Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  • × theme_ss:"Internet"
  1. Thelwall, M.; Wilkinson, D.: Finding similar academic Web sites with links, bibliometric couplings and colinks (2004) 0.03
    0.031158824 = product of:
      0.062317647 = sum of:
        0.062317647 = product of:
          0.124635294 = sum of:
            0.124635294 = weight(_text_:500 in 2571) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.124635294 = score(doc=2571,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3075407 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050306078 = queryNorm
                0.40526438 = fieldWeight in 2571, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2571)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    A common task in both Webmetrics and Web information retrieval is to identify a set of Web pages or sites that are similar in content. In this paper we assess the extent to which links, colinks and couplings can be used to identify similar Web sites. As an experiment, a random sample of 500 pairs of domains from the UK academic Web were taken and human assessments of site similarity, based upon content type, were compared against ratings for the three concepts. The results show that using a combination of all three gives the highest probability of identifying similar sites, but surprisingly this was only a marginal improvement over using links alone. Another unexpected result was that high values for either colink counts or couplings were associated with only a small increased likelihood of similarity. The principal advantage of using couplings and colinks was found to be greater coverage in terms of a much larger number of pairs of sites being connected by these measures, instead of increased probability of similarity. In information retrieval terminology, this is improved recall rather than improved precision.
  2. Thelwall, M.; Ruschenburg, T.: Grundlagen und Forschungsfelder der Webometrie (2006) 0.01
    0.013631558 = product of:
      0.027263116 = sum of:
        0.027263116 = product of:
          0.054526232 = sum of:
            0.054526232 = weight(_text_:22 in 77) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054526232 = score(doc=77,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17616332 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050306078 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 77, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=77)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    4.12.2006 12:12:22
  3. Zhang, Y.: ¬The impact of Internet-based electronic resources on formal scholarly communication in the area of library and information science : a citation analysis (1998) 0.01
    0.012048709 = product of:
      0.024097418 = sum of:
        0.024097418 = product of:
          0.048194837 = sum of:
            0.048194837 = weight(_text_:22 in 2808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048194837 = score(doc=2808,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17616332 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050306078 = queryNorm
                0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2808, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2808)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    30. 1.1999 17:22:22
  4. Neth, M.: Citation analysis and the Web (1998) 0.01
    0.011927613 = product of:
      0.023855226 = sum of:
        0.023855226 = product of:
          0.047710452 = sum of:
            0.047710452 = weight(_text_:22 in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047710452 = score(doc=108,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17616332 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050306078 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 1.1999 16:22:37
  5. Tonta, Y.: Scholarly communication and the use of networked information sources (1996) 0.01
    0.010223668 = product of:
      0.020447336 = sum of:
        0.020447336 = product of:
          0.040894672 = sum of:
            0.040894672 = weight(_text_:22 in 6389) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040894672 = score(doc=6389,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17616332 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050306078 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6389, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6389)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    IFLA journal. 22(1996) no.3, S.240-245
  6. Zhang, Y.; Jansen, B.J.; Spink, A.: Identification of factors predicting clickthrough in Web searching using neural network analysis (2009) 0.01
    0.010223668 = product of:
      0.020447336 = sum of:
        0.020447336 = product of:
          0.040894672 = sum of:
            0.040894672 = weight(_text_:22 in 2742) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040894672 = score(doc=2742,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17616332 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050306078 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2742, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2742)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 17:49:11

Languages