Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

0.011485667 = product of:
  0.045942668 = sum of:
    0.045942668 = weight(_text_:library in 271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.045942668 = score(doc=271,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050121464 = queryNorm
        0.34860963 = fieldWeight in 271, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=271)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Relevance of Ranganathan's contributions to library science. Companion volume to Proc. of the Int. Conf. ... 11.-14.11.1985, New Dehli. Ed.: T.S. Rajagopalan

0.010828791 = product of:
  0.043315165 = sum of:
    0.043315165 = weight(_text_:library in 1603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.043315165 = score(doc=1603,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050121464 = queryNorm
        0.32867232 = fieldWeight in 1603, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1603)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Discusses the basic criteria for comparison of classification for libraries. Identifies a set of intellectual criteria, derived from the general theory of library classification as expounded by Dewey, Bliss, and Ranganathan. Compares LC, DC, and BC in relation criteria namely - order, university, hospitality, adaptability, terminology, relationship, synthesis, notational features - simplicity, brevity, expressiveness, specifity, synonymity, flexibility, correlation, case of use, revision and practical use. Highlights the value of comparative studies among classification schemes

Source

Library science with a slant to documentation. 17(1980), S.73-82