Search (8348 results, page 1 of 418)

  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.12 
    0.11659854 = product of:
  0.29149634 = sum of:
    0.24901254 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.24901254 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.4430686 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052260913 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.042483795 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.042483795 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18300882 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052260913 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  2. Mas, S.; Marleau, Y.: Proposition of a faceted classification model to support corporate information organization and digital records management (2009) 0.11 
    0.11119729 = product of:
  0.27799323 = sum of:
    0.24901254 = weight(_text_:3a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.24901254 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.4430686 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052260913 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
    0.028980678 = weight(_text_:it in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028980678 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15115225 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052260913 = queryNorm
        0.19173169 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    The employees of an organization often use a personal hierarchical classification scheme to organize digital documents that are stored on their own workstations. As this may make it hard for other employees to retrieve these documents, there is a risk that the organization will lose track of needed documentation. Furthermore, the inherent boundaries of such a hierarchical structure require making arbitrary decisions about which specific criteria the classification will b.e based on (for instance, the administrative activity or the document type, although a document can have several attributes and require classification in several classes).A faceted classification model to support corporate information organization is proposed. Partially based on Ranganathan's facets theory, this model aims not only to standardize the organization of digital documents, but also to simplify the management of a document throughout its life cycle for both individuals and organizations, while ensuring compliance to regulatory and policy requirements.
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?reload=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F4755313%2F4755314%2F04755480.pdf%3Farnumber%3D4755480&authDecision=-203.
  3. Zeng, Q.; Yu, M.; Yu, W.; Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, M.: Faceted hierarchy : a new graph type to organize scientific concepts and a construction method (2019) 0.11 
    0.11119729 = product of:
  0.27799323 = sum of:
    0.24901254 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.24901254 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.4430686 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052260913 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
    0.028980678 = weight(_text_:it in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028980678 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15115225 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052260913 = queryNorm
        0.19173169 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    On a scientific concept hierarchy, a parent concept may have a few attributes, each of which has multiple values being a group of child concepts. We call these attributes facets: classification has a few facets such as application (e.g., face recognition), model (e.g., svm, knn), and metric (e.g., precision). In this work, we aim at building faceted concept hierarchies from scientific literature. Hierarchy construction methods heavily rely on hypernym detection, however, the faceted relations are parent-to-child links but the hypernym relation is a multi-hop, i.e., ancestor-to-descendent link with a specific facet "type-of". We use information extraction techniques to find synonyms, sibling concepts, and ancestor-descendent relations from a data science corpus. And we propose a hierarchy growth algorithm to infer the parent-child links from the three types of relationships. It resolves conflicts by maintaining the acyclic structure of a hierarchy.
    Content
    Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.
  4. Noever, D.; Ciolino, M.: ¬The Turing deception (2022) 0.11 
    0.11119729 = product of:
  0.27799323 = sum of:
    0.24901254 = weight(_text_:3a in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.24901254 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.4430686 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052260913 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
    0.028980678 = weight(_text_:it in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028980678 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15115225 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052260913 = queryNorm
        0.19173169 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    This research revisits the classic Turing test and compares recent large language models such as ChatGPT for their abilities to reproduce human-level comprehension and compelling text generation. Two task challenges- summary and question answering- prompt ChatGPT to produce original content (98-99%) from a single text entry and sequential questions initially posed by Turing in 1950. We score the original and generated content against the OpenAI GPT-2 Output Detector from 2019, and establish multiple cases where the generated content proves original and undetectable (98%). The question of a machine fooling a human judge recedes in this work relative to the question of "how would one prove it?" The original contribution of the work presents a metric and simple grammatical set for understanding the writing mechanics of chatbots in evaluating their readability and statistical clarity, engagement, delivery, overall quality, and plagiarism risks. While Turing's original prose scores at least 14% below the machine-generated output, whether an algorithm displays hints of Turing's true initial thoughts (the "Lovelace 2.0" test) remains unanswerable.
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2212.06721&usg=AOvVaw3i_9pZm9y_dQWoHi6uv0EN
  5. Malsburg, C. von der: ¬The correlation theory of brain function (1981) 0.10 
    0.09666581 = product of:
  0.24166451 = sum of:
    0.20751046 = weight(_text_:3a in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.20751046 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.4430686 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052260913 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
    0.034154054 = weight(_text_:it in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.034154054 = score(doc=76,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.15115225 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052260913 = queryNorm
        0.22595796 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    A summary of brain theory is given so far as it is contained within the framework of Localization Theory. Difficulties of this "conventional theory" are traced back to a specific deficiency: there is no way to express relations between active cells (as for instance their representing parts of the same object). A new theory is proposed to cure this deficiency. It introduces a new kind of dynamical control, termed synaptic modulation, according to which synapses switch between a conducting and a non- conducting state. The dynamics of this variable is controlled on a fast time scale by correlations in the temporal fine structure of cellular signals. Furthermore, conventional synaptic plasticity is replaced by a refined version. Synaptic modulation and plasticity form the basis for short-term and long-term memory, respectively. Signal correlations, shaped by the variable network, express structure and relationships within objects. In particular, the figure-ground problem may be solved in this way. Synaptic modulation introduces exibility into cerebral networks which is necessary to solve the invariance problem. Since momentarily useless connections are deactivated, interference between di erent memory traces can be reduced, and memory capacity increased, in comparison with conventional associative memory
    Source
    http%3A%2F%2Fcogprints.org%2F1380%2F1%2FvdM_correlation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0g7DvZbQPb2U7dYb49b9v_
  6. Ackermann, E.: Piaget's constructivism, Papert's constructionism : what's the difference? (2001) 0.09 
    0.09266441 = product of:
  0.23166102 = sum of:
    0.20751046 = weight(_text_:3a in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.20751046 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.4430686 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052260913 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
    0.024150565 = weight(_text_:it in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024150565 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15115225 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052260913 = queryNorm
        0.15977642 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    What is the difference between Piaget's constructivism and Papert's "constructionism"? Beyond the mere play on the words, I think the distinction holds, and that integrating both views can enrich our understanding of how people learn and grow. Piaget's constructivism offers a window into what children are interested in, and able to achieve, at different stages of their development. The theory describes how children's ways of doing and thinking evolve over time, and under which circumstance children are more likely to let go of-or hold onto- their currently held views. Piaget suggests that children have very good reasons not to abandon their worldviews just because someone else, be it an expert, tells them they're wrong. Papert's constructionism, in contrast, focuses more on the art of learning, or 'learning to learn', and on the significance of making things in learning. Papert is interested in how learners engage in a conversation with [their own or other people's] artifacts, and how these conversations boost self-directed learning, and ultimately facilitate the construction of new knowledge. He stresses the importance of tools, media, and context in human development. Integrating both perspectives illuminates the processes by which individuals come to make sense of their experience, gradually optimizing their interactions with the world.
    Content
    Vgl.: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Piaget-%E2%80%99-s-Constructivism-%2C-Papert-%E2%80%99-s-%3A-What-%E2%80%99-s-Ackermann/89cbcc1e740a4591443ff4765a6ae8df0fdf5554. Darunter weitere Hinweise auf verwandte Beiträge. Auch unter: Learning Group Publication 5(2001) no.3, S.438.
  7. Schrodt, R.: Tiefen und Untiefen im wissenschaftlichen Sprachgebrauch (2008) 0.07 
    0.06640335 = product of:
  0.33201674 = sum of:
    0.33201674 = weight(_text_:3a in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.33201674 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.4430686 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052260913 = queryNorm
        0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Content
    Vgl. auch: https://studylibde.com/doc/13053640/richard-schrodt. Vgl. auch: http%3A%2F%2Fwww.univie.ac.at%2FGermanistik%2Fschrodt%2Fvorlesung%2Fwissenschaftssprache.doc&usg=AOvVaw1lDLDR6NFf1W0-oC9mEUJf.
  8. Popper, K.R.: Three worlds : the Tanner lecture on human values. Deliverd at the University of Michigan, April 7, 1978 (1978) 0.07 
    0.06640335 = product of:
  0.33201674 = sum of:
    0.33201674 = weight(_text_:3a in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.33201674 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.4430686 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052260913 = queryNorm
        0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Ftannerlectures.utah.edu%2F_documents%2Fa-to-z%2Fp%2Fpopper80.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3f4QRTEH-OEBmoYr2J_c7H
  9. Vetere, G.; Lenzerini, M.: Models for semantic interoperability in service-oriented architectures (2005) 0.06 
    0.05810293 = product of:
  0.29051465 = sum of:
    0.29051465 = weight(_text_:3a in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.29051465 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.4430686 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052260913 = queryNorm
        0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Content
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5386707&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D5386707.
