Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Snow, K."
  • × theme_ss:"Katalogfragen allgemein"
  1. Schultz-Jones, B.; Snow, K.; Miksa, S.; Hasenyager Jr., R.L.: Historical and current implications of cataloguing quality for next-generation catalogues (2012) 0.01 
    0.011604695 = product of:
  0.04641878 = sum of:
    0.04641878 = weight(_text_:library in 5558) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04641878 = score(doc=5558,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050121464 = queryNorm
        0.3522223 = fieldWeight in 5558, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5558)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Discussions of quality in library cataloguing are traced from early library science literature to current debates. Three studies that examine dimensions of quality cataloguing in academic libraries, public libraries, and school libraries and a review of vendor processes update the issues surrounding a definition of bibliographic record quality and quality assurance processes. The implications of perceptions of bibliographic record quality on next-generation catalogues are presented with emphasis on the shift in the cataloguer's judgment from rigid standards for transcription to meeting the requirement for more metadata that matches the user need of find-ability.
    Source
    Library trends. 61(2012) no.1, S.49-82
  2. Snow, K.: Defining, assessing, and rethinking quality cataloging (2017) 0.01 
    0.006699973 = product of:
  0.026799891 = sum of:
    0.026799891 = weight(_text_:library in 5155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026799891 = score(doc=5155,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050121464 = queryNorm
        0.20335563 = fieldWeight in 5155, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5155)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Definitions of "quality cataloging" may differ from cataloger to cataloger and from institution to institution. If an objective definition of quality is elusive, how can an institution assess the quality of cataloging work? This article discusses definitions of quality cataloging in the literature and different ways it has been evaluated and measured. Academic library catalogers' perceptions of quality cataloging will also be explored, as well as how these perceptions are formed. The article concludes by suggesting ways cataloging departments can approach the creation and evaluation of quality cataloging in an ethical manner.

Authors