-
Döpfner, M.: Totale Transparenz endet immer totalitär (2021)
0.05
0.045870516 = product of:
0.09174103 = sum of:
0.09174103 = product of:
0.18348207 = sum of:
0.18348207 = weight(_text_:wissen in 110) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18348207 = score(doc=110,freq=6.0), product of:
0.2223099 = queryWeight, product of:
4.3128977 = idf(docFreq=1609, maxDocs=44218)
0.05154537 = queryNorm
0.82534367 = fieldWeight in 110, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.3128977 = idf(docFreq=1609, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=110)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- "Wir wissen, wo Du bist. Wir wissen, wo Du warst. Wir wissen mehr oder weniger, woran Du denkst." - Europa muss die Daten-Allmacht der amerikanischen und chinesischen Tech-Giganten brechen. Ein offener Brief des Vorstandschefs von Axel Springer an die Präsidentin der EU-Kommission.
-
Wolchover, N.: Wie ein Aufsehen erregender Beweis kaum Beachtung fand (2017)
0.02
0.024691058 = product of:
0.049382117 = sum of:
0.049382117 = product of:
0.09876423 = sum of:
0.09876423 = weight(_text_:22 in 3582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09876423 = score(doc=3582,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1805031 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05154537 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3582, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3582)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 4.2017 10:42:05
22. 4.2017 10:48:38
-
Schleim, S.: Warum die Wissenschaft nicht frei ist (2017)
0.01
0.013967372 = product of:
0.027934743 = sum of:
0.027934743 = product of:
0.055869486 = sum of:
0.055869486 = weight(_text_:22 in 3882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055869486 = score(doc=3882,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1805031 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05154537 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3882, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3882)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 9.10.2017 15:48:22
-
Euler, E.: Open-Access-Strategie des Landes Brandenburg (2019)
0.01
0.013241677 = product of:
0.026483353 = sum of:
0.026483353 = product of:
0.052966706 = sum of:
0.052966706 = weight(_text_:wissen in 5367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052966706 = score(doc=5367,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2223099 = queryWeight, product of:
4.3128977 = idf(docFreq=1609, maxDocs=44218)
0.05154537 = queryNorm
0.23825617 = fieldWeight in 5367, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.3128977 = idf(docFreq=1609, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5367)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Das vorliegende Papier ist das Ergebnis eines durch das MWFK Brandenburg geförderten Projektes, das seit November 2018 unter der Leitung von Prof. Dr. jur. Ellen Euler, LL.M. an der Fachhochschule Potsdam angesiedelt ist. Ziel war und ist es, alle in das wissenschaftliche Publizieren involvierten Bereiche und Akteure aus ganz Brandenburg in ein transparentes, kollaboratives und integratives Multistakeholderprojekt einzubinden und an der Erarbeitung dieser Strategie zu beteiligen. Abschließend hat sich die Brandenburgische Landesrektorenkonferenz (BLRK), in der alle brandenburgischen Hochschulen vertreten sind, im Juli 2019 mit der vorliegenden Strategie befasst. Alle Institutionen, die aktiv am Prozess teilhaben wollten, insbesondere die Hochschuleinrichtungen im Land Brandenburg und deren Infrastruktureinrichtungen, haben Vertreterinnen und Vertreter benannt, welche die Interessen und Bedürfnisse des jeweiligen Bereiches wahrnahmen und in die Strategie eingebracht haben. Durch bilaterale Gespräche, Vernetzungstreffen, Intensivworkshops und einen abschließenden Book Sprint, bei dem Expertinnen und Experten aus Wissenschaft, Forschung, Kultur und Zivilgesellschaft wertvolle Ideen und Empfehlungen zur Formulierung einer gemeinsamen Strategie zu mehr Offenheit von Wissenschaft, Forschung und Kultur im Land Brandenburg ausgearbeitet haben, die teilweise in die vorliegende Strategie eingeflossen sind, ist ein festes Netzwerk entstanden, das den weiteren Prozess über die hier vorliegende Open-Access-Strategie für wissenschaftliche Publikationen hinaus begleiten wird. Open Access als Querschnittsaufgabe bedarf gemeinsamer und koordinierter Anstrengungen auf allen Ebenen. Die vorliegende Open-Access-Strategie definiert Ziele für das Land Brandenburg und die von den relevanten Akteuren (Wissenschaftlerinnen und Wissenschaftler, Hochschulen, Infrastruktureinrichtungen und Landesregierung) umzusetzenden Maßnahmen, die zur Zielerreichung beitragen sollen, ebenso wie die notwendigen Maßnahmen zur Nachverfolgung der Zielerreichung. Das Wissen aus dem Land Brandenburg soll so verstärkt sichtbar, auffindbar, zugänglich und nutzbar gemacht werden. Der Wissenschaftsstandort Brandenburg wird damit attraktiver und die Innovationsfähigkeit der Region und der wissensbasierten Unternehmen des Landes Brandenburg wird gestärkt.
-
Krüger, N.; Pianos, T.: Lernmaterialien für junge Forschende in den Wirtschaftswissenschaften als Open Educational Resources (OER) (2021)
0.01
0.01222145 = product of:
0.0244429 = sum of:
0.0244429 = product of:
0.0488858 = sum of:
0.0488858 = weight(_text_:22 in 252) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0488858 = score(doc=252,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1805031 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05154537 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 252, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=252)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 5.2021 12:43:05
-
Strecker, D.: Nutzung der Schattenbibliothek Sci-Hub in Deutschland (2019)
0.01
0.010475528 = product of:
0.020951057 = sum of:
0.020951057 = product of:
0.041902114 = sum of:
0.041902114 = weight(_text_:22 in 596) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041902114 = score(doc=596,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1805031 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05154537 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 596, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=596)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 1. 1.2020 13:22:34
-
Taglinger, H.: Ausgevogelt, jetzt wird es ernst (2018)
0.01
0.008729608 = product of:
0.017459216 = sum of:
0.017459216 = product of:
0.03491843 = sum of:
0.03491843 = weight(_text_:22 in 4281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03491843 = score(doc=4281,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1805031 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05154537 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4281, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4281)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2018 11:38:55
-
Somers, J.: Torching the modern-day library of Alexandria : somewhere at Google there is a database containing 25 million books and nobody is allowed to read them. (2017)
0.01
0.006983686 = product of:
0.013967372 = sum of:
0.013967372 = product of:
0.027934743 = sum of:
0.027934743 = weight(_text_:22 in 3608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027934743 = score(doc=3608,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1805031 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05154537 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3608, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3608)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- You were going to get one-click access to the full text of nearly every book that's ever been published. Books still in print you'd have to pay for, but everything else-a collection slated to grow larger than the holdings at the Library of Congress, Harvard, the University of Michigan, at any of the great national libraries of Europe-would have been available for free at terminals that were going to be placed in every local library that wanted one. At the terminal you were going to be able to search tens of millions of books and read every page of any book you found. You'd be able to highlight passages and make annotations and share them; for the first time, you'd be able to pinpoint an idea somewhere inside the vastness of the printed record, and send somebody straight to it with a link. Books would become as instantly available, searchable, copy-pasteable-as alive in the digital world-as web pages. It was to be the realization of a long-held dream. "The universal library has been talked about for millennia," Richard Ovenden, the head of Oxford's Bodleian Libraries, has said. "It was possible to think in the Renaissance that you might be able to amass the whole of published knowledge in a single room or a single institution." In the spring of 2011, it seemed we'd amassed it in a terminal small enough to fit on a desk. "This is a watershed event and can serve as a catalyst for the reinvention of education, research, and intellectual life," one eager observer wrote at the time. On March 22 of that year, however, the legal agreement that would have unlocked a century's worth of books and peppered the country with access terminals to a universal library was rejected under Rule 23(e)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. When the library at Alexandria burned it was said to be an "international catastrophe." When the most significant humanities project of our time was dismantled in court, the scholars, archivists, and librarians who'd had a hand in its undoing breathed a sigh of relief, for they believed, at the time, that they had narrowly averted disaster.
