Search (18 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Begriffstheorie"
  1. Treude, L.: ¬Das Problem der Konzeptdefinition in der Wissensorganisation : über einen missglückten Versuch der Klärung (2013) 0.02
    0.021730524 = product of:
      0.06519157 = sum of:
        0.06519157 = sum of:
          0.023503343 = weight(_text_:library in 3060) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.023503343 = score(doc=3060,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13484047 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051282257 = queryNorm
              0.17430481 = fieldWeight in 3060, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3060)
          0.041688226 = weight(_text_:22 in 3060) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.041688226 = score(doc=3060,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17958173 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051282257 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3060, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3060)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    LIBREAS: Library ideas. no.22, 2013, S.xx-xx
  2. Olson, H.A.: How we construct subjects : a feminist analysis (2007) 0.02
    0.01810877 = product of:
      0.05432631 = sum of:
        0.05432631 = sum of:
          0.01958612 = weight(_text_:library in 5588) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.01958612 = score(doc=5588,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13484047 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051282257 = queryNorm
              0.14525402 = fieldWeight in 5588, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5588)
          0.03474019 = weight(_text_:22 in 5588) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03474019 = score(doc=5588,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17958173 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051282257 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5588, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5588)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    11.12.2019 19:00:22
    Source
    Library trends. 56(2007) no.2, S.509-541
  3. Dahlberg, I.: ¬Die gegenstandsbezogene, analytische Begriffstheorie und ihre Definitionsarten (1987) 0.02
    0.016212089 = product of:
      0.048636265 = sum of:
        0.048636265 = product of:
          0.09727253 = sum of:
            0.09727253 = weight(_text_:22 in 880) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09727253 = score(doc=880,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17958173 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051282257 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 880, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=880)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Pages
    S.9-22
  4. Wüster, E.: Begriffs- und Themaklassifikation : Unterschiede in ihrem Wesen und in ihrer Anwendung (1971) 0.01
    0.013896076 = product of:
      0.041688226 = sum of:
        0.041688226 = product of:
          0.08337645 = sum of:
            0.08337645 = weight(_text_:22 in 3904) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08337645 = score(doc=3904,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17958173 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051282257 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3904, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3904)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Nachrichten für Dokumentation. 22(1971) H.3, S.98-104 (T.1); H.4, S.143-150 (T.2)
  5. Dahlberg, I.: Begriffsarbeit in der Wissensorganisation (2010) 0.01
    0.009264051 = product of:
      0.027792152 = sum of:
        0.027792152 = product of:
          0.055584304 = sum of:
            0.055584304 = weight(_text_:22 in 3726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055584304 = score(doc=3726,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17958173 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051282257 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3726, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3726)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
  6. Mental images in human cognition (1991) 0.01
    0.00914019 = product of:
      0.02742057 = sum of:
        0.02742057 = product of:
          0.05484114 = sum of:
            0.05484114 = weight(_text_:library in 4085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05484114 = score(doc=4085,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13484047 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051282257 = queryNorm
                0.40671125 = fieldWeight in 4085, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4085)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Library quarterly 63(1993) no.1, S.108-110.
  7. Storms, G.; VanMechelen, I.; DeBoeck, P.: Structural-analysis of the intension and extension of semantic concepts (1994) 0.01
    0.0081060445 = product of:
      0.024318133 = sum of:
        0.024318133 = product of:
          0.048636265 = sum of:
            0.048636265 = weight(_text_:22 in 2574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048636265 = score(doc=2574,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17958173 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051282257 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2574, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2574)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2000 19:17:40
  8. Bauer, G.: ¬Die vielseitigen Anwendungsmöglichkeiten des Kategorienprinzips bei der Wissensorganisation (2006) 0.01
    0.0081060445 = product of:
      0.024318133 = sum of:
        0.024318133 = product of:
          0.048636265 = sum of:
            0.048636265 = weight(_text_:22 in 5710) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048636265 = score(doc=5710,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17958173 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051282257 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5710, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5710)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Pages
    S.22-33
  9. Bonnevie, E.: Dretske's semantic information theory and meta-theories in library and information science (2001) 0.01
    0.0065287068 = product of:
      0.01958612 = sum of:
        0.01958612 = product of:
          0.03917224 = sum of:
            0.03917224 = weight(_text_:library in 4484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03917224 = score(doc=4484,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.13484047 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051282257 = queryNorm
                0.29050803 = fieldWeight in 4484, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4484)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This article presents the semantic information theory, formulated by the philosopher Fred I. Dretske, as a contribution to the discussion of metatheories and their practical implications in the field of library and information science. Dretske's theory is described in Knowledge and the flow of information. It is founded on mathematical communication theory but developed and elaborated into a cognitive, functionalistic theory, is individually oriented, and deals with the content of information. The topics are: the information process from perception to cognition, and how concept formation takes place in terms of digitisation. Other important issues are the concepts of information and knowledge, truth and meaning. Semantic information theory can be used as a frame of reference in order to explain, clarify and refute concepts currently used in library and information science, and as the basis for critical reviews of elements of the cognitive viewpoint in IR, primarily the notion of "potential information". The main contribution of the theory lies in a clarification of concepts, but there are still problems regarding the practical applications. More research is needed to combine philosophical discussions with the practice of information and library science.
  10. Jouis, C.: Logic of relationships (2002) 0.01
    0.005790032 = product of:
      0.017370095 = sum of:
        0.017370095 = product of:
          0.03474019 = sum of:
            0.03474019 = weight(_text_:22 in 1204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03474019 = score(doc=1204,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17958173 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051282257 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1204, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1204)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    1.12.2002 11:12:22
  11. Marradi, A.: ¬The concept of concept : concepts and terms (2012) 0.01
    0.005790032 = product of:
      0.017370095 = sum of:
        0.017370095 = product of:
          0.03474019 = sum of:
            0.03474019 = weight(_text_:22 in 33) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03474019 = score(doc=33,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17958173 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051282257 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 33, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=33)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2012 13:11:25
  12. Besler, G.; Szulc, J.: Gottlob Frege's theory of definition as useful tool for knowledge organization : definition of 'context' - case study (2014) 0.01
    0.005790032 = product of:
      0.017370095 = sum of:
        0.017370095 = product of:
          0.03474019 = sum of:
            0.03474019 = weight(_text_:22 in 1440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03474019 = score(doc=1440,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17958173 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051282257 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1440, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1440)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  13. Pansegrouw, J.G.: ¬Die begrippe spesie, klas en versameling in verhouding tot indekseringteorie (1995) 0.01
    0.005222966 = product of:
      0.015668897 = sum of:
        0.015668897 = product of:
          0.031337794 = sum of:
            0.031337794 = weight(_text_:library in 4447) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031337794 = score(doc=4447,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13484047 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051282257 = queryNorm
                0.23240642 = fieldWeight in 4447, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4447)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    South African journal of library and information science. 63(1995) no.4, S.173-178
  14. Hudon, M.: Preparing terminological definitions for indexing and retrieval thesauri : a model (1996) 0.01
    0.005222966 = product of:
      0.015668897 = sum of:
        0.015668897 = product of:
          0.031337794 = sum of:
            0.031337794 = weight(_text_:library in 5193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031337794 = score(doc=5193,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13484047 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051282257 = queryNorm
                0.23240642 = fieldWeight in 5193, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5193)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization and change: Proceedings of the Fourth International ISKO Conference, 15-18 July 1996, Library of Congress, Washington, DC. Ed.: R. Green
  15. Machado, L.M.O.; Martínez-Ávila, D.; Simões, M.da Graça de Melo: Concept theory in library and information science : an epistemological analysis (2019) 0.00
    0.004616493 = product of:
      0.013849478 = sum of:
        0.013849478 = product of:
          0.027698956 = sum of:
            0.027698956 = weight(_text_:library in 5457) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027698956 = score(doc=5457,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.13484047 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051282257 = queryNorm
                0.2054202 = fieldWeight in 5457, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5457)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose The purpose of this paper is to discuss the literature on concept theory in library and information science (LIS) from an epistemological perspective, ascribing each paper to an epistemological family and discussing their relevance in the context of the knowledge organization (KO) domain. Design/methodology/approach This paper adopts a hermeneutic approach for the analysis of the texts that compose the corpus of study following contingency and categorical analyses. More specifically, the paper works with Bardin's contingency analysis and follows Hjørland's families of epistemologies for the categorization. Findings The analysis corroborates the observations made for the last ten years about the scarcity of studies on concept theory in LIS and KO. However, the study also reveals an epistemological turn on concept theory since 2009 that could be considered a departure from the rationalist views that dominated the field and a continuation of a broader paradigm shift in LIS and KO. All analyzed papers except two follow pragmatist or historicist approaches. Originality/value This paper follows-up and systematizes the contributions to the LIS and KO fields on concept theory mainly during the last decade. The epistemological analysis reveals the dominant views in this paradigm shift and the main authors and trends that are present in the LIS literature on concept theory.
  16. Sekhar, M.; Ekbote, E.R.: Cognitive skills of conceptualisation process and types of concepts (1992) 0.00
    0.004570095 = product of:
      0.013710285 = sum of:
        0.013710285 = product of:
          0.02742057 = sum of:
            0.02742057 = weight(_text_:library in 2381) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02742057 = score(doc=2381,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13484047 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051282257 = queryNorm
                0.20335563 = fieldWeight in 2381, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2381)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Imprint
    Bangalore : Sarada Ranganathan Endowment for Library Science
  17. Gemberling, T.: FRSAD, Semiotics, and FRBR-LRM (2016) 0.00
    0.004570095 = product of:
      0.013710285 = sum of:
        0.013710285 = product of:
          0.02742057 = sum of:
            0.02742057 = weight(_text_:library in 5118) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02742057 = score(doc=5118,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13484047 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051282257 = queryNorm
                0.20335563 = fieldWeight in 5118, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5118)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Philosophy grapples with the deepest and most difficult questions in human life. In a 2012 article, Jonathan Furner raises questions about the "Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data" (FRSAD) model. Can the FRSAD framers really avoid tackling philosophical questions as they attempt to do-the long-running dispute between nominalists and realists, in particular? This article attempts to flesh out a realist position while showing some implications for the new Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records-Library Reference Model. It is not clear that FRSAD really takes a realist view, as Furner claims, and a position on the nominalist-realist debate is not necessary for information professionals.
  18. McCray, A.T.; Bodenreider, O.: ¬A conceptual framework for the biomedical domain (2002) 0.00
    0.003917224 = product of:
      0.011751671 = sum of:
        0.011751671 = product of:
          0.023503343 = sum of:
            0.023503343 = weight(_text_:library in 1207) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023503343 = score(doc=1207,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13484047 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051282257 = queryNorm
                0.17430481 = fieldWeight in 1207, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1207)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Specialized domains often come with an extensive terminology, suitable for storing and exchanging information, but not necessarily for knowledge processing. Knowledge structures such as semantic networks, or ontologies, are required to explore the semantics of a domain. The UMLS project at the National Library of Medicine is a research effort to develop knowledge-based resources for the biomedical domain. The Metathesaurus is a large body of knowledge that defines and inter-relates 730,000 biomedical concepts, and the Semantic Network defines the semantic principles that apply to this domain. This chapter presents these two knowledge sources and illustrates through a research study how they can collaborate to further structure the domain. The limits of the approach are discussed.