-
Broughton, V.: Bliss Bibliographic Classification Second Edition (2009)
0.06
0.05746416 = product of:
0.08619624 = sum of:
0.07052734 = weight(_text_:digital in 3755) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07052734 = score(doc=3755,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20228553 = queryWeight, product of:
3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
0.051282257 = queryNorm
0.34865242 = fieldWeight in 3755, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3755)
0.015668897 = product of:
0.031337794 = sum of:
0.031337794 = weight(_text_:library in 3755) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031337794 = score(doc=3755,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13484047 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.051282257 = queryNorm
0.23240642 = fieldWeight in 3755, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3755)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This entry looks at the origins of the Bliss Bibliographic Classification 2nd edition and the theory on which it is built. The reasons for the decision to revise the classification are examined, as are the influences on classification theory of the mid-twentieth century. The process of revision and construction of schedules using facet analysis is described. The use of BC2 is considered along with some recent development work on thesaural and digital formats.
- Source
- Encyclopedia of library and information sciences. 3rd ed. Ed.: M.J. Bates
-
Broughton, V.: ¬The need for a faceted classification as the basis of all methods of information retrieval (2006)
0.04
0.0359151 = product of:
0.053872645 = sum of:
0.044079587 = weight(_text_:digital in 2874) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044079587 = score(doc=2874,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20228553 = queryWeight, product of:
3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
0.051282257 = queryNorm
0.21790776 = fieldWeight in 2874, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2874)
0.00979306 = product of:
0.01958612 = sum of:
0.01958612 = weight(_text_:library in 2874) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01958612 = score(doc=2874,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13484047 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.051282257 = queryNorm
0.14525402 = fieldWeight in 2874, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2874)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Purpose - The aim of this article is to estimate the impact of faceted classification and the faceted analytical method on the development of various information retrieval tools over the latter part of the twentieth and early twenty-first centuries. Design/methodology/approach - The article presents an examination of various subject access tools intended for retrieval of both print and digital materials to determine whether they exhibit features of faceted systems. Some attention is paid to use of the faceted approach as a means of structuring information on commercial web sites. The secondary and research literature is also surveyed for commentary on and evaluation of facet analysis as a basis for the building of vocabulary and conceptual tools. Findings - The study finds that faceted systems are now very common, with a major increase in their use over the last 15 years. Most LIS subject indexing tools (classifications, subject heading lists and thesauri) now demonstrate features of facet analysis to a greater or lesser degree. A faceted approach is frequently taken to the presentation of product information on commercial web sites, and there is an independent strand of theory and documentation related to this application. There is some significant research on semi-automatic indexing and retrieval (query expansion and query formulation) using facet analytical techniques. Originality/value - This article provides an overview of an important conceptual approach to information retrieval, and compares different understandings and applications of this methodology.
- Footnote
- Beitrag in einem Themenheft: UK library & information schools: UCL SLAIS.
-
Hudon, M.; Fortier, A.: Facet : itself a multifaceted concept (2018)
0.03
0.03324691 = product of:
0.09974072 = sum of:
0.09974072 = weight(_text_:digital in 4741) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09974072 = score(doc=4741,freq=4.0), product of:
0.20228553 = queryWeight, product of:
3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
0.051282257 = queryNorm
0.493069 = fieldWeight in 4741, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4741)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Challenges and opportunities for knowledge organization in the digital age: proceedings of the Fifteenth International ISKO Conference, 9-11 July 2018, Porto, Portugal / organized by: International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO Spain and Portugal Chapter, University of Porto - Faculty of Arts and Humanities, Research Centre in Communication, Information and Digital Culture (CIC.digital) - Porto. Eds.: F. Ribeiro u. M.E. Cerveira
-
Montoya, R.D.: Parsimony in biological and colon classifications (2018)
0.03
0.03324691 = product of:
0.09974072 = sum of:
0.09974072 = weight(_text_:digital in 4754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09974072 = score(doc=4754,freq=4.0), product of:
0.20228553 = queryWeight, product of:
3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
0.051282257 = queryNorm
0.493069 = fieldWeight in 4754, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4754)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Challenges and opportunities for knowledge organization in the digital age: proceedings of the Fifteenth International ISKO Conference, 9-11 July 2018, Porto, Portugal / organized by: International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO Spain and Portugal Chapter, University of Porto - Faculty of Arts and Humanities, Research Centre in Communication, Information and Digital Culture (CIC.digital) - Porto. Eds.: F. Ribeiro u. M.E. Cerveira
-
Lin, W.-Y.C.: ¬The concept and applications of faceted classifications (2006)
0.03
0.028974032 = product of:
0.086922094 = sum of:
0.086922094 = sum of:
0.031337794 = weight(_text_:library in 5083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031337794 = score(doc=5083,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13484047 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.051282257 = queryNorm
0.23240642 = fieldWeight in 5083, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5083)
0.055584304 = weight(_text_:22 in 5083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055584304 = score(doc=5083,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17958173 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051282257 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5083, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5083)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 27. 5.2007 22:19:35
- Source
- Journal of educational media and library sciences. 47(2006) no.2, S.153-171
-
Broughton, V.: Finding Bliss on the Web : some problems of representing faceted terminologies in digital environments
0.02
0.024935182 = product of:
0.07480554 = sum of:
0.07480554 = weight(_text_:digital in 3532) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07480554 = score(doc=3532,freq=4.0), product of:
0.20228553 = queryWeight, product of:
3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
0.051282257 = queryNorm
0.36980176 = fieldWeight in 3532, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3532)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- The Bliss Bibliographic Classification is the only example of a fully faceted general classification scheme in the Western world. Although it is the object of much interest as a model for other tools it suffers from the lack of a web presence, and remedying this is an immediate objective for its editors. Understanding how this might be done presents some challenges, as the scheme is semantically very rich and complex in the range and nature of the relationships it contains. The automatic management of these is already in place using local software, but exporting this to a common data format needs careful thought and planning. Various encoding schemes, both for traditional classifications, and for digital materials, represent variously: the concepts; their functional roles; and the relationships between them. Integrating these aspects in a coherent and interchangeable manner appears to be achievable, but the most appropriate format is as yet unclear.
-
Hudon, M.: Facet (2020)
0.02
0.020570476 = product of:
0.061711423 = sum of:
0.061711423 = weight(_text_:digital in 5899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061711423 = score(doc=5899,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20228553 = queryWeight, product of:
3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
0.051282257 = queryNorm
0.30507088 = fieldWeight in 5899, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5899)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- S.R. Ranganathan is credited with the introduction of the term "facet" in the field of knowledge organization towards the middle of the twentieth century. Facets have traditionally been used to organize document collections and to express complex subjects. In the digital world, they act as filters to facilitate navigation and improve retrieval. But the popularity of the term does not mean that a definitive characterization of the concept has been established. Indeed, several conceptualizations of the facet co-exist. This article provides an overview of formal and informal definitions found in the literature of knowledge organization, followed by a discussion of four common conceptualizations of the facet: process vs product, nature vs function, object vs subject and organization vs navigation.
-
Mills, J.: Library classification (1970)
0.01
0.0130574135 = product of:
0.03917224 = sum of:
0.03917224 = product of:
0.07834448 = sum of:
0.07834448 = weight(_text_:library in 1806) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07834448 = score(doc=1806,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13484047 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.051282257 = queryNorm
0.58101606 = fieldWeight in 1806, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1806)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
-
Dahlberg, I.: Grundlagen universaler Wissensordnung : Probleme und Möglichkeiten eines universalen Klassifikationssystems des Wissens (1974)
0.01
0.011580064 = product of:
0.03474019 = sum of:
0.03474019 = product of:
0.06948038 = sum of:
0.06948038 = weight(_text_:22 in 127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06948038 = score(doc=127,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17958173 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051282257 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 127, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=127)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Footnote
- Zugleich Dissertation Univ. Düsseldorf. - Rez. in: ZfBB. 22(1975) S.53-57 (H.-A. Koch)
-
Tomlinson, H.: Report on work for new general classification scheme (1969)
0.01
0.011079583 = product of:
0.03323875 = sum of:
0.03323875 = product of:
0.0664775 = sum of:
0.0664775 = weight(_text_:library in 1285) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0664775 = score(doc=1285,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13484047 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.051282257 = queryNorm
0.4930085 = fieldWeight in 1285, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1285)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Imprint
- London : Library Association
- Series
- Library Association Research Publications; no.1
-
Austin, D.: ¬The theory of integrative levels reconsidered as the basis of a general classification (1969)
0.01
0.011079583 = product of:
0.03323875 = sum of:
0.03323875 = product of:
0.0664775 = sum of:
0.0664775 = weight(_text_:library in 1286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0664775 = score(doc=1286,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13484047 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.051282257 = queryNorm
0.4930085 = fieldWeight in 1286, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1286)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Imprint
- London : Library Association
- Series
- Library Association Research Publications; no.1
-
Foskett, D.J.: Classification for a general index language: a review of recent research by the Classification Research Group (1970)
0.01
0.011079583 = product of:
0.03323875 = sum of:
0.03323875 = product of:
0.0664775 = sum of:
0.0664775 = weight(_text_:library in 3403) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0664775 = score(doc=3403,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13484047 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.051282257 = queryNorm
0.4930085 = fieldWeight in 3403, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3403)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Imprint
- London : Library Association
- Series
- Library Association research publication; no.2
-
Ranganathan, S.R.: Colon Classification: basic and depth version : Vol.1: Schedules for classification (1987)
0.01
0.011079583 = product of:
0.03323875 = sum of:
0.03323875 = product of:
0.0664775 = sum of:
0.0664775 = weight(_text_:library in 2444) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0664775 = score(doc=2444,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13484047 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.051282257 = queryNorm
0.4930085 = fieldWeight in 2444, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2444)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Imprint
- Bangalore : Sarada Ranganathan endowment for library science
- Series
- Sarada Ranganathan Endowment for Library Science series; 19
-
Tennis, J.T.: Facets and fugit tempus : considering time's effect on faceted classification schemes (2012)
0.01
0.009264051 = product of:
0.027792152 = sum of:
0.027792152 = product of:
0.055584304 = sum of:
0.055584304 = weight(_text_:22 in 826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055584304 = score(doc=826,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17958173 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051282257 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 826, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=826)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 2. 6.2013 18:33:22
-
Ranganathan, S.R.: Colon Classification : Pt.1: Rules of classification; Pt.2: Schedules of classification; Pt.3: Index to the schedules (1933)
0.01
0.00914019 = product of:
0.02742057 = sum of:
0.02742057 = product of:
0.05484114 = sum of:
0.05484114 = weight(_text_:library in 1833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05484114 = score(doc=1833,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13484047 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.051282257 = queryNorm
0.40671125 = fieldWeight in 1833, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1833)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Imprint
- Madras : The Madras Library Association
-
Perugini, S.: Supporting multiple paths to objects in information hierarchies : faceted classification, faceted search, and symbolic links (2010)
0.01
0.0081060445 = product of:
0.024318133 = sum of:
0.024318133 = product of:
0.048636265 = sum of:
0.048636265 = weight(_text_:22 in 4227) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048636265 = score(doc=4227,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17958173 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051282257 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4227, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4227)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 46(2010) no.1, S.22-43
-
Heuvel, C. van den: Multidimensional classifications : past and future conceptualizations and visualizations (2012)
0.01
0.0081060445 = product of:
0.024318133 = sum of:
0.024318133 = product of:
0.048636265 = sum of:
0.048636265 = weight(_text_:22 in 632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048636265 = score(doc=632,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17958173 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051282257 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 632, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=632)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 2.2013 11:31:25
-
Mills, J.: Faceted classification and logical division in information retrieval (2004)
0.01
0.007834448 = product of:
0.023503343 = sum of:
0.023503343 = product of:
0.047006685 = sum of:
0.047006685 = weight(_text_:library in 831) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047006685 = score(doc=831,freq=8.0), product of:
0.13484047 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.051282257 = queryNorm
0.34860963 = fieldWeight in 831, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=831)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- The main object of the paper is to demonstrate in detail the role of classification in information retrieval (IR) and the design of classificatory structures by the application of logical division to all forms of the content of records, subject and imaginative. The natural product of such division is a faceted classification. The latter is seen not as a particular kind of library classification but the only viable form enabling the locating and relating of information to be optimally predictable. A detailed exposition of the practical steps in facet analysis is given, drawing on the experience of the new Bliss Classification (BC2). The continued existence of the library as a highly organized information store is assumed. But, it is argued, it must acknowledge the relevance of the revolution in library classification that has taken place. It considers also how alphabetically arranged subject indexes may utilize controlled use of categorical (generically inclusive) and syntactic relations to produce similarly predictable locating and relating systems for IR.
- Source
- Library trends. 52(2004) no.3, S.515-540
-
Krishnamurthy, M.; Satija, M.P.; Martínez-Ávila, D.: Classification of classifications : species of library classifications (2024)
0.01
0.007834448 = product of:
0.023503343 = sum of:
0.023503343 = product of:
0.047006685 = sum of:
0.047006685 = weight(_text_:library in 1158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047006685 = score(doc=1158,freq=8.0), product of:
0.13484047 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.051282257 = queryNorm
0.34860963 = fieldWeight in 1158, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1158)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Acknowledging the importance of classification not only for library and information science but also for the study and mapping of the world phenomena, in this paper we revisit and systematize the main types of classifications and focus on the species of classification mainly drawing on the work of S. R. Ranganathan. We trace the evolution of library classification systems by their structures and modes of design of various shades of classification systems and make a comparative study of enumerative and faceted species of library classifications. The value of this paper is to have a picture of the whole spectrum of existing classifications, which may serve for the study of future developments and constructions of new systems. This paper updates previous works by Comaromi and Ranganathan and is also theoretically inspired by them.
-
Raghavan, K.S.: ¬The Colon Classification : a few considerations on its future (2015)
0.01
0.0073863883 = product of:
0.022159165 = sum of:
0.022159165 = product of:
0.04431833 = sum of:
0.04431833 = weight(_text_:library in 2760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04431833 = score(doc=2760,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13484047 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.051282257 = queryNorm
0.32867232 = fieldWeight in 2760, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2760)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- The article highlights the efforts and plans of Sarada Ranganathan Endowment for Library Science for revival of CC. Presents a brief history of the Scheme and explains is features. Discusses areas needing revamping for continual revision and existence of CC. Also seeks feedback from LIS professionals on the revision of the Scheme.
- Source
- Annals of library and information studies. 62(2015) no.4, S.231-238