  10. Berndt, M.: ¬Der Göttinger Schlagwortkatalog und die Zukunft der verbalen Sacherschließung in der SUB (1991) 0.06 
    0.05717158 = product of:
  0.14292894 = sum of:
    0.057961356 = weight(_text_:it in 780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.057961356 = score(doc=780,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15115225 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052260913 = queryNorm
        0.38346338 = fieldWeight in 780, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=780)
    0.08496759 = weight(_text_:22 in 780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08496759 = score(doc=780,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18300882 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052260913 = queryNorm
        0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 780, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=780)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    It was decided to close the Göttingen card catalogue for jubjects and continue withe the PICA Basisklassifikation and SWD
    Source
    SUB-Kultur. 1(1991) Nr.1, S.20-22
  11. Dhyani, P.: Universe of subjects and DDC engineering (1987) 0.06 
    0.05717158 = product of:
  0.14292894 = sum of:
    0.057961356 = weight(_text_:it in 825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.057961356 = score(doc=825,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15115225 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052260913 = queryNorm
        0.38346338 = fieldWeight in 825, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=825)
    0.08496759 = weight(_text_:22 in 825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08496759 = score(doc=825,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18300882 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052260913 = queryNorm
        0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 825, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=825)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    The article examines the viability of various methods used by DDC for accommodating the universe of subjects. It also provides some suggestions for efficacious use of these methods
    Source
    International classification. 14(1987), S.19-22
  12. Wusteman, J.: Patently ridiculous (2004) 0.06 
    0.05717158 = product of:
  0.14292894 = sum of:
    0.057961356 = weight(_text_:it in 2847) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.057961356 = score(doc=2847,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15115225 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052260913 = queryNorm
        0.38346338 = fieldWeight in 2847, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2847)
    0.08496759 = weight(_text_:22 in 2847) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08496759 = score(doc=2847,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18300882 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052260913 = queryNorm
        0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2847, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2847)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    The Open Source Software movement has much to offer the library community. But can it survive the onslaught of patent applications?
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.231-237
  13. Creth, S.D.: ¬The information arcade : playground for the mind (1994) 0.06 
    0.055645775 = product of:
  0.13911444 = sum of:
    0.06830811 = weight(_text_:it in 911) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06830811 = score(doc=911,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.15115225 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052260913 = queryNorm
        0.45191592 = fieldWeight in 911, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=911)
    0.070806324 = weight(_text_:22 in 911) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.070806324 = score(doc=911,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18300882 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052260913 = queryNorm
        0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 911, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=911)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    The information arcade at the main library, University of Iowa encourage and facilitates the integration of electronic information resources into the academic curriculum and into research activities. It is the result of a collaboration between librarians, faculty and computing staff. Describes how the service was set up and the services it provides
    Source
    Journal of academic librarianship. 20(1994) no.1, S.22-23
  14. Simmonds, A.: ¬The 21st century ISBN (1997) 0.06 
    0.055645775 = product of:
  0.13911444 = sum of:
    0.06830811 = weight(_text_:it in 1705) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06830811 = score(doc=1705,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.15115225 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052260913 = queryNorm
        0.45191592 = fieldWeight in 1705, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1705)
    0.070806324 = weight(_text_:22 in 1705) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.070806324 = score(doc=1705,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18300882 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052260913 = queryNorm
        0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1705, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1705)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    The Digital Object Identifier (DOI) system, launched in Oct 97, is a system for executing various processes on the Internet. Explains how it works and what it can do and discusses governance of the system warning of the need for wider investigation
    Source
    Bookseller. 1997, no.4798, S.20-22
  15. Faloutsos, C.: Signature files (1992) 0.05 
    0.053570747 = product of:
  0.13392687 = sum of:
    0.07728181 = weight(_text_:it in 3499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07728181 = score(doc=3499,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.15115225 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052260913 = queryNorm
        0.51128453 = fieldWeight in 3499, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3499)
    0.05664506 = weight(_text_:22 in 3499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05664506 = score(doc=3499,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18300882 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052260913 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3499, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3499)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Presents a survey and discussion on signature-based text retrieval methods. It describes the main idea behind the signature approach and its advantages over other text retrieval methods, it provides a classification of the signature methods that have appeared in the literature, it describes the main representatives of each class, together with the relative advantages and drawbacks, and it gives a list of applications as well as commercial or university prototypes that use the signature approach
    Date
    7. 5.1999 15:22:48
  16. Li, L.; Shang, Y.; Zhang, W.: Improvement of HITS-based algorithms on Web documents 0.05 
    0.04980251 = product of:
  0.24901254 = sum of:
    0.24901254 = weight(_text_:3a in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.24901254 = score(doc=2514,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.4430686 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052260913 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdelab.csd.auth.gr%2F~dimitris%2Fcourses%2Fir_spring06%2Fpage_rank_computing%2Fp527-li.pdf. Vgl. auch: http://www2002.org/CDROM/refereed/643/.
  17. Suchenwirth, L.: Sacherschliessung in Zeiten von Corona : neue Herausforderungen und Chancen (2019) 0.05 
    0.04980251 = product of:
  0.24901254 = sum of:
    0.24901254 = weight(_text_:3a in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.24901254 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.4430686 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052260913 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Footnote
    https%3A%2F%2Fjournals.univie.ac.at%2Findex.php%2Fvoebm%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F5332%2F5271%2F&usg=AOvVaw2yQdFGHlmOwVls7ANCpTii.
  18. Harmon, J.C.: ¬The death of quality cataloging : does it make a difference for library users? (1996) 0.05 
    0.049429227 = product of:
  0.123573065 = sum of:
    0.06692801 = weight(_text_:it in 6435) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06692801 = score(doc=6435,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.15115225 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052260913 = queryNorm
        0.44278538 = fieldWeight in 6435, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6435)
    0.05664506 = weight(_text_:22 in 6435) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05664506 = score(doc=6435,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18300882 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052260913 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6435, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6435)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Defends the role of quality cataloguing. It is only with adequate records that users will be able to find the information they require. It is a prerequisite for efficient machine retrieval and integrated services. Quality MARC records and the intellectual structure of cataloguing are essential is standards of service are to be maintained
    Source
    Journal of academic librarianship. 22(1996) no.4, S.306-307
  19. Dempsey, L.; Russell, R.; Kirriemur, J.W.: Towards distributed library systems : Z39.50 in a European context (1996) 0.05 
    0.049429227 = product of:
  0.123573065 = sum of:
    0.06692801 = weight(_text_:it in 127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06692801 = score(doc=127,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.15115225 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052260913 = queryNorm
        0.44278538 = fieldWeight in 127, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=127)
    0.05664506 = weight(_text_:22 in 127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05664506 = score(doc=127,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18300882 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052260913 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 127, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=127)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Z39.50 is an information retrieval protocol. It has generated much interest but is so far little deployed in UK systems and services. Gives a functional overview of the protocol itself and the standards background, describes some European initiatives which make use of it, and outlines various issues to do with its future use and acceptance. Z39.50 is a crucial building block of future distributed information systems but it needs to be considered alongside other protocols and services to provide useful applications
    Source
    Program. 30(1996) no.1, S.1-22
  20. Doyle, B.: ¬The classification and evaluation of Content Management Systems (2003) 0.05 
    0.049429227 = product of:
  0.123573065 = sum of:
    0.06692801 = weight(_text_:it in 2871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06692801 = score(doc=2871,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.15115225 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052260913 = queryNorm
        0.44278538 = fieldWeight in 2871, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2871)
    0.05664506 = weight(_text_:22 in 2871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05664506 = score(doc=2871,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18300882 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052260913 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2871, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2871)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    This is a report on how Doyle and others made a faceted classification scheme for content management systems and made it browsable on the web (see CMS Review in Example Web Sites, below). They discuss why they did it, how, their use of OPML and XFML, how they did research to find terms and categories, and they also include their taxonomy. It is interesting to see facets used in a business environment.
    Date
    30. 7.2004 12:22:52

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

  • el 278
  • b 39
  • p 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications