Search (12853 results, page 1 of 643)

  1. Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011) 0.58
    0.58180004 = product of:
      1.4545001 = sum of:
        0.54179716 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.54179716 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.48201048 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.056854192 = queryNorm
            1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
        0.9127029 = weight(_text_:2fdoc in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.9127029 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.62560874 = queryWeight, product of:
              11.00374 = idf(docFreq=1, maxDocs=44218)
              0.056854192 = queryNorm
            1.4589037 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              11.00374 = idf(docFreq=1, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.
  2. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.21
    0.20956811 = product of:
      0.34928018 = sum of:
        0.27089858 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.27089858 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.48201048 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.056854192 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.032163866 = weight(_text_:1 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032163866 = score(doc=562,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13966247 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.056854192 = queryNorm
            0.23029712 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.046217747 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046217747 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1990937 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.056854192 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
    Source
    Proceedings of the 4th IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM 2004), 1-4 November 2004, Brighton, UK
  3. Mari, H.: Dos fundamentos da significao a producao do sentido (1996) 0.19
    0.18757202 = product of:
      0.46893004 = sum of:
        0.4314055 = weight(_text_:object's in 819) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.4314055 = score(doc=819,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.563148 = queryWeight, product of:
              9.905128 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44218)
              0.056854192 = queryNorm
            0.7660606 = fieldWeight in 819, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              9.905128 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=819)
        0.03752451 = weight(_text_:1 in 819) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03752451 = score(doc=819,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13966247 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.056854192 = queryNorm
            0.26867998 = fieldWeight in 819, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=819)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    An approach to establishing a relationship between knowing, informing and representing, using aspects of linguistic theory to clarify semantic theory as the basis for an overall theory of meaning. Linguistic knowledge is based on a conceptual matrix which defines convergence / divergence of the categories used to specify an object's parameters; work on the analysis of discourse emphasisis the social dimension of meaning, which is the basis of the theory of acts and speech. The evaluation criteria used to determine questions about the possibility of knowledge are necessarily decisive, this opens up promising perspectives if formulating a relationship between conceptual and pragmatic approaches
    Source
    Perspectivas em ciencia da informacao. 1(1996) no.1, S.93-109
  4. Fachsystematik Bremen nebst Schlüssel 1970 ff. (1970 ff) 0.18
    0.17825446 = product of:
      0.29709074 = sum of:
        0.22574884 = weight(_text_:3a in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22574884 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.48201048 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.056854192 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
        0.03282711 = weight(_text_:1 in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03282711 = score(doc=3577,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.13966247 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.056854192 = queryNorm
            0.23504603 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
        0.038514793 = weight(_text_:22 in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038514793 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1990937 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.056854192 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Content
    1. Agrarwissenschaften 1981. - 3. Allgemeine Geographie 2.1972. - 3a. Allgemeine Naturwissenschaften 1.1973. - 4. Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Allgemeine Literaturwissenschaft 2.1971. - 6. Allgemeines. 5.1983. - 7. Anglistik 3.1976. - 8. Astronomie, Geodäsie 4.1977. - 12. bio Biologie, bcp Biochemie-Biophysik, bot Botanik, zoo Zoologie 1981. - 13. Bremensien 3.1983. - 13a. Buch- und Bibliothekswesen 3.1975. - 14. Chemie 4.1977. - 14a. Elektrotechnik 1974. - 15 Ethnologie 2.1976. - 16,1. Geowissenschaften. Sachteil 3.1977. - 16,2. Geowissenschaften. Regionaler Teil 3.1977. - 17. Germanistik 6.1984. - 17a,1. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hil. - 17a,2. Geschichte. Teilsystematik his Neuere Geschichte. - 17a,3. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hit Neueste Geschichte. - 18. Humanbiologie 2.1983. - 19. Ingenieurwissenschaften 1974. - 20. siehe 14a. - 21. klassische Philologie 3.1977. - 22. Klinische Medizin 1975. - 23. Kunstgeschichte 2.1971. - 24. Kybernetik. 