-
Mazzucchelli, A.; Sartori , F.: String similarity in CBR platforms : a preliminary study (2014)
0.03
0.029149916 = product of:
0.116599664 = sum of:
0.116599664 = sum of:
0.069064304 = weight(_text_:project in 1568) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.069064304 = score(doc=1568,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21156175 = queryWeight, product of:
4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
0.050121464 = queryNorm
0.32644984 = fieldWeight in 1568, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1568)
0.047535364 = weight(_text_:22 in 1568) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047535364 = score(doc=1568,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17551683 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050121464 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1568, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1568)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Case Based Reasoning is a very important research trend in Artificial Intelligence and can be a powerful approach in the solution of complex problems characterized by heterogeneous knowledge. In this paper we present an ongoing research project where CBR is exploited to support the identification of enterprises potentially going to bankruptcy, through a comparison of their balance indexes with the ones of similar and already closed firms. In particular, the paper focuses on how developing similarity measures for strings can be profitably supported by metadata models of case structures and semantic methods like Query Expansion.
- Pages
- S.22-29
-
Kolodner, J.: Case-based reasoning (1993)
0.01
0.0132625075 = product of:
0.05305003 = sum of:
0.05305003 = weight(_text_:library in 526) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05305003 = score(doc=526,freq=6.0), product of:
0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.050121464 = queryNorm
0.40253976 = fieldWeight in 526, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=526)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Content
- Pt.1: Background: waht is CBR? Case studies of several case-based reasoners. Reasoning using cases. The cognitive model. Pt.2: The case library: representing and indexing cases. Indexing vocabulary. Methods for index selection. Pt.3: Retrieving cases from the case library. Organizational structures and retrieval algorithms. Matching and ranking cases. Indexing and retrieval. Pt.4: Using cases. Adaptation methods and strategies. Controlling adaptation. Using cases for interpretation and evaluation. Pt.5: Pulling it all together. Building a case-based reasoner. Conclusions, opportunities, challenges. Appendix: A case library of case-based reasoning systems
-
Golding, A.R.; Rosenbloom, P.S.: Improving accuracy by combining rule-based and case-based reasoning (1996)
0.01
0.0067907665 = product of:
0.027163066 = sum of:
0.027163066 = product of:
0.054326132 = sum of:
0.054326132 = weight(_text_:22 in 607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054326132 = score(doc=607,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17551683 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050121464 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 607, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=607)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 6. 3.1997 16:22:15
-
Ram, A.; Santamaria, J.C.: Continuous case-based reasoning (1997)
0.01
0.0067907665 = product of:
0.027163066 = sum of:
0.027163066 = product of:
0.054326132 = sum of:
0.054326132 = weight(_text_:22 in 435) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054326132 = score(doc=435,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17551683 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050121464 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 435, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=435)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 6. 3.1997 16:22:15
-
Kohno, T.: Error repair and knowledge acquisition via case-based reasoning (1997)
0.01
0.0067907665 = product of:
0.027163066 = sum of:
0.027163066 = product of:
0.054326132 = sum of:
0.054326132 = weight(_text_:22 in 437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054326132 = score(doc=437,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17551683 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050121464 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 437, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=437)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 6. 3.1997 16:22:15
-
Pfeffer, M.: Automatische Vergabe von RVK-Notationen anhand von bibliografischen Daten mittels fallbasiertem Schließen (2007)
0.01
0.0057428335 = product of:
0.022971334 = sum of:
0.022971334 = weight(_text_:library in 558) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022971334 = score(doc=558,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.050121464 = queryNorm
0.17430481 = fieldWeight in 558, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=558)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Content
- Masterarbeit im Rahmen des postgradualen Fernstudiums Master of Arts (Library and Information Science)
-
Pfeffer, M.: Automatische Vergabe von RVK-Notationen mittels fallbasiertem Schließen (2009)
0.01
0.005093075 = product of:
0.0203723 = sum of:
0.0203723 = product of:
0.0407446 = sum of:
0.0407446 = weight(_text_:22 in 3051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0407446 = score(doc=3051,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17551683 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050121464 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3051, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3051)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 8.2009 19:51:28
-
Akerele, O.; David, A.; Osofisan, A.: Using the concepts of Case Based Reasoning and Basic Categories for enhancing adaptation to the user's level of knowledge in Decision Support System (2014)
0.01
0.005093075 = product of:
0.0203723 = sum of:
0.0203723 = product of:
0.0407446 = sum of:
0.0407446 = weight(_text_:22 in 1449) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0407446 = score(doc=1449,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17551683 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050121464 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1449, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1449)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
He, W.; Tian, X.: ¬A longitudinal study of user queries and browsing requests in a case-based reasoning retrieval system (2017)
0.00
0.004785695 = product of:
0.01914278 = sum of:
0.01914278 = weight(_text_:library in 3600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01914278 = score(doc=3600,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.050121464 = queryNorm
0.14525402 = fieldWeight in 3600, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3600)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- This article reports on a longitudinal analysis of query logs of a web-based case library system during an 8-year period (from 2005 to 2012). The analysis studies 3 different information-seeking approaches: keyword searching, browsing, and case-based reasoning (CBR) searching provided by the system by examining the query logs that stretch over 8 years. The longitudinal dimension of this study offers unique possibilities to see how users used the 3 different approaches over time. Various user information-seeking patterns and trends are identified through the query usage pattern analysis and session analysis. The study identified different user groups and found that a majority of the users tend to stick to their favorite information-seeking approach to meet their immediate information needs and do not seem to care whether alternative search options will offer greater benefits. The study also found that return users used CBR searching much more frequently than 1-time users and tend to use more query terms to look for information than 1-time users.
