Search (105 results, page 1 of 6)

  • × theme_ss:"Elektronisches Publizieren"
  • × language_ss:"e"
  1. Weibel, S.: ¬An architecture for scholarly publishing on the World Wide Web (1995) 0.04
    0.038114388 = product of:
      0.09528597 = sum of:
        0.038640905 = weight(_text_:it in 4555) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038640905 = score(doc=4555,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15115225 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052260913 = queryNorm
            0.25564227 = fieldWeight in 4555, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4555)
        0.05664506 = weight(_text_:22 in 4555) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05664506 = score(doc=4555,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18300882 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052260913 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4555, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4555)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    OCLC distributes several scholarly journals under its Electronic Journals Online programme, acting, in effect, as an 'electronic printer' for scholarly publishers. It is prototyping a WWW accessible version of these journals. Describes the problems encountered, detail some of the short term solutions, and highlight changes to existing standards that will enhance the use of the WWW for scholarly electronic publishing
    Date
    23. 7.1996 10:22:20
  2. Oppenheim, C.: Electronic scholarly publishing and open access (2009) 0.03
    0.033387464 = product of:
      0.08346866 = sum of:
        0.04098487 = weight(_text_:it in 3662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04098487 = score(doc=3662,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15115225 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052260913 = queryNorm
            0.27114958 = fieldWeight in 3662, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3662)
        0.042483795 = weight(_text_:22 in 3662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042483795 = score(doc=3662,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18300882 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052260913 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3662, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3662)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    A review of recent developments in electronic publishing, with a focus on Open Access (OA) is provided. It describes the two main types of OA, i.e. the `gold' OA journal route and the 'green' repository route, highlighting the advantages and disadvantages of the two, and the reactions of the publishing industry to these developments. Quality, cost and copyright issues are explored, as well as some of the business models of OA. It is noted that whilst so far there is no evidence that a shift to OA will lead to libraries cancelling subscriptions to toll-access journals, this may happen in the future, and that despite the apparently compelling reasons for authors to move to OA, so far few have shown themselves willing to do so. Conclusions about the future of scholarly publications are drawn.
    Date
    8. 7.2010 19:22:45
  3. Somers, J.: Torching the modern-day library of Alexandria : somewhere at Google there is a database containing 25 million books and nobody is allowed to read them. (2017) 0.03
    0.030259112 = product of:
      0.07564778 = sum of:
        0.04732525 = weight(_text_:it in 3608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04732525 = score(doc=3608,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.15115225 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052260913 = queryNorm
            0.31309655 = fieldWeight in 3608, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3608)
        0.02832253 = weight(_text_:22 in 3608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02832253 = score(doc=3608,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18300882 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052260913 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3608, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3608)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    You were going to get one-click access to the full text of nearly every book that's ever been published. Books still in print you'd have to pay for, but everything else-a collection slated to grow larger than the holdings at the Library of Congress, Harvard, the University of Michigan, at any of the great national libraries of Europe-would have been available for free at terminals that were going to be placed in every local library that wanted one. At the terminal you were going to be able to search tens of millions of books and read every page of any book you found. You'd be able to highlight passages and make annotations and share them; for the first time, you'd be able to pinpoint an idea somewhere inside the vastness of the printed record, and send somebody straight to it with a link. Books would become as instantly available, searchable, copy-pasteable-as alive in the digital world-as web pages. It was to be the realization of a long-held dream. "The universal library has been talked about for millennia," Richard Ovenden, the head of Oxford's Bodleian Libraries, has said. "It was possible to think in the Renaissance that you might be able to amass the whole of published knowledge in a single room or a single institution." In the spring of 2011, it seemed we'd amassed it in a terminal small enough to fit on a desk. "This is a watershed event and can serve as a catalyst for the reinvention of education, research, and intellectual life," one eager observer wrote at the time. On March 22 of that year, however, the legal agreement that would have unlocked a century's worth of books and peppered the country with access terminals to a universal library was rejected under Rule 23(e)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. When the library at Alexandria burned it was said to be an "international catastrophe." When the most significant humanities project of our time was dismantled in court, the scholars, archivists, and librarians who'd had a hand in its undoing breathed a sigh of relief, for they believed, at the time, that they had narrowly averted disaster.
  4. Digital libraries: current issues : Digital Libraries Workshop DL 94, Newark, NJ, May 19-20, 1994. Selected papers (1995) 0.03
    0.02858579 = product of:
      0.07146447 = sum of:
        0.028980678 = weight(_text_:it in 1385) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028980678 = score(doc=1385,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15115225 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052260913 = queryNorm
            0.19173169 = fieldWeight in 1385, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1385)
        0.042483795 = weight(_text_:22 in 1385) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042483795 = score(doc=1385,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18300882 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052260913 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1385, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1385)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    This volume is the first book coherently summarizing the current issues in digital libraries research, design and management. It presents, in a homogeneous way, thoroughly revised versions of 15 papers accepted for the First International Workshop on Digital Libraries, DL '94, held at Rutgers University in May 1994; in addition there are two introductory chapters provided by the volume editors, as well as a comprehensive bibliography listing 262 entries. Besides introductory aspects, the topics addressed are administration and management, information retrieval and hypertext, classification and indexing, and prototypes and applications. The volume is intended for researchers and design professionals in the field, as well as for experts from libraries administration and scientific publishing.
    Date
    22. 1.1996 18:26:45
  5. Leuser, P.: SGML-Einsatz bei Duden und Brockhaus : ein Verlag auf neuem Weg (1993) 0.02
    0.022658026 = product of:
      0.11329012 = sum of:
        0.11329012 = weight(_text_:22 in 5919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11329012 = score(doc=5919,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18300882 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052260913 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5919, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5919)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Infodoc. 19(1993) H.3, S.20-22
  6. Desmarais, N.: Data preparation for electronic publications (1998) 0.02
    0.022658026 = product of:
      0.11329012 = sum of:
        0.11329012 = weight(_text_:22 in 4702) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11329012 = score(doc=4702,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18300882 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052260913 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4702, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4702)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Advances in librarianship. 22(1998), S.59-75
  7. Electronic publishing and electronic information communication (1996) 0.02
    0.019825771 = product of:
      0.09912886 = sum of:
        0.09912886 = weight(_text_:22 in 6664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09912886 = score(doc=6664,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18300882 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052260913 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6664, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6664)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    IFLA journal. 22(1996) no.3, S.181-247
  8. Engels, T.C.E; Istenic Starcic, A.; Kulczycki, E.; Pölönen, J.; Sivertsen, G.: Are book publications disappearing from scholarly communication in the social sciences and humanities? (2018) 0.02
    0.019057194 = product of:
      0.047642983 = sum of:
        0.019320453 = weight(_text_:it in 4631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019320453 = score(doc=4631,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15115225 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052260913 = queryNorm
            0.12782113 = fieldWeight in 4631, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4631)
        0.02832253 = weight(_text_:22 in 4631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02832253 = score(doc=4631,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18300882 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052260913 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 4631, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4631)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose The purpose of this paper is to analyze the evolution in terms of shares of scholarly book publications in the social sciences and humanities (SSH) in five European countries, i.e. Flanders (Belgium), Finland, Norway, Poland and Slovenia. In addition to aggregate results for the whole of the social sciences and the humanities, the authors focus on two well-established fields, namely, economics & business and history. Design/methodology/approach Comprehensive coverage databases of SSH scholarly output have been set up in Flanders (VABB-SHW), Finland (VIRTA), Norway (NSI), Poland (PBN) and Slovenia (COBISS). These systems allow to trace the shares of monographs and book chapters among the total volume of scholarly publications in each of these countries. Findings As expected, the shares of scholarly monographs and book chapters in the humanities and in the social sciences differ considerably between fields of science and between the five countries studied. In economics & business and in history, the results show similar field-based variations as well as country variations. Most year-to-year and overall variation is rather limited. The data presented illustrate that book publishing is not disappearing from an SSH. Research limitations/implications The results presented in this paper illustrate that the polish scholarly evaluation system has influenced scholarly publication patterns considerably, while in the other countries the variations are manifested only slightly. The authors conclude that generalizations like "performance-based research funding systems (PRFS) are bad for book publishing" are flawed. Research evaluation systems need to take book publishing fully into account because of the crucial epistemic and social roles it serves in an SSH. Originality/value The authors present data on monographs and book chapters from five comprehensive coverage databases in Europe and analyze the data in view of the debates regarding the perceived detrimental effects of research evaluation systems on scholarly book publishing. The authors show that there is little reason to suspect a dramatic decline of scholarly book publishing in an SSH.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  9. Doering, P.F.: ¬The hidden dangers of electronic publishing (1995) 0.01
    0.014161265 = product of:
      0.070806324 = sum of:
        0.070806324 = weight(_text_:22 in 4551) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.070806324 = score(doc=4551,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18300882 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052260913 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4551, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4551)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 7.1996 21:39:19
  10. Olivieri, R.: Academic publishing in transition : the academic publishers response (1995) 0.01
    0.014161265 = product of:
      0.070806324 = sum of:
        0.070806324 = weight(_text_:22 in 4988) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.070806324 = score(doc=4988,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18300882 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052260913 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4988, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4988)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    IATUL proceedings (new series). 4(1995), S.15-22
  11. Canty, C.: Document query languages : why is it so hard to ask a simple question? (1993) 0.01
    0.013524316 = product of:
      0.06762158 = sum of:
        0.06762158 = weight(_text_:it in 6204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06762158 = score(doc=6204,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15115225 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052260913 = queryNorm
            0.44737396 = fieldWeight in 6204, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6204)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  12. Bradley, N.: SGML concepts (1992) 0.01
    0.011592272 = product of:
      0.057961356 = sum of:
        0.057961356 = weight(_text_:it in 5917) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.057961356 = score(doc=5917,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.15115225 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052260913 = queryNorm
            0.38346338 = fieldWeight in 5917, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5917)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    The abbreviation SGML stands for Standard Generalized Markup Language. Markup refers to adding style and formatting information to text prior to publication. It is a standard because SGML has been accepted and published by the ISO, and is not owned by any manufacturer or software vendor. It is generalized because SGML is powerful and flexible, allowing it to be used in many applications. And it is a language that embodies a specification for creation of a set of rules to define the structure of a document. SGML has been designed to easily cross incompatible computer platforms, and its 'open' nature allows for relatively simple access and manipulation of an SGML conforming document by both people and computers. Above all, SGML proposes a new way of thinking about document creation and presentation, by shifting document style considerations to the publication process rather than the creation process. This is done by dividing the document into names, logical elements, to which any style can be later applied. A byproduct of this approach is the effective creation of a flexible database, providing further access to the data for information retrieval or for re-publication
  13. Oppenheim, C.: ¬The implications of copyright legislation for electronic access to journal collections (1994) 0.01
    0.011329013 = product of:
      0.05664506 = sum of:
        0.05664506 = weight(_text_:22 in 7245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05664506 = score(doc=7245,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18300882 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052260913 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7245, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7245)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Journal of document and text management. 2(1994) no.1, S.10-22
  14. Project ELVYN : an experiment in electronic jornal delivery, facts, figures and findings (1995) 0.01
    0.011329013 = product of:
      0.05664506 = sum of:
        0.05664506 = weight(_text_:22 in 6685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05664506 = score(doc=6685,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18300882 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052260913 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6685, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6685)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    1. 3.1997 18:22:00
  15. Jensen, M.: Digital structure, digital design : issues in designing electronic publications (1996) 0.01
    0.011329013 = product of:
      0.05664506 = sum of:
        0.05664506 = weight(_text_:22 in 7481) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05664506 = score(doc=7481,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18300882 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052260913 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7481, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7481)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Journal of scholarly publishing. 28(1996) no.1, S.13-22
  16. Harter, S.P.: Scholarly communication and electronic journals : an impact study (1998) 0.01
    0.011329013 = product of:
      0.05664506 = sum of:
        0.05664506 = weight(_text_:22 in 3035) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05664506 = score(doc=3035,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18300882 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052260913 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3035, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3035)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 2.1999 16:56:06
  17. Brusilovsky, P.; Eklund, J.; Schwarz, E.: Web-based education for all : a tool for development adaptive courseware (1998) 0.01
    0.011329013 = product of:
      0.05664506 = sum of:
        0.05664506 = weight(_text_:22 in 3620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05664506 = score(doc=3620,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18300882 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052260913 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3620, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3620)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:08:06
  18. Speier, C.; Palmer, J.; Wren, D.; Hahn, S.: Faculty perceptions of electronic journals as scholarly communication : a question of prestige and legitimacy (1999) 0.01
    0.011329013 = product of:
      0.05664506 = sum of:
        0.05664506 = weight(_text_:22 in 3674) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05664506 = score(doc=3674,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18300882 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052260913 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3674, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3674)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 5.1999 14:43:47
  19. Alexander, M.: Digitising books, manuscripts and scholarly materials : preparation, handling, scanning, recognition, compression, storage formats (1998) 0.01
    0.011329013 = product of:
      0.05664506 = sum of:
        0.05664506 = weight(_text_:22 in 3686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05664506 = score(doc=3686,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18300882 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052260913 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3686, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3686)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:00:52
  20. Gilbert, S.K.: SGML theory and practice (1989) 0.01
    0.010929298 = product of:
      0.05464649 = sum of:
        0.05464649 = weight(_text_:it in 5944) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05464649 = score(doc=5944,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15115225 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052260913 = queryNorm
            0.36153275 = fieldWeight in 5944, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5944)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Provides information for people who want (or need) to know what the SGML is and want to make use of it. Gives a fairly detailed description of what SGML is, why it exists, and provides a list of SGML players who are actively involved in either developing tools, providing services, offering consultancy or enganging in research for SGML. Describes the SGML work undertaken at Hatfield Polytechnic as part of Project Quartet funded by the British Library Research and Development Dept. The results and findings conclude that SGML forms a strong backbone for present and future document handling systems

Years

Types

  • a 97
  • el 6
  • m 4
  • s 3
  • r 1
  • More… Less…