2.1975. - 25. Mathematik 3.1974. - 26. Medizin 1976. - 26a. Militärwissenschaft 1985. - 27. Musikwissenschaft 1978. - 27a. Noten 2.1974. - 28. Ozeanographie 3.1977. -29. Pädagogik 8.1985. - 30. Philosphie 3.1974. - 31. Physik 3.1974. - 33. Politik, Politische Wissenschaft, Sozialwissenschaft. Soziologie. Länderschlüssel. Register 1981. - 34. Psychologie 2.1972. - 35. Publizistik und Kommunikationswissenschaft 1985. - 36. Rechtswissenschaften 1986. - 37. Regionale Geograpgie 3.1975. - 37a. Religionswissenschaft 1970. - 38. Romanistik 3.1976. - 39. Skandinavistik 4.1985. - 40. Slavistik 1977. - 40a. Sonstige Sprachen und Literaturen 1973. - 43. Sport 4.1983. - 44. Theaterwissenschaft 1985. - 45. Theologie 2.1976. - 45a. Ur- und Frühgeschichte, Archäologie 1970. - 47. Volkskunde 1976. - 47a. Wirtschaftswissenschaften 1971 // Schlüssel: 1. Länderschlüssel 1971. - 2. Formenschlüssel (Kurzform) 1974. - 3. Personenschlüssel Literatur 5. Fassung 1968
  5. Egghe, L.: Properties of the n-overlap vector and n-overlap similarity theory (2006) 0.13
    0.13083981 = product of:
      0.32709953 = sum of:
        0.3081468 = weight(_text_:object's in 194) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3081468 = score(doc=194,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.563148 = queryWeight, product of:
              9.905128 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44218)
              0.056854192 = queryNorm
            0.54718614 = fieldWeight in 194, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              9.905128 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=194)
        0.018952738 = weight(_text_:1 in 194) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018952738 = score(doc=194,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13966247 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.056854192 = queryNorm
            0.13570388 = fieldWeight in 194, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=194)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    In the first part of this article the author defines the n-overlap vector whose coordinates consist of the fraction of the objects (e.g., books, N-grams, etc.) that belong to 1, 2, , n sets (more generally: families) (e.g., libraries, databases, etc.). With the aid of the Lorenz concentration theory, a theory of n-overlap similarity is conceived together with corresponding measures, such as the generalized Jaccard index (generalizing the well-known Jaccard index in case n 5 2). Next, the distributional form of the n-overlap vector is determined assuming certain distributions of the object's and of the set (family) sizes. In this section the decreasing power law and decreasing exponential distribution is explained for the n-overlap vector. Both item (token) n-overlap and source (type) n-overlap are studied. The n-overlap properties of objects indexed by a hierarchical system (e.g., books indexed by numbers from a UDC or Dewey system or by N-grams) are presented in the final section. The author shows how the results given in the previous section can be applied as well as how the Lorenz order of the n-overlap vector is respected by an increase or a decrease of the level of refinement in the hierarchical system (e.g., the value N in N-grams).
  6. Mas, S.; Marleau, Y.: Proposition of a faceted classification model to support corporate information organization and digital records management (2009) 0.12
    0.11745675 = product of:
      0.29364187 = sum of:
        0.27089858 = weight(_text_:3a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.27089858 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.48201048 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.056854192 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
        0.022743288 = weight(_text_:1 in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022743288 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13966247 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.056854192 = queryNorm
            0.16284466 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?reload=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F4755313%2F4755314%2F04755480.pdf%3Farnumber%3D4755480&authDecision=-203.
    Pages
    S.1-10
  7. Noever, D.; Ciolino, M.: ¬The Turing deception (2022) 0.12
    0.11745675 = product of:
      0.29364187 = sum of:
        0.27089858 = weight(_text_:3a in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.27089858 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.48201048 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.056854192 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
        0.022743288 = weight(_text_:1 in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022743288 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13966247 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.056854192 = queryNorm
            0.16284466 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    1. 1.2023 17:48:50
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2212.06721&usg=AOvVaw3i_9pZm9y_dQWoHi6uv0EN
  8. Dietz, K.: en.wikipedia.org > 6 Mio. Artikel (2020) 0.10
    0.09788063 = product of:
      0.24470158 = sum of:
        0.22574884 = weight(_text_:3a in 5669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22574884 = score(doc=5669,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.48201048 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.056854192 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5669, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5669)
        0.018952738 = weight(_text_:1 in 5669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018952738 = score(doc=5669,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13966247 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.056854192 = queryNorm
            0.13570388 = fieldWeight in 5669, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5669)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Content
    "Die Englischsprachige Wikipedia verfügt jetzt über mehr als 6 Millionen Artikel. An zweiter Stelle kommt die deutschsprachige Wikipedia mit 2.3 Millionen Artikeln, an dritter Stelle steht die französischsprachige Wikipedia mit 2.1 Millionen Artikeln (via Researchbuzz: Firehose <https://rbfirehose.com/2020/01/24/techcrunch-wikipedia-now-has-more-than-6-million-articles-in-english/> und Techcrunch <https://techcrunch.com/2020/01/23/wikipedia-english-six-million-articles/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Techcrunch+%28TechCrunch%29&guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly9yYmZpcmVob3NlLmNvbS8yMDIwLzAxLzI0L3RlY2hjcnVuY2gtd2lraXBlZGlhLW5vdy1oYXMtbW9yZS10aGFuLTYtbWlsbGlvbi1hcnRpY2xlcy1pbi1lbmdsaXNoLw&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAK0zHfjdDZ_spFZBF_z-zDjtL5iWvuKDumFTzm4HvQzkUfE2pLXQzGS6FGB_y-VISdMEsUSvkNsg2U_NWQ4lwWSvOo3jvXo1I3GtgHpP8exukVxYAnn5mJspqX50VHIWFADHhs5AerkRn3hMRtf_R3F1qmEbo8EROZXp328HMC-o>). 250120 via digithek ch = #fineBlog s.a.: Angesichts der Veröffentlichung des 6-millionsten Artikels vergangene Woche in der englischsprachigen Wikipedia hat die Community-Zeitungsseite "Wikipedia Signpost" ein Moratorium bei der Veröffentlichung von Unternehmensartikeln gefordert. Das sei kein Vorwurf gegen die Wikimedia Foundation, aber die derzeitigen Maßnahmen, um die Enzyklopädie gegen missbräuchliches undeklariertes Paid Editing zu schützen, funktionierten ganz klar nicht. *"Da die ehrenamtlichen Autoren derzeit von Werbung in Gestalt von Wikipedia-Artikeln überwältigt werden, und da die WMF nicht in der Lage zu sein scheint, dem irgendetwas entgegenzusetzen, wäre der einzige gangbare Weg für die Autoren, fürs erste die Neuanlage von Artikeln über Unternehmen zu untersagen"*, schreibt der Benutzer Smallbones in seinem Editorial <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2020-01-27/From_the_editor> zur heutigen Ausgabe."
  9. Donsbach, W.: Wahrheit in den Medien : über den Sinn eines methodischen Objektivitätsbegriffes (2001) 0.10
    0.09788063 = product of:
      0.24470158 = sum of:
        0.22574884 = weight(_text_:3a in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22574884 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.48201048 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.056854192 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
        0.018952738 = weight(_text_:1 in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018952738 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13966247 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.056854192 = queryNorm
            0.13570388 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Source
    Politische Meinung. 381(2001) Nr.1, S.65-74 [https%3A%2F%2Fwww.dgfe.de%2Ffileadmin%2FOrdnerRedakteure%2FSektionen%2FSek02_AEW%2FKWF%2FPublikationen_Reihe_1989-2003%2FBand_17%2FBd_17_1994_355-406_A.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2KcbRsHy5UQ9QRIUyuOLNi]
  10. Lutz, H.: Back to business : was CompuServe Unternehmen bietet (1997) 0.09
    0.093978725 = product of:
      0.23494682 = sum of:
        0.060648765 = weight(_text_:1 in 6569) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.060648765 = score(doc=6569,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13966247 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.056854192 = queryNorm
            0.4342524 = fieldWeight in 6569, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6569)
        0.17429805 = weight(_text_:22 in 6569) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17429805 = score(doc=6569,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1990937 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.056854192 = queryNorm
            0.8754574 = fieldWeight in 6569, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6569)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    22. 2.1997 19:50:29
    Source
    Cogito. 1997, H.1, S.22-23
  11. RAK-NBM : Interpretationshilfe zu NBM 3b,3 (2000) 0.09
    0.093978725 = product of:
      0.23494682 = sum of:
        0.060648765 = weight(_text_:1 in 4362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.060648765 = score(doc=4362,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13966247 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.056854192 = queryNorm
            0.4342524 = fieldWeight in 4362, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4362)
        0.17429805 = weight(_text_:22 in 4362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17429805 = score(doc=4362,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1990937 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.056854192 = queryNorm
            0.8754574 = fieldWeight in 4362, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4362)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2000 19:22:27
    Source
    Bibliotheksdienst. 34(2000) H.1, S.86-87
  12. Hawking, D.; Robertson, S.: On collection size and retrieval effectiveness (2003) 0.09
    0.093978725 = product of:
      0.23494682 = sum of:
        0.060648765 = weight(_text_:1 in 4109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.060648765 = score(doc=4109,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13966247 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.056854192 = queryNorm
            0.4342524 = fieldWeight in 4109, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4109)
