Search (26 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Klassifikationstheorie: Elemente / Struktur"
  1. Hjoerland, B.: Theories of knowledge organization - theories of knowledge (2017) 0.06
    0.061519597 = product of:
      0.12303919 = sum of:
        0.12303919 = sum of:
          0.07415339 = weight(_text_:wissen in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07415339 = score(doc=3494,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2223099 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.3128977 = idf(docFreq=1609, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05154537 = queryNorm
              0.33355865 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.3128977 = idf(docFreq=1609, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
          0.0488858 = weight(_text_:22 in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0488858 = score(doc=3494,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1805031 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05154537 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.22-36
    Source
    Theorie, Semantik und Organisation von Wissen: Proceedings der 13. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und dem 13. Internationalen Symposium der Informationswissenschaft der Higher Education Association for Information Science (HI) Potsdam (19.-20.03.2013): 'Theory, Information and Organization of Knowledge' / Proceedings der 14. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und Natural Language & Information Systems (NLDB) Passau (16.06.2015): 'Lexical Resources for Knowledge Organization' / Proceedings des Workshops der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) auf der SEMANTICS Leipzig (1.09.2014): 'Knowledge Organization and Semantic Web' / Proceedings des Workshops der Polnischen und Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) Cottbus (29.-30.09.2011): 'Economics of Knowledge Production and Organization'. Hrsg. von W. Babik, H.P. Ohly u. K. Weber
  2. Rescheleit, W.; Menner, L.: Vergleich der Wissensrepräsentationssprache FRL mit Dezimalklassifikation und Facettenklassifikation (1986) 0.02
    0.022471871 = product of:
      0.044943742 = sum of:
        0.044943742 = product of:
          0.089887485 = sum of:
            0.089887485 = weight(_text_:wissen in 1555) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.089887485 = score(doc=1555,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.2223099 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.3128977 = idf(docFreq=1609, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05154537 = queryNorm
                0.40433416 = fieldWeight in 1555, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.3128977 = idf(docFreq=1609, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1555)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Beim Vergleich von Klassifikationen mit Frame-Wissensbasen für Expertensysteme zeigen sich einige elementare Gemeinsamkeiten: Beide haben das Ziel einer geordneten Darstellung von Wissen. Beide bilden dazu Klassen und weisen hierarchische Beziehungen zwischen diesen Klassen auf. Anahnd der Wissensrepräsentationssprache FRL (Frame Representation Language) wird untersucht, inwieweit beide Systeme sich in das jeweils andere übertragen lassen. Die FRL speichert Wissen in einer speziellen Datenstruktur, den Frames, die aus einem Framenamen, der den jeweiligen Begriff bezeichnet, und Slots, die die Eigenschaften des Begriffs enthalten, bestehen. Eine effektive Speicherung des Wissens wird dadurch erreicht, daß die Frames in einer polyhierarchischen Struktur geordnet sind und in generischer Relation zueinander stehen müssen. Über die generische Relation lassen sich die Eigenschaften höherer Begriffe auf ihre Subklassen vererben. Es werden die Ergebnisse eines Versuchs dargestellt, Elemente bestehender Universalklassifikationen (DK, BC2) in die FRL zu übertragen
  3. Maniez, J.: ¬Des classifications aux thesaurus : du bon usage des facettes (1999) 0.02
    0.020951057 = product of:
      0.041902114 = sum of:
        0.041902114 = product of:
          0.08380423 = sum of:
            0.08380423 = weight(_text_:22 in 6404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08380423 = score(doc=6404,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1805031 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05154537 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6404, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6404)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
  4. Maniez, J.: ¬Du bon usage des facettes : des classifications aux thésaurus (1999) 0.02
    0.020951057 = product of:
      0.041902114 = sum of:
        0.041902114 = product of:
          0.08380423 = sum of:
            0.08380423 = weight(_text_:22 in 3773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08380423 = score(doc=3773,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1805031 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05154537 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3773, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3773)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
  5. Foskett, D.J.: Systems theory and its relevance to documentary classification (2017) 0.02
    0.020951057 = product of:
      0.041902114 = sum of:
        0.041902114 = product of:
          0.08380423 = sum of:
            0.08380423 = weight(_text_:22 in 3176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08380423 = score(doc=3176,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1805031 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05154537 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3176, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3176)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    6. 5.2017 18:46:22
  6. Weinberger, O.: Begriffsstruktur und Klassifikation (1980) 0.02
    0.018538348 = product of:
      0.037076697 = sum of:
        0.037076697 = product of:
          0.07415339 = sum of:
            0.07415339 = weight(_text_:wissen in 1440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07415339 = score(doc=1440,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2223099 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.3128977 = idf(docFreq=1609, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05154537 = queryNorm
                0.33355865 = fieldWeight in 1440, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.3128977 = idf(docFreq=1609, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1440)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Klassifikation kann sich auf verschiedene Gegenstandsbereiche beziehen. Sie ist im Prinzip eine extensionale Vorgangsweise resp. ein extensionales Gebilde auch dann, wenn ihr Gegenstand begriffliche Gebilde bzw. Wissen (Wissensbestandteile) sind. Die Erstellung dieses extensionalen Gebildes, das wir 'Klassat' nennen, beruht auf begrifflichen Analysen. Die Probleme der Begriffstrukturen, der Definitionen und der verschiedenen Eigentümlichkeiten gewisser Begriffe der pragmatischen Sprachen stellen daher Grundlagenprobleme der Klassifikationstheorie dar. Hieraus ergibt sich die Aufgabenstellung: Skizzzierung der logischen Grundstruktur der Klassifikation, Hinweis auf die Relevanz methodologischer Momente der Problemsituation für das Klassieren und auf gewisse strukturelle und semantische Eigentümlichkeiten der Begriffsapparatur der modernen Wissenschaften und der Umgangssprache, die Probleme der Klassifizierungsaufgaben mit such bringen und die bewirken, daß die Klassifikationen oft als praktische Annäherungen anzusehen sind
  7. Connaway, L.S.; Sievert, M.C.: Comparison of three classification systems for information on health insurance (1996) 0.01
    0.013967372 = product of:
      0.027934743 = sum of:
        0.027934743 = product of:
          0.055869486 = sum of:
            0.055869486 = weight(_text_:22 in 7242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055869486 = score(doc=7242,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1805031 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05154537 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7242, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7242)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 4.1997 21:10:19
  8. Belayche, C.: ¬A propos de la classification de Dewey (1997) 0.01
    0.013967372 = product of:
      0.027934743 = sum of:
        0.027934743 = product of:
          0.055869486 = sum of:
            0.055869486 = weight(_text_:22 in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055869486 = score(doc=1171,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1805031 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05154537 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Bulletin d'informations de l'Association des Bibliothecaires Francais. 1997, no.175, S.22-23
  9. Lin, W.-Y.C.: ¬The concept and applications of faceted classifications (2006) 0.01
    0.013967372 = product of:
      0.027934743 = sum of:
        0.027934743 = product of:
          0.055869486 = sum of:
            0.055869486 = weight(_text_:22 in 5083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055869486 = score(doc=5083,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1805031 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05154537 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5083, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5083)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    27. 5.2007 22:19:35
  10. Lorenz, B.: Zur Theorie und Terminologie der bibliothekarischen Klassifikation (2018) 0.01
    0.013967372 = product of:
      0.027934743 = sum of:
        0.027934743 = product of:
          0.055869486 = sum of:
            0.055869486 = weight(_text_:22 in 4339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055869486 = score(doc=4339,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1805031 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05154537 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4339, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4339)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.1-22
  11. Winske, E.: ¬The development and structure of an urban, regional, and local documents classification scheme (1996) 0.01
    0.01222145 = product of:
      0.0244429 = sum of:
        0.0244429 = product of:
          0.0488858 = sum of:
            0.0488858 = weight(_text_:22 in 7241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0488858 = score(doc=7241,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1805031 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05154537 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7241, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7241)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Paper presented at conference on 'Local documents, a new classification scheme' at the Research Caucus of the Florida Library Association Annual Conference, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 22 Apr 95
  12. Olson, H.A.: Sameness and difference : a cultural foundation of classification (2001) 0.01
    0.01222145 = product of:
      0.0244429 = sum of:
        0.0244429 = product of:
          0.0488858 = sum of:
            0.0488858 = weight(_text_:22 in 166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0488858 = score(doc=166,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1805031 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05154537 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 166, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=166)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  13. Kwasnik, B.H.: ¬The role of classification in knowledge representation (1999) 0.01
    0.010475528 = product of:
      0.020951057 = sum of:
        0.020951057 = product of:
          0.041902114 = sum of:
            0.041902114 = weight(_text_:22 in 2464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041902114 = score(doc=2464,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1805031 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05154537 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2464, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2464)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library trends. 48(1999) no.1, S.22-47
  14. Slavic, A.: On the nature and typology of documentary classifications and their use in a networked environment (2007) 0.01
    0.010475528 = product of:
      0.020951057 = sum of:
        0.020951057 = product of:
          0.041902114 = sum of:
            0.041902114 = weight(_text_:22 in 780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041902114 = score(doc=780,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1805031 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05154537 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 780, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=780)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22.12.2007 17:22:31
  15. Jacob, E.K.: Proposal for a classification of classifications built on Beghtol's distinction between "Naïve Classification" and "Professional Classification" (2010) 0.01
    0.010475528 = product of:
      0.020951057 = sum of:
        0.020951057 = product of:
          0.041902114 = sum of:
            0.041902114 = weight(_text_:22 in 2945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041902114 = score(doc=2945,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1805031 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05154537 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2945, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2945)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Argues that Beghtol's (2003) use of the terms "naive classification" and "professional classification" is valid because they are nominal definitions and that the distinction between these two types of classification points up the need for researchers in knowledge organization to broaden their scope beyond traditional classification systems intended for information retrieval. Argues that work by Beghtol (2003), Kwasnik (1999) and Bailey (1994) offer direction for the development of a classification of classifications based on the pragmatic dimensions of extant classification systems. Bezugnahme auf: Beghtol, C.: Naïve classification systems and the global information society. In: Knowledge organization and the global information society: Proceedings of the 8th International ISKO Conference 13-16 July 2004, London, UK. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine. Würzburg: Ergon Verlag 2004. S.19-22. (Advances in knowledge organization; vol.9)
  16. Howarth, L.C.; Jansen, E.H.: Towards a typology of warrant for 21st century knowledge organization systems (2014) 0.01
    0.010475528 = product of:
      0.020951057 = sum of:
        0.020951057 = product of:
          0.041902114 = sum of:
            0.041902114 = weight(_text_:22 in 1425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041902114 = score(doc=1425,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1805031 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05154537 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1425, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1425)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  17. Vukadin, A.; Slavic, A.: Challenges of facet analysis and concept placement in Universal Classifications : the example of architecture in UDC (2014) 0.01
    0.010475528 = product of:
      0.020951057 = sum of:
        0.020951057 = product of:
          0.041902114 = sum of:
            0.041902114 = weight(_text_:22 in 1428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041902114 = score(doc=1428,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1805031 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05154537 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1428, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1428)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  18. Gnoli, C.: Classifying phenomena : part 4: themes and rhemes (2018) 0.01
    0.010475528 = product of:
      0.020951057 = sum of:
        0.020951057 = product of:
          0.041902114 = sum of:
            0.041902114 = weight(_text_:22 in 4152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041902114 = score(doc=4152,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1805031 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05154537 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4152, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4152)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    17. 2.2018 18:22:25
  19. Molholt, P.: Qualities of classification schemes for the Information Superhighway (1995) 0.01
    0.008729608 = product of:
      0.017459216 = sum of:
        0.017459216 = product of:
          0.03491843 = sum of:
            0.03491843 = weight(_text_:22 in 5562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03491843 = score(doc=5562,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1805031 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05154537 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5562, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5562)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 21(1995) no.2, S.19-22
  20. Beghtol, C.: Naïve classification systems and the global information society (2004) 0.01
    0.008729608 = product of:
      0.017459216 = sum of:
        0.017459216 = product of:
          0.03491843 = sum of:
            0.03491843 = weight(_text_:22 in 3483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03491843 = score(doc=3483,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1805031 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05154537 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3483, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3483)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.19-22