Search (3653 results, page 1 of 183)

  1. Thelwall, M.; Thelwall, S.: ¬A thematic analysis of highly retweeted early COVID-19 tweets : consensus, information, dissent and lockdown life (2020) 0.12 
    0.11655625 = product of:
  0.29139063 = sum of:
    0.25810274 = weight(_text_:grass in 178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.25810274 = score(doc=178,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.47914773 = queryWeight, product of:
          9.7509775 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04913843 = queryNorm
        0.5386705 = fieldWeight in 178, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          9.7509775 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=178)
    0.033287894 = weight(_text_:22 in 178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.033287894 = score(doc=178,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1720744 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04913843 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 178, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=178)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Purpose Public attitudes towards COVID-19 and social distancing are critical in reducing its spread. It is therefore important to understand public reactions and information dissemination in all major forms, including on social media. This article investigates important issues reflected on Twitter in the early stages of the public reaction to COVID-19. Design/methodology/approach A thematic analysis of the most retweeted English-language tweets mentioning COVID-19 during March 10-29, 2020. Findings The main themes identified for the 87 qualifying tweets accounting for 14 million retweets were: lockdown life; attitude towards social restrictions; politics; safety messages; people with COVID-19; support for key workers; work; and COVID-19 facts/news. Research limitations/implications Twitter played many positive roles, mainly through unofficial tweets. Users shared social distancing information, helped build support for social distancing, criticised government responses, expressed support for key workers and helped each other cope with social isolation. A few popular tweets not supporting social distancing show that government messages sometimes failed. Practical implications Public health campaigns in future may consider encouraging grass roots social web activity to support campaign goals. At a methodological level, analysing retweet counts emphasised politics and ignored practical implementation issues. Originality/value This is the first qualitative analysis of general COVID-19-related retweeting.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  2. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.11 
    0.109632015 = product of:
  0.27408004 = sum of:
    0.23413457 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.23413457 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.41659617 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04913843 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.039945472 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.039945472 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1720744 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04913843 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  3. Poetische Sprachspiele : Vom Mittelalter bis zur Gegenwart (2002) 0.10 
    0.1032411 = product of:
  0.5162055 = sum of:
    0.5162055 = weight(_text_:grass in 1589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.5162055 = score(doc=1589,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.47914773 = queryWeight, product of:
          9.7509775 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04913843 = queryNorm
        1.077341 = fieldWeight in 1589, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          9.7509775 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1589)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Vergnügliche Spielereien mit der Sprache: Visuelle und poetische Erfindungen, Spiele mit Sinnverkehrungen, Rätsel, Täuschungen sowie Reim- und Verskonstruktionen aus acht Jahrhunderten von Walther von der Vogelweide bis zu Ringelnatz und Ernst Jandl, Günter Grass und vielen anderen sind in diesem Band versammelt.
  4. Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011) 0.09 
    0.09365383 = product of:
  0.46826914 = sum of:
    0.46826914 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.46826914 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.41659617 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04913843 = queryNorm
        1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.
  5. Fachsystematik Bremen nebst Schlüssel 1970 ff. (1970 ff) 0.09 
    0.09136002 = product of:
  0.22840004 = sum of:
    0.19511214 = weight(_text_:3a in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19511214 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.41659617 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04913843 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
    0.033287894 = weight(_text_:22 in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.033287894 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1720744 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04913843 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Content
