Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Hudson, J."
  • × year_i:[1980 TO 1990}
  1. Hudson, J.: Revisions to contributed cataloging in a cooperative cataloging database (1981) 0.02
    0.015314223 = product of:
      0.061256893 = sum of:
        0.061256893 = weight(_text_:library in 1187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061256893 = score(doc=1187,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.46481284 = fieldWeight in 1187, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1187)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of library automation. 14(1981) no.2, S.116-120
  2. Hudson, J.: On-the-job training for cataloging and classification (1987) 0.01
    0.006699973 = product of:
      0.026799891 = sum of:
        0.026799891 = weight(_text_:library in 389) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026799891 = score(doc=389,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.20335563 = fieldWeight in 389, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=389)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Training for cataloging and classification within the Cataloging Department is discussed for two levels of staff, copy catalogers and original catalogers. A general pattern which moves from learning to catalog straightforward materials which require minimal editing to processing materials which are progressively more complex is described for copy catalogers. A survey of heads of cataloging departments reveals that there is a general feeling that cataloging and classification are being shortchanged in library school training and recommendations for such training are made. Training programs for original catalogers also follow a pattern, from working with LC copy to preparing original cataloging records. Some variations to the training patterns for each group are noted. The article concludes with a discussion of continuing education for both groups.