Search (22 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × author_ss:"Lancaster, F.W."
  1. Lancaster, F.W.: Evaluation in the context of the digital library (1996) 0.09
    0.08622095 = product of:
      0.1724419 = sum of:
        0.11939187 = weight(_text_:digital in 7886) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11939187 = score(doc=7886,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.19770671 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.60388374 = fieldWeight in 7886, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7886)
        0.05305003 = weight(_text_:library in 7886) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05305003 = score(doc=7886,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.40253976 = fieldWeight in 7886, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7886)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Digital libraries are sufficiently differnt from more traditional print on paper libraries to present a new set of parameters relating to the evaluation of its use. Discusses evaluation criteria, problems and methods relevant to the digital library environment
    Source
    Towards a worldwide library: a ten year forecast. Proceedings of the 19th International Essen Symposium, 23-26 Sept 1996. Ed.: A.H. Helal u. J.W. Weiss
  2. Lancaster, F.W.: Artificial intelligence, expert systems and the digital library (1996) 0.08
    0.08298518 = product of:
      0.16597036 = sum of:
        0.097483054 = weight(_text_:digital in 839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.097483054 = score(doc=839,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19770671 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.493069 = fieldWeight in 839, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=839)
        0.068487294 = weight(_text_:library in 839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.068487294 = score(doc=839,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.51967657 = fieldWeight in 839, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=839)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Based partly on chapters in a forthcoming book 'Technology and Management in Library and Information Sciences' by F.W. Lancaster and B. Sandore. Some inportant functions of a research library operating largely in a networked digital environment are illustrated. The ability of artificial intelligence and expert system technologies to contribute to these functions is discussed, in the light of a report from the American Association for Artificial Intelligence, as well as experiences with these technologies in the library world and elsewhere
    Source
    Journal of information; communication; and library science. 3(1996) no.2, S.3-14
  3. Lancaster, F.W.: Indexing and abstracting in theory and practice (2003) 0.04
    0.042092286 = product of:
      0.08418457 = sum of:
        0.051698197 = weight(_text_:digital in 4913) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051698197 = score(doc=4913,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19770671 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.26148933 = fieldWeight in 4913, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4913)
        0.032486375 = weight(_text_:library in 4913) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032486375 = score(doc=4913,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.24650425 = fieldWeight in 4913, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4913)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIST 57(2006) no.1, S.144-145 (H. Saggion): "... This volume is a very valuable source of information for not only students and professionals in library and information science but also for individuals and institutions involved in knowledge management and organization activities. Because of its broad coverage of the information science topic, teachers will find the contents of this book useful for courses in the areas of information technology, digital as well as traditional libraries, and information science in general."
    Imprint
    Champaign, IL : Graduate School of Library and Information Science
  4. Lancaster, F.W.; Warner, A.: Intelligent technologies in library and information service applications (2001) 0.03
    0.034354553 = product of:
      0.068709105 = sum of:
        0.034465462 = weight(_text_:digital in 308) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034465462 = score(doc=308,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19770671 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.17432621 = fieldWeight in 308, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=308)
        0.034243647 = weight(_text_:library in 308) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034243647 = score(doc=308,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.25983828 = fieldWeight in 308, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=308)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIST 53(2002) no.4, S.321-322 (I. Fourie): "A substantial literature exists on artificial intelligence (AI) and expert systems in general, as well as in Library and Information Science (LIS). Many reports are over-confident and grossly exaggerate the power and potential of artificial intelligence (AI). This is especially true of the first phase of At, and to some extent also of the third phase that is stimulated by developments surrounding the Internet. The middle phase was mostly marked by disillusionment about the potential of Al and expert systems. The confusion around the promises made by AI and the lack of operational success, leaves managers of library and information services with the dilemma of distinguishing between worthwhile research reporting on operational projects