Search (8 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Furner, J."
  1. Furner, J.: ¬A unifying model of document relatedness for hybrid search engines (2003) 0.01
    0.008496759 = product of:
      0.042483795 = sum of:
        0.042483795 = weight(_text_:22 in 2717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042483795 = score(doc=2717,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18300882 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052260913 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2717, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2717)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    11. 9.2004 17:32:22
  2. Furner, J.: Definitions of "metadata" : a brief survey of international standards (2020) 0.01
    0.008196974 = product of:
      0.04098487 = sum of:
        0.04098487 = weight(_text_:it in 5912) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04098487 = score(doc=5912,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15115225 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052260913 = queryNorm
            0.27114958 = fieldWeight in 5912, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5912)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    A search on the term "metadata" in the International Organization for Standardization's Online Browsing Platform (ISO OBP) reveals that there are 96 separate ISO standards that provide definitions of the term. Between them, these standards supply 46 different definitions-a lack of standardization that we might not have expected, given the context. In fact, if we make creative use of Simpson's index of concentration (originally devised as a measure of ecological diversity) to measure the degree of standardization of definition in this case, we arrive at a value of 0.05, on a scale of zero to one. It is suggested, however, that the situation is not as problematic as it might seem: that low cross-domain levels of standardization of definition should not be cause for concern.
  3. Srinivasan, R.; Boast, R.; Becvar, K.M.; Furner, J.: Blobgects : digital museum catalogs and diverse user communities (2009) 0.01
    0.0070806327 = product of:
      0.035403162 = sum of:
        0.035403162 = weight(_text_:22 in 2754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035403162 = score(doc=2754,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18300882 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052260913 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2754, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2754)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 18:52:32
  4. Furner, J.: Information studies without information (2004) 0.01
    0.006762158 = product of:
      0.03381079 = sum of:
        0.03381079 = weight(_text_:it in 828) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03381079 = score(doc=828,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15115225 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052260913 = queryNorm
            0.22368698 = fieldWeight in 828, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=828)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    In philosophy of language, the phenomena fundamental to human communication are routinely modeled in ways that do not require commitment to a concept of "information" separate from those of "data," "meaning," "communication," "knowledge," and "relevance" (inter alia). A taxonomy of conceptions of information may be developed that relies on commonly drawn philosophical distinctions (between linguistic, mental, and physical entities, between objects and events, and between particulars and universals); in such a taxonomy, no category requires the label "information" in order to be differentiated from others. It is suggested that a conception of information-as-relevance is currently the most productive of advances in theoretical information studies.
  5. Furner, J.: "A brilliant mind" : Margaret Egan and social epistemology (2004) 0.01
    0.006762158 = product of:
      0.03381079 = sum of:
        0.03381079 = weight(_text_:it in 15) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03381079 = score(doc=15,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15115225 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052260913 = queryNorm
            0.22368698 = fieldWeight in 15, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=15)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Margaret Egan (1905-59) taught at the Graduate Library School of the University of Chicago (1946-55) and at the School of Library Science at Western Reserve University in Cleveland, Ohio (1955-59). With her colleague Jesse Shera, Egan wrote "Foundations of a Theory of Bibliography" for Library Quarterly in 1952; this article marked the first appearance of the term "social epistemology." After Egan's death, Shera has often been credited for the idea of social epistemology. However, there is ample evidence to show that it was Egan who originated the concept-one that is commonly viewed as fundamental to the theoretical foundations of library and information science.
  6. Furner, J.: Information science Is neither (2015) 0.01
    0.005796136 = product of:
      0.028980678 = sum of:
        0.028980678 = weight(_text_:it in 5527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028980678 = score(doc=5527,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15115225 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052260913 = queryNorm
            0.19173169 = fieldWeight in 5527, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5527)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Information science is not a science, nor is it primarily about information. In this paper, an argument is developed in support of the latter claim. A working definition of information is proposed, and doubts are raised about the extent to which each of five core subfields of information science/studies (information behavior, information retrieval, infometrics, information organization, and information ethics) has to do with information as defined. Several alternative candidates for the primary phenomenon of interest shared by those working in all five subfields are considered: these include data studies; knowledge studies; metadata studies; representation studies; relevance studies; and (as a branch of cultural studies) collection, preservation, and access studies. A prime candidate is identified, and some implications of such a reading for the application of philosophical approaches to information science/studies are highlighted.
  7. Furner, J.: Dewey deracialized : a critical race-theoretic perspective (2007) 0.00
    0.004830113 = product of:
      0.024150565 = sum of:
        0.024150565 = weight(_text_:it in 1090) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024150565 = score(doc=1090,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15115225 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052260913 = queryNorm
            0.15977642 = fieldWeight in 1090, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1090)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Critical race theory is introduced as a potentially useful approach to the evaluation of bibliographic classification schemes. An overview is presented of the essential elements of critical race theory, including clarifications of the meanings of some important terms such as "race" and "social justice." On the basis of a review of existing conceptions of the just and the antiracist library service, a rationale is presented for hypothesizing that critical race theory may be of use to the library and information sciences. The role of classification schemes as information institutions in their own right is established, and the Dewey Decimal Classification is introduced as the case to be studied. The challenges faced by classification-scheme designers in the construction and reconstruction of racerelated categories are reviewed; and an analysis is presented of one sense in which it might be suggested that recent (2003) revisions in one of the DDC's tables appear not to meet those challenges wholly successfully. An account is given of a further sense in which adoption of a critical race-theoretic approach has the more radical effect of calling into question a fundamental decision recently taken to "deracialize" the DDC. In conclusion, an assessment is made of critical race theory as a framework for evaluating library classification schemes.
  8. Gorichanaz, T.; Furner, J.; Ma, L.; Bawden, D.; Robinson, L.; Dixon, D.; Herold, K.; Obelitz Søe, S.; Martens, B. Van der Veer; Floridi, L.: Information and design : book symposium on Luciano Floridi's The Logic of Information (2020) 0.00
    0.004830113 = product of:
      0.024150565 = sum of:
        0.024150565 = weight(_text_:it in 5710) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024150565 = score(doc=5710,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15115225 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052260913 = queryNorm
            0.15977642 = fieldWeight in 5710, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5710)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose The purpose of this paper is to review and discuss Luciano Floridi's 2019 book The Logic of Information: A Theory of Philosophy as Conceptual Design, the latest instalment in his philosophy of information (PI) tetralogy, particularly with respect to its implications for library and information studies (LIS). Design/methodology/approach Nine scholars with research interests in philosophy and LIS read and responded to the book, raising critical and heuristic questions in the spirit of scholarly dialogue. Floridi responded to these questions. Findings Floridi's PI, including this latest publication, is of interest to LIS scholars, and much insight can be gained by exploring this connection. It seems also that LIS has the potential to contribute to PI's further development in some respects. Research limitations/implications Floridi's PI work is technical philosophy for which many LIS scholars do not have the training or patience to engage with, yet doing so is rewarding. This suggests a role for translational work between philosophy and LIS. Originality/value The book symposium format, not yet seen in LIS, provides forum for sustained, multifaceted and generative dialogue around ideas.