Search (24 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Referieren"
  1. Jizba, L.: Reflections on summarizing and abstracting : implications for Internet Web documents, and standardized library cataloging databases (1997) 0.05
    0.05406713 = product of:
      0.081100695 = sum of:
        0.061711423 = weight(_text_:digital in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061711423 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20228553 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051282257 = queryNorm
            0.30507088 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
        0.01938927 = product of:
          0.03877854 = sum of:
            0.03877854 = weight(_text_:library in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03877854 = score(doc=701,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.13484047 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051282257 = queryNorm
                0.28758827 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Comments on the value of abstracts or summary notes to information available online via the Internet and WWW and concludes that automated abstracting techniques would be highly useful if routinely applied to cataloguing or metadata for Internet documents and documents in other databases. Information seekers need external summary information to assess content and value of retrieved documents. Examines traditional models for writers, in library audiovisual cataloguing, periodical databases and archival work, along with innovative new model databases featuring robust cataloguing summaries. Notes recent developments in automated techniques, computational research, and machine summarization of digital images. Recommendations are made for future designers of cataloguing and metadata standards
  2. Koltay, T.: ¬A hypertext tutorial on abstracting for library science students (1995) 0.05
    0.04927495 = product of:
      0.14782485 = sum of:
        0.14782485 = sum of:
          0.07834448 = weight(_text_:library in 3061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07834448 = score(doc=3061,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.13484047 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051282257 = queryNorm
              0.58101606 = fieldWeight in 3061, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3061)
          0.06948038 = weight(_text_:22 in 3061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06948038 = score(doc=3061,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17958173 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051282257 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3061, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3061)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses briefly the application of hypertext in library user training with particular reference to a specific hypertext based tutorial designed to teach library school students the basics knowledge of abstracts and abstracting process
    Date
    27. 1.1996 18:22:06
    Source
    Journal of education for library and information science. 36(1995) no.2, S.170-173
  3. Wan, X.; Yang, J.; Xiao, J.: Incorporating cross-document relationships between sentences for single document summarizations (2006) 0.05
    0.049159747 = product of:
      0.07373962 = sum of:
        0.05289551 = weight(_text_:digital in 2421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05289551 = score(doc=2421,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20228553 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051282257 = queryNorm
            0.26148933 = fieldWeight in 2421, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2421)
        0.020844113 = product of:
          0.041688226 = sum of:
            0.041688226 = weight(_text_:22 in 2421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041688226 = score(doc=2421,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17958173 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051282257 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2421, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2421)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 10th European conference, proceedings / ECDL 2006, Alicante, Spain, September 17 - 22, 2006
  4. Lancaster, F.W.: Indexing and abstracting in theory and practice (2003) 0.05
    0.04634326 = product of:
      0.069514886 = sum of:
        0.05289551 = weight(_text_:digital in 4913) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05289551 = score(doc=4913,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20228553 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051282257 = queryNorm
            0.26148933 = fieldWeight in 4913, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4913)
        0.016619375 = product of:
          0.03323875 = sum of:
            0.03323875 = weight(_text_:library in 4913) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03323875 = score(doc=4913,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.13484047 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051282257 = queryNorm
                0.24650425 = fieldWeight in 4913, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4913)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIST 57(2006) no.1, S.144-145 (H. Saggion): "... This volume is a very valuable source of information for not only students and professionals in library and information science but also for individuals and institutions involved in knowledge management and organization activities. Because of its broad coverage of the information science topic, teachers will find the contents of this book useful for courses in the areas of information technology, digital as well as traditional libraries, and information science in general."
    Imprint
    Champaign, IL : Graduate School of Library and Information Science
  5. Koltay, T.: Abstracts and abstracting : a genre and set of skills for the twenty-first century (2010) 0.04
    0.0359151 = product of:
      0.053872645 = sum of:
        0.044079587 = weight(_text_:digital in 4125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044079587 = score(doc=4125,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20228553 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051282257 = queryNorm
            0.21790776 = fieldWeight in 4125, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4125)
        0.00979306 = product of:
          0.01958612 = sum of:
            0.01958612 = weight(_text_:library in 4125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01958612 = score(doc=4125,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13484047 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051282257 = queryNorm
                0.14525402 = fieldWeight in 4125, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4125)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Despite their changing role, abstracts remain useful in the digital world. Aimed at both information professionals and researchers who work and publish in different fields, this book summarizes the most important and up-to-date theory of abstracting, as well as giving advice and examples for the practice of writing different kinds of abstracts. The book discusses the length, the functions and basic structure of abstracts. A new approach is outlined on the questions of informative and indicative abstracts. The abstractors' personality, their linguistic and non-linguistic knowledge and skills are also discussed with special attention. The process of abstracting, its steps and models, as well as recipient's role are treated with special distinction. Abstracting is presented as an aimed (purported) understanding of the original text, its interpretation and then a special projection of the information deemed to be worth of abstracting into a new text.Despite the relatively large number of textbooks on the topic there is no up-to-date book on abstracting in the English language. In addition to providing a comprehensive coverage of the topic, the proposed book contains novel views - especially on informative and indicative abstracts. The discussion is based on an interdisciplinary approach, blending the methods of library and information science and linguistics. The book strives to a synthesis of theory and practice. The synthesis is based on a large and existing body of knowledge which, however, is often characterised by misleading terminology and flawed beliefs.
  6. Pinto, M.: Abstracting/abstract adaptation to digital environments : research trends (2003) 0.02
    0.024935182 = product of:
      0.07480554 = sum of:
        0.07480554 = weight(_text_:digital in 4446) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07480554 = score(doc=4446,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.20228553 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051282257 = queryNorm
            0.36980176 = fieldWeight in 4446, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4446)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The technological revolution is affecting the structure, form and content of documents, reducing the effectiveness of traditional abstracts that, to some extent, are inadequate to the new documentary conditions. Aims to show the directions in which abstracting/abstracts can evolve to achieve the necessary adequacy in the new digital environments. Three researching trends are proposed: theoretical, methodological and pragmatic. Theoretically, there are some needs for expanding the document concept, reengineering abstracting and designing interdisciplinary models. Methodologically, the trend is toward the structuring, automating and qualifying of the abstracts. Pragmatically, abstracts networking, combined with alternative and complementary models, open a new and promising horizon. Automating, structuring and qualifying abstracting/abstract offer some short-term prospects for progress. Concludes that reengineering, networking and visualising would be middle-term fruitful areas of research toward the full adequacy of abstracting in the new electronic age.
  7. Palais, E.S.: Abstracting for reference librarians (1988) 0.01
    0.009264051 = product of:
      0.027792152 = sum of:
        0.027792152 = product of:
          0.055584304 = sum of:
            0.055584304 = weight(_text_:22 in 2832) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055584304 = score(doc=2832,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17958173 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051282257 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2832, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2832)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Reference librarian. 1988, no.22, S.297-308
  8. Pinto, M.; Lancaster, F.W.: Abstracts and abstracting in knowledge discovery (1999) 0.01
    0.00914019 = product of:
      0.02742057 = sum of:
        0.02742057 = product of:
          0.05484114 = sum of:
            0.05484114 = weight(_text_:library in 6233) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05484114 = score(doc=6233,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13484047 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051282257 = queryNorm
                0.40671125 = fieldWeight in 6233, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6233)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Library trends. 48(1999) no.1, S.234-248
  9. Hartley, J.; Sydes, M.: Which layout do you prefer? : an analysis of readers' preferences for different typographic layouts of structured abstracts (1996) 0.01
    0.006948038 = product of:
      0.020844113 = sum of:
