Search (88 results, page 1 of 5)

  • × theme_ss:"Bibliographische Software"
  1. Copeland, A.J.; Barreau, D.: Helping people to manage and share their digital information : a role for public libraries (2011) 0.10
    0.10480183 = product of:
      0.15720275 = sum of:
        0.07480554 = weight(_text_:digital in 5583) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07480554 = score(doc=5583,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.20228553 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051282257 = queryNorm
            0.36980176 = fieldWeight in 5583, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5583)
        0.082397215 = sum of:
          0.04070899 = weight(_text_:library in 5583) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04070899 = score(doc=5583,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.13484047 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051282257 = queryNorm
              0.30190483 = fieldWeight in 5583, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5583)
          0.041688226 = weight(_text_:22 in 5583) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.041688226 = score(doc=5583,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17958173 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051282257 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5583, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5583)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    As a cultural institution, the public library is charged with providing resources and services that fit the needs of a particular community and, if space and budgets allow, of serving as a resource and repository of the community's past. To fulfill its mission to the public, the library must attract that public by offering materials and providing opportunities for them to pursue their unique and varied interests and discover new things. By engaging individuals in the identification and preservation of their own personal, digital objects, it may be possible to increase awareness in, and commitment to, community repositories that reflect a community's diversity and that will serve all. A user education program that focuses on the importance of identifying and preserving the information and artifacts that are important, that addresses the technical aspects of preservation, and that creates awareness of the benefits and challenges associated with sharing personal information can result in a community repository that ultimately has more value for both the individual and the community.
    Date
    11.12.2019 17:47:22
    Source
    Library trends. 59(2011) no.4, S.637-649
  2. Kelly, J.A.: Downloading information using bibliographic management software (1997) 0.06
    0.057948064 = product of:
      0.17384419 = sum of:
        0.17384419 = sum of:
          0.06267559 = weight(_text_:library in 3254) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06267559 = score(doc=3254,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13484047 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051282257 = queryNorm
              0.46481284 = fieldWeight in 3254, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3254)
          0.11116861 = weight(_text_:22 in 3254) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.11116861 = score(doc=3254,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17958173 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051282257 = queryNorm
              0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 3254, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3254)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Encyclopedia of library and information science. Vol.59, [=Suppl.22]
  3. Casale, M.: Full text retrieval for the Web (1996) 0.05
    0.05406713 = product of:
      0.081100695 = sum of:
        0.061711423 = weight(_text_:digital in 6757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061711423 = score(doc=6757,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20228553 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051282257 = queryNorm
            0.30507088 = fieldWeight in 6757, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6757)
        0.01938927 = product of:
          0.03877854 = sum of:
            0.03877854 = weight(_text_:library in 6757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03877854 = score(doc=6757,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.13484047 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051282257 = queryNorm
                0.28758827 = fieldWeight in 6757, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6757)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Reviews developments and improvements in techniques for searching the WWW that have been made access to full text databases a practical proposition (full text retrieval (FTR)). Reports results of interviews with 8 full text database vendors offering FTR via the WWW: Dataware (http://www.dataware.com); Excalibur (http://www.excalib.com); Fulcrum (http://www.fulcrum.com); Muscat (http://www.muscat.co.uk); Open Text (http://www.opentext.com); Personal Library Software (PLS) (http://www.pls.com); Verity (http://www.verity.com); and ZyLab (ZyIndex and ZyImage) (http://www.zylab.com). Compares the prices of the systems and lists the questions that publishers should ask before making a choice of systems for handling FTR on the Web
    Object
    Personal Library Software
    Source
    Digital publishing technologies. 1(1996) no.10, S.12-16
  4. Matthews, J.R.; Parker, M.R.: Microcomputer-based automated library systems : new series (1993) 0.05
    0.04927495 = product of:
      0.14782485 = sum of:
        0.14782485 = sum of:
          0.07834448 = weight(_text_:library in 3073) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07834448 = score(doc=3073,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.13484047 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051282257 = queryNorm
              0.58101606 = fieldWeight in 3073, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3073)
