Search (3653 results, page 1 of 183)

  1. Hartley, J.; Sydes, M.: Which layout do you prefer? : an analysis of readers' preferences for different typographic layouts of structured abstracts (1996) 0.23 
    0.23056081 = product of:
  0.576402 = sum of:
    0.5364565 = weight(_text_:typographic in 4411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.5364565 = score(doc=4411,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.47914773 = queryWeight, product of:
          9.7509775 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04913843 = queryNorm
        1.1196057 = fieldWeight in 4411, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          9.7509775 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4411)
    0.039945472 = weight(_text_:22 in 4411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.039945472 = score(doc=4411,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1720744 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04913843 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4411, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4411)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Structured abstracts are abstracts which include subheadings such as: background, aims, participants methods and results. These are rapidly replacing traditional abstracts in medical periodicals, but the number and detail of the subheadings used varies, and there is a range of different typographic settings. Reviews a number of studies designed to investigate readers' preferences for different typographic settings and layout. Over 400 readers took part in the study: students; postgraduates; research workers and academics in the social sciences. The most preferred version emerged from the last of 3 studies and 2 additional studies were then carried out to determine preferences for the overall position and layout of this most preferred version on a A4 page. The most preferred version for the setting of the subheadings are printed in bold capital letters
    Source
    Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.1, S.27-37
  2. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.11 
    0.109632015 = product of:
  0.27408004 = sum of:
    0.23413457 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.23413457 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.41659617 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04913843 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.039945472 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.039945472 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1720744 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04913843 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  3. Delsaerdt, P.: Designing the space of linguistic knowledge : a typographic analysis of sixteenth-century dictionaries (2012) 0.10 
    0.1032411 = product of:
  0.5162055 = sum of:
    0.5162055 = weight(_text_:typographic in 5559) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.5162055 = score(doc=5559,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.47914773 = queryWeight, product of:
          9.7509775 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04913843 = queryNorm
        1.077341 = fieldWeight in 5559, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          9.7509775 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5559)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Scrutinizing the ways in which early printed reference works were designed is a way of bringing typography and book history into the domain of library and information science. The core subject of this discipline is the concept of user-oriented organization of knowledge; it has a close connection to information-seeking behavior and retrieval. By studying the typographic arrangement of knowledge in early printed reference works, one can approach the history of the storage, organization, and retrieval of scientific information. The article discusses the typographic "architecture" of the dictionaries published by the Antwerp printer Christophe Plantin and, more specifically, the three dictionaries of the Dutch language compiled by Plantin's learned proofreader Cornelis Kiliaan (ca. 1530-1607). Kiliaan was one of the first authors to introduce etymology and comparative linguistics into his dictionaries. By analyzing the typographic macrostructures and microstructures of his works, it is possible to discover the lines along which they developed-in the words of Paul Valéry-into machines à savoir. The article also compares Plantin's dictionaries with the international benchmark for lexicographic publishing in the Renaissance world, viz. the translation dictionaries compiled and printed by the Parisian publisher Robert Estienne.
  4. Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011) 0.09 
    0.09365383 = product of:
  0.46826914 = sum of:
    0.46826914 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.46826914 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.41659617 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04913843 = queryNorm
        1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.