and projects that exists only on paper or in the researchers' heads. It is very difficult to sieve between the two when working through the subject literature, and to distinguish between working technology/applications and wishful thinking. This might be one reason why working systems are sometimes ignored. According to Lancaster and Warner, library managers must also look much wider than the LIS literature to note new trends; this can, however, become a daunting task. Against this background the authors report on a study conducted with the support of the Special Libraries Association's Steven I. Goldspiel Memorial Research Grant. The objective of the study was to gain sufficient familiarity with the developments in Al and related technologies to make recommendations to the information service community on what can be applied, and what to expect in the near future. The intention therefore was to focus on systems that are actually operational, and systems that hold potential for the future. Since digital libraries seems an inevitable part of our future, applications concerning them features strongly in the final recommendations. The scope of AI in Library and Information Science depends on the interpretation of the concepts artificial intelligence and expert systems. "If a system has to `behave intelligently' (e.g. make inferences or learn from its mistakes) to qualify as having AI, few such systems exist in any application. On the other hand, if one accepts that a system exhibits AI if its does things that humans need intelligence to do, many more systems would qualify" (p. 107). One example is the field of subject indexing. The same would apply if a more relaxed definition of expert systems is applied as a system that "can help the non-expert perform some task at a level closer to that of an expert, whether or not all the essential components are in place" (p. 107). Most of the AI literature relevant to libraries falls in the field of expert systems. Lancaster and Warner identify (p. 6) expert systems as " a branch of artificial intelligence, even though very few expert systems exhibit true intelligence.""
  5. Lancaster, F.W.; Mills, J.: Testing indexes and index language devices : the ASLIB Cranfield project (1964) 0.02
    0.019732658 = product of:
      0.07893063 = sum of:
        0.07893063 = product of:
          0.15786126 = sum of:
            0.15786126 = weight(_text_:project in 2261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.15786126 = score(doc=2261,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21156175 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050121464 = queryNorm
                0.74617106 = fieldWeight in 2261, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2261)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  6. Lancaster, F.W.: Libraries in the year 2001 (1993) 0.01
    0.013399946 = product of:
      0.053599782 = sum of:
        0.053599782 = weight(_text_:library in 7599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053599782 = score(doc=7599,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.40671125 = fieldWeight in 7599, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7599)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Reviews the trend away from a paper based society and towards an electronic society: with the advent of computers, electronic mail, computer conferencing, electronic invisible colleges, and the application of computers to libraries and information networks, and to publishing, with the production of electronic media. Forecasts the advent of the electronic library and the electronic librarian, the decline in the use of present day libraries, technical and library services, and the enhanced and extended role of librarians in the new situation. Predicts the eventual demise of the traditional library with the exception of non research libraries but the enhanced value of the librarians as an information specialist
    Source
    Herald of library science. 32(1993) nos.3/4, S.163-170
  7. Lancaster, F.W.: Has technology improved subject access? (199?) 0.01
    0.013399946 = product of:
      0.053599782 = sum of:
        0.053599782 = weight(_text_:library in 184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053599782 = score(doc=184,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.40671125 = fieldWeight in 184, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=184)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Footnote
    Vortrag an der FHBD 1994; Originalvortrag: International Conference on new Frontiers in Library and Information Services in Taipei, Taiwan, May 9-11, 1991
  8. Lancaster, F.W.: From custodian to knowledge engineer : the evolution of librarianship as a profession (1995) 0.01
    0.013399946 = product of:
      0.053599782 = sum of:
        0.053599782 = weight(_text_:library in 3058) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053599782 = score(doc=3058,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.40671125 = fieldWeight in 3058, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3058)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    In the monastic library of the Middle Ages, the librarian was essentially a curator, a preserver of collections. For most of history libarians were little more than custodians. The idea of a librarian as a provider of services rather than a collector or preserver of materials, did not emerge until late in the 19th century. Computer and telecommunications technologies have revolutionized the library and greatly expanded the horizons of the librarian. Discusses the ways in which technology has affected the library profession and discusses the role of the librarian in the future. The librarian will increasingly become an information intermediary or information consultant and some will be knowledge engineers involved in the design and construction of information systems and in electronic publishing
    Source
    Journal of information; communication; and library science. 1(1995) no.4, S.3-8
  9. Pinto, M.; Lancaster, F.W.: Abstracts and abstracting in knowledge discovery (1999) 0.01
    0.013399946 = product of:
      0.053599782 = sum of:
        0.053599782 = weight(_text_:library in 6233) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053599782 = score(doc=6233,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.40671125 = fieldWeight in 6233, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6233)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Library trends. 48(1999) no.1, S.234-248
  10. Lancaster, F.W.: Librarians, technology and mediocrity (1993) 0.01
    0.0132625075 = product of:
      0.05305003 = sum of:
        0.05305003 = weight(_text_:library in 7006) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05305003 = score(doc=7006,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.40253976 = fieldWeight in 7006, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7006)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Two years ago the author gave a keynote talk at the Essen Symposium that suggested that technology has lulled librarians into a false sense of security and that there is no real evidence that the increasing use of technology has improved library services at all. This talk carries this theme one stage further, suggesting that technology may actually encourage mediocrity in library and information services
    Source
    Opportunity 2000: understanding and serving users in an electronic library; 15th Int. Symp., 12.-15.10.1992; Festschrift in honour of Herbert S. White. Ed.: A.H. Helal
  11. Lancaster, F.W.; Connell, T.H.; Bishop, N.; McCowan, S.: Identifying barriers to effective subject access in library catalogs (1991) 0.01
    0.011604695 = product of:
      0.04641878 = sum of:
        0.04641878 = weight(_text_:library in 2259) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04641878 = score(doc=2259,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.3522223 = fieldWeight in 2259, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2259)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    51 subject searches were performed in an online catalog containing about 4,5 million records. Their success was judges in terms of lists of items, known to be relevant to the various topics, compiled by subject specialists (faculty members or authors of articles in specialized encyclopedias). Many of the items known to be relevant were not retrieved, even in very broad searches that sometimes retrieved several hundred records, and very little could be done to make them retrievable within the constraints of present cataloging practice. Librarians should recognize that library catalogs, as now implemented, offer only the most primitive of subject access and should seek to develop different types of subject access tools. - Vgl auch Letter (B.H. Weinberg) in: LTRS 36(1992) S.123-124.
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 35(1991), S.377-391
  12. Lancaster, F.W.: ¬The evolution of electronic publishing (1995) 0.01
    0.011485667 = product of:
      0.045942668 = sum of:
        0.045942668 = weight(_text_:library in 2446) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045942668 = score(doc=2446,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.34860963 = fieldWeight in 2446, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2446)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Library trends. 43(1995) no.4, S.518-527
  13. Lancaster, F.W.: Precision and recall (2009) 0.01
    0.010828791 = product of:
      0.043315165 = sum of:
        0.043315165 = weight(_text_:library in 3866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043315165 = score(doc=3866,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.32867232 = fieldWeight in 3866, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3866)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    F.W. Lancaster's work has been immensely influential in library and information science. He has written on indexing and information system evaluation, and has been looked to as a pioneer in many areas. Here he describes precision and recall, the two most fundamental and widespread measures of information retrieval effectiveness.
    Source
    Encyclopedia of library and information sciences. 3rd ed. Ed.: M.J. Bates
  14. Lancaster, F.W.: Searching databases on CD-ROM : comparison of the results of end-user searching with results from two modes of searching by skilled intermediaries (1994) 0.01
    0.009946881 = product of:
      0.039787523 = sum of:
        0.039787523 = weight(_text_:library in 8372) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039787523 = score(doc=8372,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.30190483 = fieldWeight in 8372, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=8372)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The results of 35 searches performed by users (end users) of an academic library (Illinois Stae University, Milner Library) in the ERIC databases on CD-ROM were compared with the results for the same topics achieved by an experienced education librarian and by a team of librarians. Recall ratios, precision ratios, and novelty ratios were calculated. Results show that the users, all faculty members or graduate students, found only about a third of the really important items. Suggests that library users are frequently misled into thinking that CD-ROM databases are easy to use and that the 'technology' guarantees satisfactory results.
  15. Lancaster, F.W.: Electronic publishing (1989) 0.01
    0.00957139 = product of:
      0.03828556 = sum of:
        0.03828556 = weight(_text_:library in 2881) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03828556 = score(doc=2881,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.29050803 = fieldWeight in 2881, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2881)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Library trends. 37(1989) no.3, S.316-325
  16. Elzy, C.; Nourie, A.; Lancaster, F.W.; Joseph, K.M.: Evaluating reference service in a large academic library (1991) 0.01
    0.009475192 = product of:
      0.03790077 = sum of:
        0.03790077 = weight(_text_:library in 4015) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03790077 = score(doc=4015,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.28758827 = fieldWeight in 4015, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4015)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Reports an unobtrusive study of the ability of professional librarians to deal with factual questions conducted at the Milner Library, Illinois State University. Standards were recruited to pose questions for which answers were known, to 19 librarians in 5 departments. In all, 190 test incidents (10 questions for each of the 19 librarians) were used. Librarians were evaluated on the accuracy of the responses given and on their responsiveness and helpfulness, as judged by the student proxies. Describes the methods used in the study, including the accuracy and attitude scales developed, presents the major results, and makes suggestions on the follow-up action that seems appropriate after a study of this kind has been performed
  17. Lancaster, F.W.: Indexing and abstracting in theory and practice (1991) 0.01
    0.009475192 = product of:
      0.03790077 = sum of:
        0.03790077 = weight(_text_:library in 752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03790077 = score(doc=752,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.28758827 = fieldWeight in 752, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=752)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Library and information science resaerch 14(1992) no.1, S.117-118 (C. Tenopir); International classification 19(1992) no.4, S.227-228 (R. Fugmann); Journal of the American Society for Information Science 43(1992) no.6, S.456 (B.R. Boyce); Cataloging & classification quarterly 15(1992) no.1, S.245-247 (E.M. Rasmussen) Journal of academic librarianship 18(1992) no.1, S.39 (G.A. Crawford) // Winner of the 1992 ASIS best information science book award
    Imprint
    London : Library Association
  18. Lancaster, F.W.: Indexing and abstracting in theory and practice (1998) 0.01
    0.008121594 = product of:
      0.032486375 = sum of:
        0.032486375 = weight(_text_:library in 4141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032486375 = score(doc=4141,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.24650425 = fieldWeight in 4141, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4141)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIS 50(1999) no.8, S.728-730 (J.-E. Mai); Indexer 21(1999) no.3, S.148 (P.F. Booth); Managing information 6(1999) no.1, S.48 (S.T. Clarke); Electronic library 17(1999) no.3, S.193 (F. Parry)
    Imprint
    London : Library Association
  19. Lancaster, F.W.: Vocabulary control for information retrieval (1986) 0.01
    0.0067907665 = product of:
      0.027163066 = sum of:
        0.027163066 = product of:
          0.054326132 = sum of:
            0.054326132 = weight(_text_:22 in 217) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054326132 = score(doc=217,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17551683 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050121464 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 217, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=217)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 4.2007 10:07:51
  20. Lancaster, F.W.: Networked electronic publishing of the results of scholarly research (1995) 0.01
    0.006699973 = product of:
      0.026799891 = sum of:
        0.026799891 = weight(_text_:library in 1675) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026799891 = score(doc=1675,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.20335563 = fieldWeight in 1675, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1675)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Series
    Publications of Essen University Library; 18