        0.020844113 = product of:
          0.041688226 = sum of:
            0.041688226 = weight(_text_:22 in 4411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041688226 = score(doc=4411,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17958173 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051282257 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4411, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4411)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.1, S.27-37
  10. Ward, M.L.: ¬The future of the human indexer (1996) 0.01
    0.006948038 = product of:
      0.020844113 = sum of:
        0.020844113 = product of:
          0.041688226 = sum of:
            0.041688226 = weight(_text_:22 in 7244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041688226 = score(doc=7244,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17958173 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051282257 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 7244, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7244)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    9. 2.1997 18:44:22
  11. Sen, B.K.: Research articles in LISA Plus : problems of identification (1997) 0.01
    0.00646309 = product of:
      0.01938927 = sum of:
        0.01938927 = product of:
          0.03877854 = sum of:
            0.03877854 = weight(_text_:library in 430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03877854 = score(doc=430,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.13484047 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051282257 = queryNorm
                0.28758827 = fieldWeight in 430, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=430)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Reports results of a study to determine how easy and quickly research articles in library and information science could be retrieved from the LISA Plus CD-ROM database. Results show that the search with the descriptor 'research' retrieves all types of articles and it is necessary to read through every abstract to locate the research articles. The introductory sentence of a substantial number of abstracts hinder the process of identification since the sentence provides such information as the conference where the paper was presented, the special issue or the section of a periodical where the article is located; or obvious background information. Suggests measures whereby research articles can be identified easily and rapidly
    Source
    Malaysian journal of library and information science. 2(1997) no.1, S.97-106
  12. Spiteri, L.F.: Library and information science vs business : a comparison of approaches to abstracting (1997) 0.01
    0.00646309 = product of:
      0.01938927 = sum of:
        0.01938927 = product of:
          0.03877854 = sum of:
            0.03877854 = weight(_text_:library in 3699) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03877854 = score(doc=3699,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.13484047 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051282257 = queryNorm
                0.28758827 = fieldWeight in 3699, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3699)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The library and information science (LIS) literature on abstracting makes little mention about abstracting conducted in the corporate / business environment, whereas the business literature suggests that abstarcting is a very important component of business writing. Examines a variety of publications from LIS and business in order to compare and contrast their approaches to the following aspects of abstracting: definitions of abstracts; types of abstracts; purpose of abstracts; and writing of abstracts. Summarises the results of the examination which revealed a number of similarities, differences, and inadequacies in the ways in which both fields approach abstracting. Concludes that both fields need to develop more detailed guidelines concerning the cognitive process of abstracting and suggests improvements to the training af absractors based on these findings
  13. Lancaster, F.W.: Indexing and abstracting in theory and practice (1991) 0.01
    0.00646309 = product of:
      0.01938927 = sum of:
        0.01938927 = product of:
          0.03877854 = sum of:
            0.03877854 = weight(_text_:library in 752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03877854 = score(doc=752,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.13484047 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051282257 = queryNorm
                0.28758827 = fieldWeight in 752, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=752)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Library and information science resaerch 14(1992) no.1, S.117-118 (C. Tenopir); International classification 19(1992) no.4, S.227-228 (R. Fugmann); Journal of the American Society for Information Science 43(1992) no.6, S.456 (B.R. Boyce); Cataloging & classification quarterly 15(1992) no.1, S.245-247 (E.M. Rasmussen) Journal of academic librarianship 18(1992) no.1, S.39 (G.A. Crawford) // Winner of the 1992 ASIS best information science book award
    Imprint
    London : Library Association
  14. Hartley, J.; Sydes, M.; Blurton, A.: Obtaining information accurately and quickly : are structured abstracts more efficient? (1996) 0.01
    0.005790032 = product of:
      0.017370095 = sum of:
        0.017370095 = product of:
          0.03474019 = sum of:
            0.03474019 = weight(_text_:22 in 7673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03474019 = score(doc=7673,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17958173 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051282257 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 7673, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=7673)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.5, S.349-356
  15. Lancaster, F.W.: Indexing and abstracting in theory and practice (1998) 0.01
    0.0055397917 = product of:
      0.016619375 = sum of:
        0.016619375 = product of:
          0.03323875 = sum of:
            0.03323875 = weight(_text_:library in 4141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03323875 = score(doc=4141,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.13484047 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051282257 = queryNorm
                0.24650425 = fieldWeight in 4141, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4141)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIS 50(1999) no.8, S.728-730 (J.-E. Mai); Indexer 21(1999) no.3, S.148 (P.F. Booth); Managing information 6(1999) no.1, S.48 (S.T. Clarke); Electronic library 17(1999) no.3, S.193 (F. Parry)
    Imprint
    London : Library Association
  16. Tibbo, H.R.: Abstracting across the disciplines : a content analysis of abstracts for the natural sciences, the social sciences, and the humanities with implications for abstracting standards and online information retrieval (1992) 0.01
    0.005222966 = product of:
      0.015668897 = sum of:
        0.015668897 = product of:
          0.031337794 = sum of:
            0.031337794 = weight(_text_:library in 2536) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031337794 = score(doc=2536,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13484047 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051282257 = queryNorm
                0.23240642 = fieldWeight in 2536, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2536)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Library and information science research. 14(1992) no.1, S.31-56
  17. Bakewell, K.G.B.; Rowland, G.: Indexing and abstracting (1993) 0.01
    0.005222966 = product of:
      0.015668897 = sum of:
        0.015668897 = product of:
          0.031337794 = sum of:
            0.031337794 = weight(_text_:library in 5540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031337794 = score(doc=5540,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13484047 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051282257 = queryNorm
                0.23240642 = fieldWeight in 5540, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5540)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Imprint
    London : Library Association Publ.
  18. Borko, H.; Bernier, C.L.: Abstracting concepts and methods (1975) 0.01
    0.005222966 = product of:
      0.015668897 = sum of:
        0.015668897 = product of:
          0.031337794 = sum of:
            0.031337794 = weight(_text_:library in 929) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031337794 = score(doc=929,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13484047 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051282257 = queryNorm
                0.23240642 = fieldWeight in 929, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=929)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Series
    Library and information science
  19. Armstrong, C.J.; Wheatley, A.: Writing abstracts for online databases : results of database producers' guidelines (1998) 0.00
    0.004570095 = product of:
      0.013710285 = sum of:
        0.013710285 = product of:
          0.02742057 = sum of:
            0.02742057 = weight(_text_:library in 3295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02742057 = score(doc=3295,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13484047 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051282257 = queryNorm
                0.20335563 = fieldWeight in 3295, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3295)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Reports on one area of research in an Electronic Libraries Programme (eLib) MODELS (MOving to Distributed Environments for Library Services) supporting study in 3 investigative areas: examination of current database producers' guidelines for their abstract writers; a brief survey of abstracts in some traditional online databases; and a detailed survey of abstracts from 3 types of electronic database (print sourced online databases, Internet subject trees or directories, and Internet gateways). Examination of database producers' guidelines, reported here, gave a clear view of the intentions behind professionally produced traditional (printed index based) database abstracts and provided a benchmark against which to judge the conclusions of the larger investigations into abstract style, readability and content
  20. Bowman, J.H.: Annotation: a lost art in cataloguing (2007) 0.00
    0.004570095 = product of:
      0.013710285 = sum of:
        0.013710285 = product of:
          0.02742057 = sum of:
            0.02742057 = weight(_text_:library in 255) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02742057 = score(doc=255,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13484047 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051282257 = queryNorm
                0.20335563 = fieldWeight in 255, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=255)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Public library catalogues in early twentieth-century Britain frequently included annotations, either to clarify obscure titles or to provide further information about the subject-matter of the books they described. Two manuals giving instruction on how to do this were published at that time. Following World War I, with the decline of the printed catalogue, this kind of annotation became rarer, and was almost confined to bulletins of new books. The early issues of the British National Bibliography included some annotations in exceptional cases. Parallels are drawn with the provision of table-of-contents information in present-day OPAC's.