        0.17429805 = weight(_text_:22 in 4109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17429805 = score(doc=4109,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1990937 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.056854192 = queryNorm
            0.8754574 = fieldWeight in 4109, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4109)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    14. 8.2005 14:22:22
    Source
    Information retrieval. 6(2003) no.1, S.99-150
  13. Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014) 0.09
    0.09029954 = product of:
      0.45149767 = sum of:
        0.45149767 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.45149767 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.48201048 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.056854192 = queryNorm
            0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
  14. Lathrop, L.: Considerations in indexing online documents (1996) 0.08
    0.083607055 = product of:
      0.20901763 = sum of:
        0.08577031 = weight(_text_:1 in 6800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08577031 = score(doc=6800,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13966247 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.056854192 = queryNorm
            0.61412567 = fieldWeight in 6800, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6800)
        0.12324733 = weight(_text_:22 in 6800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12324733 = score(doc=6800,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1990937 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.056854192 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6800, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6800)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    8. 3.1997 10:22:27
    Source
    Keywords. 4(1996) no.1, S.1+29
  15. Lathrop, L.: Indexing with Doc-to-help : an overview (1995) 0.08
    0.083607055 = product of:
      0.20901763 = sum of:
        0.08577031 = weight(_text_:1 in 6810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08577031 = score(doc=6810,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13966247 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.056854192 = queryNorm
            0.61412567 = fieldWeight in 6810, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6810)
        0.12324733 = weight(_text_:22 in 6810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12324733 = score(doc=6810,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1990937 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.056854192 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6810, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6810)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    8. 3.1997 10:22:27
    Source
    Keywords. 3(1995) no.1, S.1+27+30
  16. Pesch, K.: ¬Eine gigantische Informationsfülle : "Brockhaus multimedial 2004" kann jedoch nicht rundum überzeugen (2003) 0.08
    0.082231395 = product of:
      0.20557848 = sum of:
        0.05306767 = weight(_text_:1 in 502) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05306767 = score(doc=502,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13966247 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.056854192 = queryNorm
            0.37997085 = fieldWeight in 502, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=502)
        0.1525108 = weight(_text_:22 in 502) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1525108 = score(doc=502,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1990937 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.056854192 = queryNorm
            0.76602525 = fieldWeight in 502, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=502)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    3. 5.1997 8:44:22
    22. 9.2003 10:02:00
    Source
    Bergische Landeszeitung. Nr.208 vom 8.9.2003, S.RMA01A/1
  17. Zerbst, H.-J.; Kaptein, O.: Gegenwärtiger Stand und Entwicklungstendenzen der Sacherschließung : Auswertung einer Umfrage an deutschen wissenschaftlichen und Öffentlichen Bibliotheken (1993) 0.08
    0.0783045 = product of:
      0.19576125 = sum of:
        0.18059906 = weight(_text_:3a in 7394) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18059906 = score(doc=7394,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.48201048 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.056854192 = queryNorm
            0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 7394, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=7394)
        0.015162191 = weight(_text_:1 in 7394) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015162191 = score(doc=7394,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13966247 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.056854192 = queryNorm
            0.1085631 = fieldWeight in 7394, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=7394)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Ergebnis einer Umfrage aus dem Frühjahr 1993. A. Wissenschaftliche Bibliotheken: Versandt wurde der Fragebogen an die Mitglieder der Sektion IV des DBV. Fragen: (1a) Um welchen Bestand handelt es sich, der sachlich erschlossen wird? (1b) Wie groß ist dieser Bestand? (1c) Wird dieser Bestand vollständig oder nur in Auswahl (einzelne Fächer, Lehrbücher, Dissertationen o.