    1. Agrarwissenschaften 1981. - 3. Allgemeine Geographie 2.1972. - 3a. Allgemeine Naturwissenschaften 1.1973. - 4. Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Allgemeine Literaturwissenschaft 2.1971. - 6. Allgemeines. 5.1983. - 7. Anglistik 3.1976. - 8. Astronomie, Geodäsie 4.1977. - 12. bio Biologie, bcp Biochemie-Biophysik, bot Botanik, zoo Zoologie 1981. - 13. Bremensien 3.1983. - 13a. Buch- und Bibliothekswesen 3.1975. - 14. Chemie 4.1977. - 14a. Elektrotechnik 1974. - 15 Ethnologie 2.1976. - 16,1. Geowissenschaften. Sachteil 3.1977. - 16,2. Geowissenschaften. Regionaler Teil 3.1977. - 17. Germanistik 6.1984. - 17a,1. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hil. - 17a,2. Geschichte. Teilsystematik his Neuere Geschichte. - 17a,3. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hit Neueste Geschichte. - 18. Humanbiologie 2.1983. - 19. Ingenieurwissenschaften 1974. - 20. siehe 14a. - 21. klassische Philologie 3.1977. - 22. Klinische Medizin 1975. - 23. Kunstgeschichte 2.1971. - 24. Kybernetik. 2.1975. - 25. Mathematik 3.1974. - 26. Medizin 1976. - 26a. Militärwissenschaft 1985. - 27. Musikwissenschaft 1978. - 27a. Noten 2.1974. - 28. Ozeanographie 3.1977. -29. Pädagogik 8.1985. - 30. Philosphie 3.1974. - 31. Physik 3.1974. - 33. Politik, Politische Wissenschaft, Sozialwissenschaft. Soziologie. Länderschlüssel. Register 1981. - 34. Psychologie 2.1972. - 35. Publizistik und Kommunikationswissenschaft 1985. - 36. Rechtswissenschaften 1986. - 37. Regionale Geograpgie 3.1975. - 37a. Religionswissenschaft 1970. - 38. Romanistik 3.1976. - 39. Skandinavistik 4.1985. - 40. Slavistik 1977. - 40a. Sonstige Sprachen und Literaturen 1973. - 43. Sport 4.1983. - 44. Theaterwissenschaft 1985. - 45. Theologie 2.1976. - 45a. Ur- und Frühgeschichte, Archäologie 1970. - 47. Volkskunde 1976. - 47a. Wirtschaftswissenschaften 1971 // Schlüssel: 1. Länderschlüssel 1971. - 2. Formenschlüssel (Kurzform) 1974. - 3. Personenschlüssel Literatur 5. Fassung 1968
  6. Kubicek, H.; Schmid, U.; Wagner, H.: Mehr Information wagen! : Das US-amerikanische Projekt zur informationellen Grundversorgung (1995) 0.08 
    0.08259288 = product of:
  0.4129644 = sum of:
    0.4129644 = weight(_text_:grass in 66) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.4129644 = score(doc=66,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.47914773 = queryWeight, product of:
          9.7509775 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04913843 = queryNorm
        0.8618728 = fieldWeight in 66, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          9.7509775 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=66)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Daß die Computernetze in den USA ihre Wuzeln unter anderem in den Grass-Roots-Initiativen haben, ist bekannt. Weniger bekannt ist, daß das Projekt der Clinton/Gore-Regierung zur Schaffung einer Informations-Infrastruktur auch von aktiven Bürger-Initiativen kritisch-konstruktiv begleitet und beeinflußt wird. Während in Deutschland die Weichen für die zukünftige Mediengesellschaft hinter verschlossenen Türen gestellt werden, ist dies in den USA ein offener Prozeß. Dabei ist die zentrale Frage, wie eine Grundversorgung der Bevölkerung mit Information sichergestellt werden kann
  7. Mattison, D.: Librarians and the Free-Net movement (1994) 0.08 
    0.08259288 = product of:
  0.4129644 = sum of:
    0.4129644 = weight(_text_:grass in 1060) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.4129644 = score(doc=1060,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.47914773 = queryWeight, product of:
          9.7509775 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04913843 = queryNorm
        0.8618728 = fieldWeight in 1060, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          9.7509775 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1060)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Free Nets are community access networks most of which are available on the Internet. Librarians are at the core of these networks. Gives examples of how they participate in this movement. Describes some Canadian Free Nets. Free Nets are analogous to the role of free public libraries in the development of literacy as they are a grass roots, democratic response to the opportunities presented by computer technology and telecommunications. Lists library services on Internet accessible Free Nets and civic networks
  8. Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014) 0.08 
    0.078044854 = product of:
  0.39022428 = sum of:
    0.39022428 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.39022428 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.41659617 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04913843 = queryNorm
        0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
  9. Mari, H.: Dos fundamentos da significao a producao do sentido (1996) 0.07 
    0.07457177 = product of:
  0.37285885 = sum of:
    0.37285885 = weight(_text_:object's in 819) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.37285885 = score(doc=819,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.4867224 = queryWeight, product of:
          9.905128 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04913843 = queryNorm
        0.7660606 = fieldWeight in 819, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          9.905128 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=819)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    An approach to establishing a relationship between knowing, informing and representing, using aspects of linguistic theory to clarify semantic theory as the basis for an overall theory of meaning. Linguistic knowledge is based on a conceptual matrix which defines convergence / divergence of the categories used to specify an object's parameters; work on the analysis of discourse emphasisis the social dimension of meaning, which is the basis of the theory of acts and speech. The evaluation criteria used to determine questions about the possibility of knowledge are necessarily decisive, this opens up promising perspectives if formulating a relationship between conceptual and pragmatic approaches
  10. Dodd, D.G.: Grass-roots cataloging and classification : food for thought from World Wide Web subject-oriented hierarchical lists (1996) 0.07 
    0.07226878 = product of:
  0.36134386 = sum of:
    0.36134386 = weight(_text_:grass in 7270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.36134386 = score(doc=7270,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.47914773 = queryWeight, product of:
          9.7509775 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04913843 = queryNorm
        0.7541387 = fieldWeight in 7270, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          9.7509775 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7270)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  11. Prohl, J.: Was ist Belletristik? (1985) 0.07 
    0.07226878 = product of:
  0.36134386 = sum of:
    0.36134386 = weight(_text_:grass in 4373) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.36134386 = score(doc=4373,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.47914773 = queryWeight, product of:
          9.7509775 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04913843 = queryNorm
        0.7541387 = fieldWeight in 4373, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          9.7509775 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4373)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Content
    "Was ist Belletristik? Haben Homer, Vergil, Dante, Shakespeare und Goethe, um nur einige europäische Klassiker zu nennen, Belletristik verfaßt? Ebenso Klopstock, Lessing und Wieland, um weitere deutsche Autoren zu nennen, Herder und Schiller oder Hölderlin und Kleist? Auch George, Hofmannsthal und Rilke oder Heinrich Mann, Döblin und Feuchtwanger? Kann man sie als Belletristen bezeichnen? Nach den Auffassungen einiger einflußreicher Bibliothekare und Bibliographen anscheinend ja! Und was ist Belletristik heute, einige Jahrzehnte nach dem Zweiten Weltkrieg? Sind Böll, Grass, Uwe Johnson, der 1984 gestorben ist, Siegfried Lenz und Martin Walser, um wiederum nur einige stellvertretend zu nennen, wirklich Verfasser von Belletristik? Kann man Literatur von fachkundiger Seite so mißverstehen und herabwürdigen? Anscheinend ja!"
  12. Rauber, A.: Digital preservation in data-driven science : on the importance of process capture, preservation and validation (2012) 0.06 
    0.063918665 = product of:
  0.3195933 = sum of:
    0.3195933 = weight(_text_:object's in 469) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.3195933 = score(doc=469,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.4867224 = queryWeight, product of:
          9.905128 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04913843 = queryNorm
        0.65662336 = fieldWeight in 469, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          9.905128 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=469)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Current digital preservation is strongly biased towards data objects: digital files of document-style objects, or encapsulated and largely self-contained objects. To provide authenticity and provenance information, comprehensive metadata models are deployed to document information on an object's context. Yet, we claim that simply documenting an objects context may not be sufficient to ensure proper provenance and to fulfill the stated preservation goals. Specifically in e-Science and business settings, capturing, documenting and preserving entire processes may be necessary to meet the preservation goals. We thus present an approach for capturing, documenting and preserving processes, and means to assess their authenticity upon re-execution. We will discuss options as well as limitations and open challenges to achieve sound preservation, speci?cally within scientific processes.
  13. Schrodt, R.: Tiefen und Untiefen im wissenschaftlichen Sprachgebrauch (2008) 0.06 
    0.062435884 = product of:
  0.31217942 = sum of:
    0.31217942 = weight(_text_:3a in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.31217942 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.41659617 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04913843 = queryNorm
        0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Content
    Vgl. auch: https://studylibde.com/doc/13053640/richard-schrodt. Vgl. auch: http%3A%2F%2Fwww.univie.ac.at%2FGermanistik%2Fschrodt%2Fvorlesung%2Fwissenschaftssprache.doc&usg=AOvVaw1lDLDR6NFf1W0-oC9mEUJf.
  14. Popper, K.R.: Three worlds : the Tanner lecture on human values. Deliverd at the University of Michigan, April 7, 1978 (1978) 0.06 
    0.062435884 = product of:
  0.31217942 = sum of:
    0.31217942 = weight(_text_:3a in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.31217942 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.41659617 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04913843 = queryNorm
        0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Ftannerlectures.utah.edu%2F_documents%2Fa-to-z%2Fp%2Fpopper80.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3f4QRTEH-OEBmoYr2J_c7H
  15. Vetere, G.; Lenzerini, M.: Models for semantic interoperability in service-oriented architectures (2005) 0.05 
    0.0546314 = product of:
  0.273157 = sum of:
    0.273157 = weight(_text_:3a in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.273157 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.41659617 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04913843 = queryNorm
        0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Content
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5386707&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D5386707.