          0.06948038 = weight(_text_:22 in 3073) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06948038 = score(doc=3073,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17958173 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051282257 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3073, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3073)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Content
    Vorstellung von integrierten Bibliothekssystemen auf PC-Basis: DavexPlus; Bib-Base; BiblioFile; EloquentLibrarian; LibraryWorks; ProfessionalSeries; Alexandria; Columbia Library System; Manager Series; TheAssistant; TINLIB
    Date
    30.11.1995 20:53:22
    Object
    Columbia Library System
    Source
    Library technology reports. 29(1993), no.2
  5. Matthews, J.R.; Parker, M.R.: Microcomputer-based automated library systems : new series (1993) 0.05
    0.04927495 = product of:
      0.14782485 = sum of:
        0.14782485 = sum of:
          0.07834448 = weight(_text_:library in 3074) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07834448 = score(doc=3074,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.13484047 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051282257 = queryNorm
              0.58101606 = fieldWeight in 3074, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3074)
          0.06948038 = weight(_text_:22 in 3074) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06948038 = score(doc=3074,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17958173 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051282257 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3074, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3074)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Content
    Vorstellung von integrierten Bibliothekssystemen auf PC-Basis: PrecisionOne; INMAGIC Plus; Professional Software; SydneyPlus Library Management; TLC; ResourceLibrarian; BiblioTrac; Image2; MOLLI
    Date
    30.11.1995 20:53:22
    Object
    SydneyPlus Library Management
    Source
    Library technology reports. 29(1993), no.3
  6. Mahmood, K.: ¬The best library software for developing countries : more than 30 plus points of Micro CDS/ISIS (1997) 0.03
    0.03449247 = product of:
      0.1034774 = sum of:
        0.1034774 = sum of:
          0.05484114 = weight(_text_:library in 7890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05484114 = score(doc=7890,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.13484047 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051282257 = queryNorm
              0.40671125 = fieldWeight in 7890, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7890)
          0.048636265 = weight(_text_:22 in 7890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.048636265 = score(doc=7890,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17958173 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051282257 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7890, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7890)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the features of a library automation application called Micro CDS/ISIS. The software produced by UNESCO is used by more than 15.000 instituions all over the world. It is cost free and readily available. Its technical features include minimum hardware requirements, large database capacity, variable length fields, repeatable fields, subfields, powerful indexing, and rapid searching. It follows international data exchange standards. Support features include extensive documentation and a worldwide user group. Training courses in CDS/ISIS are conducted worldwide. These features ensure that CDS/ISIS library software is ideal for developing countries
    Date
    6. 3.1997 16:22:15
    Source
    Library software review. 16(1997) no.1, S.12-16
  7. Wurangian, N.: Using the OCLC Cataloging Micro Enhancer to produce a bibliography list (1993) 0.03
    0.033300877 = product of:
      0.09990263 = sum of:
        0.09990263 = sum of:
          0.04431833 = weight(_text_:library in 5055) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04431833 = score(doc=5055,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.13484047 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051282257 = queryNorm
              0.32867232 = fieldWeight in 5055, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5055)
          0.055584304 = weight(_text_:22 in 5055) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.055584304 = score(doc=5055,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17958173 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051282257 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5055, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5055)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the work of the E. Del Webb Memorial Library, Loma Linda Univ., in using the OCLC Cataloging Micro Enhancer and Pro-Cite software to produce a bibliography listing the latest books added to the library collection. Describes the use of the macro facility of WordPerfect for Windows to process records downloaded using the recent PRISM version of the OCLC Cataloging Micro Enhancer
    Source
    OCLC systems and services. 9(1993) no.1, S.22-24
  8. Laegreid, J.A.: SIFT: a Norwegian information retrieval system (1993) 0.03
    0.033300877 = product of:
      0.09990263 = sum of:
        0.09990263 = sum of:
          0.04431833 = weight(_text_:library in 7701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04431833 = score(doc=7701,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.13484047 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051282257 = queryNorm
              0.32867232 = fieldWeight in 7701, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7701)
          0.055584304 = weight(_text_:22 in 7701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.055584304 = score(doc=7701,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17958173 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051282257 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7701, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7701)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Describes SIFT (Search in Free Text) an information retrieval system originally developed for administering governmental documents in Norway but which is now being applied alsewhere. SIFT handles structured information well. A library system, SIFT-BIBL, is now available. SIFT's retrieval engine and search facilities are powerful. Its user interface is limited but being imporved. An application programmer interface has been released which will allow programmers to develop their own interface. A Windows-based- client-server version is now being beta tested
