Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Burger, R.H."
  • × theme_ss:"Formalerschließung"
  1. Burger, R.H.: NACO at the University of Illinois at U-C : a narrative case study (1986) 0.04 
    0.040475465 = product of:
  0.08095093 = sum of:
    0.04641878 = weight(_text_:library in 380) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04641878 = score(doc=380,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050121464 = queryNorm
        0.3522223 = fieldWeight in 380, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=380)
    0.034532152 = product of:
      0.069064304 = sum of:
        0.069064304 = weight(_text_:project in 380) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.069064304 = score(doc=380,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21156175 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.32644984 = fieldWeight in 380, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=380)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Although the Name Authority Cooperative Project (NACO) is now almost ten years old, little has been written about it from the perspective of NACO participants. This article provides a narrative case study of the effects of NACO on one academic research library, the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. The decision to accept NACO membership, NACO training at the Library of Congress, post-training implementation at the University of Illinois and effects on work flow, productivity and morale are portrayed in this description. It is hoped that the information contained here can provide more insight into the pros and cons of NACO membership that could be generalized to any library.
  2. Burger, R.H.: Authority control (1996) 0.01 
    0.0076571116 = product of:
  0.030628446 = sum of:
    0.030628446 = weight(_text_:library in 4424) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.030628446 = score(doc=4424,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050121464 = queryNorm
        0.23240642 = fieldWeight in 4424, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4424)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Assesses the development of authority control thinking and practice over a long period of time. Notes the 4 key developments that influenced the theory and practice of authority control; the development of MARC format; the establishment of OCLC, the adoption and revision of AACR; and the influence of the Library of Congress in the setting of the national bibliographic standards

Years