ä.) sachlich erschlossen? (1d) Seit wann bestehen die jetzigen Sachkataloge? (2) Auf welche Art wird der Bestand zur Zeit sachlich erschlossen? (3a) Welche Klassifikation wird angewendet? (3b) Gibt es alphabetisches SyK-Register bzw. einen Zugriff auf die Klassenbeschreibungen? (3c) Gibt es ergänzende Schlüssel für die Aspekte Ort, Zeit, Form? (4) Falls Sie einen SWK führen (a) nach welchem Regelwerk? (b) Gibt es ein genormtes Vokabular oder einen Thesaurus (ggf. nur für bestimmte Fächer)? (5) In welcher Form existieren die Sachkataloge? (6) Ist die Bibliothek an einer kooperativen Sacherschließung, z.B. in einem Verbund beteiligt? [Nein: 79%] (7) Nutzen Sie Fremdleistungen bei der Sacherschließung? [Ja: 46%] (8) Welche sachlichen Suchmöglichkeiten gibt es für Benutzer? (9) Sind zukünftige Veränderungen bei der Sacherschließung geplant? [Ja: 73%]. - B. Öffentliche Bibliotheken: Die Umfrage richtete sich an alle ÖBs der Sektionen I, II und III des DBV. Fragen: (1) Welche Sachkataloge führen Sie? (2) Welche Klassifikationen (Systematiken) liegen dem SyK zugrunde? [ASB: 242; KAB: 333; SfB: 4 (???); SSD: 11; Berliner: 18] (3) Führen Sie ein eigenes Schlagwort-Register zum SyK bzw. zur Klassifikation (Systematik)? (4) Führen Sie den SWK nach ...? [RSWK: 132 (= ca. 60%) anderen Regeln: 93] (5) Seit wann bestehen die jetzigen Sachkataloge? (6) In welcher Form existiern die Sachkataloge? (7) In welchem Umfang wird der Bestand erschlossen? (8) Welche Signaturen verwenden Sie? (9) Ist die Bibliothek an einer kooperativen Sacherschließung, z.B. einem Verbund, beteiligt? [Nein: 96%] (10) Nutzen Sie Fremdleistungen bei der Sacherschließung? [Ja: 70%] (11) Woher beziehen Sie diese Fremdleistungen? (12) Verfügen Sie über ein Online-Katalogsystem mit OPAC? [Ja: 78; Nein: 614] (13) Sind zukünftig Veränderungen bei der Sacherschließung geplant? [Nein: 458; Ja: 237]; RESÜMEE für ÖB: "(i) Einführung von EDV-Katalogen bleibt auch in den 90er Jahren ein Thema, (ii) Der Aufbau von SWK wird in vielen Bibliotheken in Angriff genommen, dabei spielt die Fremddatenübernahme eine entscheidende Rolle, (iii) RSWK werden zunehmend angewandt, Nutzung der SWD auch für andere Regeln wirkt normierend, (iv) Große Bewegung auf dem 'Systematik-Markt' ist in absehbarer Zeit nicht zu erwarten, (v) Für kleinere Bibliotheken wird der Zettelkatalog auf absehbare Zeit noch die herrschende Katalogform sein, (vi) Der erhebliche Nachholbedarf in den neuen Bundesländern wird nur in einem größeren Zeitraum zu leisten sein. ??? SPEZIALBIBIOTHEKEN ???
  18. Rauber, A.: Digital preservation in data-driven science : on the importance of process capture, preservation and validation (2012) 0.07
    0.07395523 = product of:
      0.36977616 = sum of:
        0.36977616 = weight(_text_:object's in 469) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.36977616 = score(doc=469,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.563148 = queryWeight, product of:
              9.905128 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44218)
              0.056854192 = queryNorm
            0.65662336 = fieldWeight in 469, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              9.905128 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=469)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Current digital preservation is strongly biased towards data objects: digital files of document-style objects, or encapsulated and largely self-contained objects. To provide authenticity and provenance information, comprehensive metadata models are deployed to document information on an object's context. Yet, we claim that simply documenting an objects context may not be sufficient to ensure proper provenance and to fulfill the stated preservation goals. Specifically in e-Science and business settings, capturing, documenting and preserving entire processes may be necessary to meet the preservation goals. We thus present an approach for capturing, documenting and preserving processes, and means to assess their authenticity upon re-execution. We will discuss options as well as limitations and open challenges to achieve sound preservation, speci?cally within scientific processes.
  19. Junginger, F.: Regeln für den Schlagwortkatalog: RSWK : Ergänzungen und Berichtigungen Nr.1 (1988) 0.07
    0.07355844 = product of:
      0.1838961 = sum of:
        0.060648765 = weight(_text_:1 in 195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.060648765 = score(doc=195,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13966247 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.056854192 = queryNorm
            0.4342524 = fieldWeight in 195, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=195)
        0.12324733 = weight(_text_:22 in 195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12324733 = score(doc=195,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1990937 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.056854192 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 195, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=195)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Source
    Bibliotheksdienst. 22(1988), S.552-563
  20. Ross, J.: ¬The impact of technology on indexing (2000) 0.07
    0.07355844 = product of:
      0.1838961 = sum of:
        0.060648765 = weight(_text_:1 in 263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.060648765 = score(doc=263,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13966247 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.056854192 = queryNorm
            0.4342524 = fieldWeight in 263, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=263)
        0.12324733 = weight(_text_:22 in 263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12324733 = score(doc=263,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1990937 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.056854192 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 263, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=263)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.25-26

Authors

Languages

Types

  • a 9914
  • m 1870
  • el 688
  • s 657
  • i 265
  • b 100
  • r 85
  • x 84
  • n 45
  • ? 35
  • p 14
  • l 11
  • u 9
  • d 8
  • z 7
  • fi 6
  • h 5
  • au 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications