Search (3655 results, page 1 of 183)

  1. #778 0.54 
    0.53876156 = product of:
  1.3469038 = sum of:
    1.182583 = weight(_text_:sachgruppe in 777) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      1.182583 = score(doc=777,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.47473454 = queryWeight, product of:
          9.394302 = idf(docFreq=9, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050534304 = queryNorm
        2.4910405 = fieldWeight in 777, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          9.394302 = idf(docFreq=9, maxDocs=44218)
          0.1875 = fieldNorm(doc=777)
    0.16432081 = weight(_text_:22 in 777) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.16432081 = score(doc=777,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17696252 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050534304 = queryNorm
        0.92856276 = fieldWeight in 777, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.1875 = fieldNorm(doc=777)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Date
    15. 2.1998 9:45:22
    Object
    CBT -> Sachgruppe: Computer Based Training
  2. Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011) 0.52 
    0.5171274 = product of:
  1.2928184 = sum of:
    0.48157123 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.48157123 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.4284304 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050534304 = queryNorm
        1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
    0.8112472 = weight(_text_:2fdoc in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.8112472 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.55606633 = queryWeight, product of:
          11.00374 = idf(docFreq=1, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050534304 = queryNorm
        1.4589037 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          11.00374 = idf(docFreq=1, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.
  3. #2935 0.24 
    0.2365166 = product of:
  1.182583 = sum of:
    1.182583 = weight(_text_:sachgruppe in 2934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      1.182583 = score(doc=2934,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.47473454 = queryWeight, product of:
          9.394302 = idf(docFreq=9, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050534304 = queryNorm
        2.4910405 = fieldWeight in 2934, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          9.394302 = idf(docFreq=9, maxDocs=44218)
          0.1875 = fieldNorm(doc=2934)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Object
    CBR -> Sachgruppe: Case Based Reasoning
  4. Gabler, S.: Vergabe von DDC-Sachgruppen mittels eines Schlagwort-Thesaurus (2021) 0.18 
    0.17881046 = product of:
  0.44702613 = sum of:
    0.20065469 = weight(_text_:3a in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.20065469 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.4284304 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050534304 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
    0.24637146 = weight(_text_:sachgruppe in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.24637146 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.47473454 = queryWeight, product of:
          9.394302 = idf(docFreq=9, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050534304 = queryNorm
        0.5189668 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          9.394302 = idf(docFreq=9, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Vorgestellt wird die Konstruktion eines thematisch geordneten Thesaurus auf Basis der Sachschlagwörter der Gemeinsamen Normdatei (GND) unter Nutzung der darin enthaltenen DDC-Notationen. Oberste Ordnungsebene dieses Thesaurus werden die DDC-Sachgruppen der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek. Die Konstruktion des Thesaurus erfolgt regelbasiert unter der Nutzung von Linked Data Prinzipien in einem SPARQL Prozessor. Der Thesaurus dient der automatisierten Gewinnung von Metadaten aus wissenschaftlichen Publikationen mittels eines computerlinguistischen Extraktors. Hierzu werden digitale Volltexte verarbeitet. Dieser ermittelt die gefundenen Schlagwörter über Vergleich der Zeichenfolgen Benennungen im Thesaurus, ordnet die Treffer nach Relevanz im Text und gibt die zugeordne-ten Sachgruppen rangordnend zurück. Die grundlegende Annahme dabei ist, dass die gesuchte Sachgruppe unter den oberen Rängen zurückgegeben wird. In einem dreistufigen Verfahren wird die Leistungsfähigkeit des Verfahrens validiert. Hierzu wird zunächst anhand von Metadaten und Erkenntnissen einer Kurzautopsie ein Goldstandard aus Dokumenten erstellt, die im Online-Katalog der DNB abrufbar sind. Die Dokumente vertei-len sich über 14 der Sachgruppen mit einer Losgröße von jeweils 50 Dokumenten. Sämtliche Dokumente werden mit dem Extraktor erschlossen und die Ergebnisse der Kategorisierung do-kumentiert. Schließlich wird die sich daraus ergebende Retrievalleistung sowohl für eine harte (binäre) Kategorisierung als auch eine rangordnende Rückgabe der Sachgruppen beurteilt.
    Content
    Master thesis Master of Science (Library and Information Studies) (MSc), Universität Wien. Advisor: Christoph Steiner. Vgl.: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371680244_Vergabe_von_DDC-Sachgruppen_mittels_eines_Schlagwort-Thesaurus. DOI: 10.25365/thesis.70030. Vgl. dazu die Präsentation unter: https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=0CAIQw7AJahcKEwjwoZzzytz_AhUAAAAAHQAAAAAQAg&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.dnb.de%2Fdownload%2Fattachments%2F252121510%2FDA3%2520Workshop-Gabler.pdf%3Fversion%3D1%26modificationDate%3D1671093170000%26api%3Dv2&psig=AOvVaw0szwENK1or3HevgvIDOfjx&ust=1687719410889597&opi=89978449.
  5. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.11 
    0.11274632 = product of:
  0.2818658 = sum of:
    0.24078561 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.24078561 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.4284304 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050534304 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.041080203 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.041080203 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17696252 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050534304 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  6. Fachsystematik Bremen nebst Schlüssel 1970 ff. (1970 ff) 0.09 
    0.09395528 = product of:
  0.2348882 = sum of:
    0.20065469 = weight(_text_:3a in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.20065469 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.4284304 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050534304 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
    0.034233503 = weight(_text_:22 in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.034233503 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17696252 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050534304 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Content
    1. Agrarwissenschaften 1981. - 3. Allgemeine Geographie 2.1972. - 3a. Allgemeine Naturwissenschaften 1.1973. - 4. Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Allgemeine Literaturwissenschaft 2.1971. - 6. Allgemeines. 5.1983. - 7. Anglistik 3.1976. - 8. Astronomie, Geodäsie 4.1977. - 12. bio Biologie, bcp Biochemie-Biophysik, bot Botanik, zoo Zoologie 1981. - 13. Bremensien 3.1983. - 13a. Buch- und Bibliothekswesen 3.1975. - 14. Chemie 4.1977. - 14a. Elektrotechnik 1974. - 15 Ethnologie 2.1976. - 16,1. Geowissenschaften. Sachteil 3.1977. - 16,2. Geowissenschaften. Regionaler Teil 3.1977. - 17. Germanistik 6.1984. - 17a,1. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hil. - 17a,2. Geschichte. Teilsystematik his Neuere Geschichte. - 17a,3. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hit Neueste Geschichte. - 18. Humanbiologie 2.1983. - 19. Ingenieurwissenschaften 1974. - 20. siehe 14a. - 21. klassische Philologie 3.1977. - 22. Klinische Medizin 1975. - 23. Kunstgeschichte 2.1971. - 24. Kybernetik. 2.1975. - 25. Mathematik 3.1974. - 26. Medizin 1976. - 26a. Militärwissenschaft 1985. - 27. Musikwissenschaft 1978. - 27a. Noten 2.1974. - 28. Ozeanographie 3.1977. -29. Pädagogik 8.1985. - 30. Philosphie 3.1974. - 31. Physik 3.1974. - 33. Politik, Politische Wissenschaft, Sozialwissenschaft. Soziologie. Länderschlüssel. Register 1981. - 34. Psychologie 2.1972. - 35. Publizistik und Kommunikationswissenschaft 1985. - 36. Rechtswissenschaften 1986. - 37. Regionale Geograpgie 3.1975. - 37a. Religionswissenschaft 1970. - 38. Romanistik 3.1976. - 39. Skandinavistik 4.1985. - 40. Slavistik 1977. - 40a. Sonstige Sprachen und Literaturen 1973. - 43. Sport 4.1983. - 44. Theaterwissenschaft 1985. - 45. Theologie 2.1976. - 45a. Ur- und Frühgeschichte, Archäologie 1970. - 47. Volkskunde 1976. - 47a. Wirtschaftswissenschaften 1971 // Schlüssel: 1. Länderschlüssel 1971. - 2. Formenschlüssel (Kurzform) 1974. - 3. Personenschlüssel Literatur 5. Fassung 1968
  7. Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014) 0.08 
    0.08026188 = product of:
  0.40130937 = sum of:
    0.40130937 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.40130937 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.4284304 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050534304 = queryNorm
        0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
  8. Mari, H.: Dos fundamentos da significao a producao do sentido (1996) 0.08 
    0.07669013 = product of:
  0.38345066 = sum of:
    0.38345066 = weight(_text_:object's in 819) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.38345066 = score(doc=819,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.5005487 = queryWeight, product of:
          9.905128 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050534304 = queryNorm
        0.7660606 = fieldWeight in 819, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          9.905128 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=819)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    An approach to establishing a relationship between knowing, informing and representing, using aspects of linguistic theory to clarify semantic theory as the basis for an overall theory of meaning. Linguistic knowledge is based on a conceptual matrix which defines convergence / divergence of the categories used to specify an object's parameters; work on the analysis of discourse emphasisis the social dimension of meaning, which is the basis of the theory of acts and speech. The evaluation criteria used to determine questions about the possibility of knowledge are necessarily decisive, this opens up promising perspectives if formulating a relationship between conceptual and pragmatic approaches
  9. Rauber, A.: Digital preservation in data-driven science : on the importance of process capture, preservation and validation (2012) 0.07 
    0.0657344 = product of:
  0.328672 = sum of:
    0.328672 = weight(_text_:object's in 469) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.328672 = score(doc=469,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.5005487 = queryWeight, product of:
          9.905128 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050534304 = queryNorm
        0.65662336 = fieldWeight in 469, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          9.905128 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=469)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Current digital preservation is strongly biased towards data objects: digital files of document-style objects, or encapsulated and largely self-contained objects. To provide authenticity and provenance information, comprehensive metadata models are deployed to document information on an object's context. Yet, we claim that simply documenting an objects context may not be sufficient to ensure proper provenance and to fulfill the stated preservation goals. Specifically in e-Science and business settings, capturing, documenting and preserving entire processes may be necessary to meet the preservation goals. We thus present an approach for capturing, documenting and preserving processes, and means to assess their authenticity upon re-execution. We will discuss options as well as limitations and open challenges to achieve sound preservation, speci?cally within scientific processes.
  10. Schrodt, R.: Tiefen und Untiefen im wissenschaftlichen Sprachgebrauch (2008) 0.06 
    0.0642095 = product of:
  0.32104748 = sum of:
    0.32104748 = weight(_text_:3a in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.32104748 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.4284304 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050534304 = queryNorm
        0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Content
    Vgl. auch: https://studylibde.com/doc/13053640/richard-schrodt. Vgl. auch: http%3A%2F%2Fwww.univie.ac.at%2FGermanistik%2Fschrodt%2Fvorlesung%2Fwissenschaftssprache.doc&usg=AOvVaw1lDLDR6NFf1W0-oC9mEUJf.
  11. Popper, K.R.: Three worlds : the Tanner lecture on human values. Deliverd at the University of Michigan, April 7, 1978 (1978) 0.06 
    0.0642095 = product of:
  0.32104748 = sum of:
    0.32104748 = weight(_text_:3a in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.32104748 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.4284304 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050534304 = queryNorm
        0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Ftannerlectures.utah.edu%2F_documents%2Fa-to-z%2Fp%2Fpopper80.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3f4QRTEH-OEBmoYr2J_c7H
  12. Vetere, G.; Lenzerini, M.: Models for semantic interoperability in service-oriented architectures (2005) 0.06 
    0.056183316 = product of:
  0.28091657 = sum of:
    0.28091657 = weight(_text_:3a in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.28091657 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.4284304 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050534304 = queryNorm
        0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Content
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5386707&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D5386707.
  13. Gödert, W.; Lepsky, K.: Informationelle Kompetenz : ein humanistischer Entwurf (2019) 0.06 
    0.056183316 = product of:
  0.28091657 = sum of:
    0.28091657 = weight(_text_:3a in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.28091657 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.4284304 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050534304 = queryNorm
        0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Philosophisch-ethische Rezensionen vom 09.11.2019 (Jürgen Czogalla), Unter: https://philosophisch-ethische-rezensionen.de/rezension/Goedert1.html. In: B.I.T. online 23(2020) H.3, S.345-347 (W. Sühl-Strohmenger) [Unter: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.b-i-t-online.de%2Fheft%2F2020-03-rezensionen.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0iY3f_zNcvEjeZ6inHVnOK]. In: Open Password Nr. 805 vom 14.08.2020 (H.-C. Hobohm) [Unter: https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzE0MywiOGI3NjZkZmNkZjQ1IiwwLDAsMTMxLDFd].
  14. Egghe, L.: Properties of the n-overlap vector and n-overlap similarity theory (2006) 0.05 
    0.054778665 = product of:
  0.27389333 = sum of:
    0.27389333 = weight(_text_:object's in 194) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.27389333 = score(doc=194,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.5005487 = queryWeight, product of:
          9.905128 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050534304 = queryNorm
        0.54718614 = fieldWeight in 194, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          9.905128 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=194)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    In the first part of this article the author defines the n-overlap vector whose coordinates consist of the fraction of the objects (e.g., books, N-grams, etc.) that belong to 1, 2, , n sets (more generally: families) (e.g., libraries, databases, etc.). With the aid of the Lorenz concentration theory, a theory of n-overlap similarity is conceived together with corresponding measures, such as the generalized Jaccard index (generalizing the well-known Jaccard index in case n 5 2). Next, the distributional form of the n-overlap vector is determined assuming certain distributions of the object's and of the set (family) sizes. In this section the decreasing power law and decreasing exponential distribution is explained for the n-overlap vector. Both item (token) n-overlap and source (type) n-overlap are studied. The n-overlap properties of objects indexed by a hierarchical system (e.g., books indexed by numbers from a UDC or Dewey system or by N-grams) are presented in the final section. The author shows how the results given in the previous section can be applied as well as how the Lorenz order of the n-overlap vector is respected by an increase or a decrease of the level of refinement in the hierarchical system (e.g., the value N in N-grams).
  15. Bordogna, G.; Pagani, M.: ¬A flexible content-based image retrieval model and a customizable system for the retrieval of shapes (2010) 0.05 
    0.054778665 = product of:
  0.27389333 = sum of:
    0.27389333 = weight(_text_:object's in 3450) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.27389333 = score(doc=3450,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.5005487 = queryWeight, product of:
          9.905128 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050534304 = queryNorm
        0.54718614 = fieldWeight in 3450, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          9.905128 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3450)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    The authors describe a flexible model and a system for content-based image retrieval of objects' shapes. Flexibility is intended as the possibility of customizing the system behavior to the user's needs and perceptions. This is achieved by allowing users to modify the retrieval function. The system implementing this model uses multiple representations to characterize some macroscopic characteristics of the objects shapes. Specifically, the shape indexes describe the global features of the object's contour (represented by the Fourier coefficients), the contour's irregularities (represented by the multifractal spectrum), and the presence of concavities and convexities (represented by the contour scale space distribution). During a query formulation, the user can specify both the preference for the macroscopic shape aspects that he or she considers meaningful for the retrieval, and the desired level of accuracy of the matching, which means that the visual query shape must be considered with a given tolerance in representing the desired shapes. The evaluation experiments showed that this system can be suited to different retrieval behaviors, and that, generally, the combination of the multiple shape representations increases both recall and precision with respect to the application of any single representation.
  16. #220 0.05 
    0.0542231 = product of:
  0.2711155 = sum of:
    0.2711155 = weight(_text_:22 in 219) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2711155 = score(doc=219,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.17696252 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050534304 = queryNorm
        1.5320505 = fieldWeight in 219, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.21875 = fieldNorm(doc=219)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 5.1998 20:02:22
  17. #1387 0.05 
    0.0542231 = product of:
  0.2711155 = sum of:
    0.2711155 = weight(_text_:22 in 1386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2711155 = score(doc=1386,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.17696252 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050534304 = queryNorm
        1.5320505 = fieldWeight in 1386, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.21875 = fieldNorm(doc=1386)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 5.1998 20:02:22
  18. #2103 0.05 
    0.0542231 = product of:
  0.2711155 = sum of:
    0.2711155 = weight(_text_:22 in 2102) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2711155 = score(doc=2102,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.17696252 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050534304 = queryNorm
        1.5320505 = fieldWeight in 2102, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.21875 = fieldNorm(doc=2102)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 5.1998 20:02:22
  19. Darstellung der CrissCross-Mappingrelationen im Rahmen des Semantic Web (2010) 0.05 
    0.048779063 = product of:
  0.2438953 = sum of:
    0.2438953 = weight(_text_:sachgruppe in 4285) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2438953 = score(doc=4285,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.47473454 = queryWeight, product of:
          9.394302 = idf(docFreq=9, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050534304 = queryNorm
        0.5137509 = fieldWeight in 4285, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          9.394302 = idf(docFreq=9, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4285)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Im Rahmen des CrissCross-Projekts wurde ein multilinguales, thesaurusbasiertes Recherchevokabular zu heterogen erschlossenen Dokumenten geschaffen. Dieses Recherchevokabular besteht unter anderem aus den Sachschlagwörtern der Schlagwortnormdatei (SWD) und den Notationen der Dewey-Dezimalklassifikation (DDC). Die Schlagwortnormdatei bietet einen normierten, terminologisch kontrollierten Wortschatz an. Sie enthält Schlagwörter aus allen Fachgebieten und Schlagwortkategorien, die durch die beteiligten Bibliotheken zur verbalen Inhaltserschließung genutzt und dabei täglich aktualisiert werden. Unter anderem wird die Schlagwortnormdatei auch zur verbalen Erschließung der Deutschen Nationalbibliografie verwendet. Während der verbalen Erschließung wird jedem Inhalt mindestens eine Schlagwortfolge zugewiesen. Schlagwortfolgen werden dazu benutzt, um die komplexen Themen eines Dokuments zu beschreiben. Zusätzlich wird für den Neuerscheinungsdienst der Deutschen Nationalbibliografie seit dem Jahrgang 2004 jeder Titel noch mindestens einer Sachgruppe zugewiesen. Die Strukturierung der Sachgruppen orientiert sich dabei weitestgehend an der zweiten Ebene der Dewey-Dezimalklassifikation. Die Dewey-Dezimalklassifikation ist eine international weit verbreitete Universalklassifikation. Von ihr existieren zahlreiche Übersetzungen, u. a. ins Deutsche. Seit Januar 2006 wird die DDC gemeinsam mit der SWD zur Inhaltserschließung in der Deutschen Nationalbibliografie verwendet. Bei der Inhaltserschließung mit Hilfe der DDC wird jedem Inhalt eine einzelne DDC-Notation zugewiesen. Komplexe Themen werden dabei durch die Synthese von zwei oder mehr Notationen zu einer neuen Notation dargestellt. Somit ist die DDC-Notation sowohl vergleichbar mit SWD-Schlagwörtern als auch mit ganzen Schlagwortfolgen.
    Um aus diesen beiden unabhangigen Systemen zur Inhaltserschlieung ein einheitliches, multilinguales Recherchevokabular zu bilden wurden im Rahmen des CrissCross Projekts unidirektionale Verbindungen von den einzelnen Sachschlagwortern der SWD zu den (teilweise) synthetisierten Notationen der DDC gescha en. Mittels dieser Verbindungen soll ein praziser und umfassender Zugang zu DDC-erschlossenen Dokumenten uber SWD-Schlagworter gewahrleistet werden. Da DDC-Notationen aber eher ihre Entsprechung in einer Kombination aus Schlagwortfolge und Sachgruppe haben, kann dieses Mapping in der Regel nur von SWD in Richtung DDC ausgewertet werden ohne dass ein groerer Informationsverlust auftritt. Deshalb haben die erstellten Mappings immer eine spezielle Verknupfungsrichtung, bei der die SWD als Ausgangsvokabular und die DDC als Zielvokabular dient. Das Dokument startet in Abschnitt 2 mit einem Uberblick uber die vier verschiedenen CrissCross-Mappingrelationen. Diese Mappingrelationen sollen im Rahmen einer Erweiterung fur die SKOS-Spezi kation4 semantisch reprasentiert werden. SKOS soll dabei sowohl benutzt werden, um die Konzepthierarchien der SWD und der DDC darzustellen als auch um die Mappings zwischen den beiden zu reprasentieren. Anhand von zwei konkreten Beispielen wird in Abschnitt 3 genauer erklart, welche Probleme insbesondere bei der Abbildung der CrissCross-Mappingrelationen mit Hilfe der SKOSSpezi kation auftreten. Insbesondere die Unidirektionalitat der ursprunglichen CrissCross-Mappings ist problematisch, da die in SKOS de nierten Mappingrelationen von einer Bidirektionalitat ausgehen. Das heit die Mappings mussen sowohl nutzbar sein fur die Suche in SWD-erschlossenen Bestanden als auch fur die Suche in DDC-erschlossenen Bestanden. Anhand der Beispiele in Abschnitt 3 wird deshalb auch eine initiale Losungsidee entwickelt, wie die Unidirektionalitat der CrissCross-Mappings aufgehoben werden kann.
  20. Mas, S.; Marleau, Y.: Proposition of a faceted classification model to support corporate information organization and digital records management (2009) 0.05 
    0.048157122 = product of:
  0.24078561 = sum of:
    0.24078561 = weight(_text_:3a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.24078561 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.4284304 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050534304 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?reload=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F4755313%2F4755314%2F04755480.pdf%3Farnumber%3D4755480&authDecision=-203.

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 3052
  • m 344
  • el 162
  • s 140
  • b 39
  • x 35
  • i 23
  • r 18
  • ? 8
  • p 4
  • d 3
  • n 3
  • u 2
  • z 2
  • au 1
  • h 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications