Simeoni, F.: ¬The case for metadata harvesting : how do the library-based services compare with the expert services? (2004)
0.05
0.05336667 = product of:
0.10673334 = sum of:
0.060314562 = weight(_text_:digital in 4760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060314562 = score(doc=4760,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19770671 = queryWeight, product of:
3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
0.050121464 = queryNorm
0.30507088 = fieldWeight in 4760, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4760)
0.04641878 = weight(_text_:library in 4760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04641878 = score(doc=4760,freq=6.0), product of:
0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.050121464 = queryNorm
0.3522223 = fieldWeight in 4760, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4760)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Metadata harvesting is an increasingly popular model of interaction between the mutually autonomous parties of medium, medium-large federations of digital library services. With a harvesting protocol, in particular, resource descriptions locally available at each party can be served to remote applications for the implementation of federated services, such as resource discovery. This article offers a systematic explanation of the success of the model and its standard implementations in the context of current initiatives for national and international federations.
- Source
- Library review. 53(2004) no.5, S.255-258