  5. Fachsystematik Bremen nebst Schlüssel 1970 ff. (1970 ff) 0.09 
    0.09136002 = product of:
  0.22840004 = sum of:
    0.19511214 = weight(_text_:3a in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19511214 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.41659617 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04913843 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
    0.033287894 = weight(_text_:22 in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.033287894 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1720744 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04913843 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Content
    1. Agrarwissenschaften 1981. - 3. Allgemeine Geographie 2.1972. - 3a. Allgemeine Naturwissenschaften 1.1973. - 4. Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Allgemeine Literaturwissenschaft 2.1971. - 6. Allgemeines. 5.1983. - 7. Anglistik 3.1976. - 8. Astronomie, Geodäsie 4.1977. - 12. bio Biologie, bcp Biochemie-Biophysik, bot Botanik, zoo Zoologie 1981. - 13. Bremensien 3.1983. - 13a. Buch- und Bibliothekswesen 3.1975. - 14. Chemie 4.1977. - 14a. Elektrotechnik 1974. - 15 Ethnologie 2.1976. - 16,1. Geowissenschaften. Sachteil 3.1977. - 16,2. Geowissenschaften. Regionaler Teil 3.1977. - 17. Germanistik 6.1984. - 17a,1. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hil. - 17a,2. Geschichte. Teilsystematik his Neuere Geschichte. - 17a,3. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hit Neueste Geschichte. - 18. Humanbiologie 2.1983. - 19. Ingenieurwissenschaften 1974. - 20. siehe 14a. - 21. klassische Philologie 3.1977. - 22. Klinische Medizin 1975. - 23. Kunstgeschichte 2.1971. - 24. Kybernetik. 2.1975. - 25. Mathematik 3.1974. - 26. Medizin 1976. - 26a. Militärwissenschaft 1985. - 27. Musikwissenschaft 1978. - 27a. Noten 2.1974. - 28. Ozeanographie 3.1977. -29. Pädagogik 8.1985. - 30. Philosphie 3.1974. - 31. Physik 3.1974. - 33. Politik, Politische Wissenschaft, Sozialwissenschaft. Soziologie. Länderschlüssel. Register 1981. - 34. Psychologie 2.1972. - 35. Publizistik und Kommunikationswissenschaft 1985. - 36. Rechtswissenschaften 1986. - 37. Regionale Geograpgie 3.1975. - 37a. Religionswissenschaft 1970. - 38. Romanistik 3.1976. - 39. Skandinavistik 4.1985. - 40. Slavistik 1977. - 40a. Sonstige Sprachen und Literaturen 1973. - 43. Sport 4.1983. - 44. Theaterwissenschaft 1985. - 45. Theologie 2.1976. - 45a. Ur- und Frühgeschichte, Archäologie 1970. - 47. Volkskunde 1976. - 47a. Wirtschaftswissenschaften 1971 // Schlüssel: 1. Länderschlüssel 1971. - 2. Formenschlüssel (Kurzform) 1974. - 3. Personenschlüssel Literatur 5. Fassung 1968
  6. Vanclay, J.K.: On the robustness of the h-index (2007) 0.08 
    0.08259288 = product of:
  0.4129644 = sum of:
    0.4129644 = weight(_text_:typographic in 576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.4129644 = score(doc=576,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.47914773 = queryWeight, product of:
          9.7509775 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04913843 = queryNorm
        0.8618728 = fieldWeight in 576, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          9.7509775 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=576)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    The h-index (Hirsch, 2005) is robust, remaining relatively unaffected by errors in the long tails of the citations-rank distribution, such as typographic errors that short-change frequently cited articles and create bogus additional records. This robustness, and the ease with which h-indices can be verified, support the use of a Hirsch-type index over alternatives such as the journal impact factor. These merits of the h-index apply both to individuals and to journals.
  7. Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014) 0.08 
    0.078044854 = product of:
  0.39022428 = sum of:
    0.39022428 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.39022428 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.41659617 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04913843 = queryNorm
        0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
  8. Mari, H.: Dos fundamentos da significao a producao do sentido (1996) 0.07 
    0.07457177 = product of:
  0.37285885 = sum of:
    0.37285885 = weight(_text_:object's in 819) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.37285885 = score(doc=819,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.4867224 = queryWeight, product of:
          9.905128 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04913843 = queryNorm
        0.7660606 = fieldWeight in 819, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          9.905128 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=819)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    An approach to establishing a relationship between knowing, informing and representing, using aspects of linguistic theory to clarify semantic theory as the basis for an overall theory of meaning. Linguistic knowledge is based on a conceptual matrix which defines convergence / divergence of the categories used to specify an object's parameters; work on the analysis of discourse emphasisis the social dimension of meaning, which is the basis of the theory of acts and speech. The evaluation criteria used to determine questions about the possibility of knowledge are necessarily decisive, this opens up promising perspectives if formulating a relationship between conceptual and pragmatic approaches
  9. Costas, B.R.: Typefaces, fonts, and types : toward a classification of fifteenth-century gothic "types" (2016) 0.07 
    0.07226878 = product of:
  0.36134386 = sum of:
    0.36134386 = weight(_text_:typographic in 5131) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.36134386 = score(doc=5131,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.47914773 = queryWeight, product of:
          9.7509775 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04913843 = queryNorm
        0.7541387 = fieldWeight in 5131, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          9.7509775 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5131)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    For more than a century, librarians and bibliographers have supposedly identified and cataloged gothic types using the Proctor-Haebler system and many incunabula collections have been described using it. It is now widely accepted that the Proctor-Haebler system's nomenclature and techniques are uniform and consistent for cataloging rare books and that it is informative about types. This article explains that although the Proctor-Haebler system may help us to identify a printer or a printing office, it confounds different typographic concepts (typeface, font, and type), uses contradictory methods, is based on weak or arguable assumptions, and does not inform us about "types."
  10. Rauber, A.: Digital preservation in data-driven science : on the importance of process capture, preservation and validation (2012) 0.06 
    0.063918665 = product of:
  0.3195933 = sum of:
    0.3195933 = weight(_text_:object's in 469) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.3195933 = score(doc=469,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.4867224 = queryWeight, product of:
          9.905128 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04913843 = queryNorm
        0.65662336 = fieldWeight in 469, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          9.905128 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=469)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Current digital preservation is strongly biased towards data objects: digital files of document-style objects, or encapsulated and largely self-contained objects. To provide authenticity and provenance information, comprehensive metadata models are deployed to document information on an object's context. Yet, we claim that simply documenting an objects context may not be sufficient to ensure proper provenance and to fulfill the stated preservation goals. Specifically in e-Science and business settings, capturing, documenting and preserving entire processes may be necessary to meet the preservation goals. We thus present an approach for capturing, documenting and preserving processes, and means to assess their authenticity upon re-execution. We will discuss options as well as limitations and open challenges to achieve sound preservation, speci?cally within scientific processes.
  11. Schrodt, R.: Tiefen und Untiefen im wissenschaftlichen Sprachgebrauch (2008) 0.06 
    0.062435884 = product of:
  0.31217942 = sum of:
    0.31217942 = weight(_text_:3a in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.31217942 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.41659617 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04913843 = queryNorm
        0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Content
    Vgl. auch: https://studylibde.com/doc/13053640/richard-schrodt. Vgl. auch: http%3A%2F%2Fwww.univie.ac.at%2FGermanistik%2Fschrodt%2Fvorlesung%2Fwissenschaftssprache.doc&usg=AOvVaw1lDLDR6NFf1W0-oC9mEUJf.
  12. Popper, K.R.: Three worlds : the Tanner lecture on human values. Deliverd at the University of Michigan, April 7, 1978 (1978) 0.06 
    0.062435884 = product of:
  0.31217942 = sum of:
    0.31217942 = weight(_text_:3a in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.31217942 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.41659617 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04913843 = queryNorm
        0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Ftannerlectures.utah.edu%2F_documents%2Fa-to-z%2Fp%2Fpopper80.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3f4QRTEH-OEBmoYr2J_c7H
  13. Hartley, J.; Sydes, M.: Structured abstracts in the social sciences : presentation, readability and recall (1995) 0.06 
    0.061944664 = product of:
  0.30972332 = sum of:
    0.30972332 = weight(_text_:typographic in 2383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.30972332 = score(doc=2383,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.47914773 = queryWeight, product of:
          9.7509775 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04913843 = queryNorm
        0.6464046 = fieldWeight in 2383, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          9.7509775 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2383)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Reports results of a study to explore the possibilities of extending the use of structured abstracts (which use subheadings such as background, aims, participants method, results, conclusions) of the type often found in biomedical periodicals; to test whether or not such structured abstracts are more easily searched, comprehended and recalled than abstracts set in the traditional manner; and to examine readers' preferences for different typographic settings for structured abstracts. Results indicated: that it is possible to produce structured abstracts for periodical articles in the social sciences; and that such abstracts may be easier to read, search and recall than abstracts presented in the traditional manner. Suggests that abstracts use 6 subheadings (background, aims, method, results, conclusions, and, optionally, comment) and recommends that these subheadings are conveyed in bold capital letters and, ideally, set apart from the main text by printer's rules
  14. Vetere, G.; Lenzerini, M.: Models for semantic interoperability in service-oriented architectures (2005) 0.05 
    0.0546314 = product of:
  0.273157 = sum of:
    0.273157 = weight(_text_:3a in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.273157 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.41659617 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04913843 = queryNorm
        0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Content
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5386707&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D5386707.
  15. Gödert, W.; Lepsky, K.: Informationelle Kompetenz : ein humanistischer Entwurf (2019) 0.05 
    0.0546314 = product of:
  0.273157 = sum of:
    0.273157 = weight(_text_:3a in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.273157 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.41659617 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04913843 = queryNorm
        0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Philosophisch-ethische Rezensionen vom 09.11.2019 (Jürgen Czogalla), Unter: https://philosophisch-ethische-rezensionen.de/rezension/Goedert1.html. In: B.I.T. online 23(2020) H.3, S.345-347 (W. Sühl-Strohmenger) [Unter: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.b-i-t-online.de%2Fheft%2F2020-03-rezensionen.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0iY3f_zNcvEjeZ6inHVnOK]. In: Open Password Nr. 805 vom 14.08.2020 (H.-C. Hobohm) [Unter: https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzE0MywiOGI3NjZkZmNkZjQ1IiwwLDAsMTMxLDFd].