    Date
    23. 1.1999 19:22:09
    Source
    Library technology news. 9(1993), S.3-4
  9. UNIMARC and CDS/ISIS : Proceedings of the Workshops held in Budapest, 21.-22. June 1993 and Barcelona, 26. August 1993 (1994) 0.03
    0.029138267 = product of:
      0.0874148 = sum of:
        0.0874148 = sum of:
          0.03877854 = weight(_text_:library in 8779) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03877854 = score(doc=8779,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.13484047 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051282257 = queryNorm
              0.28758827 = fieldWeight in 8779, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8779)
          0.048636265 = weight(_text_:22 in 8779) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.048636265 = score(doc=8779,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17958173 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051282257 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 8779, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8779)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: CAMPOS, F.: UNIMARC: state of the art on the universal format for international exchange; HOLT, B.: The maintenance of UNIMARC; WILLER, M.: UNIMARC / Authorities format; HOPKINSON, A.: CDS/ISIS as a tool for implementing UNIMARC; BERKE, S. u. M. SIPOS: The comprehensive information system of the National Széchényi Library and the Hungarian MARC format; SHRAIBERG, Y.: Application of the CDS/ISIS software package and UNIMARC format in the automated systems of the Russian National Public Library for Science and Technology and other libraries of the Russian Federation; STOKLASOVA, B.: Exchange formats in the Czech Republic: past, present and future
  10. Perez, E.: Industrial strength database publishing : Inmagic DB/Textworks WebPublisher (1997) 0.03
    0.029138267 = product of:
      0.0874148 = sum of:
        0.0874148 = sum of:
          0.03877854 = weight(_text_:library in 679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03877854 = score(doc=679,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.13484047 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051282257 = queryNorm
              0.28758827 = fieldWeight in 679, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=679)
          0.048636265 = weight(_text_:22 in 679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.048636265 = score(doc=679,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17958173 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051282257 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 679, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=679)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The availability of powerful indexing and database products with easy Web connections means that libraries able to gather and edit their own data are emancipated from the large vendors. The Oregon State Library staff used the Data Magician translation utility as part of a complex, but speedy, database converison project. The Oregon Index database of approximately 300.000 records was converted from a BRS database host over to the Inmagic WebPublisher system. Describes the planning and action stepts used in producing the Web accessible index database of considerable size. Participants have high ratings to effectiveness of both the translation utility and the database engine
    Date
    6. 3.1997 16:22:15
    Source
    Library software review. 16(1997) no.3, S.124-136
  11. Bellarby, L.: ¬A comparison of two personal bibliographic software packages : EndNote and Pro-Cite (1993) 0.03
    0.028974032 = product of:
      0.086922094 = sum of:
        0.086922094 = sum of:
          0.031337794 = weight(_text_:library in 561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.031337794 = score(doc=561,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13484047 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051282257 = queryNorm
              0.23240642 = fieldWeight in 561, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=561)
          0.055584304 = weight(_text_:22 in 561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.055584304 = score(doc=561,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17958173 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051282257 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 561, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=561)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Presents a summary of a more detailed study made of evaluation versions of these 2 US software packages, due to appear in 'C and L applications'. The packages are aimed at individual researchers, students and lecturers rather than libraries. Concludes that the cheaper package, EndNote, appears better suited to the students with occasional need for bibliographies, whereas the more complex (and expensive) Pro-Cite would suit a researcher or writer with a high output of professional papers. Pro-Cite could probably also be used by a small library as a means of creating a database
    Source
    Law librarian. 24(1993) no.1, S.22-23
  12. Brandt, D.S.: Ovid searching software (1996) 0.03
    0.028974032 = product of:
      0.086922094 = sum of:
        0.086922094 = sum of:
          0.031337794 = weight(_text_:library in 6754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.031337794 = score(doc=6754,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13484047 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051282257 = queryNorm
              0.23240642 = fieldWeight in 6754, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6754)
          0.055584304 = weight(_text_:22 in 6754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.055584304 = score(doc=6754,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17958173 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051282257 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6754, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6754)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    6. 3.1997 16:22:15
    Source
    Library software review. 15(1996) no.3, S.141-148
  13. Boeder, R.: Database applications for libraries : an introduction (1996) 0.03
    0.028974032 = product of:
      0.086922094 = sum of:
        0.086922094 = sum of:
          0.031337794 = weight(_text_:library in 340) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.031337794 = score(doc=340,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13484047 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051282257 = queryNorm
              0.23240642 = fieldWeight in 340, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=340)
          0.055584304 = weight(_text_:22 in 340) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.055584304 = score(doc=340,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17958173 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051282257 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 340, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=340)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Overviews database applications in libraries. Explains the 2 basic types of databases, flat-file and relational, outlines the uses and advantages of relationship systems. Librarians can utilise a number of software packages for database management and design a database in cooperation with a programmer. The librarian needs to be involved in the conceptual and external level of database design. Offers advice on finding a database designer. Outlines ideas for library related applications of database software
    Source
    Colorado libraries. 22(1996) no.1, S.25-28
  14. Kirkwood, H.P.: Ovid Web Gateway (1998) 0.03
    0.028974032 = product of:
      0.086922094 = sum of:
        0.086922094 = sum of:
          0.031337794 = weight(_text_:library in 2878) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.031337794 = score(doc=2878,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13484047 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051282257 = queryNorm
              0.23240642 = fieldWeight in 2878, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2878)
          0.055584304 = weight(_text_:22 in 2878) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.055584304 = score(doc=2878,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17958173 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051282257 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2878, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2878)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    6. 3.1997 16:22:15
    Source
    Library software review. 17(1998) no.1, S.14-23
  15. Rothera, H.: Framing the subject : a subject indexing model for electronic bibliographic databases in the humanities (1998) 0.03
    0.028974032 = product of:
      0.086922094 = sum of:
        0.086922094 = sum of:
          0.031337794 = weight(_text_:library in 3904) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.031337794 = score(doc=3904,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13484047 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051282257 = queryNorm
              0.23240642 = fieldWeight in 3904, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3904)
          0.055584304 = weight(_text_:22 in 3904) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.055584304 = score(doc=3904,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17958173 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051282257 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3904, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3904)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Library and information research news. 22(1998) no.71, S.24-33
  16. Bergman, O.; Whittaker, S.: ¬The science of managing our digital stuff (2016) 0.03
    0.028792668 = product of:
      0.086378 = sum of:
        0.086378 = weight(_text_:digital in 3971) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.086378 = score(doc=3971,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.20228553 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051282257 = queryNorm
            0.42701027 = fieldWeight in 3971, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3971)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Why we organize our personal digital data the way we do and how design of new PIM systems can help us manage our information more efficiently. Each of us has an ever-growing collection of personal digital data: documents, photographs, PowerPoint presentations, videos, music, emails and texts sent and received. To access any of this, we have to find it. The ease (or difficulty) of finding something depends on how we organize our digital stuff. In this book, personal information management (PIM) experts Ofer Bergman and Steve Whittaker explain why we organize our personal digital data the way we do and how the design of new PIM systems can help us manage our collections more efficiently.
    Content
    Bergman and Whittaker report that many of us use hierarchical folders for our personal digital organizing. Critics of this method point out that information is hidden from sight in folders that are often within other folders so that we have to remember the exact location of information to access it. Because of this, information scientists suggest other methods: search, more flexible than navigating folders; tags, which allow multiple categorizations; and group information management. Yet Bergman and Whittaker have found in their pioneering PIM research that these other methods that work best for public information management don't work as well for personal information management. Bergman and Whittaker describe personal information collection as curation: we preserve and organize this data to ensure our future access to it. Unlike other information management fields, in PIM the same user organizes and retrieves the information. After explaining the cognitive and psychological reasons that so many prefer folders, Bergman and Whittaker propose the user-subjective approach to PIM, which does not replace folder hierarchies but exploits these unique characteristics of PIM.
  17. McMahon, T.E.: Procite 4: a look at the latest release in bibliographic management software (1998) 0.02
    0.021730524 = product of:
      0.06519157 = sum of:
        0.06519157 = sum of:
          0.023503343 = weight(_text_:library in 2810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.023503343 = score(doc=2810,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13484047 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051282257 = queryNorm
              0.17430481 = fieldWeight in 2810, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2810)
          0.041688226 = weight(_text_:22 in 2810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.041688226 = score(doc=2810,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17958173 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051282257 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2810, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2810)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    6. 3.1997 16:22:15
    Source
    Library software review. 17(1998) no.1, S.4-13
  18. EndNote X1 (2007) 0.02
    0.020347223 = product of:
      0.030520834 = sum of:
        0.022039793 = weight(_text_:digital in 2928) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022039793 = score(doc=2928,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20228553 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051282257 = queryNorm
            0.10895388 = fieldWeight in 2928, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2928)
        0.00848104 = product of:
          0.01696208 = sum of:
            0.01696208 = weight(_text_:library in 2928) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01696208 = score(doc=2928,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.13484047 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051282257 = queryNorm
                0.12579368 = fieldWeight in 2928, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2928)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Mitteilungen VOEB 61(2008) H.1, S.110-112 (O. Oberhauser): "In Heft 4/2006 dieser Zeitschrift wurde die zehnte Ausgabe ("X") des bewährten Literaturverwaltungsprogramms EndNote besprochen. 2007 kam die vorliegende, elfte Version auf den Markt, diesmal mit der leicht postmodern anmutenden Zählung "X1", die sich nach der Implementierung eines kürzlich erschienenen Updates als "X1.0.1" liest. Die neue Version ist der vorhergehenden grundsätzlich ähnlich, verfügt aber über einige interessante zusätzliche Features, die im Folgenden kurz behandelt werden sollen. Eine Gruppe dieser Neuerungen betrifft die in der EndNote-Diktion als "library window" bezeichnete Kurztitelliste. In dieser ist es erstens nunmehr möglich, pro EndNote-Bibliothek bis zu 500 individuell definierbare "Gruppen" zu erstellen, denen z.B. einzelne oder mehrere ausgewählte Datensätze, aber auch Ergebnisse einer Suche in der betreffenden Bibliothek oder eine Menge importierter Datensätze zugeordnet werden können. Diese Gruppen bleiben über das Ende einer Sitzung hinweg erhalten, können aber stets leicht wieder verändert (erweitert, reduziert, umbenannt bzw. gelöscht) werden. Ein und derselbe Eintrag kann bei Bedarf auch verschiedenen Gruppen zugeordnet werden. Wenn die Spalte, in der die Gruppen aufgelistet werden (und in der zwischen der Anzeige aller Datensätze und jener einer bestimmten Gruppe hin- und hergewechselt werden kann), gerade nicht benötigt wird, kann sie mit einem in der Werkzeugleiste plazierten Icon weggeklickt werden. Ich selbst habe mit dem Gruppen-Feature bereits gute Erfahrungen gemacht, z.B. zur (temporären) Zusammenfassung von thematisch ähnlichen Einträgen, zur Zusammenführung von Vorträgen einer bestimmten Konferenz sowie zur Markierung von dringend zu beschaffender Originalliteratur. Zur Verbesserung der Kurztitelliste gehört zweitens die Option, in der Autorenspalte alle Verfasser einer Publikation (nicht nur die jeweils ersten) samt ihren Vornamen bzw. Initialen aufscheinen zu lassen. Dies ist nicht nur bei Namensgleichheit von Vorteil, sondern macht auch die Unterschiede in der Sortierung von Ein- und Mehrverfasserpublikationen transparenter und erscheint mir daher als höchst willkommene Änderung. Drittens kann jetzt, mit Hilfe eines per rechter Maustaste aufrufbaren Menüs, direkt aus der Kurztitelliste heraus der zu einem jeweiligen Datensatz gespeicherte Volltext aufgerufen bzw. eine katalogisierte Web-Adresse (URL) geöffnet werden. Während ersteres im Fall meiner Datenbank problemlos funktioniert, scheitert das URL-Öffnen an meiner Gepflogenheit, zu einer Web-Adresse auch das Zugriffsdatum festzuhalten. So wird beim Aufruf aus der Kurzanzeige z. B. der katalogisierte Eintrag
    http://informationr.net/ir/12-4/paper330.html [16.10.2007] im Web-Browser unglücklicherweise in die Adresse http://informationr.net/ir/12-4/paper330.html%20%5B16.10.2007%5D umgesetzt, während dies im Eingabefenster ("reference window") durchaus nicht der Fall ist. Dort wird der in blauer Schrift dargestellte Link korrekt erkannt und kann, ohne dass das dahinter stehende Datum stört, durch simples Anklicken in einem Browser-Fenster geöffnet werden. Als viertes und auch recht nützliches neues Feature der Kurztitelliste ist anzuführen, dass dort als Alternative zu der mit einem separaten Suchfenster realisierten Recherche in der EndNote-Library nunmehr ein kleines Eingabefenster für eine "Quick Search" zur Verfügung steht, mit der sich ein guter Teil der Abfragen bewältigen lässt. Andere Neuerungen betreffen neben der Kurztitelliste ("library window") auch das Eingabefenster ("reference window") bzw. die dort bei der Datenerfassung und -pflege erscheinenden Felder und ihre Bezeichnungen. So steht nunmehr eine umfassendere Möglichkeit zur Gestaltung von Schriftart und -grösse der Felder und ihrer Inhalte zur Verfügung. Das Feld "Link to PDF" wurde in "File Attachment" umbenannt, zumal dort jetzt pro Datensatz bis zu 45 Dateien beliebiger Formate verlinkt werden können. Das Feld für die Erfassung von Kennungen für digitale Dokumente heisst jetzt "DOI" (Digital Object Identifier), da sich dieser Identifikator insbesondere für Online-Artikel wissenschaftlicher Fachzeitschriften durchgesetzt hat. Eine neue Funktionalität, die zur Erhöhung der Flexibilität bei der Verwendung von EndNote beitragen soll, verbirgt sich hinter den Headings "Sharing Your Reference Type Table" (Manual) bzw. "Exportieren und Importieren von angepassten Datenbankstrukturen" (deutschsprachiger Produktprospekt). Damit wird es bspw. möglich gemacht, die EndNoteDatenbank eines Kollegen, die dieser mit individuellen Modifikationen (Feldbezeichnungen, Standard-Referenztyp, Spaltendefinition der Kurztitelanzeige), versehen hat, in dieser modifizierten Form zu betrachten. Dazu muss allerdings zuerst die eigene Tabelle der dokumententypspezifischen Felddefinitionen ("reference type table") exportiert und an sicherer Stelle verwahrt werden. Diese Prozedur ist für den geschilderten Fall, der nicht allzu oft vorkommen wird, unschwer durchführbar - dies zeigte sich auch bei einem einfachen Test. Wollte man sie hingegen für den alltäglichen, parallelen Betrieb von Datenbanken mit unterschiedlicher Struktur (z.B. Literatur- vs. CD- oder Filmdatenbank) nutzen, so bedürfte sie noch einer weiteren, ein ergonomisches Arbeiten besser unterstützenden Automatisierung.
  19. Moore, C.: Microcomputer software for library and information work (1991) 0.01
    0.0147727765 = product of:
      0.04431833 = sum of:
        0.04431833 = product of:
          0.08863666 = sum of:
            0.08863666 = weight(_text_:library in 1296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08863666 = score(doc=1296,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.13484047 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051282257 = queryNorm
                0.65734464 = fieldWeight in 1296, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1296)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Encyclopedia of library and information science. Vol.48, [=Suppl.11]
  20. Jayakanth, F.; Aswath, L.: ¬A PFT-based approach to make CDS/ISIS data based OAI-compliant (2006) 0.01
    0.014693196 = product of:
      0.044079587 = sum of:
        0.044079587 = weight(_text_:digital in 1495) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044079587 = score(doc=1495,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20228553 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051282257 = queryNorm
            0.21790776 = fieldWeight in 1495, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1495)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    CDS/ISIS is a powerful and popular software package for managing computerized bibliographic data. It is developed and maintained by UNESCO since 1985. It is free software available in binary form for MS-DOS, MS-Windows, Unix, and Unix-based operating systems like Linux. It is used by many libraries and organizations in many countries to maintain their Online Public Access Catalogues (OPACs) and other bibliographic databases. With the advent of the Internet and Web technologies, publishing the content of databases on the Web provides a round the clock access to the content from any PC with Internet access. Some CDS-ISIS databases are published on the Web, but many are still on standalone systems or on local area networks. Interoperability is the key for the efficient dissemination of information to end-users. The Open Archives Initiative Protocol for Metadata Harvesting (OAI-PMH) provides a technical framework for interoperability of OAI-compliant digital libraries (UNESCO. 2004). However, CDS/ISIS databases are not OAI-compliant. In this paper, we describe a simple approach, to make CDS/ISIS OAI-compliant. It is based on printing CDS/ISIS records in an OAI static repository format.

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 75
  • d 4
  • f 2
  • i 2
  • nl 2
  • ru 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 77
  • m 6
  • s 4
  • el 1
  • r 1
  • More… Less…

Classifications