Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Williamson, N.J."
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Williamson, N.J.: ¬The importance of subject analysis in library and information science education (1997) 0.04
    0.035046883 = product of:
      0.070093766 = sum of:
        0.030628446 = weight(_text_:library in 667) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030628446 = score(doc=667,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.23240642 = fieldWeight in 667, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=667)
        0.039465316 = product of:
          0.07893063 = sum of:
            0.07893063 = weight(_text_:project in 667) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07893063 = score(doc=667,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21156175 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050121464 = queryNorm
                0.37308553 = fieldWeight in 667, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=667)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses the nature and importance of subject analysis and subject authority control in the retrieval tools used in libraries and information centres. Included in the discussion are the requirements for effective subject retrieval from OPACs, bibliographic databases, full text systems and the Internet. Attempts to project the nature of subject analysis systems requirements into the future and to draw some conclusions about what new information professionals should be taught, and what skills they need to acquire for application in next century
  2. Williamson, N.J.: Subject cataloguing and LCSH (1991) 0.02
    0.015314223 = product of:
      0.061256893 = sum of:
        0.061256893 = weight(_text_:library in 7926) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061256893 = score(doc=7926,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.46481284 = fieldWeight in 7926, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7926)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses subject headings, in particular. Library of Congress Subject Headings as a standard for subject representation of documents in library catalogues. Addresses: the characteristics of LCSH, its use in subject cataloguing and retrieval and its place in online catalogues. Considers the future of LCSH
    Imprint
    London : Library Association
    Source
    Standards for the international exchange of bibliographic information: papers presented at a course held at the School of Library, Archive and Information Studies, University College, London, 3-18 August 1990. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine
  3. Williamson, N.J.: UDC activities (1993) 0.01
    0.012332911 = product of:
      0.049331643 = sum of:
        0.049331643 = product of:
          0.098663285 = sum of:
            0.098663285 = weight(_text_:project in 7086) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.098663285 = score(doc=7086,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21156175 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050121464 = queryNorm
                0.4663569 = fieldWeight in 7086, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7086)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Reports on the change in the editorship of the UDC which went to Dr. I.C. McIlwaine, U.K. The UDC in North America: the archives have been tranferred from the University of Maryland to the University of Toronto. A UDC Restructuring project has been started in a feasibility study by I.C. McIlwaine and N. Williamson
  4. McIlwaine, I.C.; Williamson, N.J.: International trends in subject analysis research (1999) 0.01
    0.0076571116 = product of:
      0.030628446 = sum of:
        0.030628446 = weight(_text_:library in 4117) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030628446 = score(doc=4117,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.23240642 = fieldWeight in 4117, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4117)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    This paper describes a survey of subject analysis research over the ten year period 1988 to 1998. Data are drawn from the 'research environment' encompassing publications, conference papers, major bibliographic resources in the field of Library and Information Science and selective searches of the Internet. Findings reveal major and minor areas of research activity. Trends and developments are identified and conclusions drawn. Strengths and weaknesses in the approaches taken to subject analysis research are discussed and suggestions for improvements are made with a view to future research directions
  5. Williamson, N.J.: Deriving a thesaurus from a restructured UDC (1996) 0.01
    0.006699973 = product of:
      0.026799891 = sum of:
        0.026799891 = weight(_text_:library in 5194) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026799891 = score(doc=5194,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.20335563 = fieldWeight in 5194, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5194)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization and change: Proceedings of the Fourth International ISKO Conference, 15-18 July 1996, Library of Congress, Washington, DC. Ed.: R. Green
  6. Williamson, N.J.: Standards and rules for subject access (1996) 0.01
    0.0057428335 = product of:
      0.022971334 = sum of:
        0.022971334 = weight(_text_:library in 5577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022971334 = score(doc=5577,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.17430481 = fieldWeight in 5577, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5577)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Standardization of subject access to bibliographic information systems is an important factor in national and international networking, cooperation, and exchange of bibliographic data. Standards, guidelines, and rules are needed to ensure consistency and quality in the design, development and application of indexing languages to documents and their citations. This paper defines the terms "standards" and "guidelines" as they apply to subject analysis used in library catalogs and bibliographic databases. It identifies and discusses the most important national and international "standards" that influence subject access to bibliographic data. Included are the tools of subject cataloging which have become standards in their own right, as well as formally prepared and approved guidelines. Each "standard" or "guideline" is described in terms of its origins, characteristics, and control and its importance in the design of bibliographic retrieval systems. Emphasis is given to the importance of the relationship between alphabetic and systematic access.