  16. Egghe, L.: Properties of the n-overlap vector and n-overlap similarity theory (2006) 0.05 
    0.053265553 = product of:
  0.26632777 = sum of:
    0.26632777 = weight(_text_:object's in 194) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.26632777 = score(doc=194,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.4867224 = queryWeight, product of:
          9.905128 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04913843 = queryNorm
        0.54718614 = fieldWeight in 194, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          9.905128 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=194)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    In the first part of this article the author defines the n-overlap vector whose coordinates consist of the fraction of the objects (e.g., books, N-grams, etc.) that belong to 1, 2, , n sets (more generally: families) (e.g., libraries, databases, etc.). With the aid of the Lorenz concentration theory, a theory of n-overlap similarity is conceived together with corresponding measures, such as the generalized Jaccard index (generalizing the well-known Jaccard index in case n 5 2). Next, the distributional form of the n-overlap vector is determined assuming certain distributions of the object's and of the set (family) sizes. In this section the decreasing power law and decreasing exponential distribution is explained for the n-overlap vector. Both item (token) n-overlap and source (type) n-overlap are studied. The n-overlap properties of objects indexed by a hierarchical system (e.g., books indexed by numbers from a UDC or Dewey system or by N-grams) are presented in the final section. The author shows how the results given in the previous section can be applied as well as how the Lorenz order of the n-overlap vector is respected by an increase or a decrease of the level of refinement in the hierarchical system (e.g., the value N in N-grams).
  17. Bordogna, G.; Pagani, M.: ¬A flexible content-based image retrieval model and a customizable system for the retrieval of shapes (2010) 0.05 
    0.053265553 = product of:
  0.26632777 = sum of:
    0.26632777 = weight(_text_:object's in 3450) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.26632777 = score(doc=3450,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.4867224 = queryWeight, product of:
          9.905128 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04913843 = queryNorm
        0.54718614 = fieldWeight in 3450, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          9.905128 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3450)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    The authors describe a flexible model and a system for content-based image retrieval of objects' shapes. Flexibility is intended as the possibility of customizing the system behavior to the user's needs and perceptions. This is achieved by allowing users to modify the retrieval function. The system implementing this model uses multiple representations to characterize some macroscopic characteristics of the objects shapes. Specifically, the shape indexes describe the global features of the object's contour (represented by the Fourier coefficients), the contour's irregularities (represented by the multifractal spectrum), and the presence of concavities and convexities (represented by the contour scale space distribution). During a query formulation, the user can specify both the preference for the macroscopic shape aspects that he or she considers meaningful for the retrieval, and the desired level of accuracy of the matching, which means that the visual query shape must be considered with a given tolerance in representing the desired shapes. The evaluation experiments showed that this system can be suited to different retrieval behaviors, and that, generally, the combination of the multiple shape representations increases both recall and precision with respect to the application of any single representation.
  18. #220 0.05 
    0.05272534 = product of:
  0.2636267 = sum of:
    0.2636267 = weight(_text_:22 in 219) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2636267 = score(doc=219,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.1720744 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04913843 = queryNorm
        1.5320505 = fieldWeight in 219, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.21875 = fieldNorm(doc=219)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 5.1998 20:02:22
  19. #1387 0.05 
    0.05272534 = product of:
  0.2636267 = sum of:
    0.2636267 = weight(_text_:22 in 1386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2636267 = score(doc=1386,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.1720744 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04913843 = queryNorm
        1.5320505 = fieldWeight in 1386, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.21875 = fieldNorm(doc=1386)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 5.1998 20:02:22
  20. #2103 0.05 
    0.05272534 = product of:
  0.2636267 = sum of:
    0.2636267 = weight(_text_:22 in 2102) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2636267 = score(doc=2102,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.1720744 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04913843 = queryNorm
        1.5320505 = fieldWeight in 2102, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.21875 = fieldNorm(doc=2102)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 5.1998 20:02:22

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 3051
  • m 344
  • el 162
  • s 140
  • b 39
  • x 35
  • i 23
  • r 18
  • ? 8
  • p 4
  • d 3
  • n 3
  • u 2
  • z 2
  • au 1
  • h 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications