Search (10 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Indexierungsstudien"
  1. Wolfram, D.; Zhang, J.: ¬An investigation of the influence of indexing exhaustivity and term distributions on a document space (2002) 0.03
    0.025965689 = product of:
      0.051931378 = sum of:
        0.051931378 = product of:
          0.103862755 = sum of:
            0.103862755 = weight(_text_:500 in 5238) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.103862755 = score(doc=5238,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3075407 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050306078 = queryNorm
                0.33772033 = fieldWeight in 5238, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5238)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Wolfram and Zhang are interested in the effect of different indexing exhaustivity, by which they mean the number of terms chosen, and of different index term distributions and different term weighting methods on the resulting document cluster organization. The Distance Angle Retrieval Environment, DARE, which provides a two dimensional display of retrieved documents was used to represent the document clusters based upon a document's distance from the searcher's main interest, and on the angle formed by the document, a point representing a minor interest, and the point representing the main interest. If the centroid and the origin of the document space are assigned as major and minor points the average distance between documents and the centroid can be measured providing an indication of cluster organization. in the form of a size normalized similarity measure. Using 500 records from NTIS and nine models created by intersecting low, observed, and high exhaustivity levels (based upon a negative binomial distribution) with shallow, observed, and steep term distributions (based upon a Zipf distribution) simulation runs were preformed using inverse document frequency, inter-document term frequency, and inverse document frequency based upon both inter and intra-document frequencies. Low exhaustivity and shallow distributions result in a more dense document space and less effective retrieval. High exhaustivity and steeper distributions result in a more diffuse space.
  2. Cleverdon, C.W.: ASLIB Cranfield Research Project : Report on the first stage of an investigation into the comparative efficiency of indexing systems (1960) 0.02
    0.020447336 = product of:
      0.040894672 = sum of:
        0.040894672 = product of:
          0.081789345 = sum of:
            0.081789345 = weight(_text_:22 in 6158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.081789345 = score(doc=6158,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17616332 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050306078 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6158, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6158)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: College and research libraries 22(1961) no.3, S.228 (G. Jahoda)
  3. Veenema, F.: To index or not to index (1996) 0.01
    0.013631558 = product of:
      0.027263116 = sum of:
        0.027263116 = product of:
          0.054526232 = sum of:
            0.054526232 = weight(_text_:22 in 7247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054526232 = score(doc=7247,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17616332 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050306078 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7247, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7247)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Canadian journal of information and library science. 21(1996) no.2, S.1-22
  4. Booth, A.: How consistent is MEDLINE indexing? (1990) 0.01
    0.011927613 = product of:
      0.023855226 = sum of:
        0.023855226 = product of:
          0.047710452 = sum of:
            0.047710452 = weight(_text_:22 in 3510) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047710452 = score(doc=3510,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17616332 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050306078 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3510, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3510)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Health libraries review. 7(1990) no.1, S.22-26
  5. Neshat, N.; Horri, A.: ¬A study of subject indexing consistency between the National Library of Iran and Humanities Libraries in the area of Iranian studies (2006) 0.01
    0.011927613 = product of:
      0.023855226 = sum of:
        0.023855226 = product of:
          0.047710452 = sum of:
            0.047710452 = weight(_text_:22 in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047710452 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17616332 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050306078 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    4. 1.2007 10:22:26
  6. Taniguchi, S.: Recording evidence in bibliographic records and descriptive metadata (2005) 0.01
    0.010223668 = product of:
      0.020447336 = sum of:
        0.020447336 = product of:
          0.040894672 = sum of:
            0.040894672 = weight(_text_:22 in 3565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040894672 = score(doc=3565,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17616332 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050306078 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3565, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3565)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    18. 6.2005 13:16:22
  7. Leininger, K.: Interindexer consistency in PsychINFO (2000) 0.01
    0.010223668 = product of:
      0.020447336 = sum of:
        0.020447336 = product of:
          0.040894672 = sum of:
            0.040894672 = weight(_text_:22 in 2552) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040894672 = score(doc=2552,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17616332 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050306078 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2552, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2552)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    9. 2.1997 18:44:22
  8. Subrahmanyam, B.: Library of Congress Classification numbers : issues of consistency and their implications for union catalogs (2006) 0.01
    0.008519724 = product of:
      0.017039448 = sum of:
        0.017039448 = product of:
          0.034078896 = sum of:
            0.034078896 = weight(_text_:22 in 5784) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034078896 = score(doc=5784,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17616332 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050306078 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5784, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5784)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  9. White, H.; Willis, C.; Greenberg, J.: HIVEing : the effect of a semantic web technology on inter-indexer consistency (2014) 0.01
    0.008519724 = product of:
      0.017039448 = sum of:
        0.017039448 = product of:
          0.034078896 = sum of:
            0.034078896 = weight(_text_:22 in 1781) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034078896 = score(doc=1781,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17616332 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050306078 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1781, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1781)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to examine the effect of the Helping Interdisciplinary Vocabulary Engineering (HIVE) system on the inter-indexer consistency of information professionals when assigning keywords to a scientific abstract. This study examined first, the inter-indexer consistency of potential HIVE users; second, the impact HIVE had on consistency; and third, challenges associated with using HIVE. Design/methodology/approach - A within-subjects quasi-experimental research design was used for this study. Data were collected using a task-scenario based questionnaire. Analysis was performed on consistency results using Hooper's and Rolling's inter-indexer consistency measures. A series of t-tests was used to judge the significance between consistency measure results. Findings - Results suggest that HIVE improves inter-indexing consistency. Working with HIVE increased consistency rates by 22 percent (Rolling's) and 25 percent (Hooper's) when selecting relevant terms from all vocabularies. A statistically significant difference exists between the assignment of free-text keywords and machine-aided keywords. Issues with homographs, disambiguation, vocabulary choice, and document structure were all identified as potential challenges. Research limitations/implications - Research limitations for this study can be found in the small number of vocabularies used for the study. Future research will include implementing HIVE into the Dryad Repository and studying its application in a repository system. Originality/value - This paper showcases several features used in HIVE system. By using traditional consistency measures to evaluate a semantic web technology, this paper emphasizes the link between traditional indexing and next generation machine-aided indexing (MAI) tools.
  10. Bade, D.: ¬The creation and persistence of misinformation in shared library catalogs : language and subject knowledge in a technological era (2002) 0.00
    0.0034078895 = product of:
      0.006815779 = sum of:
        0.006815779 = product of:
          0.013631558 = sum of:
            0.013631558 = weight(_text_:22 in 1858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.013631558 = score(doc=1858,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17616332 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050306078 = queryNorm
                0.07738023 = fieldWeight in 1858, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1858)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05