Search (61 results, page 1 of 4)

  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Möller, T.: Woher stammt das Wissen über die Halbwertzeiten des Wissens? (2017) 0.03
    0.026217185 = product of:
      0.05243437 = sum of:
        0.05243437 = product of:
          0.10486874 = sum of:
            0.10486874 = weight(_text_:wissen in 3520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10486874 = score(doc=3520,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.2223099 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.3128977 = idf(docFreq=1609, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05154537 = queryNorm
                0.4717232 = fieldWeight in 3520, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.3128977 = idf(docFreq=1609, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3520)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Theorie, Semantik und Organisation von Wissen: Proceedings der 13. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und dem 13. Internationalen Symposium der Informationswissenschaft der Higher Education Association for Information Science (HI) Potsdam (19.-20.03.2013): 'Theory, Information and Organization of Knowledge' / Proceedings der 14. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und Natural Language & Information Systems (NLDB) Passau (16.06.2015): 'Lexical Resources for Knowledge Organization' / Proceedings des Workshops der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) auf der SEMANTICS Leipzig (1.09.2014): 'Knowledge Organization and Semantic Web' / Proceedings des Workshops der Polnischen und Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) Cottbus (29.-30.09.2011): 'Economics of Knowledge Production and Organization'. Hrsg. von W. Babik, H.P. Ohly u. K. Weber
  2. Marx, W.; Bornmann, L.: On the problems of dealing with bibliometric data (2014) 0.02
    0.020951057 = product of:
      0.041902114 = sum of:
        0.041902114 = product of:
          0.08380423 = sum of:
            0.08380423 = weight(_text_:22 in 1239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08380423 = score(doc=1239,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1805031 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05154537 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1239, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1239)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    18. 3.2014 19:13:22
  3. Riechert, M.; Schmitz, J.: Qualitätssicherung von Forschungsinformationen durch visuelle Repräsentation : das Fallbeispiel des "Informationssystems Promotionsnoten" (2017) 0.02
    0.018538348 = product of:
      0.037076697 = sum of:
        0.037076697 = product of:
          0.07415339 = sum of:
            0.07415339 = weight(_text_:wissen in 3724) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07415339 = score(doc=3724,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2223099 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.3128977 = idf(docFreq=1609, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05154537 = queryNorm
                0.33355865 = fieldWeight in 3724, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.3128977 = idf(docFreq=1609, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3724)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Theorie, Semantik und Organisation von Wissen: Proceedings der 13. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und dem 13. Internationalen Symposium der Informationswissenschaft der Higher Education Association for Information Science (HI) Potsdam (19.-20.03.2013): 'Theory, Information and Organization of Knowledge' / Proceedings der 14. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und Natural Language & Information Systems (NLDB) Passau (16.06.2015): 'Lexical Resources for Knowledge Organization' / Proceedings des Workshops der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) auf der SEMANTICS Leipzig (1.09.2014): 'Knowledge Organization and Semantic Web' / Proceedings des Workshops der Polnischen und Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) Cottbus (29.-30.09.2011): 'Economics of Knowledge Production and Organization'. Hrsg. von W. Babik, H.P. Ohly u. K. Weber
  4. Dees, W.: "Publication power approach" (2013) 0.02
    0.018538348 = product of:
      0.037076697 = sum of:
        0.037076697 = product of:
          0.07415339 = sum of:
            0.07415339 = weight(_text_:wissen in 924) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07415339 = score(doc=924,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2223099 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.3128977 = idf(docFreq=1609, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05154537 = queryNorm
                0.33355865 = fieldWeight in 924, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.3128977 = idf(docFreq=1609, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=924)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Wissen - Wissenschaft - Organisation: Proceedings der 12. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation Bonn, 19. bis 21. Oktober 2009. Hrsg.: H.P. Ohly
  5. Tunger, D.: Bibliometrie : quo vadis? (2017) 0.02
    0.018538348 = product of:
      0.037076697 = sum of:
        0.037076697 = product of:
          0.07415339 = sum of:
            0.07415339 = weight(_text_:wissen in 3519) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07415339 = score(doc=3519,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2223099 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.3128977 = idf(docFreq=1609, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05154537 = queryNorm
                0.33355865 = fieldWeight in 3519, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.3128977 = idf(docFreq=1609, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3519)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Theorie, Semantik und Organisation von Wissen: Proceedings der 13. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und dem 13. Internationalen Symposium der Informationswissenschaft der Higher Education Association for Information Science (HI) Potsdam (19.-20.03.2013): 'Theory, Information and Organization of Knowledge' / Proceedings der 14. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und Natural Language & Information Systems (NLDB) Passau (16.06.2015): 'Lexical Resources for Knowledge Organization' / Proceedings des Workshops der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) auf der SEMANTICS Leipzig (1.09.2014): 'Knowledge Organization and Semantic Web' / Proceedings des Workshops der Polnischen und Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) Cottbus (29.-30.09.2011): 'Economics of Knowledge Production and Organization'. Hrsg. von W. Babik, H.P. Ohly u. K. Weber
  6. Herb, U.: Relevanz von Impact-Maßen für Open Access (2013) 0.02
    0.015890013 = product of:
      0.031780027 = sum of:
        0.031780027 = product of:
          0.06356005 = sum of:
            0.06356005 = weight(_text_:wissen in 926) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06356005 = score(doc=926,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2223099 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.3128977 = idf(docFreq=1609, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05154537 = queryNorm
                0.28590742 = fieldWeight in 926, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.3128977 = idf(docFreq=1609, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=926)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Wissen - Wissenschaft - Organisation: Proceedings der 12. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation Bonn, 19. bis 21. Oktober 2009. Hrsg.: H.P. Ohly
  7. Bornmann, L.: Lässt sich die Qualität von Forschung messen? (2013) 0.02
    0.015890013 = product of:
      0.031780027 = sum of:
        0.031780027 = product of:
          0.06356005 = sum of:
            0.06356005 = weight(_text_:wissen in 928) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06356005 = score(doc=928,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2223099 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.3128977 = idf(docFreq=1609, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05154537 = queryNorm
                0.28590742 = fieldWeight in 928, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.3128977 = idf(docFreq=1609, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=928)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Wissen - Wissenschaft - Organisation: Proceedings der 12. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation Bonn, 19. bis 21. Oktober 2009. Hrsg.: H.P. Ohly
  8. Scholarly metrics under the microscope : from citation analysis to academic auditing (2015) 0.01
    0.013967372 = product of:
      0.027934743 = sum of:
        0.027934743 = product of:
          0.055869486 = sum of:
            0.055869486 = weight(_text_:22 in 4654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055869486 = score(doc=4654,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1805031 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05154537 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4654, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4654)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2017 17:12:50
  9. Bornmann, L.; Mutz, R.: From P100 to P100' : a new citation-rank approach (2014) 0.01
    0.013967372 = product of:
      0.027934743 = sum of:
        0.027934743 = product of:
          0.055869486 = sum of:
            0.055869486 = weight(_text_:22 in 1431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055869486 = score(doc=1431,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1805031 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05154537 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1431, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1431)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 8.2014 17:05:18
  10. Ohly, P.: Dimensions of globality : a bibliometric analysis (2016) 0.01
    0.013967372 = product of:
      0.027934743 = sum of:
        0.027934743 = product of:
          0.055869486 = sum of:
            0.055869486 = weight(_text_:22 in 4942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055869486 = score(doc=4942,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1805031 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05154537 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4942, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4942)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2019 11:22:31
  11. Crespo, J.A.; Herranz, N.; Li, Y.; Ruiz-Castillo, J.: ¬The effect on citation inequality of differences in citation practices at the web of science subject category level (2014) 0.01
    0.012345529 = product of:
      0.024691058 = sum of:
        0.024691058 = product of:
          0.049382117 = sum of:
            0.049382117 = weight(_text_:22 in 1291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049382117 = score(doc=1291,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1805031 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05154537 = queryNorm
                0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 1291, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1291)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This article studies the impact of differences in citation practices at the subfield, or Web of Science subject category level, using the model introduced in Crespo, Li, and Ruiz-Castillo (2013a), according to which the number of citations received by an article depends on its underlying scientific influence and the field to which it belongs. We use the same Thomson Reuters data set of about 4.4 million articles used in Crespo et al. (2013a) to analyze 22 broad fields. The main results are the following: First, when the classification system goes from 22 fields to 219 subfields the effect on citation inequality of differences in citation practices increases from ?14% at the field level to 18% at the subfield level. Second, we estimate a set of exchange rates (ERs) over a wide [660, 978] citation quantile interval to express the citation counts of articles into the equivalent counts in the all-sciences case. In the fractional case, for example, we find that in 187 of 219 subfields the ERs are reliable in the sense that the coefficient of variation is smaller than or equal to 0.10. Third, in the fractional case the normalization of the raw data using the ERs (or subfield mean citations) as normalization factors reduces the importance of the differences in citation practices from 18% to 3.8% (3.4%) of overall citation inequality. Fourth, the results in the fractional case are essentially replicated when we adopt a multiplicative approach.
  12. Yan, E.: Finding knowledge paths among scientific disciplines (2014) 0.01
    0.012345529 = product of:
      0.024691058 = sum of:
        0.024691058 = product of:
          0.049382117 = sum of:
            0.049382117 = weight(_text_:22 in 1534) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049382117 = score(doc=1534,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1805031 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05154537 = queryNorm
                0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 1534, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1534)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    26.10.2014 20:22:22
  13. Zhu, Q.; Kong, X.; Hong, S.; Li, J.; He, Z.: Global ontology research progress : a bibliometric analysis (2015) 0.01
    0.012345529 = product of:
      0.024691058 = sum of:
        0.024691058 = product of:
          0.049382117 = sum of:
            0.049382117 = weight(_text_:22 in 2590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049382117 = score(doc=2590,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1805031 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05154537 = queryNorm
                0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2590, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2590)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    17. 9.2018 18:22:23
  14. Campanario, J.M.: Large increases and decreases in journal impact factors in only one year : the effect of journal self-citations (2011) 0.01
    0.01222145 = product of:
      0.0244429 = sum of:
        0.0244429 = product of:
          0.0488858 = sum of:
            0.0488858 = weight(_text_:22 in 4187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0488858 = score(doc=4187,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1805031 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05154537 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4187, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4187)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2011 12:53:00
  15. Ding, Y.: Applying weighted PageRank to author citation networks (2011) 0.01
    0.01222145 = product of:
      0.0244429 = sum of:
        0.0244429 = product of:
          0.0488858 = sum of:
            0.0488858 = weight(_text_:22 in 4188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0488858 = score(doc=4188,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1805031 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05154537 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4188, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4188)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2011 13:02:21
  16. Schlögl, C.: Internationale Sichtbarkeit der europäischen und insbesondere der deutschsprachigen Informationswissenschaft (2013) 0.01
    0.01222145 = product of:
      0.0244429 = sum of:
        0.0244429 = product of:
          0.0488858 = sum of:
            0.0488858 = weight(_text_:22 in 900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0488858 = score(doc=900,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1805031 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05154537 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 900, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=900)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2013 14:04:09
  17. Vieira, E.S.; Cabral, J.A.S.; Gomes, J.A.N.F.: Definition of a model based on bibliometric indicators for assessing applicants to academic positions (2014) 0.01
    0.01222145 = product of:
      0.0244429 = sum of:
        0.0244429 = product of:
          0.0488858 = sum of:
            0.0488858 = weight(_text_:22 in 1221) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0488858 = score(doc=1221,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1805031 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05154537 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1221, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1221)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    18. 3.2014 18:22:21
  18. Ajiferuke, I.; Lu, K.; Wolfram, D.: ¬A comparison of citer and citation-based measure outcomes for multiple disciplines (2010) 0.01
    0.010475528 = product of:
      0.020951057 = sum of:
        0.020951057 = product of:
          0.041902114 = sum of:
            0.041902114 = weight(_text_:22 in 4000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041902114 = score(doc=4000,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1805031 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05154537 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4000, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4000)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    28. 9.2010 12:54:22
  19. Albarrán, P.; Ruiz-Castillo, J.: References made and citations received by scientific articles (2011) 0.01
    0.010475528 = product of:
      0.020951057 = sum of:
        0.020951057 = product of:
          0.041902114 = sum of:
            0.041902114 = weight(_text_:22 in 4185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041902114 = score(doc=4185,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1805031 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05154537 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4185, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4185)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This article studies massive evidence about references made and citations received after a 5-year citation window by 3.7 million articles published in 1998 to 2002 in 22 scientific fields. We find that the distributions of references made and citations received share a number of basic features across sciences. Reference distributions are rather skewed to the right while citation distributions are even more highly skewed: The mean is about 20 percentage points to the right of the median, and articles with a remarkable or an outstanding number of citations represent about 9% of the total. Moreover, the existence of a power law representing the upper tail of citation distributions cannot be rejected in 17 fields whose articles represent 74.7% of the total. Contrary to the evidence in other contexts, the value of the scale parameter is above 3.5 in 13 of the 17 cases. Finally, power laws are typically small, but capture a considerable proportion of the total citations received.
  20. D'Angelo, C.A.; Giuffrida, C.; Abramo, G.: ¬A heuristic approach to author name disambiguation in bibliometrics databases for large-scale research assessments (2011) 0.01
    0.010475528 = product of:
      0.020951057 = sum of:
        0.020951057 = product of:
          0.041902114 = sum of:
            0.041902114 = weight(_text_:22 in 4190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041902114 = score(doc=4190,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1805031 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05154537 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4190, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4190)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2011 13:06:52

Languages

  • e 53
  • d 8

Types

  • a 60
  • m 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…