LIS, provides forum for sustained, multifaceted and generative dialogue around ideas.

0.062143143 = product of:
  0.12428629 = sum of:
    0.12428629 = product of:
      0.37285885 = sum of:
        0.37285885 = weight(_text_:object's in 819) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.37285885 = score(doc=819,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4867224 = queryWeight, product of:
              9.905128 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04913843 = queryNorm
            0.7660606 = fieldWeight in 819, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              9.905128 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=819)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

An approach to establishing a relationship between knowing, informing and representing, using aspects of linguistic theory to clarify semantic theory as the basis for an overall theory of meaning. Linguistic knowledge is based on a conceptual matrix which defines convergence / divergence of the categories used to specify an object's parameters; work on the analysis of discourse emphasisis the social dimension of meaning, which is the basis of the theory of acts and speech. The evaluation criteria used to determine questions about the possibility of knowledge are necessarily decisive, this opens up promising perspectives if formulating a relationship between conceptual and pragmatic approaches

0.053265553 = product of:
  0.106531106 = sum of:
    0.106531106 = product of:
      0.3195933 = sum of:
        0.3195933 = weight(_text_:object's in 469) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3195933 = score(doc=469,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4867224 = queryWeight, product of:
              9.905128 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04913843 = queryNorm
            0.65662336 = fieldWeight in 469, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              9.905128 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=469)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Current digital preservation is strongly biased towards data objects: digital files of document-style objects, or encapsulated and largely self-contained objects. To provide authenticity and provenance information, comprehensive metadata models are deployed to document information on an object's context. Yet, we claim that simply documenting an objects context may not be sufficient to ensure proper provenance and to fulfill the stated preservation goals. Specifically in e-Science and business settings, capturing, documenting and preserving entire processes may be necessary to meet the preservation goals. We thus present an approach for capturing, documenting and preserving processes, and means to assess their authenticity upon re-execution. We will discuss options as well as limitations and open challenges to achieve sound preservation, speci?cally within scientific processes.

0.052029904 = product of:
  0.10405981 = sum of:
    0.10405981 = product of:
      0.31217942 = sum of:
        0.31217942 = weight(_text_:3a in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.31217942 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.41659617 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04913843 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Vgl. auch: https://studylibde.com/doc/13053640/richard-schrodt. Vgl. auch: http%3A%2F%2Fwww.univie.ac.at%2FGermanistik%2Fschrodt%2Fvorlesung%2Fwissenschaftssprache.doc&usg=AOvVaw1lDLDR6NFf1W0-oC9mEUJf.

0.052029904 = product of:
  0.10405981 = sum of:
    0.10405981 = product of:
      0.31217942 = sum of:
        0.31217942 = weight(_text_:3a in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.31217942 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.41659617 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04913843 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

https%3A%2F%2Ftannerlectures.utah.edu%2F_documents%2Fa-to-z%2Fp%2Fpopper80.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3f4QRTEH-OEBmoYr2J_c7H

0.04660305 = product of:
  0.0932061 = sum of:
    0.0932061 = product of:
      0.1864122 = sum of:
        0.1864122 = weight(_text_:22 in 2433) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1864122 = score(doc=2433,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1720744 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04913843 = queryNorm
            1.0833232 = fieldWeight in 2433, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.21875 = fieldNorm(doc=2433)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

4. 9.2011 12:28:22

0.04660305 = product of:
  0.0932061 = sum of:
    0.0932061 = product of:
      0.1864122 = sum of:
        0.1864122 = weight(_text_:22 in 2818) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1864122 = score(doc=2818,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1720744 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04913843 = queryNorm
            1.0833232 = fieldWeight in 2818, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.21875 = fieldNorm(doc=2818)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 5.1998 19:49:25

0.04660305 = product of:
  0.0932061 = sum of:
    0.0932061 = product of:
      0.1864122 = sum of:
        0.1864122 = weight(_text_:22 in 4315) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1864122 = score(doc=4315,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1720744 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04913843 = queryNorm
            1.0833232 = fieldWeight in 4315, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.21875 = fieldNorm(doc=4315)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 5.1998 19:49:25

0.04660305 = product of:
  0.0932061 = sum of:
    0.0932061 = product of:
      0.1864122 = sum of:
        0.1864122 = weight(_text_:22 in 7400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1864122 = score(doc=7400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1720744 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04913843 = queryNorm
            1.0833232 = fieldWeight in 7400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.21875 = fieldNorm(doc=7400)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 5.1998 19:49:25