-
Goldhor, H.: ¬The effect of prime display location on public library circulation of selected adult titles (1972)
0.02
0.021657582 = product of:
0.08663033 = sum of:
0.08663033 = weight(_text_:library in 1035) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08663033 = score(doc=1035,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.050121464 = queryNorm
0.65734464 = fieldWeight in 1035, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1035)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Library quarterly. 42(1972), S.371-389
-
Hyman, R.J.: Access to library collections : summary of a documentary and opinion survey on the direct shelf approach and browsing (1971)
0.02
0.016243188 = product of:
0.06497275 = sum of:
0.06497275 = weight(_text_:library in 2428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06497275 = score(doc=2428,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.050121464 = queryNorm
0.4930085 = fieldWeight in 2428, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2428)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Library resources and technical services. 15(1971), S.479-491
-
Cramer, C.H.: Open shelves and open minds : a history of the Cleveland Public Library (1972)
0.02
0.015314223 = product of:
0.061256893 = sum of:
0.061256893 = weight(_text_:library in 7352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061256893 = score(doc=7352,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.050121464 = queryNorm
0.46481284 = fieldWeight in 7352, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7352)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
-
Hyman, R.J.: Access to library collections : an inquiry into the validity of the direct shelf approach, with special reference to browsing (1972)
0.01
0.013399946 = product of:
0.053599782 = sum of:
0.053599782 = weight(_text_:library in 7344) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053599782 = score(doc=7344,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.050121464 = queryNorm
0.40671125 = fieldWeight in 7344, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7344)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
-
Cooper, L.: Problems associated with the ability of elementary school children to successfully retrieve material in the school library media center and some alternative methods of classification which may help to alleviate these problems : a case study of the Common School Library, Amherst, Massachusetts (1996)
0.01
0.009475192 = product of:
0.03790077 = sum of:
0.03790077 = weight(_text_:library in 6743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03790077 = score(doc=6743,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.050121464 = queryNorm
0.28758827 = fieldWeight in 6743, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6743)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
-
Holley, R.P.: Classification in the USA (1986)
0.01
0.009475192 = product of:
0.03790077 = sum of:
0.03790077 = weight(_text_:library in 1524) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03790077 = score(doc=1524,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.050121464 = queryNorm
0.28758827 = fieldWeight in 1524, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1524)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- United States libraries use classification to provide subject browsing in open stacks. The DDC used by 85% of American libraries, is a theoretical, universal attempt to organize all knowledge. The LCC lacks intellectual consistency since it was based upon library warrant to organize materials in one collection. Many academic libraries use LCC because the Library of Congress' shared bibliographic records with the LCC call numbers reflect the collecting interests of academic libraries. LCC is more hospitable to change than DDC whoese phoenix schedules have encountered resistance throughout the world. Classification currently receives less attention than subject headings since United States librarians place great hope in the computer to resolve subject heading problems while remaining conservative about classification
-
East, D.: User views of compact shelving in an open access library (1994)
0.01
0.008121594 = product of:
0.032486375 = sum of:
0.032486375 = weight(_text_:library in 828) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032486375 = score(doc=828,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.050121464 = queryNorm
0.24650425 = fieldWeight in 828, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=828)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Provides an overview of the installation of electrically and mechanically assisted compact shelving and procedures for relocating over 2.000 linear feet of books, scores, recordings and manuscripts, prior to, during and after installation of such a system at Bowling Green State University (BGSU), Ohio, USA. In the light of concern expressed by librarians that patrons would be dissatisfied with the accompanying restrictions such as reduced browsing capability, slow retrieval, and their need to obtain instruction in operating the shelving, a survey was conducted among graduate and undergraduate students to ascertain their views of electric compact shelving for books and scores in the Music Library of Sound Recordings Archives of BGSU Libraries. The survey identified: apprehension concerning the use of the installation; the adequacy of instructions for use; the level of inconvenience / delay in accessing material; overall satisfaction; and the positive and negative features of the installation
