Janes, J.W.; McKinney, R.: Relevance judgements of actual users and secondary judges : a comparative study (1992)
0.01
0.009475192 = product of:
0.03790077 = sum of:
0.03790077 = weight(_text_:library in 4276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03790077 = score(doc=4276,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.050121464 = queryNorm
0.28758827 = fieldWeight in 4276, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4276)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Examines judgements of relevance of document representations to query statements made by people other than the the originators of the queries. A small group of graduate students in the School of Information and Library Studies and undergraduates of Michigan Univ. judges sets of documents that had been retrieved for and judged by real users for a previous study. The assessment of relevance, by the secondary judges, were analysed by themselves and in comparison with the users' assessments. The judges performed reasonably well but some important differences were identified. Secondary judges use the various fields of document records in different ways than users and have a higher threshold of relevance
- Source
- Library quarterly. 62(1992) no.2, S.150-168