  16. Gödert, W.; Lepsky, K.: Informationelle Kompetenz : ein humanistischer Entwurf (2019) 0.05 
    0.0546314 = product of:
  0.273157 = sum of:
    0.273157 = weight(_text_:3a in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.273157 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.41659617 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04913843 = queryNorm
        0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Philosophisch-ethische Rezensionen vom 09.11.2019 (Jürgen Czogalla), Unter: https://philosophisch-ethische-rezensionen.de/rezension/Goedert1.html. In: B.I.T. online 23(2020) H.3, S.345-347 (W. Sühl-Strohmenger) [Unter: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.b-i-t-online.de%2Fheft%2F2020-03-rezensionen.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0iY3f_zNcvEjeZ6inHVnOK]. In: Open Password Nr. 805 vom 14.08.2020 (H.-C. Hobohm) [Unter: https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzE0MywiOGI3NjZkZmNkZjQ1IiwwLDAsMTMxLDFd].
  17. Egghe, L.: Properties of the n-overlap vector and n-overlap similarity theory (2006) 0.05 
    0.053265553 = product of:
  0.26632777 = sum of:
    0.26632777 = weight(_text_:object's in 194) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.26632777 = score(doc=194,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.4867224 = queryWeight, product of:
          9.905128 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04913843 = queryNorm
        0.54718614 = fieldWeight in 194, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          9.905128 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=194)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    In the first part of this article the author defines the n-overlap vector whose coordinates consist of the fraction of the objects (e.g., books, N-grams, etc.) that belong to 1, 2, , n sets (more generally: families) (e.g., libraries, databases, etc.). With the aid of the Lorenz concentration theory, a theory of n-overlap similarity is conceived together with corresponding measures, such as the generalized Jaccard index (generalizing the well-known Jaccard index in case n 5 2). Next, the distributional form of the n-overlap vector is determined assuming certain distributions of the object's and of the set (family) sizes. In this section the decreasing power law and decreasing exponential distribution is explained for the n-overlap vector. Both item (token) n-overlap and source (type) n-overlap are studied. The n-overlap properties of objects indexed by a hierarchical system (e.g., books indexed by numbers from a UDC or Dewey system or by N-grams) are presented in the final section. The author shows how the results given in the previous section can be applied as well as how the Lorenz order of the n-overlap vector is respected by an increase or a decrease of the level of refinement in the hierarchical system (e.g., the value N in N-grams).
  18. Bordogna, G.; Pagani, M.: ¬A flexible content-based image retrieval model and a customizable system for the retrieval of shapes (2010) 0.05 
    0.053265553 = product of:
  0.26632777 = sum of:
    0.26632777 = weight(_text_:object's in 3450) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.26632777 = score(doc=3450,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.4867224 = queryWeight, product of:
          9.905128 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04913843 = queryNorm
        0.54718614 = fieldWeight in 3450, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          9.905128 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3450)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    The authors describe a flexible model and a system for content-based image retrieval of objects' shapes. Flexibility is intended as the possibility of customizing the system behavior to the user's needs and perceptions. This is achieved by allowing users to modify the retrieval function. The system implementing this model uses multiple representations to characterize some macroscopic characteristics of the objects shapes. Specifically, the shape indexes describe the global features of the object's contour (represented by the Fourier coefficients), the contour's irregularities (represented by the multifractal spectrum), and the presence of concavities and convexities (represented by the contour scale space distribution). During a query formulation, the user can specify both the preference for the macroscopic shape aspects that he or she considers meaningful for the retrieval, and the desired level of accuracy of the matching, which means that the visual query shape must be considered with a given tolerance in representing the desired shapes. The evaluation experiments showed that this system can be suited to different retrieval behaviors, and that, generally, the combination of the multiple shape representations increases both recall and precision with respect to the application of any single representation.
  19. #220 0.05 
    0.05272534 = product of:
  0.2636267 = sum of:
    0.2636267 = weight(_text_:22 in 219) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2636267 = score(doc=219,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.1720744 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04913843 = queryNorm
        1.5320505 = fieldWeight in 219, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.21875 = fieldNorm(doc=219)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 5.1998 20:02:22
  20. #1387 0.05 
    0.05272534 = product of:
  0.2636267 = sum of:
    0.2636267 = weight(_text_:22 in 1386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2636267 = score(doc=1386,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.1720744 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04913843 = queryNorm
        1.5320505 = fieldWeight in 1386, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.21875 = fieldNorm(doc=1386)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 5.1998 20:02:22

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 3051
  • m 345
  • el 162
  • s 140
  • b 39
  • x 35
  • i 23
  • r 17
  • ? 8
  • p 4
  • d 3
  • n 3
  • u 2
  • z 2
  • au 1
  • h 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications