-
Borbinha, J.: Authority control in the world of metadata (2004)
0.06
0.060949948 = product of:
0.09142492 = sum of:
0.07480554 = weight(_text_:digital in 5666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07480554 = score(doc=5666,freq=4.0), product of:
0.20228553 = queryWeight, product of:
3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
0.051282257 = queryNorm
0.36980176 = fieldWeight in 5666, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5666)
0.016619375 = product of:
0.03323875 = sum of:
0.03323875 = weight(_text_:library in 5666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03323875 = score(doc=5666,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13484047 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.051282257 = queryNorm
0.24650425 = fieldWeight in 5666, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5666)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This paper discusses the concept of "metadata" in the scope of the "digital library," two terms recently used in a great diversity of perspectives. It is not the intent to promote privilege of any particular view, but rather to help provide a better understanding of these multiple perspectives. The paper starts with a discussion of the concept of digital library, followed by an analysis of the concept of metadata. It continues with a discussion about the relationship of this concept with technology, services, and scenarios of application. The concluding remarks stress the three main arguments assumed for the relevance of the concept of metadata: the growing number of heterogeneous genres of information resources, the new emerging scenarios for interoperability, and issues related to the cost and complexity of current technology.
-
Hill, L.L.; Frew, J.; Zheng, Q.: Geographic names : the implementation of a gazetteer in a georeferenced digital library (1999)
0.05
0.05239789 = product of:
0.07859683 = sum of:
0.06107847 = weight(_text_:digital in 1240) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06107847 = score(doc=1240,freq=6.0), product of:
0.20228553 = queryWeight, product of:
3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
0.051282257 = queryNorm
0.30194187 = fieldWeight in 1240, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1240)
0.017518358 = product of:
0.035036717 = sum of:
0.035036717 = weight(_text_:library in 1240) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035036717 = score(doc=1240,freq=10.0), product of:
0.13484047 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.051282257 = queryNorm
0.25983828 = fieldWeight in 1240, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1240)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The Alexandria Digital Library (ADL) Project has developed a content standard for gazetteer objects and a hierarchical type scheme for geographic features. Both of these developments are based on ADL experience with an earlier gazetteer component for the Library, based on two gazetteers maintained by the U.S. federal government. We define the minimum components of a gazetteer entry as (1) a geographic name, (2) a geographic location represented by coordinates, and (3) a type designation. With these attributes, a gazetteer can function as a tool for indirect spatial location identification through names and types. The ADL Gazetteer Content Standard supports contribution and sharing of gazetteer entries with rich descriptions beyond the minimum requirements. This paper describes the content standard, the feature type thesaurus, and the implementation and research issues. A gazetteer is list of geographic names, together with their geographic locations and other descriptive information. A geographic name is a proper name for a geographic place and feature, such as Santa Barbara County, Mount Washington, St. Francis Hospital, and Southern California. There are many types of printed gazetteers. For example, the New York Times Atlas has a gazetteer section that can be used to look up a geographic name and find the page(s) and grid reference(s) where the corresponding feature is shown. Some gazetteers provide information about places and features; for example, a history of the locale, population data, physical data such as elevation, or the pronunciation of the name. Some lists of geographic names are available as hierarchical term sets (thesauri) designed for information retreival; these are used to describe bibliographic or museum materials. Examples include the authority files of the U.S. Library of Congress and the GeoRef Thesaurus produced by the American Geological Institute. The Getty Museum has recently made their Thesaurus of Geographic Names available online. This is a major project to develop a controlled vocabulary of current and historical names to describe (i.e., catalog) art and architecture literature. U.S. federal government mapping agencies maintain gazetteers containing the official names of places and/or the names that appear on map series. Examples include the U.S. Geological Survey's Geographic Names Information System (GNIS) and the National Imagery and Mapping Agency's Geographic Names Processing System (GNPS). Both of these are maintained in cooperation with the U.S. Board of Geographic Names (BGN). Many other examples could be cited -- for local areas, for other countries, and for special purposes. There is remarkable diversity in approaches to the description of geographic places and no standardization beyond authoritative sources for the geographic names themselves.
- Object
- Alexandria Digital Library
-
Leth, P.: Subject access - the Swedish approach (2007)
0.05
0.049951315 = product of:
0.14985394 = sum of:
0.14985394 = sum of:
0.0664775 = weight(_text_:library in 131) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0664775 = score(doc=131,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13484047 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.051282257 = queryNorm
0.4930085 = fieldWeight in 131, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=131)
0.08337645 = weight(_text_:22 in 131) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08337645 = score(doc=131,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17958173 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051282257 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 131, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=131)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Content
- Vortrag anlässlich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".
-
Hengel, C.: Mapping name authorities : the Virtual International Authority File (VIAF) (2007)
0.05
0.049951315 = product of:
0.14985394 = sum of:
0.14985394 = sum of:
0.0664775 = weight(_text_:library in 1266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0664775 = score(doc=1266,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13484047 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.051282257 = queryNorm
0.4930085 = fieldWeight in 1266, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1266)
0.08337645 = weight(_text_:22 in 1266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08337645 = score(doc=1266,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17958173 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051282257 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1266, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1266)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Content
- Vortrag anlässlich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".
-
Goossens, P.: Authority control : trends and challenges (2007)
0.05
0.049951315 = product of:
0.14985394 = sum of:
0.14985394 = sum of:
0.0664775 = weight(_text_:library in 1290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0664775 = score(doc=1290,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13484047 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.051282257 = queryNorm
0.4930085 = fieldWeight in 1290, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1290)
0.08337645 = weight(_text_:22 in 1290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08337645 = score(doc=1290,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17958173 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051282257 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1290, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1290)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Content
- Vortrag anlässlich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".
-
Petrucciani, A.: ¬The other half of cataloguing : new models and perspectives for the control of authors and works (2004)
0.04
0.0359151 = product of:
0.053872645 = sum of:
0.044079587 = weight(_text_:digital in 5669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044079587 = score(doc=5669,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20228553 = queryWeight, product of:
3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
0.051282257 = queryNorm
0.21790776 = fieldWeight in 5669, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5669)
0.00979306 = product of:
0.01958612 = sum of:
0.01958612 = weight(_text_:library in 5669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01958612 = score(doc=5669,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13484047 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.051282257 = queryNorm
0.14525402 = fieldWeight in 5669, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5669)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Today's electronic catalogue makes retrieval of specific records very simple and quick in most (not all) cases, but searches aimed at the reliable retrieval of all material answering a well-defined need (author, work, theme, form, etc.) are still long and tiring, and sometimes impossible, in crowded bibliographic databases. In spite of its great relevance, authority control has been and still is the "poor relative" of cataloguing, the often neglected or overlooked "other half" if we compare it to the creation of bibliographic records. The FRBR study and the new authority control standards (GARR and UNIMARC Authorities) are important steps towards future perspectives. Even today, cataloguing codes do not make clear the difference between the access points for bibliographic records and the relationships (work-to-work, author-to-work, etc.) that are independent from spoecific publications. With the development of richer authority records and relationships, the bibliographic record might be relieved of information related to entities different from publications and of all the functions more suitably worked out upstream or downstream in access systems or by links to the images and/or the texts of the publications themselves. A "light" bibliographic record would no longer be the paramount component of library information systems; it would keep its central role rather as nimble, swift turntable between access and content organization systems and systems for management and display of digital resources themselves.
-
El-Sherbini, M.A.: Cataloging and classification : review of the literature 2005-06 (2008)
0.03
0.033300877 = product of:
0.09990263 = sum of:
0.09990263 = sum of:
0.04431833 = weight(_text_:library in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04431833 = score(doc=249,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13484047 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.051282257 = queryNorm
0.32867232 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
0.055584304 = weight(_text_:22 in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055584304 = score(doc=249,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17958173 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051282257 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- This paper reviews library literature on cataloging and classification published in 2005-06. It covers pertinent literature in the following areas: the future of cataloging; Functional Requirement for Bibliographic Records (FRBR); metadata and its applications and relation to Machine-Readable Cataloging (MARC); cataloging tools and standards; authority control; and recruitment, training, and the changing role of catalogers.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
- Source
- Library resources and technical services. 52(2008) no.3, S.148-163
-
Vellucci, S.L.: Metadata and authority control (2000)
0.03
0.032043364 = product of:
0.09613009 = sum of:
0.09613009 = sum of:
0.04749382 = weight(_text_:library in 180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04749382 = score(doc=180,freq=6.0), product of:
0.13484047 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.051282257 = queryNorm
0.3522223 = fieldWeight in 180, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=180)
0.048636265 = weight(_text_:22 in 180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048636265 = score(doc=180,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17958173 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051282257 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 180, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=180)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- A variety of information communities have developed metadata schemes to meet the needs of their own users. The ability of libraries to incorporate and use multiple metadata schemes in current library systems will depend on the compatibility of imported data with existing catalog data. Authority control will play an important role in metadata interoperability. In this article, I discuss factors for successful authority control in current library catalogs, which include operation in a well-defined and bounded universe, application of principles and standard practices to access point creation, reference to authoritative lists, and bibliographic record creation by highly trained individuals. Metadata characteristics and environmental models are examined and the likelihood of successful authority control is explored for a variety of metadata environments.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
- Source
- Library resources and technical services. 44(2000) no.1, S.33-43
-
DiLauro, T.; Choudhury, G.S.; Patton, M.; Warner, J.W.; Brown, E.W.: Automated name authority control and enhanced searching in the Levy collection (2001)
0.03
0.02873208 = product of:
0.04309812 = sum of:
0.03526367 = weight(_text_:digital in 1160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03526367 = score(doc=1160,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20228553 = queryWeight, product of:
3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
0.051282257 = queryNorm
0.17432621 = fieldWeight in 1160, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1160)
0.0078344485 = product of:
0.015668897 = sum of:
0.015668897 = weight(_text_:library in 1160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015668897 = score(doc=1160,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13484047 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.051282257 = queryNorm
0.11620321 = fieldWeight in 1160, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1160)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This paper is the second in a series in D-Lib Magazine and describes a workflow management system being developed by the Digital Knowledge Center (DKC) at the Milton S. Eisenhower Library (MSEL) of The Johns Hopkins University. Based on experience from digitizing the Lester S. Levy Collection of Sheet Music, it was apparent that large-scale digitization efforts require a significant amount of human labor that is both time-consuming and costly. Consequently, this workflow management system aims to reduce the amount of human labor and time for large-scale digitization projects. The mission of this second phase of the project ("Levy II") can be summarized as follows: * Reduce costs for large collection ingestion by creating a suite of open-source processes, tools, and interfaces for workflow management * Increase access capabilities by providing a suite of research tools * Demonstrate utility of tools and processes with a subset of the online Levy Collection The cornerstones of the workflow management system include optical music recognition (OMR) software and an automated name authority control system (ANAC). The OMR software generates a logical representation of the score for sound generation, music searching, and musicological research. The ANAC disambiguates names, associating each name with an individual (e.g., the composer Septimus Winner also published under the pseudonyms Alice Hawthorne and Apsley Street, among others). Complementing the workflow tools, a suite of research tools focuses upon enhanced searching capabilities through the development and application of a fast, disk-based search engine for lyrics and music and the incorporation of an XML structure for metadata. The first paper (Choudhury et al. 2001) described the OMR software and musical components of Levy II. This paper focuses on the metadata and intellectual access components that include automated name authority control and the aforementioned search engine.
-
Wang, S.; Koopman, R.: Second life for authority records (2015)
0.03
0.02873208 = product of:
0.04309812 = sum of:
0.03526367 = weight(_text_:digital in 2303) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03526367 = score(doc=2303,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20228553 = queryWeight, product of:
3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
0.051282257 = queryNorm
0.17432621 = fieldWeight in 2303, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2303)
0.0078344485 = product of:
0.015668897 = sum of:
0.015668897 = weight(_text_:library in 2303) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015668897 = score(doc=2303,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13484047 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.051282257 = queryNorm
0.11620321 = fieldWeight in 2303, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2303)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Authority control is a standard practice in the library community that provides consistent, unique, and unambiguous reference to entities such as persons, places, concepts, etc. The ideal way of referring to authority records through unique identifiers is in line with the current linked data principle. When presenting a bibliographic record, the linked authority records are expanded with the authoritative information. This way, any update in the authority records will not affect the indexing of the bibliographic records. The structural information in the authority files can also be leveraged to expand the user's query to retrieve bibliographic records associated with all the variations, narrower terms or related terms. However, in many digital libraries, especially largescale aggregations such as WorldCat and Europeana, name strings are often used instead of authority record identifiers. This is also partly due to the lack of global authority records that are valid across countries and cultural heritage domains. But even when there are global authority systems, they are not applied at scale. For example, in WorldCat, only 15% of the records have DDC and 3% have UDC codes; less than 40% of the records have one or more topical terms catalogued in the 650 MARC field, many of which are too general (such as "sports" or "literature") to be useful for retrieving bibliographic records. Therefore, when a user query is based on a Dewey code, the results usually have high precision but the recall is much lower than it should be; and, a search on a general topical term returns millions of hits without being even complete. All these practices make it difficult to leverage the key benefits of authority files. This is also true for authority files that have been transformed into linked data and enriched with mapping information. There are practical reasons for using name strings instead of identifiers. One is the indexing and query response. The future infrastructure design should take the performance into account while embracing the benefit of linking instead of copying, without introducing extra complexity to users. Notwithstanding all the restrictions, we argue that largescale aggregations also bring new opportunities for better exploiting the benefits of authority records. It is possible to use machine learning techniques to automatically link bibliographic records to authority records based on the manual input of cataloguers. Text mining and visualization techniques can offer a contextual view of authority records, which in return can be used to retrieve missing or mis-catalogued records. In this talk, we will describe such opportunities in more detail.
-
Hickey, T.B.; Toves, J.; O'Neill, E.T.: NACO normalization : a detailed examination of the authority file comparison rules (2006)
0.03
0.02535228 = product of:
0.07605684 = sum of:
0.07605684 = sum of:
0.02742057 = weight(_text_:library in 5760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02742057 = score(doc=5760,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13484047 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.051282257 = queryNorm
0.20335563 = fieldWeight in 5760, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5760)
0.048636265 = weight(_text_:22 in 5760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048636265 = score(doc=5760,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17958173 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051282257 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5760, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5760)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
- Source
- Library resources and technical services. 50(2006) no.3, S.166-172
-
Wolverton, R.E.: Becoming an authority on authority control : an annotated bibliography of resources (2006)
0.03
0.02535228 = product of:
0.07605684 = sum of:
0.07605684 = sum of:
0.02742057 = weight(_text_:library in 120) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02742057 = score(doc=120,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13484047 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.051282257 = queryNorm
0.20335563 = fieldWeight in 120, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=120)
0.048636265 = weight(_text_:22 in 120) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048636265 = score(doc=120,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17958173 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051282257 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 120, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=120)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
- Source
- Library resources and technical services. 50(2006) no.1, S.31-41
-
Horn, M.E.: "Garbage" in, "refuse and refuse disposal" out : making the most of the subject authority file in the OPAC (2002)
0.03
0.02535228 = product of:
0.07605684 = sum of:
0.07605684 = sum of:
0.02742057 = weight(_text_:library in 156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02742057 = score(doc=156,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13484047 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.051282257 = queryNorm
0.20335563 = fieldWeight in 156, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=156)
0.048636265 = weight(_text_:22 in 156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048636265 = score(doc=156,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17958173 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051282257 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 156, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=156)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
- Source
- Library resources and technical services. 46(2002) no.3, S.111-
-
Russell, B.M.; Spillane, J.L.: Using the Web for name authority work (2001)
0.03
0.02535228 = product of:
0.07605684 = sum of:
0.07605684 = sum of:
0.02742057 = weight(_text_:library in 167) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02742057 = score(doc=167,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13484047 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.051282257 = queryNorm
0.20335563 = fieldWeight in 167, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=167)
0.048636265 = weight(_text_:22 in 167) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048636265 = score(doc=167,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17958173 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051282257 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 167, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=167)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
- Source
- Library resources and technical services. 45(2001) no.2, S.73-79
-
Danowski, P.: Authority files and Web 2.0 : Wikipedia and the PND. An Example (2007)
0.02
0.024637476 = product of:
0.07391243 = sum of:
0.07391243 = sum of:
0.03917224 = weight(_text_:library in 1291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03917224 = score(doc=1291,freq=8.0), product of:
0.13484047 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.051282257 = queryNorm
0.29050803 = fieldWeight in 1291, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1291)
0.03474019 = weight(_text_:22 in 1291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03474019 = score(doc=1291,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17958173 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051282257 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1291, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1291)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- More and more users index everything on their own in the web 2.0. There are services for links, videos, pictures, books, encyclopaedic articles and scientific articles. All these services are library independent. But must that really be? Can't libraries help with their experience and tools to make user indexing better? On the experience of a project from German language Wikipedia together with the German person authority files (Personen Namen Datei - PND) located at German National Library (Deutsche Nationalbibliothek) I would like to show what is possible. How users can and will use the authority files, if we let them. We will take a look how the project worked and what we can learn for future projects. Conclusions - Authority files can have a role in the web 2.0 - there must be an open interface/ service for retrieval - everything that is indexed on the net with authority files can be easy integrated in a federated search - O'Reilly: You have to found ways that your data get more important that more it will be used
- Content
- Vortrag anlässlich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".
-
Jantz, R.C.: ¬An approach to managing vocabulary for databases on the Web (1999)
0.02
0.023509113 = product of:
0.07052734 = sum of:
0.07052734 = weight(_text_:digital in 5354) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07052734 = score(doc=5354,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20228553 = queryWeight, product of:
3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
0.051282257 = queryNorm
0.34865242 = fieldWeight in 5354, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5354)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- This paper proposes an approach for managing vocabulary for reference databases on the Web. The approach is directed at domain specific databases in which much of the referenced material remains in non-digital form. A combination of interactive and manual processes are outlined along with a proposed implementation approach. For this limited class of databases, it is suggested that the approach can significantly improve vocabulary management with relatively low costs in manual effort.
-
Byrum, J.D.: ¬The emerging global bibliographical network : the era of international standardization in the development of cataloging policy (2000)
0.02
0.022888117 = product of:
0.06866435 = sum of:
0.06866435 = sum of:
0.03392416 = weight(_text_:library in 190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03392416 = score(doc=190,freq=6.0), product of:
0.13484047 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.051282257 = queryNorm
0.25158736 = fieldWeight in 190, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=190)
0.03474019 = weight(_text_:22 in 190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03474019 = score(doc=190,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17958173 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051282257 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 190, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=190)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Catalogers have become interdependent in their pursuit to provide bibliographic control and access. This interdependency has brought with it the need for greater agreement in applying common cataloging policies and rules. The expanded application of AACR2 (Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules) is fostering greater uniformity in the provision of bibliographic description and access. The rules have been translated into numerous languages and used in European, Middle Eastern, and Latin American countries. Cataloging committees and individual libraries in Europe and South Africa have expressed strong interest in adopting, adapting, or aligning with AACR2. PCC (Program for Cooperative Cataloguing) is one of the most successful cooperative cataloging efforts and has a considerable international component, which encourages the use of AACR, LCSH (Library of Congress Subject Headings), and MARC. AACR2 is successful on an international level because it is based in internationally developed standards, including ISBDs and the Paris Principles. ISBDs (International Standard Bibliographic Description) and the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records are examples of the contributions that IFLA (International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions) has made to the internationalization of cataloging. IFLA sponsored the international conference that resulted in the Paris Principles as well as subsequent projects to craft international policy in relation to uniform headings for persons, corporate bodies, and titles.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
- Source
- Library resources and technical services. 44(2000) no.3, S.114-121
-
Chen, S.-J.: Semantic enrichment of linked personal authority data : a case study of elites in late imperial China (2019)
0.02
0.020779317 = product of:
0.06233795 = sum of:
0.06233795 = weight(_text_:digital in 5642) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06233795 = score(doc=5642,freq=4.0), product of:
0.20228553 = queryWeight, product of:
3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
0.051282257 = queryNorm
0.3081681 = fieldWeight in 5642, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5642)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- The study uses the Database of Names and Biographies (DNB) as an example to explore how in the transformation of original data into linked data, semantic enrichment can enhance engagement in digital humanities. In the preliminary results, we have defined instance-based and schema-based categories of semantic enrichment. In the instance-based category, in which enrichment occurs by enhancing the content of entities, we further determined three types, including: 1) enriching the entities by linking to diverse external resources in order to provide additional data of multiple perspectives; 2) enriching the entities with missing data, which is needed to satisfy the semantic queries; and, 3) providing the entities with access to an extended knowledge base. In the schema-based categories that enrichment occurs by enhancing the relations between the properties, we have identified two types, including: 1) enriching the properties by defining the hierarchical relations between properties; and, 2) specifying properties' domain and range for data reasoning. In addition, the study implements the LOD dataset in a digital humanities platform to demonstrate how instances and entities can be applied in the full texts where the relationship between entities are highlighted in order to bring scholars more semantic details of the texts.
-
Tillett, B.B.: Authority control at the international level (2000)
0.02
0.01810877 = product of:
0.05432631 = sum of:
0.05432631 = sum of:
0.01958612 = weight(_text_:library in 191) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01958612 = score(doc=191,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13484047 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.051282257 = queryNorm
0.14525402 = fieldWeight in 191, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=191)
0.03474019 = weight(_text_:22 in 191) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03474019 = score(doc=191,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17958173 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051282257 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 191, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=191)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
- Source
- Library resources and technical services. 44(2000) no.3, S.168-172
-
French, J.C.; Powell, A.L.; Schulman, E.: Using clustering strategies for creating authority files (2000)
0.02
0.017631836 = product of:
0.05289551 = sum of:
0.05289551 = weight(_text_:digital in 4811) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05289551 = score(doc=4811,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20228553 = queryWeight, product of:
3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
0.051282257 = queryNorm
0.26148933 = fieldWeight in 4811, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4811)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- As more online databases are integrated into digital libraries, the issue of quality control of the data becomes increasingly important, especially as it relates to the effective retrieval of information. Authority work, the need to discover and reconcile variant forms of strings in bibliographical entries, will become more critical in the future. Spelling variants, misspellings, and transliteration differences will all increase the difficulty of retrieving information. We investigate a number of approximate string matching techniques that have traditionally been used to help with this problem. We then introduce the notion of approximate word matching and show how it can be used to improve detection and categorization of variant forms. We demonstrate the utility of these approaches using data from the Astrophysics Data System and show how we can reduce the human effort involved in the creation of authority files
