Search (3267 results, page 1 of 164)

  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Berndt, M.: ¬Der Göttinger Schlagwortkatalog und die Zukunft der verbalen Sacherschließung in der SUB (1991) 0.06
    0.05717158 = product of:
      0.14292894 = sum of:
        0.057961356 = weight(_text_:it in 780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.057961356 = score(doc=780,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15115225 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052260913 = queryNorm
            0.38346338 = fieldWeight in 780, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=780)
        0.08496759 = weight(_text_:22 in 780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08496759 = score(doc=780,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18300882 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052260913 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 780, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=780)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    It was decided to close the Göttingen card catalogue for jubjects and continue withe the PICA Basisklassifikation and SWD
    Source
    SUB-Kultur. 1(1991) Nr.1, S.20-22
  2. Thomsen, E.: Reference and collection development on the Internet : a how-to-do-it manual for librarians (1996) 0.06
    0.05717158 = product of:
      0.14292894 = sum of:
        0.057961356 = weight(_text_:it in 1575) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.057961356 = score(doc=1575,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15115225 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052260913 = queryNorm
            0.38346338 = fieldWeight in 1575, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1575)
        0.08496759 = weight(_text_:22 in 1575) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08496759 = score(doc=1575,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18300882 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052260913 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1575, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1575)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Journal of academic librarianship. 22(1996) no.6, S.472 (B.J. Scales)
  3. Creth, S.D.: ¬The information arcade : playground for the mind (1994) 0.06
    0.055645775 = product of:
      0.13911444 = sum of:
        0.06830811 = weight(_text_:it in 911) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06830811 = score(doc=911,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15115225 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052260913 = queryNorm
            0.45191592 = fieldWeight in 911, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=911)
        0.070806324 = weight(_text_:22 in 911) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.070806324 = score(doc=911,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18300882 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052260913 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 911, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=911)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    The information arcade at the main library, University of Iowa encourage and facilitates the integration of electronic information resources into the academic curriculum and into research activities. It is the result of a collaboration between librarians, faculty and computing staff. Describes how the service was set up and the services it provides
    Source
    Journal of academic librarianship. 20(1994) no.1, S.22-23
  4. Simmonds, A.: ¬The 21st century ISBN (1997) 0.06
    0.055645775 = product of:
      0.13911444 = sum of:
        0.06830811 = weight(_text_:it in 1705) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06830811 = score(doc=1705,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15115225 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052260913 = queryNorm
            0.45191592 = fieldWeight in 1705, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1705)
        0.070806324 = weight(_text_:22 in 1705) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.070806324 = score(doc=1705,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18300882 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052260913 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1705, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1705)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    The Digital Object Identifier (DOI) system, launched in Oct 97, is a system for executing various processes on the Internet. Explains how it works and what it can do and discusses governance of the system warning of the need for wider investigation
    Source
    Bookseller. 1997, no.4798, S.20-22
  5. Faloutsos, C.: Signature files (1992) 0.05
    0.053570747 = product of:
      0.13392687 = sum of:
        0.07728181 = weight(_text_:it in 3499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07728181 = score(doc=3499,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.15115225 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052260913 = queryNorm
            0.51128453 = fieldWeight in 3499, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3499)
        0.05664506 = weight(_text_:22 in 3499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05664506 = score(doc=3499,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18300882 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052260913 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3499, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3499)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Presents a survey and discussion on signature-based text retrieval methods. It describes the main idea behind the signature approach and its advantages over other text retrieval methods, it provides a classification of the signature methods that have appeared in the literature, it describes the main representatives of each class, together with the relative advantages and drawbacks, and it gives a list of applications as well as commercial or university prototypes that use the signature approach
    Date
    7. 5.1999 15:22:48
  6. Harmon, J.C.: ¬The death of quality cataloging : does it make a difference for library users? (1996) 0.05
    0.049429227 = product of:
      0.123573065 = sum of:
        0.06692801 = weight(_text_:it in 6435) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06692801 = score(doc=6435,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.15115225 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052260913 = queryNorm
            0.44278538 = fieldWeight in 6435, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6435)
