Search (17 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Svenonius, E."
  1. Svenonius, E.: ¬The intellectual foundation of information organization (2000) 0.03 
    0.028061522 = product of:
  0.056123044 = sum of:
    0.034465462 = weight(_text_:digital in 5056) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.034465462 = score(doc=5056,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19770671 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050121464 = queryNorm
        0.17432621 = fieldWeight in 5056, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5056)
    0.021657582 = weight(_text_:library in 5056) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021657582 = score(doc=5056,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050121464 = queryNorm
        0.16433616 = fieldWeight in 5056, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5056)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Knowledge organization 27(2000) no.3, S.173-175 (G. Campbell): "Bibliographic control rests on a rich and intriguing theoretical foundation. All too often, however, students and scholars of information studies pass this foundation over, perhaps because of its fragmentation. Information organization theory has evolved in tandem with practice, and particularly through innumerable policy decisions: its central tenets, therefore, appear in prefaces to manuals and catalogues, in library bulletins, in standards and rule interpretations, and in professional and scholarly conference proceedings. Gathering this theory together is a formidable task, and Svenonius has already made a significant contribution through the two sourcebooks she has coedited: Foundations of Cataloging (1985), and Theory of Subject Analysis (1985). With The Intellectual Foundation of Information Organization, 'Svenonius goes a huge step further: she pulls the fragments of bibliographic control theory together and sets them within a holistic theoretical framework. The result is a significant contribution to LIS scholarship, one which evokes the best of all possible responses: dissatisfied cries for more. Svenonius divides her treatise into two parts containing five chapters each. The first part provides a theoretically-grounded articulation of the objectives, entities, languages and principles of information organization. The field, she argues, rests on three distinct philsophical traditions. Systems philosophy, as developed in library circles by Charles Cutter, gives a holistic and visionary dimension to bibliographic control: a tendency to see individual processes as part of a larger, coherent structure. The philosophy of science, typified in the field by Cyril Cleverdon in the 1950s, emphasizes the need to quantify and generalize, and to subject the tenets of information retrieval to empirical verification. Language philosophy introduces the concept of language rules, and argues that information organization is a "particular kind of language use" (p. 6): an approach which enables us to employ linguistic concepts of semantics, vocabulary and syntax to explain the processes of information organization. Having established this framework, Svenonius goes on to discuss the objectives of bibliographic retrieval systems. Deftly combining the seminal contributions of Cutter, Seymour Lubetzky, the Paris Principles of 1961, and the IFLA objectives of 1997, she produces five central objectives of bibliographic control: locating entitles (finding), identifying entitles (collocating), selecting them (choice), acquiring or gaining access to them (acquisition), and navigating a bibliographic database (navigation) (p. 20)". -
    Series
    Digital libraries and electronic publishing series
  2. Svenonius, E.: Use of classification in online retrieval (1983) 0.02 
    0.015314223 = product of:
  0.061256893 = sum of:
    0.061256893 = weight(_text_:library in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.061256893 = score(doc=108,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050121464 = queryNorm
        0.46481284 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 27(1983), S.76-80
  3. Svenonius, E.; Schmierer, H.P.: Current issues in the subject control of information (1977) 0.02 
    0.015314223 = product of:
  0.061256893 = sum of:
    0.061256893 = weight(_text_:library in 5278) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.061256893 = score(doc=5278,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050121464 = queryNorm
        0.46481284 = fieldWeight in 5278, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5278)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Library quarterly. 47(1977), S.326-346
  4. Svenonius, E.: Bibliographical classification (1990) 0.01 
    0.013399946 = product of:
  0.053599782 = sum of:
    0.053599782 = weight(_text_:library in 2404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.053599782 = score(doc=2404,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050121464 = queryNorm
        0.40671125 = fieldWeight in 2404, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2404)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Library classification and its functions. Int. Conf. on ..., 20.-21.6.1989, Edmonton, Alberta. Ed.: A. Nitecki u. T. Fell
  5. Svenonius, E.: ¬The conceptual foundations of descriptive cataloging (1989) 0.01 
    0.013399946 = product of:
  0.053599782 = sum of:
    0.053599782 = weight(_text_:library in 5434) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.053599782 = score(doc=5434,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050121464 = queryNorm
        0.40671125 = fieldWeight in 5434, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5434)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Series
    Library and information science
  6. Svenonius, E.: Design of controlled vocabularies (1990) 0.01 
    0.013399946 = product of:
  0.053599782 = sum of:
    0.053599782 = weight(_text_:library in 1271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.053599782 = score(doc=1271,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050121464 = queryNorm
        0.40671125 = fieldWeight in 1271, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1271)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Encyclopedia of library and information science. Vol.45, [=Suppl.10]
  7. Svenonius, E.; Molto, M.: Automatic derivation of name access points in cataloging (1990) 0.01 
    0.010828791 = product of:
  0.043315165 = sum of:
    0.043315165 = weight(_text_:library in 3569) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.043315165 = score(doc=3569,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050121464 = queryNorm
        0.32867232 = fieldWeight in 3569, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3569)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Reports the results of research designed to explore the feasibility of automatically deriving name access points from machine readable title pages of English language monographs. Results show that approximately 88% of the access points selected by the Library of Congress or the National Library of Medicine could be automatically derived from title page data. These results have implications for the design of bibliographic standards and on-line catalogues.
  8. Svenonius, E.; McGarry, D.: Objectivity in evaluating subject heading assignment (1993) 0.01 
    0.008633038 = product of:
  0.034532152 = sum of:
    0.034532152 = product of:
      0.069064304 = sum of:
        0.069064304 = weight(_text_:project in 5612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.069064304 = score(doc=5612,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21156175 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.32644984 = fieldWeight in 5612, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5612)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Recent papers have called attention to discrepancies in the assignment of LCSH. While philosophical arguments can be made that subject analysis, if not a logical impossibility, at least is point-of-view dependent, subject headings continue to be assigned and continue to be useful. The hypothesis advanced in the present project is that to a considerable degree there is a clear-cut right and wrong to LCSH subject heading assignment. To test the hypothesis, it was postulated that the assignment of a subject heading is correct if it is supported by textual warrant (at least 20% of the book being cataloged is on the topic) and is constructed in accordance with the LoC Subject Cataloging Manual: Subject Headings. A sample of 100 books on scientific subjects was used to test the hypothesis
  9. Molto, M.; Svenonius, E.: ¬An electronic interface to AACR2 (1998) 0.01 
    0.008633038 = product of:
  0.034532152 = sum of:
    0.034532152 = product of:
      0.069064304 = sum of:
        0.069064304 = weight(_text_:project in 2838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.069064304 = score(doc=2838,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21156175 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.32644984 = fieldWeight in 2838, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2838)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Reports results of a project to explore ways of reconfiguring AACR2 for use in an automated environment. A subset of AACR2 title proper rules for books was chosen for analysis. A functional classification of the rule subset was developed, based on the 4 facets: Source, Choice, Form, and Definition. The rules were also classified according to whether they were core or peripheral. A prototype electronic interface was developed for searching and displaying the classified rules. The greatest problem in the rule reconfiguration stemmed from the structural problems of AACR2: rule groupings combining multiple subfacets under a single rule; rule redundancy; and rule scatter, between chapters, and between sections of chapters and appendices
  10. Svenonius, E.: Design of controlled vocabularies in the context of emerging technologies (1988) 0.01 
    0.0076571116 = product of:
  0.030628446 = sum of:
    0.030628446 = weight(_text_:library in 762) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.030628446 = score(doc=762,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050121464 = queryNorm
        0.23240642 = fieldWeight in 762, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=762)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Library science with a slant to documentation and information studies. 25(1988), S.215-227
  11. Liu, S.; Svenonius, E.: DORS: DDC online retrieval system (1991) 0.01 
    0.0076571116 = product of:
  0.030628446 = sum of:
    0.030628446 = weight(_text_:library in 1155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.030628446 = score(doc=1155,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050121464 = queryNorm
        0.23240642 = fieldWeight in 1155, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1155)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 35(1991), S.359-375
  12. Svenonius, E.: Directions for research in indexing, classification, and cataloging (1981) 0.01 
    0.0076571116 = product of:
  0.030628446 = sum of:
    0.030628446 = weight(_text_:library in 1891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.030628446 = score(doc=1891,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050121464 = queryNorm
        0.23240642 = fieldWeight in 1891, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1891)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 25(1981), S.88-103
  13. Svenonius, E.: ¬The epistemological foundations of knowledge representations (2004) 0.01 
    0.0076571116 = product of:
  0.030628446 = sum of:
    0.030628446 = weight(_text_:library in 766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.030628446 = score(doc=766,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050121464 = queryNorm
        0.23240642 = fieldWeight in 766, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=766)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Library trends. 52(2004) no.3, S.571-587
  14. Svenonius, E.: Good indexing : a question of evidence (1975) 0.01 
    0.006699973 = product of:
  0.026799891 = sum of:
    0.026799891 = weight(_text_:library in 1890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026799891 = score(doc=1890,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050121464 = queryNorm
        0.20335563 = fieldWeight in 1890, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1890)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Library science with a slant to documentation. 12(1975), S.33-39
  15. Svenonius, E.: ¬The impact of computer technology on knowledge representations (1992) 0.01 
    0.006699973 = product of:
  0.026799891 = sum of:
    0.026799891 = weight(_text_:library in 2379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026799891 = score(doc=2379,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050121464 = queryNorm
        0.20335563 = fieldWeight in 2379, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2379)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Imprint
    Bangalore : Sarada Ranganathan Endowment for Library Science
  16. Svenonius, E.: LCSH: semantics, syntax and specifity (2000) 0.01 
    0.0057428335 = product of:
  0.022971334 = sum of:
    0.022971334 = weight(_text_:library in 5599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022971334 = score(doc=5599,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050121464 = queryNorm
        0.17430481 = fieldWeight in 5599, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5599)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    The LCSH century: one hundred years with the Library of Congress Subject Headings system. Ed.: A.T. Stone
  17. Svenonius, E.: LCSH: semantics, syntax and specifity (2000) 0.01 
    0.0057428335 = product of:
  0.022971334 = sum of:
    0.022971334 = weight(_text_:library in 5602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022971334 = score(doc=5602,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050121464 = queryNorm
        0.17430481 = fieldWeight in 5602, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5602)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    The LCSH century: one hundred years with the Library of Congress Subject Headings system. Ed.: A.T. Stone

Authors

Years

Types

  • a 15
  • m 2

Themes

Subjects

Classifications