Alimohammadi, D.: Webliometrics : a new horizon in information research (2006)
0.01
0.008121594 = product of:
0.032486375 = sum of:
0.032486375 = weight(_text_:library in 621) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032486375 = score(doc=621,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.050121464 = queryNorm
0.24650425 = fieldWeight in 621, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=621)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Purpose - During the second half of the past century, the field of library and information science (LIS) has frequently used the research methods of the social sciences. In particular, quantitative assessment research methodologies, together with one of its associated concepts, quantitative assessment metrics, have also been used in the information field, out of which more specific bibliometric, scientometric, informetric and webometric research instruments have been developed. This brief communication tries to use the metrics system to coin a new concept in information science metrical studies, namely, webliometrics. Design/methodology/approach - An overview of the webliography is presented, while webliometrics as a type of research method in LIS is defined. Webliometrics' functions are enumerated and webliometric research methods are sketched out. Findings - That webliometrics is worthy of further clarification and development, both in theory and practice. Research limitations/implications - Webliometrics potentially offer a powerful and rigorous new research tool for LIS researchers. Practical implications - The research outputs of webliometrics, although theoretically and statistically rigorous, are of immediate practical value. Originality/value - This paper aims to increase the knowledge of an original thought as yet under-utilised approach to research methods.
- Source
- Library review. 55(2006) no.6, S.344-348