        0.05664506 = weight(_text_:22 in 6435) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05664506 = score(doc=6435,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18300882 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052260913 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6435, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6435)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Defends the role of quality cataloguing. It is only with adequate records that users will be able to find the information they require. It is a prerequisite for efficient machine retrieval and integrated services. Quality MARC records and the intellectual structure of cataloguing are essential is standards of service are to be maintained
    Source
    Journal of academic librarianship. 22(1996) no.4, S.306-307
  7. Dempsey, L.; Russell, R.; Kirriemur, J.W.: Towards distributed library systems : Z39.50 in a European context (1996) 0.05
    0.049429227 = product of:
      0.123573065 = sum of:
        0.06692801 = weight(_text_:it in 127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06692801 = score(doc=127,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.15115225 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052260913 = queryNorm
            0.44278538 = fieldWeight in 127, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=127)
        0.05664506 = weight(_text_:22 in 127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05664506 = score(doc=127,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18300882 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052260913 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 127, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=127)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Z39.50 is an information retrieval protocol. It has generated much interest but is so far little deployed in UK systems and services. Gives a functional overview of the protocol itself and the standards background, describes some European initiatives which make use of it, and outlines various issues to do with its future use and acceptance. Z39.50 is a crucial building block of future distributed information systems but it needs to be considered alongside other protocols and services to provide useful applications
    Source
    Program. 30(1996) no.1, S.1-22
  8. Robertson, G.: What is information? (1996) 0.05
    0.047642983 = product of:
      0.119107455 = sum of:
        0.04830113 = weight(_text_:it in 5735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04830113 = score(doc=5735,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15115225 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052260913 = queryNorm
            0.31955284 = fieldWeight in 5735, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5735)
        0.070806324 = weight(_text_:22 in 5735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.070806324 = score(doc=5735,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18300882 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052260913 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5735, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5735)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses information in the context of information resources management arguing that it is an essential resource for every organization but one that needs to be managed better. Examines information as a resource, as an asset, as a commodity, as a rubbish
    Source
    Managing information. 3(1996) no.6, S.22-23
  9. Lambert, N.: ORBIT'S PowerSearch : what's great, what's missing (1994) 0.05
    0.047642983 = product of:
      0.119107455 = sum of:
        0.04830113 = weight(_text_:it in 2700) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04830113 = score(doc=2700,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15115225 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052260913 = queryNorm
            0.31955284 = fieldWeight in 2700, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2700)
        0.070806324 = weight(_text_:22 in 2700) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.070806324 = score(doc=2700,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18300882 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052260913 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2700, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2700)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Reviews the PowerSearch multifile searching software introduced by ORBIT Search Service as it is used for searching patent databases. Looks at its useful features: deduping, patent family grouping, merge, and virtual file merging. Looks at some possible improvements to both PowerSearch itself and to the ORBIT system to accomodate PowerSearch
    Source
    Searcher. 2(1994) no.5, S.18-22
  10. Velthoven, A.: 'Heeft u nog een mooi boek voor mij?' : het adviseren van romanlezers (1994) 0.05
    0.047499646 = product of:
      0.11874911 = sum of:
        0.038640905 = weight(_text_:it in 8191) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038640905 = score(doc=8191,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15115225 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052260913 = queryNorm
            0.25564227 = fieldWeight in 8191, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8191)
        0.08010821 = weight(_text_:22 in 8191) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08010821 = score(doc=8191,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18300882 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052260913 = queryNorm
            0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 8191, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8191)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    On 19 Aug 94 a group of readers' advisers met to discuss their problems in Utrecht Provincial Central Library in the Netherlands. The panel felt that too much emphasis had been placed on libraries' information role and that more effort should be devoted to recreational reading through organising lectures and reading groups. It was felt that training sessions should be organised and a network created for the exchange of ideas
    Source
    Bibliotheek en samenleving. 22(1994) no.11, S.22-23
  11. Eichert, C.: ¬Die kommunale Bibliothek : der Knoten im Netz (1998) 0.05
    0.047499646 = product of:
      0.11874911 = sum of:
        0.038640905 = weight(_text_:it in 6609) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038640905 = score(doc=6609,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15115225 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052260913 = queryNorm
            0.25564227 = fieldWeight in 6609, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6609)
        0.08010821 = weight(_text_:22 in 6609) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08010821 = score(doc=6609,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18300882 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052260913 = queryNorm
            0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 6609, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6609)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Argues that current discussion on management of and training in networking is technocratic in nature and that it is the duty of public policy to foster personality development and present individuals with new intellectual challenges. Suggests that libraries are nodes in a communal network fulfilling the task of pathfinder, providing information, transferring knowledge, fostering cultural heritage and providing areas for communications and social integration
    Date
    22. 2.1999 13:35:25
    Source
    Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis. 22(1998) H.1, S.97-101
  12. Currie, W.L.: Organizational structure and the use of information technology : preliminary findings of a survey in the private and public sector (1996) 0.05
    0.046874404 = product of:
      0.11718601 = sum of:
        0.06762158 = weight(_text_:it in 4547) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06762158 = score(doc=4547,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.15115225 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052260913 = queryNorm
            0.44737396 = fieldWeight in 4547, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4547)
        0.04956443 = weight(_text_:22 in 4547) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04956443 = score(doc=4547,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18300882 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052260913 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4547, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4547)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Examines several contextual factors relating to IT and organizational structure in private and public organizations. They include organization size; finance and accounting for IT; and management roles and responsibilities. A Questionnaire survey was sent to a random sample of public and private sector organizations ranging from local authorities, NHS trusts, banks, building societies and manufacturing firms. preliminary findings suggests that organizational restructuring is often implemented through ad hoc managerial strategies triggered by financial imparatives. Whilst IT plays a part in the restructuring process, complex environmental and internal influences on organization structure and IT make over generalizations highly problematic. This is irrespective of the sector in which the organization operates
    Date
    22. 7.1996 19:46:16
  13. Lund, H.: Electronic documents and authorship : who did it? (1994) 0.04
    0.04451662 = product of:
      0.11129155 = sum of:
        0.05464649 = weight(_text_:it in 8474) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05464649 = score(doc=8474,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15115225 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052260913 = queryNorm
            0.36153275 = fieldWeight in 8474, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8474)
        0.05664506 = weight(_text_:22 in 8474) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05664506 = score(doc=8474,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18300882 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052260913 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 8474, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8474)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Today's increasing use of electronic documents raises the question: will it be necessary to change the core concepts of author and work within the tradition of Anglo-American Cataloging Rules when dealing with electronic documents? Describes the current definition of author and work as given in the traditional AACR and presents 2 systems working with electronic documents, electronic office systems and groupware
    Source
    New library world. 95(1994) no.1115, S.22-25
  14. Diodato, V.: Duplicate entries versus see cross references in back-of-the book indexes (1994) 0.04
    0.04451662 = product of:
      0.11129155 = sum of:
        0.05464649 = weight(_text_:it in 1427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05464649 = score(doc=1427,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15115225 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052260913 = queryNorm
            0.36153275 = fieldWeight in 1427, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1427)
        0.05664506 = weight(_text_:22 in 1427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05664506 = score(doc=1427,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18300882 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052260913 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1427, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1427)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Considers whether, when there is a choice, a back-of-book indexer should use a duplicate entry or a see reference. Guidelines suggest that it is preferable to use the duplicate entry if it would not add to the length or complexity of the index. Studies 1.100 see references in 202 back-of-book indexes and concludes that 22% of the see references should have been replaced by duplicate entries. Failure to select a duplicate entry instead of a see reference occurs most frequently in science and techology books and in indexes with no subheadings
  15. Brugger, J.M.: Cataloging for digital libraries (1996) 0.04
    0.04451662 = product of:
      0.11129155 = sum of:
        0.05464649 = weight(_text_:it in 3689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05464649 = score(doc=3689,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15115225 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052260913 = queryNorm
            0.36153275 = fieldWeight in 3689, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3689)
        0.05664506 = weight(_text_:22 in 3689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05664506 = score(doc=3689,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18300882 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052260913 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3689, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3689)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Using grant funding, some prominent creators of digital libraries have promised users of networked resources certain kinds of access. Some of this access finds a ready-made vehicle in USMARC, some of it in the TEI header, some of it has yet to find the most appropriate vehicle. In its quest to provide access to what users need, the cataloging community can show leadership by exploring the strength inherent in a metadata-providing system like the TEI header.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.59-73
  16. Collins, B.R.: Beyond cruising : reviewing (1996) 0.04
    0.04451662 = product of:
      0.11129155 = sum of:
        0.05464649 = weight(_text_:it in 4739) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05464649 = score(doc=4739,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15115225 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052260913 = queryNorm
            0.36153275 = fieldWeight in 4739, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4739)
        0.05664506 = weight(_text_:22 in 4739) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05664506 = score(doc=4739,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18300882 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052260913 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4739, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4739)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Proposes that librarians use their traditional skills developed for reviewing the quality and value of print materials in the new environment of the WWW to evaluate web sites. Notes the work of the Infofilter project (http://www.kcpl.lib.mo.us/infofilter.htm) which has been attempting to do this. Argues that the current 'web reviewing' sources are of little value, and do not adhere to standards of quality. Discusses characteristics of the Web which make it quite different from print materials, especially the interactivity and collaboration which it promotes, and gives examples of these
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:43:55
  17. Taylor-Teran, L.: Filemaker Pro 3.0 for Windows 95 (1997) 0.04
    0.04451662 = product of:
      0.11129155 = sum of:
        0.05464649 = weight(_text_:it in 678) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05464649 = score(doc=678,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15115225 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052260913 = queryNorm
            0.36153275 = fieldWeight in 678, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=678)
        0.05664506 = weight(_text_:22 in 678) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05664506 = score(doc=678,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18300882 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052260913 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 678, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=678)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Reviews Filemaker Pro 3.0, the newest version of the Claris database, which brings relational properties to a previously flat file system. Describes the features of the new database, examining its strengths and weaknesses. Filemaker is known for its ease of use, its flexibility, and its cross platform performance, but its weak searching capabilities make it less than ideal for typical library information needs. However, it is an excellent program for projects within the library requiring a database, but without the need for complex searching
    Date
    6. 3.1997 16:22:15
  18. Matson, L.D.; Bonski, D.J.: Do digital libraries need librarians? (1997) 0.04
    0.04451662 = product of:
      0.11129155 = sum of:
        0.05464649 = weight(_text_:it in 1737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05464649 = score(doc=1737,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15115225 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052260913 = queryNorm
            0.36153275 = fieldWeight in 1737, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1737)
        0.05664506 = weight(_text_:22 in 1737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05664506 = score(doc=1737,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18300882 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052260913 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1737, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1737)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Defines digital libraries and discusses the effects of new technology on librarians. Examines the different viewpoints of librarians and information technologists on digital libraries. Describes the development of a digital library at the National Drug Intelligence Center, USA, which was carried out in collaboration with information technology experts. The system is based on Web enabled search technology to find information, data visualization and data mining to visualize it and use of SGML as an information standard to store it
    Date
    22.11.1998 18:57:22
  19. Ashton, J.: ONE: the final OPAC frontier (1998) 0.04
    0.04451662 = product of:
      0.11129155 = sum of:
        0.05464649 = weight(_text_:it in 2588) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05464649 = score(doc=2588,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15115225 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052260913 = queryNorm
            0.36153275 = fieldWeight in 2588, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2588)
        0.05664506 = weight(_text_:22 in 2588) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05664506 = score(doc=2588,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18300882 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052260913 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2588, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2588)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the European Commission's OPAC Network in Europe (ONE) project which attempts to make it simpler to search a number of major European OPACs crossing all frontiers via online interface. Explains how this is done and the British Library's involvement in it, assessment of the project and plans for the future
    Source
    Select newsletter. 1998, no.22, Spring, S.5-6
  20. Chan, H.C.; Goldstein, R.C.: User-database interaction at the knowledge level of abstraction (1997) 0.04
    0.04451662 = product of:
      0.11129155 = sum of:
        0.05464649 = weight(_text_:it in 2743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05464649 = score(doc=2743,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15115225 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052260913 = queryNorm
            0.36153275 = fieldWeight in 2743, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2743)
        0.05664506 = weight(_text_:22 in 2743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05664506 = score(doc=2743,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18300882 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052260913 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2743, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2743)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Proposes and develops a new level of user-database interaction, the knowledge-level interface, where the user and the database system exchange only knowledge from the user. Under the new KL approach, the database system is no longer seen as a store of data. It is an agent to hold domain knowledge and provide it upon request
    Date
    22. 1.1999 19:06:09

Authors

Languages

Types

  • a 2909
  • m 215
  • s 93
  • el 56
  • i 16
  • r 14
  • b 13
  • x 7
  • ? 6
  • d 3
  • p 3
  • n 2
  • au 1
  • h 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications