Search (41 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval"
  1. Chan, L.M.; Hodges, T.: Entering the millennium : a new century for LCSH (2000) 0.03
    0.033387464 = product of:
      0.08346866 = sum of:
        0.04098487 = weight(_text_:it in 5920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04098487 = score(doc=5920,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15115225 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052260913 = queryNorm
            0.27114958 = fieldWeight in 5920, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5920)
        0.042483795 = weight(_text_:22 in 5920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042483795 = score(doc=5920,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18300882 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052260913 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5920, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5920)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH), a system originally designed as a tool for subject access to the Library's own collection in the late nineteenth century, has become, in the course of the last century, the main subject retrieval tool in library catalogs throughout the United States and in many other countries. It is one of the largest non-specialized controlled vocabularies in the world. As LCSH enters a new century, it faces an information environment that has undergone vast changes from what had prevailed when LCSH began, or, indeed, from its state in the early days of the online age. In order to continue its mission and to be useful in spheres outside library catalogs as well, LCSH must adapt to the multifarious environment. One possible approach is to adopt a series of scalable and flexible syntax and application rules to meet the needs of different user communities
    Date
    27. 5.2001 16:22:21
  2. Anderson, J.D.; Pérez-Carballo, J.: Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) (2009) 0.03
    0.033387464 = product of:
      0.08346866 = sum of:
        0.04098487 = weight(_text_:it in 3837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04098487 = score(doc=3837,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15115225 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052260913 = queryNorm
            0.27114958 = fieldWeight in 3837, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3837)
        0.042483795 = weight(_text_:22 in 3837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042483795 = score(doc=3837,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18300882 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052260913 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3837, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3837)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Library of Congress Subject Headings (LSCH), which celebrated its 100th birthday in 1998, is the largest cataloging and indexing language in the world for the indication of the topics and formats of books and similar publications. It consists of a controlled list of main headings, many with subdivisions, with a rich system of cross references. It is supported by the U.S. government, and undergoes systematic revision. In recent decades its managers have begun to confront challenges such as biased terminology, complicated syntax (how terms are put together to form headings), and effective displays in electronic media. Many suggestions have been made for its improvement, including moving to a fully faceted system.
    Date
    27. 8.2011 14:22:13
  3. Fast, K.; Leise, F.; Steckel, M.: Facets and controlled vocabularies : an annotated bibliography (2003) 0.01
    0.013385601 = product of:
      0.06692801 = sum of:
        0.06692801 = weight(_text_:it in 2900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06692801 = score(doc=2900,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.15115225 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052260913 = queryNorm
            0.44278538 = fieldWeight in 2900, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2900)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    An online series of articles explaining controlled vocabularies and, in particular, faceted classification. It is not yet finished, but what they have covered is very well done, practical and informative, with useful advice and a full treatment. It is worth reading now, and when they actually get to performing facet analysis and making a faceted system, it will make a very useful reference.
  4. Fast, K.; Leise, F.; Steckel, M.: All about facets and controlled vocabularies (2002) 0.01
    0.013385601 = product of:
      0.06692801 = sum of:
        0.06692801 = weight(_text_:it in 5141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06692801 = score(doc=5141,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.15115225 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052260913 = queryNorm
            0.44278538 = fieldWeight in 5141, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5141)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    An online series of articles explaining controlled vocabularies and, in particular, faceted classification. It is not yet finished, but what they have covered is very well done, practical and informative, with useful advice and a full treatment. It is worth reading now, and when they actually get to performing facet analysis and making a faceted system, it will make a very useful reference.
  5. Fast, K.; Leise, F.; Steckel, M.: What is a controlled vocabulary? (2002) 0.01
    0.013385601 = product of:
      0.06692801 = sum of:
        0.06692801 = weight(_text_:it in 2417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06692801 = score(doc=2417,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.15115225 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052260913 = queryNorm
            0.44278538 = fieldWeight in 2417, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2417)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    An online series of articles explaining controlled vocabularies and, in particular, faceted classification. It is not yet finished, but what they have covered is very well done, practical and informative, with useful advice and a full treatment. It is worth reading now, and when they actually get to performing facet analysis and making a faceted system, it will make a very useful reference.
  6. Fast, K.; Leise, F.; Steckel, M.: Creating a controlled vocabulary (2003) 0.01
    0.013385601 = product of:
      0.06692801 = sum of:
        0.06692801 = weight(_text_:it in 2461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06692801 = score(doc=2461,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.15115225 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052260913 = queryNorm
            0.44278538 = fieldWeight in 2461, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2461)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    An online series of articles explaining controlled vocabularies and, in particular, faceted classification. It is not yet finished, but what they have covered is very well done, practical and informative, with useful advice and a full treatment. It is worth reading now, and when they actually get to performing facet analysis and making a faceted system, it will make a very useful reference.
  7. Fast, K.; Leise, F.; Steckel, M.: Synonym rings and authority files (2003) 0.01
    0.013385601 = product of:
      0.06692801 = sum of:
        0.06692801 = weight(_text_:it in 2468) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06692801 = score(doc=2468,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.15115225 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052260913 = queryNorm
            0.44278538 = fieldWeight in 2468, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2468)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    An online series of articles explaining controlled vocabularies and, in particular, faceted classification. It is not yet finished, but what they have covered is very well done, practical and informative, with useful advice and a full treatment. It is worth reading now, and when they actually get to performing facet analysis and making a faceted system, it will make a very useful reference.
  8. Fast, K.; Leise, F.; Steckel, M.: Controlled vocabularies : a glosso-thesaurus (2003) 0.01
    0.013385601 = product of:
      0.06692801 = sum of:
        0.06692801 = weight(_text_:it in 2469) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06692801 = score(doc=2469,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.15115225 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052260913 = queryNorm
            0.44278538 = fieldWeight in 2469, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2469)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    An online series of articles explaining controlled vocabularies and, in particular, faceted classification. It is not yet finished, but what they have covered is very well done, practical and informative, with useful advice and a full treatment. It is worth reading now, and when they actually get to performing facet analysis and making a faceted system, it will make a very useful reference.
  9. Olson, H.A.; Boll, J.J.: Subject analysis in online catalogs (2001) 0.01
    0.011712402 = product of:
      0.05856201 = sum of:
        0.05856201 = weight(_text_:it in 6113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05856201 = score(doc=6113,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.15115225 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052260913 = queryNorm
            0.38743722 = fieldWeight in 6113, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6113)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Knowledge organization 28(2001) no.4, S.206-208 (C. Arsenault):"Overall, this is an excellent work, on an ever increasingly pertinent topic. This long-awaited second edition provides a thorough and comprehensive update of an already important text. I very highly recommend it to professionals and academics alike ; both neophytes and veterans will find it valuable. It is a fundamental work that cannot be ignored in the field of subject analysis and retrieval for all bibliographic systems, including online catalogs."
  10. Lambert, N.: Of thesauri and computers : reflections on the need for thesauri (1995) 0.01
    0.011329013 = product of:
      0.05664506 = sum of:
        0.05664506 = weight(_text_:22 in 3734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05664506 = score(doc=3734,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18300882 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052260913 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3734, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3734)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Searcher. 3(1995) no.8, S.18-22
  11. Stone, A.T.: Up-ending Cutter's pyramid : the case for making subject references to broader terms (1996) 0.01
    0.009912886 = product of:
      0.04956443 = sum of:
        0.04956443 = weight(_text_:22 in 7238) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04956443 = score(doc=7238,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18300882 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052260913 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7238, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7238)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 4.1997 20:43:23
  12. Ashton, J.; Kent, C.: FAST: a journey toward sustainability in subject indexing at the British Library (2023) 0.01
    0.009563136 = product of:
      0.04781568 = sum of:
        0.04781568 = weight(_text_:it in 1172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04781568 = score(doc=1172,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15115225 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052260913 = queryNorm
            0.31634116 = fieldWeight in 1172, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1172)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    This article provides an update on progress since the partial roll-out of FAST in 2015 at the British Library. It discusses developments to the product and the provision of community interaction with FAST via a FAST funnel, ensuring the vocabulary is robust and flexible enough to meet the continued needs of Legal Deposit workflows. It describes the planning and implementation methods used in rolling out FAST to the majority of cataloging workflows at the British Library leading to extensive training over the autumn of 2022.
  13. Nicholson, J.; Lake, S.: Implementation of FAST in two digital repositories : breaking silos, unifying subject practices (2023) 0.01
    0.009563136 = product of:
      0.04781568 = sum of:
        0.04781568 = weight(_text_:it in 1174) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04781568 = score(doc=1174,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15115225 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052260913 = queryNorm
            0.31634116 = fieldWeight in 1174, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1174)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    This study traces evolving approaches to the use of the FAST (Faceted Application of Subject Terminology) in digital repositories at Atkins Library at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte, where changes in staffing, the launch of an institutional repository, and efforts to address problematic language in metadata have necessitated a shift from an in-depth indexing approach to FAST to a lightweight "tagging" model more suited to present-day metadata needs. Despite the subject schema's apparent simplicity, Atkins' experience with FAST has shown that it still requires significant time, effort, and experimentation in order to deploy it to best effect.
  14. Frommeyer, J.: Chronological terms and period subdivisions in LCSH, RAMEAU, and RSWK : development of an integrative model for time retrieval across various online catalogs (2004) 0.01
    0.008496759 = product of:
      0.042483795 = sum of:
        0.042483795 = weight(_text_:22 in 131) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042483795 = score(doc=131,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18300882 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052260913 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 131, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=131)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  15. Leissing, U.; Rädler, K.; Hauer, M.: Query-Expansion durch Fachthesauri : Erfahrungsbericht zu dandelon.com, Vorarlberger Parlamentsinformationssystem und vorarlberg.at (2010) 0.01
    0.008496759 = product of:
      0.042483795 = sum of:
        0.042483795 = weight(_text_:22 in 3728) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042483795 = score(doc=3728,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18300882 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052260913 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3728, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3728)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
  16. Svenonius, E.: LCSH: semantics, syntax and specifity (2000) 0.01
    0.008196974 = product of:
      0.04098487 = sum of:
        0.04098487 = weight(_text_:it in 5599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04098487 = score(doc=5599,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15115225 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052260913 = queryNorm
            0.27114958 = fieldWeight in 5599, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5599)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    This paper looks at changes affecting LCSH over its 100-year history. Adopting a linguistic conceptualization, it frames these changes as relating to the semantics, syntax and pragmatics of the LCSH language. While its category semantics has remained stable over time, the LCSH relational semantics underwent a significant upheaval when a thesaural structure was imposed upon its traditional See and See also structure. Over time the LCSH syntax has become increasingly complex as it has moved from being largely enumerative to in large part synthetic. Until fairly recently the LCSH pragmatics consisted of only one rule, viz, the injunction to assign specific headings. This rule, always controversial, has become even more debated and interpreted with the move to the online environment
  17. Svenonius, E.: LCSH: semantics, syntax and specifity (2000) 0.01
    0.008196974 = product of:
      0.04098487 = sum of:
        0.04098487 = weight(_text_:it in 5602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04098487 = score(doc=5602,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15115225 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052260913 = queryNorm
            0.27114958 = fieldWeight in 5602, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5602)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    This paper looks at changes affecting LCSH over its 100-year history. Adopting a linguistic conceptualization, it frames these changes as relating to the semantics, syntax and pragmatics of the LCSH language. While its category semantics has remained stable over time, the LCSH relational semantics underwent a significant upheaval when a thesaural structure was imposed upon its traditional See and See also structure. Over time the LCSH syntax has become increasingly complex as it has moved from being largely enumerative to in large part synthetic. Until fairly recently the LCSH pragmatics consisted of only one rule, viz, the injunction to assign specific headings. This rule, always controversial, has become even more debated and interpreted with the move to the online environment
  18. Lucarelli, A.: Semantic authority control and New Soggettario (2004) 0.01
    0.008196974 = product of:
      0.04098487 = sum of:
        0.04098487 = weight(_text_:it in 5674) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04098487 = score(doc=5674,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15115225 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052260913 = queryNorm
            0.27114958 = fieldWeight in 5674, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5674)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    The project of the renewal of the Subject Headings for Italian Library Catalogues (Soggettario), financed by the National Central Library in Florence, proposes a pre-coordinated language, both analytic and synthetic, complying with international rules on vocabulary control and structure, based on category analysis of semantic relationships. It envisages a strict distinction between semantic relationships and syntactic ones, and bases its citation order of subject strings on the analysis model for logical relationships. Thanks to its features, the new Soggettario agrees both with the logic of Guidelines for Subject Authority and Reference Entries and of UNIMARC. Authorities, and with FRBR (Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records). The rigorous structure of the thesaurus will facilitate the transfer of controlled terminology to lists or authority files and archives. The Italian National Bibliography (BNI) will have to play a leading role on the control of coherence of semantic access points. It will validate the strings created by other libraries and control their coherence according to the syntax rules envisaged in the new method.
  19. O'Neill, E.T.; Chan, L.M.: FAST - a new approach to controlled subject access (2008) 0.01
    0.008196974 = product of:
      0.04098487 = sum of:
        0.04098487 = weight(_text_:it in 2181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04098487 = score(doc=2181,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15115225 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052260913 = queryNorm
            0.27114958 = fieldWeight in 2181, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2181)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Recent trends, driven to a large extent by the rapid proliferation of digital resources, are forcing changes in bibliographic control to make it easier to use, understand, and apply subject data. Subject headings are no exception. The enormous volume and rapid growth of digital libraries and repositories and the emergence of numerous metadata schemes have spurred a reexamination of the way subject data are to be provided for such resources efficiently and effectively. To address this need, OCLC in cooperation with the Library of Congress, has taken a new approach, called FAST (Faceted Application of Subject Terminology). FAST headings are based on the existing vocabulary in Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH), but are applied with a simpler syntax than required by Library of Congress application policies. Adapting the LCSH vocabulary in a simplified faceted syntax retains the rich vocabulary of LCSH while making it easier to understand, control, apply, and use.
  20. Blair, D.C.: Language and representation in information retrieval (1991) 0.01
    0.0077281813 = product of:
      0.038640905 = sum of:
        0.038640905 = weight(_text_:it in 1545) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038640905 = score(doc=1545,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.15115225 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052260913 = queryNorm
            0.25564227 = fieldWeight in 1545, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1545)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Information or Document Retrieval is the subject of this book. It is not an introductory book, although it is self-contained in the sense that it is not necessary to have a background in the theory or practice of Information Retrieval in order to understand its arguments. The book presents, as clearly as possible, one particular perspective on Information Retrieval, and attempts to say that certain aspects of the theory or practice of the management of documents are more important than others. The majority of Information Retrieval research has been aimed at the more experimentally tractable small-scale systems, and although much of that work has added greatly to our understanding of Information Retrieval it is becoming increasingly apparent that retrieval systems with large data bases of documents are a fundamentally different genre of systems than small-scale systems. If this is so, which is the thesis of this book, then we must now study large information retrieval systems with the same rigor and intensity that we once studied small-scale systems. Hegel observed that the quantitative growth of any system caused qualitative changes to take place in its structure and processes.

Years

Languages

  • e 36
  • d 3
  • i 1
  • nl 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 28
  • el 7
  • m 6
  • s 2
  • i 1
  • More… Less…

Classifications